Article 51 of the Geneva Convention

IM2 said:
I understand that a legitimate military objective is not to obey an illegal order. You have never fought for what is right here in America. I have. You have fought for corporations. So you can go take your miitay objectice and shove them up your ---. What Trump threatened violated Article 51 of the Geneva Convention.
Click to expand...


Wow, you can put your propaganda in the exact same place. Supply routes and the means of production have always been legitimate objectives. They've been part of every military campaign in history. BTW why is it you lefties never criticize Iran when they intentionally target civilian populations as do their proxies?

.
 
IM2 said:
The threat to eliminate the Iranian civilization by bombing electrical grids, bridges, and other infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention.

Specifically Article 51.

Article 51 of the Geneva Convention provides essential protections for civilians during armed conflict, prohibiting attacks on civilian populations and ensuring their safety.

Text​

Article 51 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that:
  1. General Protection: The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations.
  2. Prohibition of Attacks: The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
  3. Protection During Hostilities: Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Article unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
  4. Indiscriminate Attacks: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. This includes attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
  5. Reprisals Against Civilians: Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.
  6. Use of Civilians to Shield Military Objectives: The presence or movements of the civilian population shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

Implications​

Article 51 emphasizes the importance of protecting civilians during armed conflicts and establishes clear prohibitions against targeting non-combatants. It aims to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. Violations of these protections can lead to serious consequences under international humanitarian law, including potential war crimes charges.

This article is part of a broader framework of international humanitarian law designed to safeguard human rights during times of war and conflict, reflecting the commitment of the international community to uphold the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict.

Click to expand...
Seems to me if he tells them WHERE and WHEN he is going to bomb, there shouldn’t be any civilians in the areas huh?
 
OKTexas said:
YWow, you can put your propaganda in the exact same place. Supply routes and the means of production have always been legitimate objectives. They've been part of every military campaign in history. BTW why is it you lefties never criticize Iran when they intentionally target civilian populations as do their proxies?

.
Click to expand...
You are the one spewing propaganda.

explaininghistory.org

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.
explaininghistory.org explaininghistory.org

You would not tolerate this if it happened here. So then your blind belief in the propaganda you ae fed doesn't allow you to understand why something like this would piss peple off toward America. This is something whites like you aren't able to understand because the propaganda of white and Western civilization supremacy doesn't allow you to.

Why is this thread still open?

DonGlock26

Thread 'Obama library to require ID to enter.'

"Obama Center takes heat as critics cry foul over ID rules for free entry — while Dems blast voter ID laws
Illinois residents must show valid ID for free Tuesday admission ahead of the center's June 19 opening
The Obama Presidential Center is facing a wave of backlash ahead of its opening, with critics blasting its admission policies and raising broader concerns about the project’s cost and management.

Conservative commentators on social media are taking aim at the center’s requirement that Illinois residents show valid identification to receive free admission on certain days...
  • Thanks
  • Funny
  • Informative
38303075

It has been reported
 
Tyrion234 said:
Seems to me if he tells them WHERE and WHEN he is going to bomb, there shouldn’t be any civilians in the areas huh?
Click to expand...
Seems that there should not be any bombing period.

You right-wingers don't get it. If we start wars, we can get hit too.
 
IM2 said:
You are the one spewing propaganda.

explaininghistory.org

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.
explaininghistory.org explaininghistory.org

You would not tolerate this if it happened here. So then your blind belief in the propaganda you ae fed doesn't allow you to understand why something like this would piss peple off toward America. This is something whites like you aren't able to understand because the propaganda of white and Western civilization supremacy doesn't allow you to.

Why is this thread still open?

DonGlock26

Thread 'Obama library to require ID to enter.'

"Obama Center takes heat as critics cry foul over ID rules for free entry — while Dems blast voter ID laws
Illinois residents must show valid ID for free Tuesday admission ahead of the center's June 19 opening
The Obama Presidential Center is facing a wave of backlash ahead of its opening, with critics blasting its admission policies and raising broader concerns about the project’s cost and management.

Conservative commentators on social media are taking aim at the center’s requirement that Illinois residents show valid identification to receive free admission on certain days...
  • Thanks
  • Funny
  • Informative
38303075

It has been reported
Click to expand...


Perhaps you should stay on topic, and you history reference has nothing to do with what's happening currently and what legitimate military targets are.

.
 
IM2 said:
The threat to eliminate the Iranian civilization by bombing electrical grids, bridges, and other infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention.

Specifically Article 51.

Article 51 of the Geneva Convention provides essential protections for civilians during armed conflict, prohibiting attacks on civilian populations and ensuring their safety.

Text​

Article 51 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that:
  1. General Protection: The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations.
  2. Prohibition of Attacks: The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
  3. Protection During Hostilities: Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Article unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
  4. Indiscriminate Attacks: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. This includes attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
  5. Reprisals Against Civilians: Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.
  6. Use of Civilians to Shield Military Objectives: The presence or movements of the civilian population shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

Implications​

Article 51 emphasizes the importance of protecting civilians during armed conflicts and establishes clear prohibitions against targeting non-combatants. It aims to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. Violations of these protections can lead to serious consequences under international humanitarian law, including potential war crimes charges.

This article is part of a broader framework of international humanitarian law designed to safeguard human rights during times of war and conflict, reflecting the commitment of the international community to uphold the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict.

Click to expand...
I don’t see bridges or power plants anywhere in your diatribe.
 
IM2 said:
Seems that there should not be any bombing period.

You right-wingers don't get it. If we start wars, we can get hit too.
Click to expand...
That’s how wars work. It’s also why you go kill them first.
 
IM2 said:
The threat to eliminate the Iranian civilization by bombing electrical grids, bridges, and other infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention.

Specifically Article 51.

Article 51 of the Geneva Convention provides essential protections for civilians during armed conflict, prohibiting attacks on civilian populations and ensuring their safety.

Text​

Article 51 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that:
  1. General Protection: The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations.
  2. Prohibition of Attacks: The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
  3. Protection During Hostilities: Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Article unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
  4. Indiscriminate Attacks: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. This includes attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
  5. Reprisals Against Civilians: Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.
  6. Use of Civilians to Shield Military Objectives: The presence or movements of the civilian population shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

Implications​

Article 51 emphasizes the importance of protecting civilians during armed conflicts and establishes clear prohibitions against targeting non-combatants. It aims to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. Violations of these protections can lead to serious consequences under international humanitarian law, including potential war crimes charges.

This article is part of a broader framework of international humanitarian law designed to safeguard human rights during times of war and conflict, reflecting the commitment of the international community to uphold the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict.

Click to expand...
Good thing he didn’t kill any civilians

Unlike your pals in Iran
 
LordBrownTrout said:
What about when the iranian occult guard gunned down and murdered over 70,000 citizens in the streets?
Click to expand...

The number keep going up daily! Anyone that was killed were Jew and CIA plants to take down the country.

United States involvement in regime change - Wikipedia

1846–1848: Annexation of Texas and invasion of California
1865–1867: Mexico
1887–1889: Samoa
1893: Kingdom of Hawaii
1899–1902: Philippines
1903: Colombia
1906–1909: Cuba
1909–1910: Nicaragua
1912–1933: Nicaragua
1914: Mexico
1915–1934: Haiti
1916–1924: Dominican Republic
1917–1919: Germany
1917–1920: Austria-Hungary
1918–1920: Russia
1941–1952: Japan
1941–1949: Germany
1941–1946: Italy
1944–1946: France
1944–1945: Belgium
1944–1945: Netherlands
1944–1945: Philippines
1945–1955: Austria
1945–1948: South Korea
1947–1949: Greece
1949–1953: Albania
1949: Syria
1950–1953: Burma and China
1952: Egypt
1952: Guatemala
1952–1953: Iran
1954: Guatemala
1956–1957: Syria
1957–1959: Indonesia
1959: Iraq
1959–1963: South Vietnam
1959–1962: Cuba
1959: Cambodia
1960–1965: Congo-Leopoldville
1960: Laos
1961: Dominican Republic
1963: Iraq
1964: British Guiana
1964: Brazil
1965–1967: Indonesia
1970–1979: Cambodia
1970–1973: Chile
1971: Bolivia
1974–1991: Ethiopia
1975–1991: Angola
1975–1999: East Timor
1979–1992: Afghanistan
1980–1989: Poland
1981–1982: Chad
1981–1990: Nicaragua
1983: Grenada
1989–1994: Panama
1986–1991: Soviet Union
1991: Iraq
1991: Haiti
1992–1996: Iraq
1994–1995: Haiti
1996–1997: Zaire
2000: FR Yugoslavia
2001–2021: Afghanistan
2002: Venezuela
2003–2021: Iraq
2004: Haiti
2005: Kyrgyzstan
2006–2007: Palestine
2005–2009: Syria
2011: Libya
2012–2017: Syria
2019: Bolivia
2019–2022: Venezuela

...and the list is not up to date.

Wikipedia

jews that's the score.webp
 
IM2 said:
The threat to eliminate the Iranian civilization by bombing electrical grids, bridges, and other infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention.

Specifically Article 51.

Article 51 of the Geneva Convention provides essential protections for civilians during armed conflict, prohibiting attacks on civilian populations and ensuring their safety.

Text​

Article 51 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that:
  1. General Protection: The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations.
  2. Prohibition of Attacks: The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
  3. Protection During Hostilities: Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Article unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
  4. Indiscriminate Attacks: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. This includes attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
  5. Reprisals Against Civilians: Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.
  6. Use of Civilians to Shield Military Objectives: The presence or movements of the civilian population shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

Implications​

Article 51 emphasizes the importance of protecting civilians during armed conflicts and establishes clear prohibitions against targeting non-combatants. It aims to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. Violations of these protections can lead to serious consequences under international humanitarian law, including potential war crimes charges.

This article is part of a broader framework of international humanitarian law designed to safeguard human rights during times of war and conflict, reflecting the commitment of the international community to uphold the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict.

Click to expand...
You what now?
 
IM2 said:
The threat to eliminate the Iranian civilization by bombing electrical grids, bridges, and other infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention.

Specifically Article 51.

Article 51 of the Geneva Convention provides essential protections for civilians during armed conflict, prohibiting attacks on civilian populations and ensuring their safety.

Text​

Article 51 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that:
  1. General Protection: The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations.
  2. Prohibition of Attacks: The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
  3. Protection During Hostilities: Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Article unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
  4. Indiscriminate Attacks: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. This includes attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
  5. Reprisals Against Civilians: Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.
  6. Use of Civilians to Shield Military Objectives: The presence or movements of the civilian population shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

Implications​

Article 51 emphasizes the importance of protecting civilians during armed conflicts and establishes clear prohibitions against targeting non-combatants. It aims to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. Violations of these protections can lead to serious consequences under international humanitarian law, including potential war crimes charges.

This article is part of a broader framework of international humanitarian law designed to safeguard human rights during times of war and conflict, reflecting the commitment of the international community to uphold the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict.

Click to expand...


Okay, lock Bill Clinton and Tony Blair up for war crimes.


The Varvarin bridge bombing on 30 May 1999 was an aerial bombing executed by NATO as part of the Operation Allied Force. Ten people were killed and 17 were severely injured, all of them civilians.

en.wikipedia.org

Varvarin bridge bombing - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...


The Grdelica train bombing occurred on 12 April 1999, when two AGM-130 missiles fired by a USAF F-15E Strike Eagle fighter bomber hit a passenger train while it was passing across a railway bridge over the South Morava river in the Grdelica gorge, some 300 kilometres (190 mi) south of Belgrade, Serbia. At least 20 civilian passengers were killed or declared missing. Estimates of the total death toll run as high as 60.[1] It is considered the deadliest rail bombing by two NATO missiles in Serbian history.[3][4]

The bombing occurred during Operation Allied Force, a NATO operation against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) aimed at forcing the FRY government to end the repression of Albanians in Kosovo.[5] The campaign had begun by attacking mainly military targets, but by mid-April the emphasis had changed to strategic and economic targets such as transport links, particularly major bridges.


en.wikipedia.org

Grdelica train bombing - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
 
15th post
IM2 said:
The threat to eliminate the Iranian civilization by bombing electrical grids, bridges, and other infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention.

Specifically Article 51.

Article 51 of the Geneva Convention provides essential protections for civilians during armed conflict, prohibiting attacks on civilian populations and ensuring their safety.

Text​

Article 51 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that:
  1. General Protection: The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations.
  2. Prohibition of Attacks: The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence aimed at spreading terror among the civilian population are prohibited.
  3. Protection During Hostilities: Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Article unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.
  4. Indiscriminate Attacks: Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. This includes attacks that may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.
  5. Reprisals Against Civilians: Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.
  6. Use of Civilians to Shield Military Objectives: The presence or movements of the civilian population shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.

Implications​

Article 51 emphasizes the importance of protecting civilians during armed conflicts and establishes clear prohibitions against targeting non-combatants. It aims to ensure that military operations are conducted in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure. Violations of these protections can lead to serious consequences under international humanitarian law, including potential war crimes charges.

This article is part of a broader framework of international humanitarian law designed to safeguard human rights during times of war and conflict, reflecting the commitment of the international community to uphold the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their status in a conflict.

Click to expand...
The goatfuckers themselves are not held accountable to the Geneva Convention when they mandate the children of Iran go make circles around strategic assets or when they say Israel should be wiped off the map.

Sounds like your loyalty lies in Geneva. Leave!
 
g5000 said:
Sorry, tard. Bashing Trump is not bashing America.

And you think you aren't in a cult! :lol:
Click to expand...
Neither is bashing Obama. His capitulation to Iran was an absolute failure.The goatfucker mullahs knew he answered to Valerie Jarrett so it was easy for them to set the terms that they would never adhere to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

After Iran, Trump Needs To Bomb The Administrative State Into Submission

< Previous Thread

Is Trump's Time Nearing End? - Attacks Tucker, MTG, Candice, Megyn, A Jones, others

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Pastelli
Roaring Lion Shows Israel’s Moral Compass in War. Gaza and Iran Alike—Israel’s War Is With Terror, Not Civilians. [Re pallyweid]
Replies
7
Views
236
Matted Joybeard
M
Pastelli
Mullahcracy adopting "palestinian" 'dead baby strategy' [based on CENTCOM message]
2 3
Replies
42
Views
408
Stryder50
Stryder50
berg80
The downed Air Force officer had more than a normal reason to be afraid of capture.
3 4 5
Replies
92
Views
595
berg80
berg80
Doc7505
Hypocrisy Bomb: When Obama or Clinton Bombed Power Grids, NYT Cheered. Trump Threatens It? “War Crimes!”
2
Replies
30
Views
175
Mashmont
M
Pastelli
UN = DISCREDITED: All its agencies so called "human tights" (re Israel / GGG Genocidal Gaza Govt or Islamic Fascist Republic) [OIC controlled]
Replies
1
Views
56
EdwinAMartin
E

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom