Ron Paul: "They're Terrorists Because We're Occupiers".

[Kalam]

Is it your pro jihad video in arabic again?

Do you prefer Turkish?

Just a reminder of your pro-jihad youtube video in arabic?

And you are not an arab extremist, right?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1854817-post147.html

"He lit the light of a lamp,
Black from misguidance,
And created from a few people
A generation coming with the dawn.
So they destroyed a head of aggression,
And humiliated every oppressor --
War against every aggressor,
And peace for every peaceful one."

I can understand why you, a supporter of Israel, would take offense to calls for war against oppressors. As I said, I'm not an Arab. I can post more if you like.

 

[Liability]

Do you prefer Turkish?

Just a reminder of your pro-jihad youtube video in arabic?

And you are not an arab extremist, right?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1854817-post147.html

"He lit the light of a lamp,
Black from misguidance,
And created from a few people
A generation coming with the dawn.
So they destroyed a head of aggression,
And humiliated every oppressor --
War against every aggressor,
And peace for every peaceful one."

I can understand why you, a supporter of Israel, would take offense to calls for war against oppressors. As I said, I'm not an Arab. I can post more if you like.

You can indeed endlessly post the lies and deliberate deceptions of the Islamists.

But it doesn't change the fact that what they ACTUALLY hold is not just knowable, nowadays, to us infidels: we are totally on to them and their efforts to decieve.

No religion ever known to mankind is more thoroughly debased than Pedophile Mohammed's fraudulent "Islam."

Islam is a sewer rat religion.

 

[Kalam]

Just a reminder of your pro-jihad youtube video in arabic?

And you are not an arab extremist, right?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1854817-post147.html

"He lit the light of a lamp,
Black from misguidance,
And created from a few people
A generation coming with the dawn.
So they destroyed a head of aggression,
And humiliated every oppressor --
War against every aggressor,
And peace for every peaceful one."

I can understand why you, a supporter of Israel, would take offense to calls for war against oppressors. As I said, I'm not an Arab. I can post more if you like.

You can indeed endlessly post the lies and deliberate deceptions of the Islamists.

But it doesn't change the fact that what they ACTUALLY hold is not just knowable, nowadays, to us infidels: we are totally on to them and their efforts to decieve.

No religion ever known to mankind is more thoroughly debased than Pedophile Mohammed's fraudulent "Islam."

Islam is a sewer rat religion.

Is that all?

 

[JakeStarkey]

And Cmike also agrees I am sure that the neo-cons are like the Palestinians: on the losing side of history.

You are such a doofus.

We actually agree on this issue, why are you looking for a fight?

Not looking for a fight at all, but you can't be allowed to twist evidence. Your immoral stubborness is no excuse for that behavior.

 

[JakeStarkey]

But I am glad we can agree on some things. And one thing I agree on most: the neo-cons never, ever dominate my party again. Let's take their money and their votes, but give them no policy or decision making power.

Don't worry conservatives aren't interested in being in your communist party

Your big govt neo-cons are far closer to the coms/socialists than my conservative GOP.

Here, this will help you Learn to Speak Teabag: Learn to Speak Tea Bag | Mark Fiore's Animated Cartoon Site

 

[CMike]

And Cmike also agrees I am sure that the neo-cons are like the Palestinians: on the losing side of history.

You are such a doofus.

We actually agree on this issue, why are you looking for a fight?

Not looking for a fight at all, but you can't be allowed to twist evidence. Your immoral stubborness is no excuse for that behavior.

Name on thing that I said that I twisted around?

I did not. All my arguements I backed up. I didn't even use editorial content. I used the person's own words.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are such a doofus.

We actually agree on this issue, why are you looking for a fight?

Not looking for a fight at all, but you can't be allowed to twist evidence. Your immoral stubborness is no excuse for that behavior.

Name on thing that I said that I twisted around?

I did not. All my arguements I backed up. I didn't even use editorial content. I used the person's own words.

You certainly did. This was pointed out to you time and again. You can only critically derive from the evidence what it means, not interpret as you wish.

 

[CMike]

Not looking for a fight at all, but you can't be allowed to twist evidence. Your immoral stubborness is no excuse for that behavior.

Name on thing that I said that I twisted around?

I did not. All my arguements I backed up. I didn't even use editorial content. I used the person's own words.

You certainly did. This was pointed out to you time and again. You can only critically derive from the evidence what it means, not interpret as you wish.

I don't have too.

When you falsely accused Bush/Cheney of saying that Hussein did 911, and not only could you not produce a statement like that from them, but I was able to produce direct quotes in context of they saying that that had no evidence that hussein did 911, that speaks for itself.

Jake it's called honesty. You liberals should learn about it.

The lack of honesty disgusts me.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are twisting (yet again) what was said and the evidence that was produced. You have lost this. Move along.

 

[CMike]

You are twisting (yet again) what was said and the evidence that was produced. You have lost this. Move along.

Let's summarize.

You make ridiculous claims.

I provide irrefutable facts proving that you are mistaken

You say you won the debate

 

[The Rabbi]

You are twisting (yet again) what was said and the evidence that was produced. You have lost this. Move along.

Let's summarize.

You make ridiculous claims.

I provide irrefutable facts proving that you are mistaken

You say you won the debate

That's because you are arguing with "Jake, King of the Unsubstantiated Statement." It's like one of those punching bags you knock down and they come right back up again.

 

[JakeStarkey]

That's because, Rab, I have no trouble dealing with wingnut evasions and outright lies, like yours and cmike.

 

[CMike]

Jake the problem is that you don't start out with the truth.

You read something on DailyKos or the NYT and you take it as fact, and you don't question it.

This is what these left wing sources rely on. That nothing will be questioned. That's because the libs don't want to question them, they want to believe them.

They said that Pres. Bush falsely said that Hussein did 911. However, did you ever question it? Did you ever ask yourself did you ever hear Pres. Bush say that? If you did, and investigate it you would find out he didn't, but said the opposite.

The lefty sources say that Al Qaida had nothing to do with Hussein? Did you question that? How do they know? In fact, the CIA, and DOD, in declassified memos stated that there was cooperation and ties that went back a decade.

The lefty sources said that Hussein didn't have WMD. Did you question that? Are you really that unable to understand that just because they weren't found after months of notice that Hussein had that we were coming, that he could have destroyed or moved them? Why is this so difficult to understand? Are you going to truely ignore that your entire democrat leadership including Bil Clinton, Hillary, Al Gore, Kerry , and Ted Kennedy said the same thing?

Your lefty sources say how horrible it was that terrorists were waterboarded? However, did you ever question why was it used? What information was gained? What was the criteria for using them? What would have happened if it wasn't used? Did it stop a major terrorist attack because it was used? It did, because waterboarding was used it stopped a terrorist attack of terrorists flying a plane into a Los Angeles building.

At least do yourself a favor and question everything. Ask yourself if these things can be backed up or not.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I have never read DailyKos and have read the Times maybe twice, cmike.

What I do is is this: look at your posts, and where your post is inherently inconsistent with the reasonable-person standard, I point out the flaws.

That makes you mad because it upsets your far right wingnut agenda.

 

[nodoginnafight]

CMike - you are making the exact mistake you claim Jake is making. You are taking unsubstatiated claims and calling them "facts."

And claiming that anyone who doesn't swallow your hogwash hook, line, and sinker is just deluded by "lefty" sources.

Your claims have been refuted by sources from ALL OVER the political spectrum.

You seem to be the one addicted to hyper-partisan, misinformation sources.

But yeah - EVERYONE ELSE are the ones with the problem .............

 

[CMike]

That's because, Rab, I have no trouble dealing with wingnut evasions and outright lies, like yours and cmike.

Really? I challenge you to post anything that I wrote that was a lie.

 

[CMike]

CMike - you are making the exact mistake you claim Jake is making. You are taking unsubstatiated claims and calling them "facts."

And claiming that anyone who doesn't swallow your hogwash hook, line, and sinker is just deluded by "lefty" sources.

Your claims have been refuted by sources from ALL OVER the political spectrum.

You seem to be the one addicted to hyper-partisan, misinformation sources.

But yeah - EVERYONE ELSE are the ones with the problem .............

Yeah...what unsubstatiated claim? What claims have been refuted? What misinformation have I posted?

 

[CMike]

I have never read DailyKos and have read the Times maybe twice, cmike.

What I do is is this: look at your posts, and where your post is inherently inconsistent with the reasonable-person standard, I point out the flaws.

That makes you mad because it upsets your far right wingnut agenda.

On the contrary, it doesn't make me made at all. I am happy that you can provide no evidence, and how easily it is to refute what you are saying.

Not very challenging though.

 

[nodoginnafight]

That's because, Rab, I have no trouble dealing with wingnut evasions and outright lies, like yours and cmike.

Really? I challenge you to post anything that I wrote that was a lie.

"They said that Pres. Bush falsely said that Hussein did 911. However, did you ever question it? Did you ever ask yourself did you ever hear Pres. Bush say that? If you did, and investigate it you would find out he didn't, but said the opposite."

"The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al Qaeda [is] because there was a relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda," Bush told reporters after a Cabinet meeting at the White House.

 

[GHook93]

The Muslims are murdering women and children and harvesting their organs. Right, blu.

israel admitted to doing it. don't be retarded

LOL, they also admitted to creating and spreading AIDS, creating poverty, getting famine, creating cancer, the black plague. Those dirty Jews even invented old age to kill us all!