NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 26,304
- 5,544
- 245
What lie? There is no lie in what I said: Define it if you think it is there.I have often made the point that you are a liar, but never as strongly as you just did
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What lie? There is no lie in what I said: Define it if you think it is there.I have often made the point that you are a liar, but never as strongly as you just did
Correll wrote: I made several points supporting my claim of different treatment. 22JAN20-POST#0933
NFBW wrote: That is impossible because you have not made the foundational case that there is an equivalence of the worst of the Chauvin rioters to compare to the ProudBoyBIGGS and “Elmer of the Oath Keepers” worst type and highest rank of the J6 rioter. There is nothing to compare. How did you make a point of comparison. You are a liar Correll . You made no point. It is not possible. 22JAN20-POST#0939
Whar lie? There is no lie in what I said: Define it if you think it is there.
YOu cut the context, thus completely changing the meaning of my post, and addressed teh new meaning.
That's a rule violation. Report himYOu cut the context, thus completely changing the meaning of my post, and addressed teh new meaning.
You are a liar, and an asshole.
You cannot compare the treatment to non-comparable groups, dumb ass. To say you did it is therefore a lie.I compared the treatment of the two groups of rioters.
That's a rule violation. Report him
why can't he? that isn't a logical statement. are you ok?You cannot compare the treatment to non-comparable groups, dumb ass. To say you did it is therefore a lie.
What other meaning of “That makes logical sense.” Is out there?Really tough to have a structured conversation with a demofk whose intentions is just to be a dick every post.
He can’t use it to make a point in an argument because it is meaningless and a waste of my time because it is absurd just like your question.why can't he? that isn't a logical statement. are you ok?
No two historical events are identical. That fact allows the sleazy lying progs to claim they aren't comparable whenever you point out their hypocrisy. It's a weasel, and nothing more.why can't he? that isn't a logical statement. are you ok?
What other meaning of “That makes logical sense.” Is out there? You are obviously confused about what context actual is.
this is just a click away
You cannot compare the treatment to non-comparable groups, dumb ass. To say you did it is therefore a lie.
What other meaning of “That makes logical sense.” Is out there?
I’m waiting Correll might need help on this
so only you get to set the debating rules? hahahaahahahahahaha Thanks for proving my post.He can’t use it to make a point in an argument because it is meaningless and a waste of my time because it is absurd just like your question.
Thats not a debating rule - It is a fact.so only you get to set the debating rules?
YOu are lying. You don't need to wait. My point was explained in the portion of my quote that you cut
Thats not a debating rule - It is a fact.