Rice acknowledges some of her Benghazi info was incorrect but has no regrets

[Clementine]

Rice acknowledges some of her Benghazi info was incorrect but has no regrets | Fox News

Wow, the lies from these leftist assholes never ******* ends. And they don't even care.

they made up the story about the movie, only a complete buffoon buys that.



Rice said “No,” when Gregory asked whether she had any regrets about her statements.

Rice said the Benghazi attacks appeared to be a "spontaneous reaction” to an anti-Islamic video on the Internet.




At least that ***** got a great job and the spouse of those murdered have a nice warm tombstone to snuggle with.

I don't ever expect this regime to apologize for lying. They are mad they were caught and still trying to spin it.

Lying about the cause of the attacks is really bad because it looks like they were making stuff up to protect radical Muslims. Not cool. I just hope in the end it wasn't because they knew about the planned attack and were complacent.

We should have been aggressive at finding those responsible, yet the only one Hillary vowed to get was the filmmaker.

More negative remarks were made about the anti-Muslim film than about the subhuman pieces of scum that committed the murders. That alone is telling. I was shocked at the mindset of people in the Obama administration. When the lie fell through, they became defensive and we still don't have answers. The false talking points are still circulating, but those have been debunked. Obama supposedly hears everything on the news like the rest of us. Such bullshit. He started telling the lie about the film maker right away and won't say who spun that lie. Being he, Hillary and Rice are the only ones who stated that, it's safe to say that one of them, or all of them, conspired to mislead the American people and protect the terrorists.

Polls show that the majority of Americans still want questions answered about Benghazi and want congress to continue investigating.

Sorry, Lamestreamers: Most Americans Believe Benghazi Investigation Should Continue | Independent Journal Review

 

[Two Thumbs]

Rice acknowledges some of her Benghazi info was incorrect but has no regrets | Fox News

Wow, the lies from these leftist assholes never ******* ends. And they don't even care.

they made up the story about the movie, only a complete buffoon buys that.



Rice said “No,” when Gregory asked whether she had any regrets about her statements.

Rice said the Benghazi attacks appeared to be a "spontaneous reaction” to an anti-Islamic video on the Internet.




At least that ***** got a great job and the spouse of those murdered have a nice warm tombstone to snuggle with.

so then there is no news here. Good to know, but you keep on squeezing those butt cheeks hoping something magical will come out

actually you're right

libs not caring that they lied to the country isn't news. guess it's ok they ruined that video directors life with their lies, but it was just him, just one man.

 

[The Rabbi]

Rice acknowledges some of her Benghazi info was incorrect but has no regrets | Fox News

Wow, the lies from these leftist assholes never ******* ends. And they don't even care.

they made up the story about the movie, only a complete buffoon buys that.



Rice said “No,” when Gregory asked whether she had any regrets about her statements.

Rice said the Benghazi attacks appeared to be a "spontaneous reaction” to an anti-Islamic video on the Internet.




At least that ***** got a great job and the spouse of those murdered have a nice warm tombstone to snuggle with.

Rice's comments had nothing to do with the four deaths in Benghazi. She could have claimed Puff the Magic Dragon was responsible, it wouldn't have changed what happed.

To call her a ****, and insinuate that the spouses "have a nice warm tombstone to snuggle with" is somehow Rice's fault, makes you quite a despicable individual.

Yes, Rice flat out lied. But instead of foaming at the mouth over who lied about a video, let's concentrate on figuring out who planned and carried out the attacks.

"At this point what difference does it make?"

 

[Two Thumbs]

Rice acknowledges some of her Benghazi info was incorrect but has no regrets | Fox News

Wow, the lies from these leftist assholes never ******* ends. And they don't even care.

they made up the story about the movie, only a complete buffoon buys that.



Rice said “No,” when Gregory asked whether she had any regrets about her statements.

Rice said the Benghazi attacks appeared to be a "spontaneous reaction” to an anti-Islamic video on the Internet.




At least that ***** got a great job and the spouse of those murdered have a nice warm tombstone to snuggle with.

"that *****" has at least 50 IQ points beyond yours, she is better educated and busted through the glass ceiling on talent, hard work and people skills. No wonder you call her a "*****", morons like you must feel so inadequate when a women of color has credentials which far exceed anything you could dream of, and is light years beyond anything you have ever done.

so it's ok to be a lying degenerate as long as she is a she and a person of color.

that's a whole new kind of pathetic


nice try to make this about race and sex though. guess you saw that trying to use bush and mitt failed so you broke out the older stuff.

 

[The Rabbi]

Rice acknowledges some of her Benghazi info was incorrect but has no regrets | Fox News

Wow, the lies from these leftist assholes never ******* ends. And they don't even care.

they made up the story about the movie, only a complete buffoon buys that.



Rice said “No,” when Gregory asked whether she had any regrets about her statements.

Rice said the Benghazi attacks appeared to be a "spontaneous reaction” to an anti-Islamic video on the Internet.




At least that ***** got a great job and the spouse of those murdered have a nice warm tombstone to snuggle with.

"that *****" has at least 50 IQ points beyond yours, she is better educated and busted through the glass ceiling on talent, hard work and people skills. No wonder you call her a "*****", morons like you must feel so inadequate when a women of color has credentials which far exceed anything you could dream of, and is light years beyond anything you have ever done.

so it's ok to be a lying degenerate as long as she is a she and a person of color.

that's a whole new kind of pathetic


nice try to make this about race and sex though. guess you saw that trying to use bush and mitt failed so you broke out the older stuff.

She is a very accomplished liar. That seems to be the main criterion for a job in this administration.

 

[Sallow]

Bush lied 5000 died....shrug...

...won't even get into Iraqi civilians...

And yet every investigation into the supposed lying of Bush ruled no lying, Go figure. Including one done by the democrats. Further in order to believe Bush lied one must assume Clinton and his entire Administration lied before Bush as well as the French, German and English Governments.

One must assume that since independent briefings are given to Congress separate from the President that every member of the Democratic party that voted for force was lying as well.

Lot of liars there dumb ass.

Link?

 

[Sallow]

Rice acknowledges some of her Benghazi info was incorrect but has no regrets | Fox News

Wow, the lies from these leftist assholes never ******* ends. And they don't even care.

they made up the story about the movie, only a complete buffoon buys that.



Rice said “No,” when Gregory asked whether she had any regrets about her statements.

Rice said the Benghazi attacks appeared to be a "spontaneous reaction” to an anti-Islamic video on the Internet.




At least that ***** got a great job and the spouse of those murdered have a nice warm tombstone to snuggle with.

"that *****" has at least 50 IQ points beyond yours, she is better educated and busted through the glass ceiling on talent, hard work and people skills. No wonder you call her a "*****", morons like you must feel so inadequate when a women of color has credentials which far exceed anything you could dream of, and is light years beyond anything you have ever done.

so it's ok to be a lying degenerate as long as she is a she and a person of color.

that's a whole new kind of pathetic


nice try to make this about race and sex though. guess you saw that trying to use bush and mitt failed so you broke out the older stuff.

She's not a degenerate and she didn't lie at all.

You guys make up whole new definitions for words that have nothing to do with English.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0x6vIAtFcI]English, ************, do you speak it? - YouTube[/ame]

 

[ScienceRocks]

We spend 600 billion a year so I can have my freedom of speech. If you think what Obama did was ok then you might not value it.

 

[Claudette]

When a supposition comes along that the common commie can't handle ^^^^^^^^^^^ then simply blame Bush. I hate Bush but even I can see that this overused nonsense is just a crutch too often used by commie heathens to simply brush the actual subject into a corner so that it may be ignored by other commie filth. Next, a circle jerk and a May Day parade.

Yup. Its called deflect, deflect and deflect again.

Anytime someone on this board says something negative about Barry and his pack of boobs the next thing you get is 9-11, the Iraq war and Bush.

Of course its kinda hard to defend the current jackass in chief, Hilbat and the pack of boobs that Barry surrounds himself with. Its much easier to blame Bush.

Barry is a failure as POTUS but what can one expect from a law professor/part time senator/community organizer? He was no more fit to be POTUS than my dog. Oh wait. My dog would have done a better job.

 

[Sallow]

When a supposition comes along that the common commie can't handle ^^^^^^^^^^^ then simply blame Bush. I hate Bush but even I can see that this overused nonsense is just a crutch too often used by commie heathens to simply brush the actual subject into a corner so that it may be ignored by other commie filth. Next, a circle jerk and a May Day parade.

Yup. Its called deflect, deflect and deflect again.

Anytime someone on this board says something negative about Barry and his pack of boobs the next thing you get is 9-11, the Iraq war and Bush.

Of course its kinda hard to defend the current jackass in chief, Hilbat and the pack of boobs that Barry surrounds himself with. Its much easier to blame Bush.

Barry is a failure as POTUS but what can one expect from a law professor/part time senator/community organizer? He was no more fit to be POTUS than my dog. Oh wait. My dog would have done a better job.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-CAcdta_8I]Falwell and Robertson on The 700 Club after 9/11 - YouTube[/ame]

You guys blame Americans for terrorist attacks.

 

[TooTall]

Bush, Iraq, no WMD, 4,000 Americans died, plus a few dozen thousand Iraqis (probably more), trillions of dollars squandered, millions of lives changed or ruined.

No remorse, no apology, not even a Rick Perry "oops".

At least these two prominent Democrats apologized, or did they?

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

 

[TooTall]

Why did the CIA refuse more security? Why did Congress allow nations the embassies are located provide security instead of the US? Budget cuts?

The CIA didn't refuse more security, the State Department was responsible for the security. They had sufficient funds, merely the wrong priorities where to spend it.
It is the host countries responsiblity to provide security for other countries embassies and consulates.
Several other countries and the Red Cross had closed down operations in Benghazi due to the instability of the new government. Once again, a poor decision on the part of the State Department to stay open and not provide additional security.

 

[RandomVariable]

Why did the CIA refuse more security? Why did Congress allow nations the embassies are located provide security instead of the US? Budget cuts?

The CIA didn't refuse more security, the State Department was responsible for the security. They had sufficient funds, merely the wrong priorities where to spend it.
It is the host countries responsiblity to provide security for other countries embassies and consulates.
Several other countries and the Red Cross had closed down operations in Benghazi due to the instability of the new government. Once again, a poor decision on the part of the State Department to stay open and not provide additional security.

So again, what was so important that Ambassador Stevens would fly into what was practically a war zone the day before September 11th and stay overnight? Wasn't he the one trying to let everyone know how dangerous the place was? Was he trying to prove a point?

 

[Sallow]

Why did the CIA refuse more security? Why did Congress allow nations the embassies are located provide security instead of the US? Budget cuts?

The CIA didn't refuse more security, the State Department was responsible for the security. They had sufficient funds, merely the wrong priorities where to spend it.
It is the host countries responsiblity to provide security for other countries embassies and consulates.
Several other countries and the Red Cross had closed down operations in Benghazi due to the instability of the new government. Once again, a poor decision on the part of the State Department to stay open and not provide additional security.

So again, what was so important that Ambassador Stevens would fly into what was practically a war zone the day before September 11th and stay overnight? Wasn't he the one trying to let everyone know how dangerous the place was? Was he trying to prove a point?

Yeah..that's one of those "inconvenient" points that never gets address.

Along with:

-Why did the CIA set up an outpost inside a diplomatic consulate?
-What were 2 CIA operatives (Because, let's face it, those guys were CIA) doing there?
-Why did the story of holding prisoners get squashed?

I mean, conservatives opened up an ugly anthill. But absolutely refuse to see the damage they did.

 

[Sallow]

Bush, Iraq, no WMD, 4,000 Americans died, plus a few dozen thousand Iraqis (probably more), trillions of dollars squandered, millions of lives changed or ruined.

No remorse, no apology, not even a Rick Perry "oops".

At least these two prominent Democrats apologized, or did they?

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

Why should they apologize?

They were lied too by President George W. Bush.

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

Sweet mother of Jesus - make it stop already.

 

[Sallow]

Sweet mother of Jesus - make it stop already.

You can bet your bottom dollar this is going to be around forever.

Look at the Civil war. Conservatives got their asses roundly kicked in that, but you never see them giving up on it.

 

[Freewill]

Sweet mother of Jesus - make it stop already.

You can bet your bottom dollar this is going to be around forever.

Look at the Civil war. Conservatives got their asses roundly kicked in that, but you never see them giving up on it.

Sorry, you are wrong once again. The union was conserved and the black man was freed. Definitely not a liberal endeavor. You all put them in chains.

 

[BlindBoo]

Bush lied 5000 died....shrug...

...won't even get into Iraqi civilians...

And yet every investigation into the supposed lying of Bush ruled no lying, Go figure. Including one done by the democrats. Further in order to believe Bush lied one must assume Clinton and his entire Administration lied before Bush as well as the French, German and English Governments.

One must assume that since independent briefings are given to Congress separate from the President that every member of the Democratic party that voted for force was lying as well.

Lot of liars there dumb ass.

Lie by Lie: A Timeline of How We Got Into Iraq | Mother Jones

The other Rice floated the Aluminum Tube as evidence of a nuclear program in her talking point on many Sunday shows knowing full well they were not. That Rice was not demonized for lying but promoted to SoS. Republicans are such hypocrites.

 

[RandomVariable]

The CIA didn't refuse more security, the State Department was responsible for the security. They had sufficient funds, merely the wrong priorities where to spend it.
It is the host countries responsiblity to provide security for other countries embassies and consulates.
Several other countries and the Red Cross had closed down operations in Benghazi due to the instability of the new government. Once again, a poor decision on the part of the State Department to stay open and not provide additional security.

So again, what was so important that Ambassador Stevens would fly into what was practically a war zone the day before September 11th and stay overnight? Wasn't he the one trying to let everyone know how dangerous the place was? Was he trying to prove a point?

Yeah..that's one of those "inconvenient" points that never gets address.

Along with:

-Why did the CIA set up an outpost inside a diplomatic consulate?
-What were 2 CIA operatives (Because, let's face it, those guys were CIA) doing there?
-Why did the story of holding prisoners get squashed?

I mean, conservatives opened up an ugly anthill. But absolutely refuse to see the damage they did.

A question I would like answered is who was it exactly who decided the FBI could not have access to the compound until long after any useful evidence would have gone.