NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 26,284
- 5,530
- 245
You are a liar. I quoted Correll verbatim.And said he said something he didn’t
if you think I didn’t cut and paste the evidence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are a liar. I quoted Correll verbatim.And said he said something he didn’t
And then you posted the lie. I gave you your post
You are a dumbassed liar. You wrote Secretary of State plain as a fucking sunny day in Yuma AzNope, not me, state legislature has that right
There is no lie in that post and I explained - if you see a lie in there cut and paste whatever yiou think is a lie so I can refute you.And then you posted the lie. I gave you your post
NFBW wrote: STRENGTH IN NUMBERS of a mob IS A WEAPON - TRUMP got the NUMBERS there on Jan6 22JAN19-POST#0919
Correll wrote: Sorry. That makes logical sense. but I have spent years here, discussing issues with leftards, and when it is your side with the mob, vs smaller numbers or individuals of our side, that was never accepted. - - - So, you don't get claim that now. 22JAN20-POST#0926
NFBW wrote: Did you write on January 20 in post 926 that my statement “STRENGTH IN NUMBERS of a mob IS A WEAPON - TRUMP got the NUMBERS there on Jan6” makes logical sense?
So after that I wrote that you concur that DJT supplied the weapon on Jan6 and you call that a lie. You are an idiot. And your buddy jc456 is an idiot too. No wonder you are Trump voters 22JAN19-POST#0985
I took nothing you wrote out of context. You are a liar.,I wrote a good deal on jan 20th. That you want to take a portion of what I wrote out of context, and address that as though it was my final point, instead of just part of my supporting logic,
I took nothing you wrote out of context. You are a liar.,
I wrote a good deal on jan 20th. That you want to take a portion of what I wrote out of context, and address that as though it was my final point, instead of just part of my supporting logic
What exactly is out of context when you write that anything makes logical sense?
If it makes sense it always makes sense - it can’t mean it does not make sense
I’m not addressing that as though it was your final point. Your final point is what it is and it includes a sub point we agree on because it makes logical sense. Strength in numbers is a weapon and DJT brought the advantage of strength in numbers to DC on Jan6. - - - This is in writing - context is what included 22JAN21-POST#0990
NFBW wrote: STRENGTH IN NUMBERS of a mob IS A WEAPON - TRUMP got the NUMBERS there on Jan6 22JAN19-POST#0919
Correll wrote: Sorry. That makes logical sense. but I have spent years here, discussing issues with leftards, and when it is your side with the mob, vs smaller numbers or individuals of our side, that was never accepted. - - - So, you don't get claim that now. 22JAN20-POST#0926
NFBW wrote: Did you write on January 20 in post 926 that my statement “STRENGTH IN NUMBERS of a mob IS A WEAPON - TRUMP got the NUMBERS there on Jan6” makes logical sense
NFBW wrote: Did you write on January 20 in post 926 that my statement “strength in numbers of a mob is a weapon - Trump got the numbers there on Jan6” makes logical sense? 22JAN19-POST#0985
Correll wrote: I wrote a good deal on Jan 20th. 22JAN20-POST#0986
NFBW wrote: That’s great but not what you were asked. In all that writing Correll , did you write on January 20 in post 926 that my statement “strength in numbers of a mob is a weapon - Trump got the numbers there on Jan6” makes logical sense? Yes or No? 22JAN22-POST#0991
NFBW wrote: Did you write on January 20 in post 926 that my statement “strength in numbers of a mob is a weapon - Trump got the numbers there on Jan6” makes logical sense? 22JAN19-POST#0985
Correll wrote: That you want to take a portion of what I wrote out of context, and address that as though it was my final point, instead of just part of my supporting logic, is you being a liar and an asshole. 22JAN20-POST#0986
NFBW wrote: No I do not want any part of that. I want you to answer what you were asked Correll . Did you write on January 20 in post 926 that my statement “strength in numbers of a mob is a weapon - Trump got the numbers there on Jan6” makes logical sense? Yes or No? 22JAN22-POST#0992
Did you order the code red?NFBW wrote: Did you Correll write on January 20 in post 926 that my statement “strength in numbers of a mob is a weapon - Trump got the numbers there on Jan6” makes logical sense? I don’t want your opinions on all kinds of unrelated trivial shit - JUST Yes or no? 22JAN19-POST#0998
NFBW wrote: the 20,000 to 30,000 protesters that Trump lured to DC were one unified weapon of the insurrection whether they individually breached the Capitol or not. Correll is absolutely stunned that he put in writing that the concept that Trump brought the weapon on Jan 6 makes logical sense 22JAN19-POST#1000Did you order the code red?