007
Charter Member
PI's point needs no defending. It's based in fact and logic. Disputing it is defending the indefensible pard.
...and what is his point? Because it sounds like a ill-conceived, poorly written rant that is quite far removed from making a strong case about homosexuality, acceptance of different sexual orientations, culture, law...
so since you do understand it, can you state the argument simply?
In other words, he has to "dumb it down" for you to be able to understand it.