Yet there you were PC policing. Will you be okay?
I'm fine thanks. The guy I voted for to do a job is in office and slowly but surely checking off the things on the agenda he ran on.
The better question is...are YOU okay? The woman you voted for is unemployed and sitting on her sizable rump bemoaning the fact she didn't win the Presidency. Will you be okay?
Did the guy you voted for run on an agenda of separating children from parents and separating America from the rest of the world ,,,? Did he run on the great separations of Americans ? Question,,,,,if you knew those were the roads he would take would you still have voted for him?
No...he ran on strengthening the border and enforcing our immigration laws. The "separating" children thing is nothing more that a diversion to keep people from focusing on the IG report that just came out that shows how disgustingly corrupt the LAST administration was!
Oldstyle This IG report?
4 key takeaways from the inspector general’s report on the FBI, Comey, and Clinton emails
The IG found little evidence that political bias impacted the Clinton email probe — but sharply criticized James Comey and Peter Strzok.
By
Andrew Prokopandrew@vox.com Updated Jun 14, 2018, 5:50pm EDT
SHARE
James Comey.
Brendan SmialowskiAFP/Getty
A new report by the
Justice Department’s inspector general has found little affirmative evidence that political bias affected the FBI’s handling of the
Hillary Clinton email investigation.
But the report (which
you can read at this link) criticizes several FBI employees involved in the probe for expressing anti-Trump political views in private messages — and it criticizes then-FBI Director James Comey’s unusual decisions to circumvent Justice Department leadership and speak publicly about the case.
Regarding the overall handling of the email probe itself, Inspector General Michael Horowitz extensively reviewed decisions about whom the FBI and DOJ interviewed, how they sought evidence, how they decided to grant immunity to certain people, and so on. Without endorsing all these choices, he concluded that overall, they were “not unreasonable” and seemed based on investigative judgment calls — not political bias, as President Trump and many on the right have often asserted.
While FBI director Christopher Wray said Thursday afternoon that he was “disappointed” by the report’s findings overall, he did point out that “this report did not find any evidence of political bias or improper considerations actually impacting the investigation under review.”
And on two more specific fronts, Horowitz is far more critical.
First, he writes, FBI officials involved in the case sent each other messages on their FBI devices “that created the appearance” of political bias. Here, he particularly criticizes FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok for texting his co-worker and lover Lisa Page that “we’ll stop” Trump from winning the election.
Horowitz says he found no affirmative evidence that Strzok skewed his decision-making for political reasons. But he says he “did not have confidence” that Strzok’s decision in the campaign’s final month to prioritize the Trump campaign/Russia probe over new Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop “was free from bias.” He writes that Strzok and other FBI employees “brought discredit to themselves” and hurt the bureau’s reputation.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/60067827/GettyImages_957434422.0.jpg)
