Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[NotfooledbyW]

Cplus6221228-#6,560 CarsomyrPlusSix If there is a tribe for individual human liberty, human rights, and equality, sign me up

NFBW/: No sign-up for you amongst us viable human beings. You do not stand for viable human liberty, or viable human rights, or viable human equality. You sellout viable human women, and call them whores if they don’t worship Trump and thank him for the Catholic SCOTUS, for hoped for political benefit from the hyped up melodrama of standing up for the god given sanctity of Republican not and never was viable human life, and you don’t believe in God.

END2212290047

 

[Delldude]

Cplus6221228-#6,560 CarsomyrPlusSix If there is a tribe for individual human liberty, human rights, and equality, sign me up

NFBW/: No sign-up for you amongst us viable human beings. You do not stand for viable human liberty, or viable human rights, or viable human equality. You sellout viable human women, and call them whores if they don’t worship Trump and thank him for the Catholic SCOTUS, for hoped for political benefit from the hyped up melodrama of standing up for the god given sanctity of Republican not and never was viable human life, and you don’t believe in God.

END2212290047

QAnon Holy roller.....?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Dragonlady220910-#44 As long as Republicans oppose women's rights, they're dead in the water

Delldude221107-#170 “McConnell can chirp all he wants, but a national abortion ban is as unconstitutional as RvW was.”

NFBW: Why is a national abortion ban unconstitutional Delldude ?????

END2212290155

 

[NotfooledbyW]

1srelluc220917-#4 I'm pro-choice (with guardrails) so you can't make hay with me on that.
^
^
greenP220919-#11 “you shouldrn't be pro "choice" because what one is choosing is murder “ •••• “Let the child choose. And since "self preservation is the first law of nature" we can all assume how they would choose”

NFBW: Question for greenerpastures based upon my observation of your reprimand of 1srelluc for being pro-choice:

NFBW: It is possible that 1srelluc thinks you are a Bible Thumper because being pro-choice in the public realm does not mean one is pro-abortion in a private realm. Do you think being pro-choice for the anonymous public necessarily means one wants that choice for themselves in their private personal relationships???

END2212290329

 

[beagle9]

You vote for the vile collectivist socialist party with zero respect for the Constitution and zero respect for individual liberty or individual human rights because you want those human beings you hate to be killed without legal consequence. You want those you hate denied their human rights so they can be killed on a whim. Because you are inhuman filth, which fits with America’s collectivist socialist party.

You are also a habitual liar disoriented from reality, which makes you a natural fit with that party’s dementia-ridden standard bearer, who has no consistent principles at all other than saying whatever will get him the support of his howling collectivist mob.

He asked for it, you gave it to him.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Quick Reference Links "

* Rolling Clarity Credits *

I'm guessing 'wrights' refers to 'woke rights', not real rights or Wright Wrights. Or maybe his Spellcheck is screwed up and came from an outsourced sub-contractor in Mumbai.

Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...

www.usmessageboard.com

Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ?

Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians

" Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians " * Lying Under Cover Of Pretending To Liberate Through Domination * The right wing outlets must ttop referring to the left as liberals and call them either authoritarians , or conservatives . The term liberal is synonymous with...

www.usmessageboard.com

A Treatise of Legal Philosophy on Adequate Political Science Terms for Civics Pedagogy

" A Treatise of Legal Philosophy on Adequate Political Science Terms for Civics Pedagogy " * Obfuscation Mock Heir Clock Hair * There is little doubt regarding my disdain for a liberal versus conservative paradigm as it is as near to intellectual buffoonery as one could conceive , as the...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[NotfooledbyW]

NFBW221227-#6,536 “I oppose government coercion and you support government coercion. •••• that is the truth.”
••
NFBW221227-#6,551 “I vote Democrat because I want the religious right party never holding power to ban abortion because I do not seek to impose my personal belief on the value of life on the general public out of respect for the Constitution and individual liberty.”
^
^
Cplus6221228-#6,558 You vote for the vile collectivist socialist party
^
^
beagle9221229-#6,565l He {NFBW} asked for it, you { CarsomyrPlusSix } gave it to him.
••
1srelluc220917-#4 1srelluc I'm pro-choice (with guardrails) ••••
••
NFBW: I am pro-choice with guardrails outside my personal relationships and opposed to abortion within my personal relationships, which Meriweather was non-tribal enough to understand. You should be ashamed
•^
MeriW221227-#6,552 “I return to my philosophy: Don't pursue the lie.”
^
NFBW221228-#6,559 I have a similar cardinal rule based upon what Jesus reportedly said “seek the truth and ye shall be free” in the sense that if all sought the truth all would universally be free of the tribal differences that divide mankind.

NFBW: So beagle9 why do you applaud a liar like CarsomyrPlusSix and thus bring shame for your belief in Jesus Christ who tells us to seek truth in order to be free.

END2212290907

 

[1srelluc]

NFBW221227-#6,536 “I oppose government coercion and you support government coercion. •••• that is the truth.”
••
NFBW221227-#6,551 “I vote Democrat because I want the religious right party never holding power to ban abortion because I do not seek to impose my personal belief on the value of life on the general public out of respect for the Constitution and individual liberty.”
^
^
Cplus6221228-#6,558 You vote for the vile collectivist socialist party
^
^
beagle9221229-#6,565l He {NFBW} asked for it, you { CarsomyrPlusSix } gave it to him.
••
1srelluc220917-#4 1srelluc I'm pro-choice (with guardrails) ••••
••
NFBW: I am pro-choice with guardrails outside my personal relationships and opposed to abortion within my personal relationships, which Meriweather was non-tribal enough to understand. You should be ashamed
•^
MeriW221227-#6,552 “I return to my philosophy: Don't pursue the lie.”
^
NFBW221228-#6,559 I have a similar cardinal rule based upon what Jesus reportedly said “seek the truth and ye shall be free” in the sense that if all sought the truth all would universally be free of the tribal differences that divide mankind.

NFBW: So beagle9 why do you applaud a liar like CarsomyrPlusSix and thus bring shame for your belief in Jesus Christ who tells us to seek truth in order to be free.

END2212290907

Jeez, don't you have something better to do than post walls of text in a old-ass thread?

 

[beagle9]

NFBW221227-#6,536 “I oppose government coercion and you support government coercion. •••• that is the truth.”
••
NFBW221227-#6,551 “I vote Democrat because I want the religious right party never holding power to ban abortion because I do not seek to impose my personal belief on the value of life on the general public out of respect for the Constitution and individual liberty.”
^
^
Cplus6221228-#6,558 You vote for the vile collectivist socialist party
^
^
beagle9221229-#6,565l He {NFBW} asked for it, you { CarsomyrPlusSix } gave it to him.
••
1srelluc220917-#4 1srelluc I'm pro-choice (with guardrails) ••••
••
NFBW: I am pro-choice with guardrails outside my personal relationships and opposed to abortion within my personal relationships, which Meriweather was non-tribal enough to understand. You should be ashamed
•^
MeriW221227-#6,552 “I return to my philosophy: Don't pursue the lie.”
^
NFBW221228-#6,559 I have a similar cardinal rule based upon what Jesus reportedly said “seek the truth and ye shall be free” in the sense that if all sought the truth all would universally be free of the tribal differences that divide mankind.

NFBW: So beagle9 why do you applaud a liar like CarsomyrPlusSix and thus bring shame for your belief in Jesus Christ who tells us to seek truth in order to be free.

END2212290907

Why do you utter the name of Christ who would probably say to you "depart from me for I never knew you" ?? Meaning that if you take the stand that you have taken, otherwise to allow a person with support to remove her baby in a most henious way from her body, then you truly don't know Christ or his message in life.

 

[Delldude]

Dragonlady220910-#44 As long as Republicans oppose women's rights, they're dead in the water

Delldude221107-#170 “McConnell can chirp all he wants, but a national abortion ban is as unconstitutional as RvW was.”

NFBW: Why is a national abortion ban unconstitutional Delldude ?????

END2212290155

For the same reason allowing it was.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

NFBW: So beagle9 why do you applaud a liar like CarsomyrPlusSix and thus bring shame for your belief in Jesus Christ who tells us to seek truth in order to be free.

Because I tell the truth, especially about you, you bigoted deceitful pro-abort filth who definitionally must worship a lowly “god” of killing the weakest among us for personal gain, and who from the Abrahamic religion perspective, blasphemes that the demonic, hateful filth you worship is their god.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Cplus6221228-#6,560 CarsomyrPlusSix If there is a tribe for individual human liberty, human rights, and equality, sign me up

NFBW/: No sign-up for you amongst us viable human beings.

Fuck your surfactant fetish.

Go masturbate to some industrial surfactant already and leave the rest of the sane folks to debate absent your peculiarities.

You sellout viable human women, and call them whores if they don’t worship Trump

Fucking lying piece of shit. I’ve said no such thing.

and you don’t believe in God.

Yet somehow I manage to be a moral human being and you are the lowliest most immoral scum on this site. Did your awful “god” make you this way or did you make up your demonic filth “god” in your own image from your own desires?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

1srelluc221229-#6,568 Jeez, don't you have something better to do than post walls of text in a old-ass thread?

NFBW: I am pro-choice and pro-privacy for all people unbeknownst to me, churched or not, who engage in sex, recreational or not, and I see you are a rare pro-choice Republican who ignites my curiosity to see you refer to the massive white Christian nationalists Trump MAGA election denying most powerful voter bloc in American politics as BIBLE THUMPERS. I am interested in seeing how all that BIBLE THUMPING goes if Trump gets indicted and watching the Bible THUMPING Catholic driven SCOTUS contribute to the demise of the GOP along with all its unAmerucan Trumpism.

Your whining about format bores me since it shows me the mindless state with which you are engaged here, just like CarsomyrPlusSix •• If you have a mind please use it and we could have an interesting discussion being on the pro-choice side together.

END2212280951

 

[NotfooledbyW]

NFBW221229-#6,561 and you don’t believe in God.
^
^
Cplus6221229-#6,572 CarsomyrPlusSix Yet somehow I manage to be a moral human being.

NFBW: A moral person does not demand the government must force a law abiding woman to suffer government intrusion and interference into the privacy of her life preventing her from making a decision whether or not she is wiling to assume the risk of carrying an unplanned pregnancy beyond 24 weeks.

END2212292044

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

NFBW: A moral person does not demand the government to force a law abiding woman to suffer Government intrusion and interference into the privacy of her life preventing her from making a decision whether or not she is wiling to assume the risk of carrying an unplanned pregnancy beyond 24 weeks.

END2212292042

A moral person must insist on laws against killing innocent human beings in cold blood, because human lives should be protected against violence.

A moral person would not call laws against such homicides “government intrusion,” only an insane might-makes-right anarchist would.

A moral person would accept responsibility for their own actions and expect the same for others - if you make a kid, take care of your kid.

You are immoral scum.

 

[DudleySmith]

" Quick Reference Links "

* Rolling Clarity Credits *

Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...

www.usmessageboard.com

Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ?

Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians

" Left Wing Are Not Liberals They Are Extreme Authoritarians " * Lying Under Cover Of Pretending To Liberate Through Domination * The right wing outlets must ttop referring to the left as liberals and call them either authoritarians , or conservatives . The term liberal is synonymous with...

www.usmessageboard.com

A Treatise of Legal Philosophy on Adequate Political Science Terms for Civics Pedagogy

" A Treatise of Legal Philosophy on Adequate Political Science Terms for Civics Pedagogy " * Obfuscation Mock Heir Clock Hair * There is little doubt regarding my disdain for a liberal versus conservative paradigm as it is as near to intellectual buffoonery as one could conceive , as the...

www.usmessageboard.com

So somebody's Spellcheck is screwed up. Damn foreigners.

 

[Delldude]

So somebody's Spellcheck is screwed up. Damn foreigners.

The equal Wrights guy?

 

[DudleySmith]

NFBW221229-#6,561 and you don’t believe in God.
^
^
Cplus6221229-#6,572 CarsomyrPlusSix Yet somehow I manage to be a moral human being.

NFBW: A moral person does not demand the government must force a law abiding woman to suffer government intrusion and interference into the privacy of her life preventing her from making a decision whether or not she is wiling to assume the risk of carrying an unplanned pregnancy beyond 24 weeks.

END2212292044

The Govy. didn't force her to screw anybody, dumbass, that was her freedom of choice. She willingly assumed the risk of an unwanted pregnancy, dumbass. So, no, she can'tforce the state to legalize the murder of a baby for the bourgeois crime of Inconvenience.

 

[beagle9]

The Govy. didn't force her to screw anybody, dumbass, that was her freedom of choice. She willingly assumed the risk of an unwanted pregnancy, dumbass. So, no, she can'tforce the state to legalize the murder of a baby for the bourgeois crime of Inconvenience.

Exactly.... But think about this, not only are they attempting to add or gain back the one more thing to something they feel that they can get the government to enforce for them, rather it just goes to show the patterns in which they have used the government to overthrow their adversaries or enemies in this country for quite sometimes now (i.e.it's quite dangerous to allow certain people to highjack government), because it's all in order for them to gain total freedom no matter how that freedom looks with these malcontents.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

NFBW221229-#6,574 A moral person does not demand the government must force a law abiding woman to suffer government intrusion and interference into the privacy of her life preventing her from making a decision whether or not she is wiling to assume the risk of carrying an unplanned pregnancy beyond 24 weeks.
^
^
DudleyS221229-#6,578 The Govy. didn't force her to screw anybody, dumbass, that was her freedom of choice.

NFBW: so tell me, @Dudley, why does a woman give up freedom of choice concerning her body, her health and her finances if she gets pregnant accidentally?

And then we can talk about the fact that the aforementioned woman does not care to appeal to the government to legalize abortion. Laws, dealing with abortion, when the constitution was being written, were generally in line with English common law, which intrinsically held that a pregnant woman is not required to respect the unborn inside her body until what they used to call quickening. I tie quickening to viability, because generally that occurs when it’s obvious to the rest of society that a woman is pregnant, so roe versus wade did not actually legalize abortion, as is usually most politically, but not legally claimed. roe versus wade prevented states from banning abortion based on the right to individual privacy, which I believe should be translated as individual liberty.


END2212291147