Retire The Record

[Flanders]

You can argue which president was the worst. You can argue which president was the biggest liar or the most corrupt. You can even argue which president was the dumbest, but there is no doubt that Taqiyya the Liar created the worst administrations in America’s history bar none.

Forget every freakazoid the president empowered except his two secretaries of state —— Clinton and Kerry —— and his two US Ambassadors to the United Nations —— Suzy Five Shows and Samantha Power —— and future historians need look no further than the years 2009 through 2016 to find the worst administrations in history. They were so bad, the record for worst administration should be retired. The ultimate proof: America will not survive long enough for a worse administration to take the record away from the Chicago sewer rat.

Evidence

The United Nations 2030 Agenda endorsed by President Obama, Pope Francis and the U.N. General Assembly brings the world one giant step closer to true global governance.

XXXXX​

The plan bypasses Congress and the legislatures of the world’s other 193 nations. Yet, the heads of state agreed to work toward implementation, largely through secret trade deals and backroom bureaucratic rule-making, experts told WND.​

A one government world has always been about giving ruling classes absolute authority, in addition to a universal police force crushing revolutions. Basically, the New World Order’s agenda is well known. Ditto the utopian economic doctrine that sells the garbage:

The U.N. document focuses on ending poverty and gender inequality, combating climate change and opening up borders to migrants and refugees.​

This is what it will take to make a global government stick:

Every nation will become a police state that is reinforced by the UN’s universal police force. To better understand how that will work just remember this: That which we call a police force in a free society is called an army in a dictatorship. Once the threat of cross-border wars has been laid to rest every national army must transform itself into a police force committed solely to suppressing private sector liberties or cease to exist.

Bashar Bashes Kerry | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

Peacekeepers?

Whenever totalitarian global government proponents talk about eliminating the cost of maintaining a military defense they don’t tell you they simply want those savings diverted to increasing police powers in every country in the world. It’s a lot easier for the global villagers to control a police state than it is for them to dominate military personnel in a bunch of sovereign nations.

Neither individual liberties protected by a dedicated military, or a UN police state, can be had on the cheap. Whenever the global villagers talk about one international army dedicated to maintaining universal peace, I can’t help thinking: That which is called a police force in a free society is called an army in a dictatorship. Just look at every tin pot military dictatorship that ever was if you doubt me.

The global government crowd’s hidden objective is to protect their own power, privileges, and assets in a revolution-proof world because cross-border wars can be prevented with a minimum amount of political courage exercised by a few militarily strong freedom-loving sovereign nations. In short: The world does not require the United Nations to put an end to cross-border wars. Without any assistance from the UN worth mentioning, the United States and its allies standing fast against military conquest by an aggressive government is easier than eating ice cream.

NOTE: The revolutions that triggered the so-called Arab Spring is backfiring. The line between revolution and civil war turned out to be as useless as the Maginot Line.

​

“Good revolutions” that were supposed to bring freedom and democracy to the Middle East are degenerating into totalitarian governments worse than the ones that were overthrown, as well as increasing the certainty of a major cross-border war.

Parenthetically, a universal police force must begin with the UN’s stamp of approval. Indeed, the UN opposes self-defense military alliances entered into by like-minded allies. Vietnam and Iraq are two examples of the UN’s opposition. The UN requires Americans to serve with military personnel from enemy countries; even requiring Americans to wear United Nations apparel of one kind or another.

UN-approved military coalitions that are always being encouraged are nothing more than American quislings leading the UNIC’s (United Nations/International Community) relentless march towards control over a universal police force implementing Socialist policies and non-existent International law. The UNIC police force will be called Universal Peacekeepers up until the day all opposition is silenced; then the lie will no longer be needed.

The trek towards UN omnipotence is being led by American globalists of questionable loyalty for the purposes of protecting their bodies, their incomes, their political power, and their privileges. That protection comes at the cost of American private sector liberties.

NOTE: Nothing but the will of a few powerful nations makes it easier to prevent cross-border wars in a world without the United Nations. In fact, Putin engages in cross-borders precisely because of the United Nations.

The joke I made in September 2013 is not funny today:

The joke is that Putin is sitting in the catbird seat while Kerry and Administration busybodies are on their knees begging for a face-saving crumb or two.

Bashar Bashes Kerry | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

Putin is eating Kerry & Company alive in Syria:

Putin signs decree drafting 150,000 conscripts into the Russian military... as his jets launch new wave of air strikes in Syria
By Will Stewart and Simon Tomlinson for MailOnline
Published: 02:23 EST, 1 October 2015 | Updated: 09:56 EST, 1 October 2015

Vladimir Putin drafts 150,000 conscripts into the Russian military​

while the traitor is hoping a Nobel Peace Prize will wash him clean:

Nobel Prize Rumors Put Focus On Kerry-Iran Coziness
Secretary of state’s legacy increasingly linked to Iranian regime fortunes
BY: Adam Kredo
October 1, 2015 5:00 am

Nobel Prize Rumors Put Focus On Kerry-Iran Coziness​

Finally, young Americans should be very careful not to be suckered into fighting in a crisis manufactured by the New World Order crowd. Putin is backing those people into a corner. They will do whatever it takes to implement their global government —— not Putin’s.

“But, remember, the elite who are behind this are experts at manufactured crisis and their motto is ordo ab chao, which means ‘order out of chaos.’ This was a term coined by the Masonic leader Albert Pike,” McGuire told WND. “The new global order will be birthed by either a global financial crisis, the prospect of World War III involving Islam, Russia, Ukraine, NATO, Iran, Syria and Israel and a manufactured climate-change crisis.”

Obama puts U.S. on 'fast track' to world government
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 09/30/2015 @ 8:00 pm

Obama puts U.S. on ‘fast track’ to world government​

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Dunno how you can claim to be an arch-anything Flan when you don't take market performance ibnto your assesment. Sound more like a 3rd party wannabe.

2,000 days of Obama: How have stocks done?

 

[Flanders]

Dunno how you can claim to be an arch-anything Flan when you don't take market performance ibnto your assesment. Sound more like a 3rd party wannabe.

2,000 days of Obama: How have stocks done?

To Delta4Embassey: Frankly, I do not give a rat’s ass about the stock market's absentee owners. My views on the economy include market performance:

As I’ve said a thousand times any talk about an economic solution to the nation’s problems is a waste of time if you’re not going to repeal the XVI Amendment —— THE TAX ON INCOME. All of the babbling about creating jobs, stimulating growth, reducing the deficit, and the biggest scam of all “economic equality” amounts to nothing more than useful idiots spreading government propaganda.

Flatten The Flat-taxers | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

My views on a third party are also well-known to the people who agree with me:

I’ve long said that the minute a serious third party becomes a reality the Republicans and Democrats will merge into one party; i.e., pool their big money contributors, their positions of influence, and so on. The Republican party’s undeniable betrayals on amnesty and open-borders tells me that the ruling class is preparing for the merger.

NOTE: Third parties never stood a chance when they concentrated their efforts on a presidential candidate like Ross Perot. Tea Parties do not have, nor do they need, a presidential candidate until they become one party. They sure as hell will not find a candidate among the current crop of RINO who swear they are conservative. In short: Karl Rove’s Republicans will never give the nomination to a true conservative like Mike Lee or Ted Cruz. Nevertheless, Tea Parties are a serious threat to the establishment because they are winning congressional seats.

Betrayal Signals Merger | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

You can argue which president was the worst. You can argue which president was the biggest liar or the most corrupt. You can even argue which president was the dumbest, but there is no doubt that Taqiyya the Liar created the worst administrations in America’s history bar none.

Forget every freakazoid the president empowered except his two secretaries of state —— Clinton and Kerry —— and his two US Ambassadors to the United Nations —— Suzy Five Shows and Samantha Power —— and future historians need look no further than the years 2009 through 2016 to find the worst administrations in history. They were so bad, the record for worst administration should be retired. The ultimate proof: America will not survive long enough for a worse administration to take the record away from the Chicago sewer rat.

Evidence

The United Nations 2030 Agenda endorsed by President Obama, Pope Francis and the U.N. General Assembly brings the world one giant step closer to true global governance.

XXXXX​

The plan bypasses Congress and the legislatures of the world’s other 193 nations. Yet, the heads of state agreed to work toward implementation, largely through secret trade deals and backroom bureaucratic rule-making, experts told WND.​

A one government world has always been about giving ruling classes absolute authority, in addition to a universal police force crushing revolutions. Basically, the New World Order’s agenda is well known. Ditto the utopian economic doctrine that sells the garbage:

The U.N. document focuses on ending poverty and gender inequality, combating climate change and opening up borders to migrants and refugees.​

This is what it will take to make a global government stick:

Every nation will become a police state that is reinforced by the UN’s universal police force. To better understand how that will work just remember this: That which we call a police force in a free society is called an army in a dictatorship. Once the threat of cross-border wars has been laid to rest every national army must transform itself into a police force committed solely to suppressing private sector liberties or cease to exist.

Bashar Bashes Kerry | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

Peacekeepers?

Whenever totalitarian global government proponents talk about eliminating the cost of maintaining a military defense they don’t tell you they simply want those savings diverted to increasing police powers in every country in the world. It’s a lot easier for the global villagers to control a police state than it is for them to dominate military personnel in a bunch of sovereign nations.

Neither individual liberties protected by a dedicated military, or a UN police state, can be had on the cheap. Whenever the global villagers talk about one international army dedicated to maintaining universal peace, I can’t help thinking: That which is called a police force in a free society is called an army in a dictatorship. Just look at every tin pot military dictatorship that ever was if you doubt me.

The global government crowd’s hidden objective is to protect their own power, privileges, and assets in a revolution-proof world because cross-border wars can be prevented with a minimum amount of political courage exercised by a few militarily strong freedom-loving sovereign nations. In short: The world does not require the United Nations to put an end to cross-border wars. Without any assistance from the UN worth mentioning, the United States and its allies standing fast against military conquest by an aggressive government is easier than eating ice cream.

NOTE: The revolutions that triggered the so-called Arab Spring is backfiring. The line between revolution and civil war turned out to be as useless as the Maginot Line.

​

“Good revolutions” that were supposed to bring freedom and democracy to the Middle East are degenerating into totalitarian governments worse than the ones that were overthrown, as well as increasing the certainty of a major cross-border war.

Parenthetically, a universal police force must begin with the UN’s stamp of approval. Indeed, the UN opposes self-defense military alliances entered into by like-minded allies. Vietnam and Iraq are two examples of the UN’s opposition. The UN requires Americans to serve with military personnel from enemy countries; even requiring Americans to wear United Nations apparel of one kind or another.

UN-approved military coalitions that are always being encouraged are nothing more than American quislings leading the UNIC’s (United Nations/International Community) relentless march towards control over a universal police force implementing Socialist policies and non-existent International law. The UNIC police force will be called Universal Peacekeepers up until the day all opposition is silenced; then the lie will no longer be needed.

The trek towards UN omnipotence is being led by American globalists of questionable loyalty for the purposes of protecting their bodies, their incomes, their political power, and their privileges. That protection comes at the cost of American private sector liberties.

NOTE: Nothing but the will of a few powerful nations makes it easier to prevent cross-border wars in a world without the United Nations. In fact, Putin engages in cross-borders precisely because of the United Nations.

The joke I made in September 2013 is not funny today:

The joke is that Putin is sitting in the catbird seat while Kerry and Administration busybodies are on their knees begging for a face-saving crumb or two.

Bashar Bashes Kerry | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

Putin is eating Kerry & Company alive in Syria:

Putin signs decree drafting 150,000 conscripts into the Russian military... as his jets launch new wave of air strikes in Syria
By Will Stewart and Simon Tomlinson for MailOnline
Published: 02:23 EST, 1 October 2015 | Updated: 09:56 EST, 1 October 2015

Vladimir Putin drafts 150,000 conscripts into the Russian military​

while the traitor is hoping a Nobel Peace Prize will wash him clean:

Nobel Prize Rumors Put Focus On Kerry-Iran Coziness
Secretary of state’s legacy increasingly linked to Iranian regime fortunes
BY: Adam Kredo
October 1, 2015 5:00 am

Nobel Prize Rumors Put Focus On Kerry-Iran Coziness​

Finally, young Americans should be very careful not to be suckered into fighting in a crisis manufactured by the New World Order crowd. Putin is backing those people into a corner. They will do whatever it takes to implement their global government —— not Putin’s.

“But, remember, the elite who are behind this are experts at manufactured crisis and their motto is ordo ab chao, which means ‘order out of chaos.’ This was a term coined by the Masonic leader Albert Pike,” McGuire told WND. “The new global order will be birthed by either a global financial crisis, the prospect of World War III involving Islam, Russia, Ukraine, NATO, Iran, Syria and Israel and a manufactured climate-change crisis.”

Obama puts U.S. on 'fast track' to world government
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 09/30/2015 @ 8:00 pm

Obama puts U.S. on ‘fast track’ to world government​

From your article - this clip, Flanders:

‘One crisis away’

The goal is to get every nation to willingly sign onto the plan and thereby give up elements of their national sovereignty, which could be done more easily in a time of crisis, McGuire said.

“The U.N. vote is about to put America and the world on the fast track to a one-world government,” he told WND. “We are literally just one crisis away from that happening. It could happen overnight, and I don’t think most people realize this.”

In fact, the Telegraph, a major British newspaper, reported this week that the IMF was warning of just such an event, with a “mass default” in emerging markets where global corporations are exposed to weak economic conditions.

The trigger could be higher U.S. interest rates.

These corporations have “gorged themselves on cheap debt,” the IMF warned. But the rug will eventually be pulled out by the Federal Reserve, causing a cascading collapse.

Speaking before the United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 28, Obama argued that it is necessary for the U.S. to retreat as a world superpower so that global governance can rise up in its place.


Read more at Obama puts U.S. on ‘fast track’ to world government
_____________
To be clear the U.N. is the Roman Catholic system / government and has been from its inception, Flanders. The League of Nations (the 1st U.N.) was founded by the Jesuits. The Jesuits were behind the creation of the U.N. as well. This is the Roman Catholic System / Government endorsing the Roman Catholic System / Government and their own Jesuit Pope as One World Ruler.

 

[Flanders]

Forget every freakazoid the president empowered except his two secretaries of state —— Clinton and Kerry —— and his two US Ambassadors to the United Nations —— Suzy Five Shows and Samantha Power

The only thing worse than not showing up is walking out after a screwball begins speaking to the General Assembly. Question: Exactly what was so important that the gawk and the traitor had to discuss with the sewer rat instead of listening to an ally?

“Ambassador Power and Secretary Kerry were unable to attend Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech before the General Assembly because they were called into a meeting with President Obama, which they participated in via video teleconference,” a State Department Official told Breitbart News.

XXXXX​

Although they were both in New York for the United Nations General Assembly meetings, the two high-ranking U.S. officials were notably absent for the entirety of the Israeli Prime Minister’s speech.​

My guess is that the insult boils down to a strong objection to politically incorrect speech:

. . . Israeli Prime Minister excoriated the international body for not condemning the Iranian regime when it calls for Israel’s destruction.

XXXXX​

. . . Netanyahu said in his condemnation of the United Nations.​

Obama Pulled John Kerry and Samantha Power From Netanyahu UN Speech
by Jordan Schachtel
1 Oct 2015
Washington, DC

Obama Pulled Kerry and Amb. Power From Netanyahu Speech​

I see a lot of humor in snubbing an ally coming from an administration that promises world peace through diplomacy. Personally, my faith in diplomacy begins and ends in state dinners. When Mickey Mouse comes to dinner you serve cheese. When a Muslim comes to dinner you do not serve pork. Neither Jew nor Muslim eat pork; so I never could see a diplomatic conflict between the two.

 

[Flanders]

The global government crowd’s hidden objective is to protect their own power, privileges, and assets in a revolution-proof world because cross-border wars can be prevented with a minimum amount of political courage exercised by a few militarily strong freedom-loving sovereign nations.

Putin is betting that the United Nations has no interest in saving NATO:

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, established in 1949, has 28 members devoted to the idea of collective security. Prediction: By the time President Obama leaves office in 2017, the NATO pledge of mutual defense in response to aggression will have been exposed as worthless. Objectively the alliance will have ceased to exist. The culprits? Vladimir Putin—and Barack Obama.

The Coming Defeat of NATO
Column: How Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama will break the Atlantic alliance
BY: Matthew Continetti
October 2, 2015 5:00 am

The Coming Defeat of NATO​

Putin is right. The collective security of a few nations falls far short of a revolution-proof world which is the result the global government crowd has been working to achieve since 1945. Moscow, Peking, and Tehran know they can do anything they please individually, or collectively, certain the United States, and possibly Great Britain, will do whatever it takes to keep the concept of a revolution-proof world alive in the United Nations.

The concept of a revolution-proof world must be abandoned and replaced with a policy that ends cross-borders wars. The obvious benefit of ending cross-border wars begins with an end of Peace Without Victory wars. The machinery is simple:

1. Do not create another formal International organization patterned after the League of Nations and the United Nations.

2. Every government that commits to ending cross-border wars agrees to provide men and material to defeat an aggressive nation that invaded another country.

3. An alliance dedicated to ending cross-border wars shall have no other mandate or authority.

4. The alliance shall only meet when it becomes necessary.

5. Stopping an aggressor nation includes the total destruction of the invading country.

6 Destroy everything with all of the technology available short of nuclear weapons. Destroy every commercial building. Destroy every structure higher than 25 feet. Destroy every dam, every bridge, every tunnel, every power plant, every airport, every railroad. When that is done do not sign a peace treaty with people who advocated war in the first place. Never signing a peace treaty means that every time a defeated enemy rebuilds something knock it down again until they curse the reason they started their war.

7. Systematically keep the defeated people living in the dark ages for a century.

8. Every neutral country that accepts refugees from a defeated country will be seen as committing an act of war.

9. Anyone found guilty of providing aid and comfort to the enemy during, or after the war ends, would be sentenced to living the remainder of their life in the defeated country.

Finally, I’ll wager that Putin was laughing at then-presidential wannabe John McCain’s naiveté in 2007 as much as he laughs at the sewer rat today:

McCain Favors a 'League of Democracies'
By LIZ SIDOTI
The Associated Press
Monday, April 30, 2007; 8:15 PM

McCain Favors a 'League of Democracies'​

To this day, McCain never called for America to withdraw from the UN. Why settle for one International organization interfering in America’s affairs when you can have two? At the time, McCain appeared to be courting media liberals when he said his League of Democracies could act where the UN failed to act. That recommendation came dangerously close to the U.S. military functioning as the world’s police force controlled by the United Nations.

The UN has always been a train wreck for the American people. Today, the UN is an earthquake shifting the ground under America’s feet.

Read this article and ask yourself how many of today’s crop of media choices are different than McCain:

McCain, Soros, and the New “Global Order”
Cliff Kincaid — March 13, 2008

McCain, Soros, and the New “Global Order”​

 

[Flanders]

You can argue which president was the worst. You can argue which president was the biggest liar or the most corrupt. You can even argue which president was the dumbest, but there is no doubt that Taqiyya the Liar created the worst administrations in America’s history bar none.

http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2015-10/195348_5_.jpg​

If you interpret every law and government policy as sales campaigns, I can argue that the Chicago sewer rat is the worst salesman ever. He failed to sell anything he tried to sell. If he was paid sales commissions he would be pennyless. The Edsel was a howling success compared to his foreign policy:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/...ontent/uploads/2012/09/20120927_Edsel_004.jpg​

1958 Ford Edsel

That's why we're all here, right? To celebrate E Day, the date 50 years ago when Ford took one of the autodom's most hilarious pratfalls. But why? It really wasn't that bad a car. True, the car was kind of homely, fuel thirsty and too expensive, particularly at the outset of the late '50s recession. But what else? It was the first victim of Madison Avenue hyper-hype. Ford's marketing mavens had led the public to expect some plutonium-powered, pancake-making wondercar; what they got was a Mercury. Cultural critics speculated that the car was a flop because the vertical grill looked like a vagina. Maybe. America in the '50s was certainly phobic about the female business. How did the Edsel come to be synonymous with failure? All of the above, consolidated into an irrational groupthink and pressurized by a joyously catty media. Interestingly, it was Ford President Robert McNamara who convinced the board to bail out of the Edsel project; a decade later, it was McNamara, then Secretary of Defense, who couldn't bring himself to quit the disaster of Vietnam, even though he knew a lemon when he saw one.

The 50 Worst Cars of All Time - TIME​

The sewer rat’s failed domestic sales campaigns now include more gun control laws. Buyers stampeded for the exit within minutes of his opening sales pitch.

The products he claims credit for were forced on the pubic.

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/...m/Edsel-1960AndrewMcColganAutoRestoration.JPG​

Like the Edsel, the ACA is headed for the junkyard:

Feds admit Supremes should review Obamacare – again!
Posted By Bob Unruh On 10/02/2015 @ 8:26 pm

Feds admit Supremes should review Obamacare – again!​

The Iran Nuclear TREATY came with a no-return policy:

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/...m/Edsel-1960AndrewMcColganAutoRestoration.JPG​

Multinationals is the TPP’s only customers:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/...ll.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Scan-5.jpeg​

Taqiyya the Salesman not only forced the American people to buy millions of illegal aliens, the American people must maintain them in good order for as far as the eye can see.

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/...liens-statue-of-liberty-political-cartoon.jpg​

And this is the guy who sold himself as a super-salesman:

Berry recounted meetings with White House officials, reminiscent of some during the Clinton days, where he and others urged them not to force Blue Dogs “off into that swamp” of supporting bills that would be unpopular with voters back home.

“I’ve been doing that with this White House, and they just don’t seem to give it any credibility at all,” Berry said. “They just kept telling us how good it was going to be. The president himself, when that was brought up in one group, said, ‘Well, the big difference here and in ’94 was you’ve got me.’ We’re going to see how much difference that makes now.”
January 25, 2010

Berry: Obama said "big difference" between '10 and '94 is "me"

Berry: Obama said "big difference" between '10 and '94 is "me"​

 

[Flanders]

The sewer rat’s failed domestic sales campaigns now include more gun control laws. Buyers stampeded for the exit within minutes of his opening sales pitch.

I once said that blue was the color of Socialism. Little did I know that a UN beret would go from here:

http://diggerhistory.info/images/uniforms2/un-beret.jpg

to here in six years:

http://canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/cover100415.jpg

Any American who fails to see the reason America-haters are desperate to disarm the American people while their sewer rat is still the commander and chief is begging to die a victim:

Like all things named by the UN, the ‘Strong Cities Network’ (SCN) sounds benign and good for society, a society distracted from what is really going on by their own self-serving governments.

XXXXX​

The project, introduced out of the proverbial blue at United Nations headquarters on Wednesday by Attorney General Loretta Lynch, is touted as the launch of a strong cities network “to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism”.

Blue Helmets to Supplant America’s Blue Line
By Judi McLeod
October 4, 2015

Blue Helmets to Supplant America’s Blue Line​

It’s obvious the Administration fears the day they have to call in United Nations troops to assist the federal government in putting down a rebellion. Facing well-armed Americans can get mighty hairy for UN troops; more so if a substantial number of military units loyal to this country join the rebellion. ‘Strong Cities Network’ brings a rebellion much closer.

 

[Flanders]

Any American who fails to see the reason America-haters are desperate to disarm the American people while their sewer rat is still the commander and chief is begging to die a victim:

Like all things named by the UN, the ‘Strong Cities Network’ (SCN) sounds benign and good for society, a society distracted from what is really going on by their own self-serving governments.

The next 14 months will be the most dangerous months the America people will ever face —— if they survive:

In the mid-1990s Australia and Great Britain both instituted what were virtually complete bans on firearm possession.

Obama referenced the bans thus:​

We know that other countries, in response to one mass shooting, have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings. Friends of ours, allies of ours — Great Britain, Australia, countries like ours. So we know there are ways to prevent it.​

Obama Goes Beyond Mere Gun Control, Hints at Confiscation
by AWR Hawkins
3 Oct 2015

Obama Goes Beyond Mere Gun Control, Hints at Confiscation - Breitbart​

The difference is that neither Great Britain or Australia have a Second Amendment that was written specifically to protect from tyranny. The Second Amendment was not ratified to defend against sick nut jobs as the filthy piece of scum in the White House wants you to believe so he can abolish it.

Anybody interested in hanging on to their country PLEASE read the open letter in this link:

http://www.allenbwest.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/safe_image1-300x180.jpeg

An Australian debunks Australian gun laws for Obama
Written by Allen West on June 15, 2014

An Australian debunks Australian gun laws for Obama - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com​

 

[Flanders]

I have not heard the bazooka argument for a while. No less of a clown than Biden brought it up:

"The Second Amendment doesn’t say you can own a bazooka or an F-15 with hellfire missiels. There is ability of government to limit the type of weapon avaialable...

Joe Biden: 2nd Amendment Doesn't Say You Can Own An F-15 With Hellfire Missiles​

The Second Amendment does not forbid the ownership of specific weapons.What the 2nd Amendment does say is:

A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.​

What is that dumbbell Biden does not understand about “. . . shall not be infringed.”

The Right to bear UNREGISTERED weapons is the only protection against tyranny. Free people do not stand a chance against the government’s arsenal. Less so in light of United Nations troops standing ready to kill Americans as soon as they get the green light from this Administration.

Like all things named by the UN, the ‘Strong Cities Network’ (SCN) sounds benign and good for society, a society distracted from what is really going on by their own self-serving governments.

XXXXX​

The project, introduced out of the proverbial blue at United Nations headquarters on Wednesday by Attorney General Loretta Lynch, is touted as the launch of a strong cities network “to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism”.

In short: Bazookas, F-15s, tanks, cannons, and everything else in the hands of the American people is the only chance a free people have to remain free.

Finally, you tell me which of these two songs Biden & Company sing when they get together:

​

​

 

[Flanders]

the traitor is hoping a Nobel Peace Prize will wash him clean:

John Kerry let me down. I was praying those damned Norwegian sardines would have given him a Peace Prize:

Maybe President Obama will be able to console Kerry by letting him hold his Nobel Peace Prize, which Obama was awarded months after becoming president. Obama got his for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples."​

John Kerry, Iranian Leaders Passed Over for Nobel Peace Prize Snubbed.
2:33 PM, Oct 9, 2015 • By SHOSHANA WEISSMANN

John Kerry, Iranian Leaders Passed Over for Nobel Peace Prize​

If anybody deserves to join the company of the worst of them it is John Kerry:

Woodrow Wilson
Ralph Bunche
Jimmy Carter
Albert Schweitzer
Nasser Arafat
Goofy Annan
Nelson Mandela
Mikhail Gorbachev
Mohamed ElBaradei
Al Gore
Barack Obama,

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in 1954 and again in 1981 is the Peace Prize that really turns my stomach. That first one was given 61 years before those filthy bums actually “earned” it by dumping Muslim terrorists in Europe and the United States.

Bottom line: The long list of losers Norway calls winners far overshadows a few decent recipients.

Finally, I was really pulling for Kerry. Not only would a Peace Prize hold him up as a sick joke, he would have brought the Nobel Peace Prize to new low among the people who know what it is.

 

[Flanders]

Move the cursor to 4:50 to hear Charles Krauthammer name John Kerry as his loser of the week. Krauthammer did not throw bouquets at the Norwegians either:

Video | Special Report | Bret Baier | Fox News Channel​

Kerry aside, I never understood why any American should be proud of an American receiving a Nobel Peace Prize when it is awarded by Socialists. The only difference I ever saw between a Nobel Peace Prize and a prize given by Moscow or Peking is media telling Americans they should embrace journalism's love of the Nobel Peace Prize; a love affair that began long before television came along.

My fantasy has been for an American to win —— then give the prize money to the John Birch Society or the NRA.

 

[Flanders]

The project, introduced out of the proverbial blue at United Nations headquarters on Wednesday by Attorney General Loretta Lynch, is touted as the launch of a strong cities network “to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism”.

Did you ever wonder how “lawyers” like Loretta Lynch can get to be AG without knowing that the most offensive speech requires the most protection:

What about blurring the distinction between speech and violence? Lynch is so serious about stopping Islamophobia that she’s sending a clear message to those who engage in “anti-Muslim rhetoric” — the Department of Justice is watching you:​

When we talk about the First amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American. They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.​

The Attorney General of the United States Is Disgracing Herself
by David French December 4, 2015 4:25 PM

The Attorney General of the United States Is Disgracing Herself, by David French, National Review​

 

[Flanders]

Let’s have three cheers and one cheer more for Joe Walsh and George Pataki.

That threat against the First Amendment is not sitting well with former Illinois Rep. Joe Walsh, a Republican who served in Congress from 2011 to 2013 and who now hosts a radio program.

In a video posted to his Facebook page, Walsh slammed both Islam and Lynch.

“I think Islam has a real freaking problem, alright? There is a cancer in Islam, and if they’re not going to learn to assimilate, I don’t want them in this country,” he said.

“You got a problem, Loretta Lynch, with me saying that? Then throw me in jail. I think Islam is evil. I think Islam has a huge problem. I think most Muslims around the world are not compatible with American values. I don’t want them here.”

Walsh continued his challenge to Lynch in comments posted to his Facebook page.

"Muslims are killing us in the streets. I am unafraid to tell the truth. C'mon Loretta Lynch, ARREST ME!

"The day after Muslim terrorists killed 14 Americans, Attorney General Loretta Lynch vowed to prosecute anyone who uses 'anti-Muslim rhetoric' that 'edges toward violence.'

"What the hell does that mean? I have a 1st Amendment right, Ms Lynch, to say whatever I want about Muslims.

You want to try and prosecute me for what I say? I dare you. Here goes:

"Most Muslims around the world are terrorists, support terrorism, and/or support Shariah law. They are our enemy. I don't want them in America. Any Muslim that won't assimilate should get the hell out of America. Any Muslim that is a terrorist or supports terrorism should be killed. If 'moderate' Muslims don't speak out against terrorism, they are our enemy and we should call them out and kick them out of this country. I hope there is a backlash against Muslims because Islam, as practiced by most Muslims, is not a religion of peace, and all of us who do live in peace should do whatever we can to defeat Islam.

"There Ms. Lynch. As an American, I have a right to say everything I just did. And I will continue to speak the truth about Islam in the hopes that others will wake up to this truth and do what we can to defeat this evil in our midst.

"Is that 'anti-Muslim rhetoric' that 'edges toward violence'? Go ahead and prosecute me. I dare you."

Former New York Gov. George Pataki, a 2016 Republican candidate for president, upped the ante with a tweet calling for the death of Islamic radicals.

"We must declare war on radical Islam. @LorettaLynch I'm not edging toward violent speech, I'm declaring we kill them. Go ahead, arrest me."

Backlash: 'Anti-Muslim' speakers dare Lynch to prosecute

Backlash: ‘Anti-Muslim’ speakers dare Lynch to prosecute​

 

[Flanders]

Did you ever wonder how “lawyers” like Loretta Lynch can get to be AG without knowing that the most offensive speech requires the most protection:

​

Asked by POLITICO why she was reluctant to publicly say even that the shootings were inspired by ISIL, Lynch stressed the need for investigators to keep an open mind to all possibilities.​

December 8, 2015
Loretta Lynch pulls back her words. Slightly. And delivers another whopper.
By Carol Brown

Blog: Loretta Lynch pulls back her words. Slightly. And delivers another whopper.​

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

You can argue which president was the worst. You can argue which president was the biggest liar or the most corrupt. You can even argue which president was the dumbest, but there is no doubt that Taqiyya the Liar created the worst administrations in America’s history bar none.

Forget every freakazoid the president empowered except his two secretaries of state —— Clinton and Kerry —— and his two US Ambassadors to the United Nations —— Suzy Five Shows and Samantha Power —— and future historians need look no further than the years 2009 through 2016 to find the worst administrations in history. They were so bad, the record for worst administration should be retired. The ultimate proof: America will not survive long enough for a worse administration to take the record away from the Chicago sewer rat.

Evidence

The United Nations 2030 Agenda endorsed by President Obama, Pope Francis and the U.N. General Assembly brings the world one giant step closer to true global governance.

XXXXX​

The plan bypasses Congress and the legislatures of the world’s other 193 nations. Yet, the heads of state agreed to work toward implementation, largely through secret trade deals and backroom bureaucratic rule-making, experts told WND.​

A one government world has always been about giving ruling classes absolute authority, in addition to a universal police force crushing revolutions. Basically, the New World Order’s agenda is well known. Ditto the utopian economic doctrine that sells the garbage:

The U.N. document focuses on ending poverty and gender inequality, combating climate change and opening up borders to migrants and refugees.​

This is what it will take to make a global government stick:

Every nation will become a police state that is reinforced by the UN’s universal police force. To better understand how that will work just remember this: That which we call a police force in a free society is called an army in a dictatorship. Once the threat of cross-border wars has been laid to rest every national army must transform itself into a police force committed solely to suppressing private sector liberties or cease to exist.

Bashar Bashes Kerry | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

Peacekeepers?

Whenever totalitarian global government proponents talk about eliminating the cost of maintaining a military defense they don’t tell you they simply want those savings diverted to increasing police powers in every country in the world. It’s a lot easier for the global villagers to control a police state than it is for them to dominate military personnel in a bunch of sovereign nations.

Neither individual liberties protected by a dedicated military, or a UN police state, can be had on the cheap. Whenever the global villagers talk about one international army dedicated to maintaining universal peace, I can’t help thinking: That which is called a police force in a free society is called an army in a dictatorship. Just look at every tin pot military dictatorship that ever was if you doubt me.

The global government crowd’s hidden objective is to protect their own power, privileges, and assets in a revolution-proof world because cross-border wars can be prevented with a minimum amount of political courage exercised by a few militarily strong freedom-loving sovereign nations. In short: The world does not require the United Nations to put an end to cross-border wars. Without any assistance from the UN worth mentioning, the United States and its allies standing fast against military conquest by an aggressive government is easier than eating ice cream.

NOTE: The revolutions that triggered the so-called Arab Spring is backfiring. The line between revolution and civil war turned out to be as useless as the Maginot Line.

​

“Good revolutions” that were supposed to bring freedom and democracy to the Middle East are degenerating into totalitarian governments worse than the ones that were overthrown, as well as increasing the certainty of a major cross-border war.

Parenthetically, a universal police force must begin with the UN’s stamp of approval. Indeed, the UN opposes self-defense military alliances entered into by like-minded allies. Vietnam and Iraq are two examples of the UN’s opposition. The UN requires Americans to serve with military personnel from enemy countries; even requiring Americans to wear United Nations apparel of one kind or another.

UN-approved military coalitions that are always being encouraged are nothing more than American quislings leading the UNIC’s (United Nations/International Community) relentless march towards control over a universal police force implementing Socialist policies and non-existent International law. The UNIC police force will be called Universal Peacekeepers up until the day all opposition is silenced; then the lie will no longer be needed.

The trek towards UN omnipotence is being led by American globalists of questionable loyalty for the purposes of protecting their bodies, their incomes, their political power, and their privileges. That protection comes at the cost of American private sector liberties.

NOTE: Nothing but the will of a few powerful nations makes it easier to prevent cross-border wars in a world without the United Nations. In fact, Putin engages in cross-borders precisely because of the United Nations.

The joke I made in September 2013 is not funny today:

The joke is that Putin is sitting in the catbird seat while Kerry and Administration busybodies are on their knees begging for a face-saving crumb or two.

Bashar Bashes Kerry | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

Putin is eating Kerry & Company alive in Syria:

Putin signs decree drafting 150,000 conscripts into the Russian military... as his jets launch new wave of air strikes in Syria
By Will Stewart and Simon Tomlinson for MailOnline
Published: 02:23 EST, 1 October 2015 | Updated: 09:56 EST, 1 October 2015

Vladimir Putin drafts 150,000 conscripts into the Russian military​

while the traitor is hoping a Nobel Peace Prize will wash him clean:

Nobel Prize Rumors Put Focus On Kerry-Iran Coziness
Secretary of state’s legacy increasingly linked to Iranian regime fortunes
BY: Adam Kredo
October 1, 2015 5:00 am

Nobel Prize Rumors Put Focus On Kerry-Iran Coziness​

Finally, young Americans should be very careful not to be suckered into fighting in a crisis manufactured by the New World Order crowd. Putin is backing those people into a corner. They will do whatever it takes to implement their global government —— not Putin’s.

“But, remember, the elite who are behind this are experts at manufactured crisis and their motto is ordo ab chao, which means ‘order out of chaos.’ This was a term coined by the Masonic leader Albert Pike,” McGuire told WND. “The new global order will be birthed by either a global financial crisis, the prospect of World War III involving Islam, Russia, Ukraine, NATO, Iran, Syria and Israel and a manufactured climate-change crisis.”

Obama puts U.S. on 'fast track' to world government
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 09/30/2015 @ 8:00 pm

Obama puts U.S. on ‘fast track’ to world government​

That is the three stooges you have to keep your eye on, Flanders - you named them - Obama - Pope Francis - And his Mouthpiece - UN Assembly. If ever there was a covenant made in hell - that's it!

 

[Flanders]

What about blurring the distinction between speech and violence? Lynch is so serious about stopping Islamophobia that she’s sending a clear message to those who engage in “anti-Muslim rhetoric” — the Department of Justice is watching you:

Can anybody tell me why Loretta Lynch fails to see violent people screaming for censorship will commit violent acts:

​

http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-con...ube-screenshot-Kettlebasher1-Getty-Images.jpg

Muslim Students Demand TOTAL BAN On All ‘Islamophobic Speech’ At Taxpayer-Funded College
Eric Owens
Education Editor
8:51 AM 12/30/2015

SDSU Muslim Students Demand 'Islamophobic Speech' BAN​

 

[peach174]

Dunno how you can claim to be an arch-anything Flan when you don't take market performance ibnto your assesment. Sound more like a 3rd party wannabe.

2,000 days of Obama: How have stocks done?

Thanks
You just put up proof as to how much the Dem's are in bed with Wall St.

 

[Flanders]

If anybody deserves to join the company of the worst of them it is John Kerry:

Woodrow Wilson
Ralph Bunche
Jimmy Carter
Albert Schweitzer
Nasser Arafat
Goofy Annan
Nelson Mandela
Mikhail Gorbachev
Mohamed ElBaradei
Al Gore
Barack Obama

If Trump has any brains he will pull his name out of contention:

Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
By Eliza Collins
02/03/16 04:05 PM

Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize​

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

What about blurring the distinction between speech and violence? Lynch is so serious about stopping Islamophobia that she’s sending a clear message to those who engage in “anti-Muslim rhetoric” — the Department of Justice is watching you:

Can anybody tell me why Loretta Lynch fails to see violent people screaming for censorship will commit violent acts:

​

http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-con...ube-screenshot-Kettlebasher1-Getty-Images.jpg

Muslim Students Demand TOTAL BAN On All ‘Islamophobic Speech’ At Taxpayer-Funded College
Eric Owens
Education Editor
8:51 AM 12/30/2015

SDSU Muslim Students Demand 'Islamophobic Speech' BAN​

Lynch is going by the UN playbook - their Res. 16 that makes criticism of Muslims or Islam a criminal act - fines - prison sentences to enforce it will follow once the UN gets that ball rolling. It's already happening in the EU. Not so much here in the USA. Muslims are not in a position to demand anything. This is not their homeland. They should be sent back to their own Muslim nations as they cannot adapt. To comply with their demands is to comply with Sharia law and that simply cannot be done by the West.