Revolting middle class. If the rich keep funding war with the lives of the lower classes, I wonder w

Quality in governance is not directly related to the size of the governing entity.
Actually, it is pretty much directly related.

Every time government has started expansding without bound, taxes have risen, debt has soared, and regulations and restrictions have exploded, costing people more and more time and efforts for no real improvement.

Sort of like the U.S. government since the 1930s.
Biggies Are Piggies

Libretardians keep ignoring the dishonesty of applying principles to only one side. Whatever is said about Big Government must be said about Big Business. All the rules corporate parasites make, such as not paying recruited future employees while they are in college, have the force of law.
 
"Revolting Middle Class".

Forgive the diversion here, but when I saw that title, I thought of a great line from "I Love Lucy".

Lucy & Ethel felt they were being taken for granted by Ricky & Fred, and decided to do something about it.

Lucy: "Ricky, Ethel and I are revolting."

Ricky: "No, honey, you can be a little annoying, but you're not that bad".

:laugh:
.
 
No one has a right to set his sons up halfway to the finish line.

There are no real anti-nepotism laws that I know of so if we do not have that right, who is not enforcing it.

You obviously think that aristocracy means "the best runners."

Not at all but in our society, they are fitter than those in the lower demographic levels in terms of survivability.
That is why the poor want to be rich and the rich do not want to be poor.

So you deny that it means unearned hereditary power and position, which ensures that the best runners won't win.

Again, we are not judging fitness by physical prowess but on overall survivability.

I would not say that it is unearned in all cases but in some cases I am sure that that word applies.

Eventually, the society is totally dependent on birth,

That is just beginning in the present generation of those who have inherited great wealth.

They are guaranteed to earn more of a % than the rest of us and yes, that means that we will in effect be living under oligarchs and basically Royalty gained by birth.

That is why a workers party is so important as they are the mainstay of the country and not the rich oligarchs.

Regards
DL
The "rule of law" has become the law of the rulers. We must take back the law into our own hands and abolish birth privileges, such as living off Daddy's Money in college. Your loyal-peassnt refusal to give each generation a fresh start means you have been sidetracked into irrelevance.
 
Get rid of the lower class parasites
Preppies' Pet Pit Bulls

They are empowered by HeirHead upper-class parasites, who use them against the White majority. This scheme also benefits the born-rich "Conservatives," who can pretend to oppose their Liberal fraternity brothers and get votes that way. The united preordained ruling class is playing out a Bad Cop, Good Cop scenario on us.
 
The U. S. needs a third party to draw both overextended wings in and that should be a worker’s party.
I agree that both major political parties are shit, but "worker's party" sound just too communist for my taste. Sorry.

Why not just support the Libertarian Party? (I know they suck right now)

Limited government is the answer to all these problems.

Because libertarians are the polar opposite of a "worker's party".

I'd actually like the see Democrats and Republicans replaced by the Libertarians and straight-up socialists. Then we could have a real debate over where we want to go as a nation. As it is, the Ds and Rs are just feeding us to their war machine.
 
Get rid of the lower class parasites
Preppies' Pet Pit Bulls

They are empowered by HeirHead upper-class parasites, who use them against the White majority. This scheme also benefits the born-rich "Conservatives," who can pretend to oppose their Liberal fraternity brothers and get votes that way. The united preordained ruling class is playing out a Bad Cop, Good Cop scenario on us.
[emoji41]
8be029e5aacb0bcf13a26829f848f3a9.jpg
 
Revolting middle class. If the rich keep funding war with the lives of the lower classes, I wonder when the lower classes will revolt.

I would like to think, soonest is best, thanks to the left being too far left of the political spectrum, and the right being too far right.

The U. S. needs a third party to draw both overextended wings in and that should be a worker’s party.

If the worst affected by war, the middle and working classes, do not form a third party to represent the wealth creating demography of the country do nothing revolutionary, the dumbing down of the middle has worked quite well and the nation has no heart or love of self.

If the average working man or woman is not to be represented by either Democrats or Republicans, and are too dumbed down to see the requirement to be represented as important, and continue with their antiquated two party system, then you my dear Yankee friends, have devolved into quite a revolting and heartless middle and working classes.

You are even more revolting than the rich C S sons of bitches that don’t care for your welfare at all. The rich do not give any thought to your welfare, even as you enrich them more and more daily. It seems to me that you match their mind set by not giving a thought to your own long term welfare or about what kind of American Nightmare you are giving your children.

Bring the rich to heel or face a nuclear war. It’s your revolting choice.

Regards
DL
We have an all volunteer military. How do you revolt against something you aren't forced into?

By recognizing that it is evil and seeking the good.

In this case, the good of the soldiers parents being represented in their political party that has thrown them over for cash and corruption.

Regards
DL
 
The U. S. needs a third party to draw both overextended wings in and that should be a worker’s party.
I agree that both major political parties are shit, but "worker's party" sound just too communist for my taste. Sorry.

Why not just support the Libertarian Party? (I know they suck right now)

Limited government is the answer to all these problems.

Because libertarians are the polar opposite of a "worker's party".

I'd actually like the see Democrats and Republicans replaced by the Libertarians and straight-up socialists. Then we could have a real debate over where we want to go as a nation. As it is, the Ds and Rs are just feeding us to their war machine.

In Political Theater, Names Are Costumes

Do you really expect us to believe you believe that a clique of elitist snobs, who want to tyrannize the proletariat if they take over the labor movement, literally represents a "workers' party"?
 
U R making about as much sense as a Chevy Mustang.
If you were rich you would not give away your money.
Everyone wants to be rich.
Everyone wants money.
Everyone takes every tax break that they can get.
The Corrupt Democratic Party is anti-middle class and hating the rich doesn't help the middle class.
 
Revolting middle class. If the rich keep funding war with the lives of the lower classes, I wonder when the lower classes will revolt.

I would like to think, soonest is best, thanks to the left being too far left of the political spectrum, and the right being too far right.

The U. S. needs a third party to draw both overextended wings in and that should be a worker’s party.

If the worst affected by war, the middle and working classes, do not form a third party to represent the wealth creating demography of the country do nothing revolutionary, the dumbing down of the middle has worked quite well and the nation has no heart or love of self.

If the average working man or woman is not to be represented by either Democrats or Republicans, and are too dumbed down to see the requirement to be represented as important, and continue with their antiquated two party system, then you my dear Yankee friends, have devolved into quite a revolting and heartless middle and working classes.

You are even more revolting than the rich C S sons of bitches that don’t care for your welfare at all. The rich do not give any thought to your welfare, even as you enrich them more and more daily. It seems to me that you match their mind set by not giving a thought to your own long term welfare or about what kind of American Nightmare you are giving your children.

Bring the rich to heel or face a nuclear war. It’s your revolting choice.

Regards
DL
Pound Every Preppy's Pampered Piehole Into Pulp

Aristocracy and democracy cannot coexist. We must force the 1% to abolish all birth privileges. This won't become a land of opportunity until the son of a millionaire has just as much chance of winding up being a blue-collar worker as the son of a blue-collar worker does.

Don't argue with the pathetic mindless bootlickers. They are driven by the childish neurosis of hating their Daddies for not getting rich and spoiling them.
North Korea is already doing everything that you want. Everyone is equal and everything is free in North Korea.
 
Revolting middle class. If the rich keep funding war with the lives of the lower classes, I wonder when the lower classes will revolt.

I would like to think, soonest is best, thanks to the left being too far left of the political spectrum, and the right being too far right.

The U. S. needs a third party to draw both overextended wings in and that should be a worker’s party.

If the worst affected by war, the middle and working classes, do not form a third party to represent the wealth creating demography of the country do nothing revolutionary, the dumbing down of the middle has worked quite well and the nation has no heart or love of self.

If the average working man or woman is not to be represented by either Democrats or Republicans, and are too dumbed down to see the requirement to be represented as important, and continue with their antiquated two party system, then you my dear Yankee friends, have devolved into quite a revolting and heartless middle and working classes.

You are even more revolting than the rich C S sons of bitches that don’t care for your welfare at all. The rich do not give any thought to your welfare, even as you enrich them more and more daily. It seems to me that you match their mind set by not giving a thought to your own long term welfare or about what kind of American Nightmare you are giving your children.

Bring the rich to heel or face a nuclear war. It’s your revolting choice.

Regards
DL
Pound Every Preppy's Pampered Piehole Into Pulp

Aristocracy and democracy cannot coexist. We must force the 1% to abolish all birth privileges. This won't become a land of opportunity until the son of a millionaire has just as much chance of winding up being a blue-collar worker as the son of a blue-collar worker does.

Don't argue with the pathetic mindless bootlickers. They are driven by the childish neurosis of hating their Daddies for not getting rich and spoiling them.
North Korea is already doing everything that you want. Everyone is equal and everything is free in North Korea.
A Mirror Image: Different From Left to Right, But the Same Ugliness

I put my life on the line against the Commies, your Masters' sons didn't. So they, just like their Campus Commie Classmates, lie about equal opportunity. Through the power of numbers, we must forc the Chickenhawk Preppies to practice what they preach.
 
The U. S. needs a third party to draw both overextended wings in and that should be a worker’s party.
I agree that both major political parties are shit, but "worker's party" sound just too communist for my taste. Sorry.

Why not just support the Libertarian Party? (I know they suck right now)

Limited government is the answer to all these problems.

Because libertarians are the polar opposite of a "worker's party".

I'd actually like the see Democrats and Republicans replaced by the Libertarians and straight-up socialists. Then we could have a real debate over where we want to go as a nation. As it is, the Ds and Rs are just feeding us to their war machine.

In Political Theater, Names Are Costumes

Do you really expect us to believe you believe that a clique of elitist snobs, who want to tyrannize the proletariat if they take over the labor movement, literally represents a "workers' party"?

I'm not sure what you're asking. What clique of elitist snobs want to take over the labor movement?
 

Forum List

Back
Top