Riley Gaines gives her story on the Joe Rogan show.

[AzogtheDefiler]

Actually, it's right on point. The opponents of gay marriage used all sort of scare tactics to get people to think, "They're coming for the children".

Eventually, people realized that these fears were unfounded, and only the craziest homophobes are still making a big deal about it.

The culture changes, guy.

Unfounded? It led to attacking bakers and the odd trans movement. It wasn’t unfounded. It was a slippery slope. And led to men tackling women and people like you shrugging.

 

[el midgetron]

Sure I did. It's just not what you wanted to hear.

The only way to defend transgender ideology is to engage in make-believe. Which is what you are doing here.

The fact remains that in your make believe world, there is no way to define what a woman is.

 

[JoeB131]

Dude, they are "coming for the children"

This take is as bad as the NY Time Frootloop expose.

See, you can't help yourself.

 

[JoeB131]

Unfounded? It led to attacking bakers and the odd trans movement. It wasn’t unfounded. It was a slippery slope. And led to men tackling women and people like you shrugging.

No one is attacking bakers. If bakers don't want to bake gay cakes, they should find something else to do for a living.

If you want to write stricter guidelines for contact sports, I really wouldn't have a big problem with that. The problem is you want to ban all Trans athletes from all sports.

 

[JoeB131]

The only way to defend transgender ideology is to engage in make-believe. Which is what you are doing here.

The fact remains that in your make believe world, there is no way to define what a woman is.

Sure there is, just not the way you want to.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No one is attacking bakers. If bakers don't want to bake gay cakes, they should find something else to do for a living.

If you want to write stricter guidelines for contact sports, I really wouldn't have a big problem with that. The problem is you want to ban all Trans athletes from all sports.

You just attacked bakers. Well done.

Nope. Trans women only. Trans men may do as they wish. Trans women must compete against men. Why? Trans women are men.

 

[martybegan]

See, you can't help yourself.

Dude, you can't ignore the reality of the situation.

It didn't "stop there". It's moved on to drugging and mutilating mentally ill children.

 

[el midgetron]

Sure there is, just not the way you want to.

Right, engage in make believe and delusion. The place where you claim not defining a woman is an adequate answer to what a woman is.

You are welcome to your fantasy land, Joe. Just don’t expect us to join you or validate your delusion.

 

[hadit]

Um, okay, so the best women swimmers can all be beaten by a mediocre male swimmer, so why should we care about women's swimming?

I always find this argument kind of silly. The only reason why "women's athletics" exists is because you have this silliness called Title IX that mandates schools set aside money for it, even though it's a money loser.

I've always felt Collegiate Athletics was some weird artifact from an earlier time when Colleges were only for rich people.

And yet you feel the need to jump into EVERY thread that mentions women's sports just to tell everyone over and over again that you don't care about women's sports. Why do you feel that need?

 

[Soupnazi630]

I answered it completely clearly... you just didn't want to hear that answer.

Hey, guy, the Shemale you picked up at the bar was an honest mistake... we all believe you have a case of the Not-gays.



Nope.

After Repukes **** up the economy (because they always do), you will be amazed how quickly people stop caring about this non-issue.

Hey, remember how you guys made claims like this after Bush demagogued gay marriage in 2004?

2 years later you lost Congress
4 years later, Obama won a REAL landslide
7 years later, gay marriage was legal in the whole country.

you are lying

Younever ansewered the question

 

[JoeB131]

You just attacked bakers. Well done.

Hardly. No one is forcing them to be bakers. If they choose to be bakers, they have to accommodate every customer who walks in through the door, not just the ones who their magic sky friend approves of.

Nope. Trans women only. Trans men may do as they wish. Trans women must compete against men. Why? Trans women are men.

Or we can just get rid of sports altogether on the public dime, then people can form their own leagues and make whatever rules they want.

Right, engage in make believe and delusion. The place where you claim not defining a woman is an adequate answer to what a woman is.

You are welcome to your fantasy land, Joe. Just don’t expect us to join you or validate your delusion.

Here's the reality, in 10 years, trans people will be completely accepted, and you transphobes will have to join the racists and homophobes in keeping your opinions to yourselves.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Hardly. No one is forcing them to be bakers. If they choose to be bakers, they have to accommodate every customer who walks in through the door, not just the ones who their magic sky friend approves of.



Or we can just get rid of sports altogether on the public dime, then people can form their own leagues and make whatever rules they want.




Here's the reality, in 10 years, trans people will be completely accepted, and you transphobes will have to join the racists and homophobes in keeping your opinions to yourselves.

Or we can let them bake for who they want to bake. Free country. Sports are essential. We pay for them via RE Taxes. You don’t have kids you don’t get it

 

[hadit]

Hardly. No one is forcing them to be bakers. If they choose to be bakers, they have to accommodate every customer who walks in through the door, not just the ones who their magic sky friend approves of.

No one's forcing singers to sell their music either. If they choose to be singers, they have to accommodate every politician that wants to use one of their songs on the campaign trail, not just the ones that Oprah Winfrey is paid to approve of.

 

[el midgetron]

Here's the reality, in 10 years, trans people will be completely accepted, and you transphobes will have to join the racists and homophobes in keeping your opinions to yourselves.

Scientology is now in its 70th year…..

I disagree. I think there will always be people who have no moral qualms about objecting to child sexual mutilation or the disingenuous people like yourself who support it.

 

[JoeB131]

Or we can let them bake for who they want to bake. Free country. Sports are essential. We pay for them via RE Taxes. You don’t have kids you don’t get it

We can let the trannies play for whatever team they want to. Free country.

Sports aren't essential.

We also pay for public services for baker, hense, why it's a public accommodation.

Scientology is now in its 70th year…..

Scientology is a cult. Not even comparable.

I disagree. I think there will always be people who have no moral qualms about objecting to child sexual mutilation or the disingenuous people like yourself who support it.

Nobody is mutilating children. in fact, most transgender kids can't even get hormone treatments.

 

[el midgetron]

Scientology is a cult. Not even comparable.

Transgender ideology is worse than a cult. Cults usually involve faith-based belief systems. Cults recognize their claims are subjective truths. Transgender ideology believes it’s an objective belief system. Or at a minimum a belief system that they think should be imposed above objective reality.

Tom Cruise could explain the beliefs of Scientology. You can’t even define what a woman is.

 

[WEATHER53]

Guys against girls is for pusses, wierdos and cucks who cannot achieve victory by any other means

 

[JoeB131]

Transgender ideology is worse than a cult. Cults usually involve faith-based belief systems. Cults recognize their claims are subjective truths. Transgender ideology believes it’s an objective belief system. Or at a minimum a belief system that should be imposed above objective reality.

Tom Cruise could explain the beliefs of Scientology. You can’t even define what a woman is.

Sure I can, just not the definition you like.

While there is no evidence that Evil Space Lord Zenu dropped frozen aliens into volcanos, there is plenty of evidence that the brains of transgender people function like that of their identified gender.

 

[el midgetron]

Sure I can, just not the definition you like.

Then do it.

A non-definition is not a “definition”. This is just more engaging in fantasy on your part.

While there is no evidence that Evil Space Lord Zenu dropped frozen aliens into volcanos, there is plenty of evidence that the brains of transgender people function like that of their identified gender.

How is that even possible if gender is a social construct? In a very short time, transgender ideology has collapsed in upon its self. The fundamental concept of transgender ideology is that sex and gender are distinct and separate. You just back peddled into the dichotomy I asked about in my first post here.

If the gendered brain is real, then why aren’t they using those parameters to identify what children are actually transgender? The answer is because no one who believes this nonsense cares. The word of a 4 year old is good enough for you.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

We can let the trannies play for whatever team they want to. Free country.

Sports aren't essential.

We also pay for public services for baker, hense, why it's a public accommodation.



Scientology is a cult. Not even comparable.



Nobody is mutilating children. in fact, most transgender kids can't even get hormone treatments.

No we can’t because they put females at risk. You’re arguing just to argue