Ron Paul: "They're Terrorists Because We're Occupiers".
- Thread starter Political Junky
- Start date
Liability
Locked Account.
Wow. Yet ANOTHER outright lie from the idiot, Jokey.
Jokey: since we can all plainly see that there was no admission of a lie and no evidence of a lie, your dishonest claim is a transparent fraud that only makes you look MORE dishonest and MORE stupid than you generally do.
Liars like you should learn NOT to lie.
Last edited:
nodoginnafight
No Party Affiliation
Yes, yes, ANYONE who disagrees with your spin must be ignorant or lying.
When you quote someone claiming something, that makes it fact, huh? But when others document non-partisan de-bunking of that claim - it's just "kool-aid" ????????
Gee, never seen anyone attempt to defend their POV THAT way on these boards ..........
ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
When you quote someone claiming something, that makes it fact, huh? But when others document non-partisan de-bunking of that claim - it's just "kool-aid" ????????
Gee, never seen anyone attempt to defend their POV THAT way on these boards ..........
ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Last edited:
CMike
Zionist, proud to be
- Oct 25, 2009
- 9,219
- 1,172
- 190
What debunking of a claim? So far there were was no evidence debunking anything.
I quoted in context the testimony of CIA Director Tenet in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee stating that there were ties for at least a decade between Al Qaida and Iraq.
Then the response I get from the libs are AH HA that just proves that they were right, makes zero sense
Please show how you debunked this?
So how do you explain the war on Iraq? Guess bush is just a violent person?
This guy is way to honest to be a repug!!! Good job mr. Paul and you are exactly right!!!
jillian
Princess
someone else who hasn't a clue that we weren't OCCUPYING anything in the mid-east before we were attacked.
so sad.
the long lists of countries we had troops, spies, and offensive actions in before 9/11 has been listed multiple times in this thread
Well, we certainly found out that Democratic claims that Saddam had a nuclear weapon were unfounded. I guess they lied.
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,540
- 2,165
- Banned
- #551
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice on Nuclear Capabilities: "We do know that there have been shipments going . . . into Iraq . . . of aluminum tubes that really are only suited to -- high-quality aluminum tools [sic] that are only really suited for nuclear weapons programs, centrifuge programs."
Source: Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, CNN (9/8/2002).
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice on Nuclear Capabilities: "We do know that he is actively pursuing a nuclear weapon." Source: Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, CNN (9/8/2002).
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice on Nuclear Capabilities: "The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." Source: Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, CNN (9/8/2002).
Source: Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, CNN (9/8/2002).
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice on Nuclear Capabilities: "We do know that he is actively pursuing a nuclear weapon." Source: Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, CNN (9/8/2002).
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice on Nuclear Capabilities: "The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." Source: Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer, CNN (9/8/2002).
CMike
Zionist, proud to be
- Oct 25, 2009
- 9,219
- 1,172
- 190
CMike
Zionist, proud to be
- Oct 25, 2009
- 9,219
- 1,172
- 190
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
CMike
Zionist, proud to be
- Oct 25, 2009
- 9,219
- 1,172
- 190
Just for Jake.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,540
- 2,165
- Banned
- #556
Go back and review what was written. Cmike documented that he lied. It does not require an admission.
You wannabe Republicans will never be allowed a say in party matters ever again. We will take your money and your votes.
Line up.
You wannabe Republicans will never be allowed a say in party matters ever again. We will take your money and your votes.
Line up.
jillian
Princess
I know people love all things partisan, but this isn't really a "partisan" issue, IMO.
CMike
Zionist, proud to be
- Oct 25, 2009
- 9,219
- 1,172
- 190
I think the libs can never admit that they are wrong because it would destroy their "causes" and their trust in their leaders.
They read or hear things from the liberal icons and that is all the evidence they need. They will never ever question it.
It doesnt' matter how strong the evidence is that they are wrong, they will never accept it.
Where would the be without their "bush lied, people died" mantra? What causes would they have if they accepted thatthe nonsense they have been spewing were indeed wrong? What if it's a fact that Bush didn't lie?
What if the war has been justified? What if Al Qaida and Iraq had ties that went back a decade?
How can they accept the truth? How can they accept that the people that they look up too, such as Obama, and his minions have been lying to them?
They put their entire trust in whatever comes out of their mouths. How can they possibly accept that they are liars?
How would the democrat leaders fire them up if the liberal riff raff really accepted that they have and are being lied too?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
How many Iranian sleeper cells did Biden bring into the US?- Started by Nostra
- Replies: 9
-
Check Out This Nonsense: Hollywood Democrats Come Back To Life — With Cash- Started by trumptman
- Replies: 3
-
-
-
Trump, Television, Media, and the war for the American mind.- Started by Raynine
- Replies: 0
