Romney needs to withdraw. open the convention.

[Avorysuds]

Right now most Republicans secretly want Paul to pull off an upset. Think of the disaster that would be for the money currently spent to destroy Mitt… Then of course the “how the **** do we attack Paul’s record” issue. They can try and make him out to be a racist but let’s be honest, they are doing that with Mitt LOLOLOLz.

 

[P@triot]

obama is running on romney is an out of touch elite, and its working.

Obama has $10 of millions of dollars, attended Harvard, has played more golf than any president in history at this point in their presidency, and flies off to Martha's Vinyard every weekend.

Now who is the out of touch elite?

You want Romney to stop because he's going to destory Obama like Reagan destroyed Carter, and you know it and that is bothering you immensely.

 

[Care4all]

Three of them, actually. He was judge, jury, and executioner. Sorta not what our Founders designed.

all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president...it wasn't done on a whim....have you read anything on it that the advisers said? of course, Bush's advisors said he too had done nothing unconstitutional with preemptive war....going to war against a country that was not at our door step, trying to kill us.... that was a new precedence for us.....but apparently not unconstitutional according to his advisers...

all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president

I guess you and those lawyers and advisers and the "Constructional Scholar" obama himself never heard of DUE PROCESS.

The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. These words have as their central promise an assurance that all levels of American government must operate within the law ("legality") and provide fair procedures. Most of this essay concerns that promise. We should briefly note, however, three other uses these words have had in American constitutional law.
Due process | LII / Legal Information Institute

has there been any other precedences that has defined this further?

why didn't congress bring charges and impeach him?

the constitution also states that we can not go to war against anyone, unless Congress votes on it with 2/3's of the house and 2/3's of the senate voting YEA....but for some reason, that hasn't been followed either....???

 

[Avatar4321]

What's Romney's message, Swiss bank accounts for everybody? You know the OP's right, but is there really a better choice?

LOL How about you listen to Romney's message instead of the left talking points you so love. Why isn't Obama running on his record?? Why is his campaign focused on "evil Bain" rather than on his signature accomplishment, ObamaTax??

If there's nothing wrong with Bain, why is he running away from his involvement?

He isn't. He is just pointing out the obvious fact that he cant be held responsible for Bain decision when he was no longer with the company. I worked for a convenience store once over a decade ago. I would be shocked if anyone tried to hold me responsible for what they did after I left.

 

[P@triot]

romney is getting destroyed with all this bain stuff. open the convention so we can choose a better candidate.

Actually, Obama is the one getting destroyed with all of this "Bain stuff". The lies are so egregious, even the media - the propaganda arm of the lying liberals - can't stomach it and have said that Obama is flat out lying about Bain and needs to stop.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

romney is getting destroyed with all this bain stuff. open the convention so we can choose a better candidate.

no all this "bain" stuff is a bunch of Lies.

Charles it doesn't matter if this bain stuff is true or false, it does not out weigh anything obama has done. It can all be true but we still have this obama shit.

 

[Truthmatters]

he gave sworn testimony that he did go to a bain holdings meeting


why do you just ignore that fact?

 

[Truthmatters]

He then signed SEC filings that he had NOTHING to do with Bain holdings at the time.

one has to be a lie

 

[Si modo]

He then signed SEC filings that he had NOTHING to do with Bain holdings at the time.

one has to be a lie

Neither is a lie.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president...it wasn't done on a whim....have you read anything on it that the advisers said? of course, Bush's advisors said he too had done nothing unconstitutional with preemptive war....going to war against a country that was not at our door step, trying to kill us.... that was a new precedence for us.....but apparently not unconstitutional according to his advisers...

all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president

I guess you and those lawyers and advisers and the "Constructional Scholar" obama himself never heard of DUE PROCESS.

The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. These words have as their central promise an assurance that all levels of American government must operate within the law ("legality") and provide fair procedures. Most of this essay concerns that promise. We should briefly note, however, three other uses these words have had in American constitutional law.
Due process | LII / Legal Information Institute

has there been any other precedences that has defined this further?

why didn't congress bring charges and impeach him?

the constitution also states that we can not go to war against anyone, unless Congress votes on it with 2/3's of the house and 2/3's of the senate voting YEA....but for some reason, that hasn't been followed either....???

why didn't congress bring charges and impeach him?

Is this a serious question? We have a corrupted government. The whole government needs to be changed .

 

[Inthemiddle]

Three of them, actually. He was judge, jury, and executioner. Sorta not what our Founders designed.

all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president...it wasn't done on a whim....have you read anything on it that the advisers said? of course, Bush's advisors said he too had done nothing unconstitutional with preemptive war....going to war against a country that was not at our door step, trying to kill us.... that was a new precedence for us.....but apparently not unconstitutional according to his advisers...

As I said, judge, jury, and executioner. It's unconstitutional. We have three branches, and that's to ensure that one branch does not usurp the responsibilities and powers of the others. It protects all of our rights. Except when we have a POTUS who doesn't know what the Constitution is.

After the 9-11 attacks, all commercial flights were grounding and fighter jets were scrambled and were prepared to shoot down commercial aircraft if found in the air, and not responding to military demands. Fortunately, things did not come to that. But if they had, would you have objected that it was unconstitutional?

 

[Care4all]

LOL How about you listen to Romney's message instead of the left talking points you so love. Why isn't Obama running on his record?? Why is his campaign focused on "evil Bain" rather than on his signature accomplishment, ObamaTax??

If there's nothing wrong with Bain, why is he running away from his involvement?

He isn't. He is just pointing out the obvious fact that he cant be held responsible for Bain decision when he was no longer with the company. I worked for a convenience store once over a decade ago. I would be shocked if anyone tried to hold me responsible for what they did after I left.

in order to be able to run for governor in massachusetts, romney claimed he was still flying there, working for Bain as a boardmember, when he was living in Utah.....and now that he is running for president, he is saying that's not true, he stopped with Bain in 1999.... you don't see the lie or predicament he put himself in by flip flopping??????

 

[Inthemiddle]

all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president...it wasn't done on a whim....have you read anything on it that the advisers said? of course, Bush's advisors said he too had done nothing unconstitutional with preemptive war....going to war against a country that was not at our door step, trying to kill us.... that was a new precedence for us.....but apparently not unconstitutional according to his advisers...

all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president

I guess you and those lawyers and advisers and the "Constructional Scholar" obama himself never heard of DUE PROCESS.

The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. These words have as their central promise an assurance that all levels of American government must operate within the law ("legality") and provide fair procedures. Most of this essay concerns that promise. We should briefly note, however, three other uses these words have had in American constitutional law.
Due process | LII / Legal Information Institute

has there been any other precedences that has defined this further?

why didn't congress bring charges and impeach him?

the constitution also states that we can not go to war against anyone, unless Congress votes on it with 2/3's of the house and 2/3's of the senate voting YEA....but for some reason, that hasn't been followed either....???

I guess it must really infuriate him when a police officer shoots a person dead in the course of their duties to protect the public. I mean, why don't they just wait for a jury trial?

 

[Si modo]

all the lawyers and advisers said he was within his duties as president...it wasn't done on a whim....have you read anything on it that the advisers said? of course, Bush's advisors said he too had done nothing unconstitutional with preemptive war....going to war against a country that was not at our door step, trying to kill us.... that was a new precedence for us.....but apparently not unconstitutional according to his advisers...

As I said, judge, jury, and executioner. It's unconstitutional. We have three branches, and that's to ensure that one branch does not usurp the responsibilities and powers of the others. It protects all of our rights. Except when we have a POTUS who doesn't know what the Constitution is.

After the 9-11 attacks, all commercial flights were grounding and fighter jets were scrambled and were prepared to shoot down commercial aircraft if found in the air, and not responding to military demands. Fortunately, things did not come to that. But if they had, would you have objected that it was unconstitutional?

Why would I? It wasn't unconstitutional.

 

[Nosmo King]

Bain is just the Media frenzy of vetting the Repub. Like sending teams of reporters to Alaska to dig up stuff on Palin, while Obama has coffee with Bill Ayres. The mindless media deicides the election, and if Bammy does another 4, thank the media once again.

A boy just can't have enough scapegoats!

 

[Si modo]

I guess you and those lawyers and advisers and the "Constructional Scholar" obama himself never heard of DUE PROCESS.

The Constitution states only one command twice. The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. These words have as their central promise an assurance that all levels of American government must operate within the law ("legality") and provide fair procedures. Most of this essay concerns that promise. We should briefly note, however, three other uses these words have had in American constitutional law.
Due process | LII / Legal Information Institute

has there been any other precedences that has defined this further?

why didn't congress bring charges and impeach him?

the constitution also states that we can not go to war against anyone, unless Congress votes on it with 2/3's of the house and 2/3's of the senate voting YEA....but for some reason, that hasn't been followed either....???

I guess it must really infuriate him when a police officer shoots a person dead in the course of their duties to protect the public. I mean, why don't they just wait for a jury trial?

Not likely. But, I bet he gets a good laugh about folks comparing apples to lawn mowers. I know I do.

 

[Katzndogz]

obama is running on romney is an out of touch elite, and its working.

Obama has $10 of millions of dollars, attended Harvard, has played more golf than any president in history at this point in their presidency, and flies off to Martha's Vinyard every weekend.

Now who is the out of touch elite?

You want Romney to stop because he's going to destory Obama like Reagan destroyed Carter, and you know it and that is bothering you immensely.

Romney is winning, therefore he has to withdraw to give the failure a chance.

 

[Charles_Main]

romney is getting destroyed with all this bain stuff. open the convention so we can choose a better candidate.

no all this "bain" stuff is a bunch of Lies.

Charles it doesn't matter if this bain stuff is true or false, it does not out weigh anything obama has done. It can all be true but we still have this obama shit.

Perception matters.

Despite our Laws, a Candidate must prove himself innocent. Sucks but true.

 

[Care4all]

As I said, judge, jury, and executioner. It's unconstitutional. We have three branches, and that's to ensure that one branch does not usurp the responsibilities and powers of the others. It protects all of our rights. Except when we have a POTUS who doesn't know what the Constitution is.

After the 9-11 attacks, all commercial flights were grounding and fighter jets were scrambled and were prepared to shoot down commercial aircraft if found in the air, and not responding to military demands. Fortunately, things did not come to that. But if they had, would you have objected that it was unconstitutional?

Why would I? It wasn't unconstitutional.

so, killing citizens that have committed no crime, were never charged with a crime, can be killed by our gvt?

 

[Inthemiddle]

As I said, judge, jury, and executioner. It's unconstitutional. We have three branches, and that's to ensure that one branch does not usurp the responsibilities and powers of the others. It protects all of our rights. Except when we have a POTUS who doesn't know what the Constitution is.

After the 9-11 attacks, all commercial flights were grounding and fighter jets were scrambled and were prepared to shoot down commercial aircraft if found in the air, and not responding to military demands. Fortunately, things did not come to that. But if they had, would you have objected that it was unconstitutional?

Why would I? It wasn't unconstitutional.

Killing American citizens, innocent citizens at that, would have been okay under those circumstances? For what? To defend the public against a militant attack by terrorists? So why is it unconstitutional to defend the public against a militant attack by terrorists who happen to be American citizens?