Rittenhouse ordered to stand trial

Either way we're seeing a powerful new contender for president in a few years. Even if convicted of some dreamed-up "felony" as there are no longer any impediments to holding the office. Proven when America elected a foreigner (by his/her/its own admission in writing) not just once but twice.
 
Looks like Kyle is going to stand trial for his alleged crimes:


Kyle Rittenhouse — the 17-year-old charged with killing two people during protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, after the shooting of Jacob Blake — will stand trial on charges of felony homicide and other crimes, a court commissioner ruled Thursday.
During a preliminary hearing at Kenosha County Circuit Court, which was held via video link, commissioner Loren Keating ruled that there was enough evidence to send Rittenhouse to trial over the Aug. 25 killings of Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26.
Rittenhouse also faces charges of possession of a dangerous weapon while under the age of 18 and felony attempted homicide for injuring a third man, Gaige Grosskreutz.
Lawyers for Rittenhouse argued that the teen, who has been praised by right-wing commentators and viewed sympathetically by the Trump administration, had acted in self-defense when he opened fire.
But Keating said those arguments were issues for trial — not a preliminary hearing. The teen’s lawyers also asked Keating to dismiss two charges, including possession of a dangerous weapon, but the commissioner declined, saying that was also an issue for trial.

Rittenhouse, of Antioch, Illinois, was released on $2 million bond last month, money mostly raised by conservatives through a legal defense fund.

And in related news..the 19yo who posed as a straw buyer for Kyle's gun has been charged:


Charges have been filed against a 19-year-old man who prosecutors allege purchased and supplied the gun used by 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse in the fatal shootings of two protesters in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
Dominick Black, of Kenosha, faces two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor, causing death, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kenosha County Circuit Court. If he's found guilty, he faces up to 6 years in prison per count.

According to the criminal complaint, Black enlisted the help of Rittenhouse in guarding the Kenosha car dealership Car Source from property damage and looting. The complaint stated Black “volunteered to go out after curfew” and “asked Mr. Rittenhouse to join him.”

In interviews, the owner of Car Source has denied requesting help from either Black or Rittenhouse in protecting his dealership during the protests.

It's sad that a 17yo will be tried as an adult, and if justice is served he will be sentenced to life in prison w/o parole.

It's not sad when that 17 year old kid decides to take adult actions, cross state lines and take possession of an illegal firearm, and then kill someone.

If he believes he was right, let him proclaim that in court, and let him be judged...


You are really confused about this aren't you Moon Bat?

The young man is being charged with murder for political reasons for an act of self defense.

By the way, go read the Bill of rights. There are no age limitations on the right to keep and bear arms.

A child has the right to defend themself the same as an adult.

I'd run rings around you with regards to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights so, really, check yourself.

The fact of the matter is that both Wisconsin and Illinois prohibit the possession of the type of weapon he had. In his home state of Illinois, he would have to have an FOID (Firearm Owner's Identification Card). Rittenhouse doesn't have one. In Wisconsin, the transfer of a firearm to anyone under the age of 18 is illegal, and the possession of a firearm by anyone under the age of 18 is illegal, unless the minor is supervised by an adult while hunting or while undergoing a course of instruction.

There's no confusion here. There's no grey area

Ten bucks?


What does state law say about a mob beating someone to death?

What about an elected official ordering the police to stand down so that the mob can destroy and terrorize?


Hell, wasn't the mob in violation of a curfew?


Why do laws only apply to one side these days?

Those things don't matter in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse. It wasn't Rittenhouse's duty to enforce the curfew. In fact, if the mob was in violation of a curfew, so was Rittenhouse...

No one said he was trying to enforce the curfew. In fact, what he was trying to do was protect people and property from people who were already engaged in criminal activity, including violating the curfew.

Let me ask you something, Mr. I'm-a-combat-vet. If there was a similar violent riot in your city, or in a neighboring town, and someone you knew asked you to come help him protect his business from being destroyed, would you have gone?


Was this joker trying to give credibility to his opinion by claiming he was a combat vet?

LOL! Damn that boy is confused.

How much credibility does being a Vietnam Vet, a certified fire arms instructor and a certified range officer give my opinions on the Kyle issue?

Not much because none of those have a damn thing to do with the subject, huh?

Well, my opinion comes from being classified as "spoils of war" by the sort of violent primitives who were rioting and burning in Kenosha that night. And I would far rather live in a community where 17-year-olds feel the need to defend their neighbors than one where they feel virtuous in saying, "He provoked them by not hiding at home."

Any man who doesn't give consideration to which attitude makes the women around him feel safer isn't much of a man.


Kyle is a great American hero.

These Moon Bats don't think that because they are just as confused about Ethics as they are Economics, History, Climate Science, Biology and the Constitution.

Ten bucks?

No?

Wow, you sure don't seem real sure about the outcome.

I'm not saying that I think he should go to jail.

I'm saying that I think he's going to.

Those are two very different things...
 
No liberalism involved just one of jurisprudence and the evidence.
Homosexual convicts raping a 17 year old boy is a liberal wet dream not supported by law


I don't think that Mr. Rittenhouse will be going to the pen for this, but if theoretically he would, I don't think the homos and chomos would touch him. He whacked one of them on videotape, they would steer clear of Kyle lest they face a similar fate.
 
Hmm. The democrats bail out race rioters. Fact. People that burned down cities and race riots. Trump haters did this. The democrats constantly push this anti cop anti white narrative. Is this what the democrats think democracy has come to? Pandering to the lowest common denominator? Apparently.
Poor Kyle is just another victim of circumstances
He's the victim of a corrupt dem district attorney...........
Yeah, so was Manson.





Manson was a murderer. This kid, isn't.
Actually. Manson never killed anyone. He and Moonglow have that in common.
 
Hmm. The democrats bail out race rioters. Fact. People that burned down cities and race riots. Trump haters did this. The democrats constantly push this anti cop anti white narrative. Is this what the democrats think democracy has come to? Pandering to the lowest common denominator? Apparently.
Poor Kyle is just another victim of circumstances
He's the victim of a corrupt dem district attorney...........
Yeah, so was Manson.





Manson was a murderer. This kid, isn't.
Actually. Manson never killed anyone. He and Moonglow have that in common.
That is correct. That is the justice system in the US.
 
The friend will plea out on the Straw Purchase charge and Kyle is possibly looking at two counts of manslaughter and being in possession of a firearm that he legally was not allow to have.

I doubt they will get him on the killings but having the gun is no way around it...

No, you're wrong. Stop practicing law...you're not a lawyer and you suck at it.
 
The friend will plea out on the Straw Purchase charge and Kyle is possibly looking at two counts of manslaughter and being in possession of a firearm that he legally was not allow to have.

I doubt they will get him on the killings but having the gun is no way around it...

Agreed. I wonder if the DA might get Kyle to plea to 2 manslaughter counts and the weapons charge in return for a minimal sentence in a low-security prison and extended parole.
Or as an alternative to himself, his mother, and/or his siblings starring in their very own snuff movies.
 
Either way we're seeing a powerful new contender for president in a few years. Even if convicted of some dreamed-up "felony" as there are no longer any impediments to holding the office. Proven when America elected a foreigner (by his/her/its own admission in writing) not just once but twice.
He could, theoretically, run in 2040.
 
The friend will plea out on the Straw Purchase charge and Kyle is possibly looking at two counts of manslaughter and being in possession of a firearm that he legally was not allow to have.

I doubt they will get him on the killings but having the gun is no way around it...

No, you're wrong. Stop practicing law...you're not a lawyer and you suck at it.

I am wrong on the straw purchase?

Sure I am and now Straw purchase is not against the law because some asshole on the interweb claims it is not...

You do understand that doing a Straw Purchase is a crime or will you claim nope because rioters made it legal in your mental midget world?

Also Kyle was in possession of a firearm illegally obtained which also is against the law or will you disagree again because you believe the law is unconstitutional?

Come on and tell me when a straw purchase has ever been legal and when a minor who obtained the firearm through a straw purchase is legal?

Those two are crimes, so prove me wrong!
 
He "shouldn't go to jail" huh.
Soooooo any gun nut who feels the urge can just walk around blowing people away on your planet?
No... And That's not what he did. So... I suggest you educate yourself on the topic.

Yeah, no. It's on video. I suggest you follow your own advice.
It is on video. Which you obviously never watched. Much like your complete humiliation in the Sandmann incident. Self defense by protecting himself from your sides child molesters and domestic violence perpetrators. I suggest you STFU as you have now embarrassed yourself yet again. You are bitch slapped as usual.
 
Hmm. The democrats bail out race rioters. Fact. People that burned down cities and race riots. Trump haters did this. The democrats constantly push this anti cop anti white narrative. Is this what the democrats think democracy has come to? Pandering to the lowest common denominator? Apparently.
Poor Kyle is just another victim of circumstances
He's the victim of a corrupt dem district attorney...........
Yeah, so was Manson.





Manson was a murderer. This kid, isn't.
Actually Manson wasn't a murderer, HE didn't kill anyone in the Tait/La Bianca murders. He was just the puppet master pulling the strings. He was convicted of murder because he was part of the group that committed the crimes.
 
And several posters on this very board have publicly called for Rump to PARDON this piece of shit.

So conservatives clamoring to defend homicidal maniacs now. We live in interesting times.
No reason to pardon him... He shouldn't go to jail. He'll get hit for a couple lesser crimes... But...
If found guilty of his crimes he should certainly to go prison.

That far too many on the right perceive Rittenhouse as some sort of ‘hero’ is a symptom of the disease that is conservativism.
He might be found guilty of being a minor in possession of a firearm. That's a very minor crime and real criminal gang members are let slide on that one all the time. No impartial jury will convict him of murder UNLESS there are things not on the publicly available videos. What was shown on the videos is clearly self-defense by a pretty competent person who only shot at those who were an immediate threat to his well being.
 

Forum List

Back
Top