Because it's OK to kill it before your so called "viability" date? Because it's not really human before that date?You are a double liar. I am advocating #1 a woman’s right to decide #2 to terminate and end a not viable human life.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because it's OK to kill it before your so called "viability" date? Because it's not really human before that date?You are a double liar. I am advocating #1 a woman’s right to decide #2 to terminate and end a not viable human life.
So one day before your so called viability date, it's not murder to kill it? And 1 day after your so called viability date, it is murder to kill it?NFBW2208102158-#4,614 Ending the life of a human being is murder.
NFBW: Yes, as a human being It’s none of my business what a woman does with her body prior to 28 weeks after conception., But after that when a fetus is viable sufficient enough to survive outside the womb, it makes common sense to me that the decision to abort should be made prior to viability. So abortion should be legal prior to viability. After viability abortion should not be legal except to save the life of the woman., Fifty years of Roe vs Wade is sufficient precedent of law on just that. the third trimester, after fetal viability—government could regulate and even ban abortion to further its interest in the potentiality of life, but it must safeguard the patient’s life and health.So one day before your so called viability date, it's not murder to kill it? And 1 day after your so called viability date, it is murder to kill it?
NFBW: You are a liar. I do not advocate for abortion. I advocate for choice., if every woman who gets pregnant chooses to carry her baby to natural birth I wouid be happy as hell to see that. But that decision has to happen in private without government intrusion or coercion other than providing facts based information on preventing pregnancy devoted to making abortion rare.Because it's OK to kill it before your so called "viability"
Viable life begins at 28 weeks.The entire question is when life begins?
Sorry bud, but the feds are out of it. It goes back to the state's no matter how much you attempt to keep your Fed's hands in it. I see your angle now. You for some reason want to keep the feds involved, and you want this why ??NFBW: Yes, as a human being It’s none of my business what a woman does with her body prior to 28 weeks after conception., But after that when a fetus is viable sufficient enough to survive outside the womb, it makes common sense to me that the decision to abort should be made prior to viability. So abortion should be legal prior to viability. After viability abortion should not be legal except to save the life of the woman., Fifty years of Roe vs Wade is sufficient precedent of law on just that. the third trimester, after fetal viability—government could regulate and even ban abortion to further its interest in the potentiality of life, but it must safeguard the patient’s life and health.
In other words, Roe firmly established the core constitutional principle that government cannot ban abortion prior to viability, and could only regulate it before viability in ways that help pregnant people.
States can do their murder stuff after viability. I Support that as long as life of the mother cones first and in thise cases should not be regarded as murder any different than self defense. END2208132350
So just to be clear, you believe abortion is murder 1 day after your so called "viability" date.NFBW: Yes, as a human being It’s none of my business what a woman does with her body prior to 28 weeks after conception., But after that when a fetus is viable sufficient enough to survive outside the womb, it makes common sense to me that the decision to abort should be made prior to viability. So abortion should be legal prior to viability. After viability abortion should not be legal except to save the life of the woman., Fifty years of Roe vs Wade is sufficient precedent of law on just that. the third trimester, after fetal viability—government could regulate and even ban abortion to further its interest in the potentiality of life, but it must safeguard the patient’s life and health.
In other words, Roe firmly established the core constitutional principle that government cannot ban abortion prior to viability, and could only regulate it before viability in ways that help pregnant people.
States can do their murder stuff after viability. I Support that as long as life of the mother cones first and in thise cases should not be regarded as murder any different than self defense. END2208132350
But it's OK if you killed a human being in the womb 1 day before your so called viability date, right? Because it's not really a human being if it can't live outside of the mother, right? So what is it?NFBW: You are a liar. I do not advocate for abortion. I advocate for choice., if every woman who gets pregnant chooses to carry her baby to natural birth I wouid be happy as hell to see that. But that decision has to happen in private without government intrusion or coercion other than providing facts based information on preventing pregnancy devoted to making abortion rare.
And viability is not “so-called” asshole scientist wannabee ding - it is a scientific fact. A one cell fertilized egg is not viable and the developments that occur insude the womb remain not viable for up to 28 weeks. That Is scientific fact. END2208140016
Is it ok to pull their limbs off to get them out 1 day before your so called viability date?NFBW: what’s to discuss? You have no opinion on the legality of killing a human organism by abortion. In ding-#2,403 you are ok with abortion being legal, so killing whatever you want to call it ding is ok with you.
I on the other hand want a federal law that says killing whatever you want to call it after 28 weeks should not be legal. States must ban abortion after 28 weeks, You are ok with killing whatever you want to call it if a state decides to kill viable whatever you want to call it’s. END2208140049
Is there a material difference to the fetus whether he is aborted prior to or after your so called viability date? I mean it's a live one minute and dead the next, right? Either way, right? You are jumping through a lot of unnecessary hoops and using convoluted logic to try to make abortion moral.Viable life begins at 28 weeks.
NFBW: States with laws that ban legal safe abortion as a medical procedure that a woman can obtain in another state as it is right now, do so for political/religious ideology not to protect innocent life.Every teenage girl and every woman who has an abortion is pregnant with a child she does not want to raise. What are we going to do with all these unwanted children? I do not see so called "pro life" people lining up to adopt them.
Needless homicides of the innocent and helpless are surely any decent person’s call, and we’re calling it like it is and trying to stop this bullshit....until you begin to understand it isn't your call.
I’m sorry you flunked Biology but no actually mom can’t do that without ruthlessly killing her own kid, to whom she owes parental responsibility. It’s that ruthlessly killing part we are not terribly fond of.Well, that's easy enough to solve. The fetus can just gestate somewhere other than that particular woman. Right? I mean that IS how it all works, right?
Women are involved in pregnancy, duh.Until you can acknowledge that:
1. Women are integrally involved in the whole fetus scene
2. Women are human beings
So I guess you would be pro-slavery then as well as pro-abortion. It isn’t your choice, you would say, so it isn’t your business, you’re not getting abducted and forced to pick cotton, so just let other people go to the market and buy non-people. I mean, that kind of apathy isn’t going to be interpreted as racist or in support of slave markets. Wait, yes, yes it would.I'm not uncomfortable morally. I simply don't CARE either way.
IT.ISN'T.MY.CHOICE.
Do you understand that point?
Literal ghouls are less monstrous then abortionists."ghoulish"
I can speak for myself and be honest. I don’t have one.Why don't you come clean and tell us what your religious stake in all this is as well?
You CAN be honest about your faith, right?