Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
WyattEarp*bear513210625-#359 • Wyatt earp • So if someone murders you we should let that person go free?they will never debate in good faith
Are you somehow worried or are you creating the narrative that if changes are made like shooting down Roe versus Wade, and the SCOTUS sending it back to the state's is going to cause the state's to pursue criminal charges on those who were getting abortions legally ???? Not going to happen, but if law's are created in individual state's that makes something illegal, then obey the law is all anyone can do until overturned if such a thing happens.WyattEarp*bear513210625-#359 • Wyatt earp • So if someone murders you we should let that person go free?
If someone murders me after I have met the requirement of live birth and the criminal is apprehended, tried and convicted they should be locked up until they die. It’s too late for me in this case but locking murderers locked up is necessary for the mass of humanity to live in the pursuits of happiness.
END2303191818
Why would anyone expect sympathy for traitors to a us republic credo of e pluribus unum ?For these guys it seems they will never stop their schtick and they will never debate in good faith and I have just lost all patience with them.
The hue mammon reference is applied as a pejorative by alluding to membership in the mammalian class .I can only read “hue mammon wrights” so many times without thinking I am in some weird scifi setting, and I can’t stomach just the flagrant dishonesty AND post format of NFBW.
Which fool speaks of their own good faith , while projecting pity poor mouth false conjectures of another acting in bad faith , as an excuse to censure to avoid being a witness to other monikers suffering the same miserable fate of defeated conjectures ?Just reading his… unique… format, even if this guy 100% agreed with me and was nice and honest, instead of what he is… would still be noxious.
Way the fuck tl;dr." Awl Hold Yearn Own "
* Ha New Man *
As a semblance of hue mammon , ha nu man mocks you with the boon of its tall tail tales - Hanuman - Wikipedia !
It is by nature from vanity that damned dirty hue mammon apes ignore where itself would be on a universal scale of exploitation for an apex predator of itself which did abide by it .
The damned dirty hue mammon apes want an exception of their own inchoate developing selves , when it affords no exception from exploitation to any other inchoate life , even while it affords selective exception from exploitation for any other sentient or sapient being , without empathy for however extensive anxieties of suffering may be .
If the mundane expectations of damned dirty hue mammon apes were presented from a non aggression perspective of Jainism - Wikipedia , a claim for exception for its inchoate selves might not be considered morose .
Sew there go the damn dirty hue mammon apes clear cutting forest lungs of the world in unsustainable numbers to edify its gluttonous over populated selves with the flatulence of brahma .
If at least the somnambulism drivel from the auspices of egocentric myopia were capable of intimating that a morpheme is a smallest inflection of sound with which a meaning is associated , and that eponyms are meaning associated with combinations of morphemes and words , it would be understood that competent sophists can amend the vernacular and lexicon to establish a more valid normative perspective ,
The term right to describe normative perspectives is an antiquated absurdity , which alludes to epistemological absolutes which are additionally based upon ridiculous constructs of a syntactically misapplied reference to nature by contemporary " natural law " theorists !
* Pretentious Dogma For Clueless Camps And Traitorous Populism Clowns *
Natural law[1] (Latin: ius naturale, lex naturalis) is a system of law based on a close observation of human nature, and based on values intrinsic to human nature that can be deduced and applied independently of positive law (the express enacted laws of a state or society).[2] According to the theory of law called jusnaturalism, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason."[3] Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality."[4]Natural law - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
* Natural Law As It Is And Not As Sum Nomian Dictum Stipulates It Must Be *
Legal positivism (as understood in the Anglosphere) is a school of thought of analytical jurisprudence developed largely by legal philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries, such as Jeremy Bentham and John Austin. While Bentham and Austin developed legal positivist theory, empiricism provided the theoretical basis for such developments to occur. The most prominent legal positivist writer in English has been H. L. A. Hart, who, in 1958, found common usages of "positivism" as applied to law to include the contentions that:Legal positivism - Wikipedia
Historically, legal positivism is in opposition to natural law's theories of jurisprudence, with particular disagreement surrounding the natural lawyer's claim that there is a necessary connection between law and morality.
- laws are commands of human beings;
- there is not any necessary relation between law and morality, that is, between law as it is and as it ought to be;
- analysis (or study of the meaning) of legal concepts is worthwhile and is to be distinguished from history or sociology of law, as well as from criticism or appraisal of law, for example with regard to its moral value or to its social aims or functions;
- a legal system is a closed, logical system in which correct decisions can be deduced from predetermined legal rules without reference to social considerations (legal formalism);
- moral judgments, unlike statements of fact, cannot be established or defended by rational argument, evidence, or proof ("noncognitivism" in ethics).[1]
The term positivism is derived from Latin ponere, positum, meaning "to put". "Positive law" is that which is man-made, i.e., defined formally.[2]
* Objectivity Of Scientific Method Versus Subjectivity Of Social Norms *
Perspectivism (German: Perspektivismus; also called perspectivalism) is the epistemological principle that perception of and knowledge of something are always bound to the interpretive perspectives of those observing it. While perspectivism does not regard all perspectives and interpretations as being of equal truth or value, it holds that no one has access to an absolute view of the world cut off from perspective.[1] Instead, all such viewing occurs from some point of view which in turn affects how things are perceived. Rather than attempt to determine truth by correspondence to things outside any perspective, perspectivism thus generally seeks to determine truth by comparing and evaluating perspectives among themselves.[1]Perspectivism - Wikipedia
The perspectival conception of objectivity used by Nietzsche sees the deficiencies of each perspective as remediable by an asymptotic study of the differences between them. This stands in contrast to Platonic notions in which objective truth is seen to reside in a wholly non-perspectival domain.[4] Despite this, perspectivism is often misinterpreted[3] as a form of relativism or as a rejection of objectivity entirely.[8] Though it is often mistaken to imply that no way of seeing the world can be taken as definitively true, perspectivism can instead be interpreted as holding certain interpretations (such as that of perspectivism itself) to be definitively true.[3]
* Let Us Know When Ewe Believe To Be Caught Up *
As usual , once that occurs , there is not much else to debate , as the validity of conclusions are clear , as matters of fact .
Your constant spew of utterly nonsensical babble isn’t worth reading." Ignore Them And They Will Go Away Ostriches Cowering Behind White Noise Of Populism "
* Fee Press Setting Itself Up To Be Mocked And Intellectually Bitch Slapped *
The liberal versus conservative paradigm is intellectual buffoonery that causes mental retardation of political science and civics in us public .
Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments
" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...www.usmessageboard.com
Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians
" Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians " * Lying Under Cover Of Pretending To Liberate Through Domination * The right wing outlets must ttop referring to the left as liberals and call them either authoritarians , or conservatives . The term liberal is synonymous with...
Non Aggression Principles For Other Races Towards Ones Own Race And Non Violence Principles For Within Ones Own Race
" Non Aggression Principles For Other Races Towards Ones Own Race And Non Violence Principles Within Ones Own Race " * Hypocrisy Or Not Hypocrisy ? * * Racist Or Not Racist ? *
Does Non Violence Principles Correct Non Aggression Principles Lexicon ?
"Does Non Violence Principles Correct Non Aggression Principles Lexicon ? " * Definition Buy Explanation * Social systems include allowable limits of aggression ; thus , by definition , violence is illegitimate aggression . This is a call to correctly annotate an understanding for terms . A...
Yup. Confirmation that I was right to put them on ignore in the first place.I think anyone who has someone on ignore gets curious enough to click on a post now and then, otherwise just to see the stupidity going on that seems to never change.. lol.
Ah. The butthurt is strong in monkey. Good! Good!" Gloating Maid In The Image Of Gawd Primordial Transitions Satisfaction Junctions "
* Eye Know Doubt Have An Ass With A Hole That Expends Shit *
I have done my best not to maintain an ignore list , and have thus far succeeded .
You might want to consider further when John "Bluto" Blutarsky is proffered as an avatar .
Your constant spew of utterly nonsensical babble isn’t worth reading.
Your approval is not my objective .Way the fuck tl;dr.
I can’t convince the pathetic loser that he isn’t making any points with his weirdness. Like spelling human “rights” with “wrights.” Such a pathetic and pointless and dopey affectation.For these guys it seems they will never stop their schtick and they will never debate in good faith and I have just lost all patience with them.
I can only read “hue mammon wrights” so many times without thinking I am in some weird scifi setting, and I can’t stomach just the flagrant dishonesty AND post format of NFBW.
Just reading his… unique… format, even if this guy 100% agreed with me and was nice and honest, instead of what he is… would still be noxious.
Yup. Confirmation that I was right to put them on ignore in the first place.
No redemption for those losers! Bwahaha.
Back to the Phantom Zone they go. Where they can rot in pieces. BWAHAHAHA!
(Cue the psycho music.).
Yeah , keep on with your mealy mouth cowardice .Ah. The butthurt is strong in monkey. Good! Good!
* Linguistically challenged mental Pygmy*" Punked Bitches "
* Whimpering Cry Babies *
Yeah , keep on with your mealy mouth cowardice .
The only ones butt hurt here are diddled man pussies boasting about having to walk away for being unable to contend with counter arguments that put their own arguments to shame .
Rejection of argument without reasonable cause is intellectual cowardice … and cowards always run away for the most part.,I reject it as any meaningful part of this discussion.
No no. You keep making the claim that the common law has diddly dog to do with the topic. But, as usual, you confuse making the claim and reiterating it with supporting it.Rejection of argument without reasonable cause is intellectual cowardice … and cowards always run away for the most part.,
* Linguistically challenged mental Pygmy*
* justifiably humiliated whining *
It sure sucks to be monkey.
allthatsinteresting.com
No no. You keep making the claim that the common law has diddly dog to do with the topic.
* Ho Hum. Monkey is a Ho? *" Corn Ball Ad Hominem "
* Whatever You Say Bluto *
Filmmaker and close friend Penny Marshall knew about Belushi’s drug use all too well, telling The Hollywood Reporter, “I swear, you’d walk down the street with him, and people would hand him drugs. And then he’d do all of them — be the kind of character he played in sketches or Animal House.”The Heroin And Cocaine-Fueled Final Hours Of John Belushi's Tragic Life
"Because of those damn drugs, everything just got out of control."
Be Careful, because when you trigger them with common sense and the truth, they immediately go on these long drinking uhhh I meanFalse.
I reject it as any meaningful part of this discussion.
No purpose is served by addressing the balance of your way too verbose post. It was off the rails from jump street.
