Revisionist history focusing on 1/6 is getting louder.

[Mr. Friscus]

But they didn't halt the SCOTUS.

See the difference?

They intended to… and attempted to. Isn’t that what the standards are?

Things are getting VERY specific.. did it have to be on a weekday?

 

[EMH]

LOL

Hundreds of trials?? Every one was because not a single juror could find them guilty as charged?

And what about all the others who pled guilty. They did that so their lives wouldn't be on danger too?

You sound paranoid and insane.

Why did James T Justis get off???

https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/12/politics/oath-keeper-jesus-christ-superstar-acquitted/index.html

Maybe because he is a GAY LEFT WING Broadway fraud who joined Oath Keepers 2 weeks before 1/6....?

Maybe because he did a threesome with homO and Big Mike???

 

[Faun]

Nobody was in charge of security of the Capitol and the grounds?

Said no one ever.

The Capitol Police Board is responsible for that.

 

[elektra]

There's a grand total of zero evidence that Pelosi knew about Trump's "offer." Which was not really an offer anyway.

There is plenty of evidence, you just refuse to acknowledge it.

 

[BackAgain]

You are being coy here.
You forgot to mention that these "procedural grounds" were that Trump's attorneys couldn't produce any actual credible evidence when asked for it, to demonstrate the fraud they were alleging.

Speaking of zero credibility, you don't present any evidence here that the statement is false....other than your (typical) prissy boy queen assertion that it is false.
How about providing some actual credible substance to prove your assertion?

Another EPIC FAIL by intheButtAgain!

You are being a dishonest douche again.

But what else is new?

The fail, as always, is yours.

 

[MagicMike]

I never said there was an insurrection, so you are wrong on the first part of your premise.

I never blamed an insurrection on Pelosi so the second part of your statement is wrong.

I never said some who took part in the protest, smashed windows, opened locked doors, fought with the Capitol Police are not guilty.

Where do you get off at asking a question that insinuates and have said things I have not said.

MagicMike, you have proved that you have no comprehension or are simply clutching at straws trying to prove your opinion has some basis in fact.

Nice moonwalk there.

 

[Faun]

How many Mossad would be put in front of firing squads if patriotic Americans (instead of Zionist Fascist Traitors) were actually put in charge at FBI and DOJ?

Zero. They have smaller balls than Hamas.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Now you’re saying if anything delays a vote, it’s sedition.

It's not just me saying it... I'm just reflecting what the law says about it...

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy​

​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.​

LOL… you’re reaching big time. This law was not intended to deal with random rioters. You’re trying to fit a medium shirt into an XL body.

 

[elektra]

Said no one ever.

The Capitol Police Board is responsible for that.

and the hip bone is connected to the back bone...

and Nancy Pelosi is responsible for the Capitol Police Board, the Sergeant at Arms who is member of the board reports directly to Nancy Pelosi. He dont even have to get in a car or on the phone, he just walks across the hall to her office.

and during an emergency, the Sergeant at Arms reports to Nancy Pelosi the second he is aware of a problem,

Nancy Pelosi failed to protect the Capitol

 

[BackAgain]

Does anyone remember the last time MangledDick posted on topic? Or with any supporting facts or links? Or even with a hint of intelligence?

No?

There’s a reason for that.

While bug is busy trying his hand at historical revisionism while accusing others of the very thing about which he is guilty, MangledDick isn’t even willing to get that close to the topic.

 

[lantern2814]

You are welcome to factually dispute the evidence about 1/6 that is in the public sphere. But we both know you can't.

SInce you have NO facts and your precious committee destroyed all their proven FABRICATED “evidence” rather than comply with demands to turn it over, we all know you will just continue to lie and whine. We all know you aren’t capable of handling the truth of the matter. Continue whining....

 

[Faun]

I need evidence to show that we do not have all the information the legislative branch of government has, or more specifically the Speaker of the House.

You are acting the fool

Translation: you can't back your bullshit because it's bullshit

 

[Faun]

Google is not the arbiter of truth.

WTF??

Who said anything about google??

And YOU are definitely not the arbiter of truth.

Post a link to a verifiable website confirming your claims.

 

[elektra]

WTF??

Who said anything about google??

And YOU are definitely not the arbiter of truth.

Post a link to a verifiable website confirming your claims.

You just did,

Google is not the arbiter of truth.

 

[Faun]

Yet, there is a leader of congress, the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The person who is 2nd in line to become president, after the vice president.

2nd in line, that alone shows who is in charge and the most powerful person in congress. Tasked with ensuring the security of the Capitol

Being second in line to the president does not make the Speaker the leader of Congress.

You're mental. Even funnier, this lie of yours is the foundation of your bullshit. Which now explains why you cling to it so desperately. Because even you know your house of cards collapses without that absurdity.

 

[Faun]

You just did,

Google is not the arbiter of truth.

Retard, I said don't post a link to Google. I said post a link to a verifiable site.

 

[elektra]

Being second in line to the president does not make the Speaker the leader of Congress.

You're mental. Even funnier, this lie of yours is the foundation of your bullshit. Which now explains why you cling to it so desperately. Because even you know your house of cards collapses without that absurdity

Who does the Sergeant at Arms report to and why

 

[elektra]

Retard, I said don't post a link to Google. I said post a link to a verifiable site.

Websites are found with Google
Verifiable? What the fuck is that, a site approved by democrats?
Google is not the arbiter of truth.

 

[Marener]

Who does the Sergeant at Arms report to and why

Which one?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The MAGA stooges have no evidence that there was a steal and that the riot was not a riot.