Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CaféAuLait;6099216 said:After 9/11 conservatives have no ground to stand on in regards to national security. And it gets worse. These fools supported the illegal invasion, conquering and destruction of Iraq.
So 9-11 had nothing to do with Clinton ignoring warnings? Nothing to do with his inaction? Please.
CaféAuLait;6099078 said:Lots of possible explanations. Wait for investigation before going off half cocked as usual.
Did anyone say the same to the WH who first blamed this violence on a film? Why not wait for an 'investigation' before declaring such?
Because in 20 other countries there were protests triggered by the film, and first CIA reports did the same? More Pubcrappe, no "lies"...
Explain to me what sort of investigation is underway:
"looters and curiosity-seekers were free to roam in the initial chaotic aftermath, and many documents may already have disappeared.
No government-provided security forces are guarding the compound, and Libyan investigators have visited just once, according to a member of the family who owns the compound and who allowed the journalists to enter Wednesday.
Two private security guards paid for by the compoundÂ’s Libyan owner are the only people watching over the sprawling site, which is composed of two adjoining villa complexes and protected in some places by a wall only eight feet high."
I don't see anything there about anyone investigating anything.
Sensitive documents left behind at American mission in Libya - The Washington Post
Then change the channel. Did Fox mention the State Dept., FBI, and CIA investigations? Doubtful LOL.
As opposed to RW BS and media gotcha, they take time.
CaféAuLait;6099216 said:After 9/11 conservatives have no ground to stand on in regards to national security. And it gets worse. These fools supported the illegal invasion, conquering and destruction of Iraq.
So 9-11 had nothing to do with Clinton ignoring warnings? Nothing to do with his inaction? Please.
Clinton didn't ignore shit.
The congress was hellbent to impeach him..and would not authorize the use of special operations to go in and get Osama. That's probably because Reagan and Bush both funded Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan. Heck..George HW Bush's son took over Abusto..a business started by Osama Bin Laden's brother, Salim. They left Clinton with Cruise missiles..and he used them. It didn't work..but he tried. And remember..Republicans called it "wagging the dog" or a distraction from Monica Lewinsky.
Well..because they weren't serious..and because they did everything they could to embarrass Clinton, Republicans gave us 9/11.
Gee thanks guys.
See you on election day.
The commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks issued a stinging condemnation yesterday of the U.S. government's failed hunt for Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorist network, finding that both the Clinton and Bush administrations focused too heavily on diplomacy that did not work and were reluctant to consider aggressive military action.
The reports suggest that many of the Clinton administration's policies also were ineffectual, revealing significant new details about as many as four missed opportunities to kill or capture bin Laden in 1998 and 1999.
The Clinton administration had as many as four chances to kill or capture bin Laden between December 1998 and July 1999, but all the operations were scuttled because of uncertain intelligence and fears that civilians or dignitaries might be killed. In one example, in May 1999, sources provided detailed reports about bin Laden's whereabouts in the Kandahar area over a period of five nights, but strikes were not ordered because the military was concerned about the accuracy of the reports and the risk of collateral damage, investigators found.
"Having a chance to get [bin Laden] three times in 36 hours and foregoing the chance each time has made me a bit angry," a CIA unit chief wrote to a colleague, adding that Tenet "finds himself alone at the table, with the other princip[als] basically saying 'we'll go along with your decision Mr. Director,' and implicitly saying that the Agency will hang alone if the attack doesn't get [bin Laden]."
I'm curious. WHY would the 'rescuers' all have cell phones out? Wouldn't they be too busy, you know, rescuing him?
"all"?
You MUST have a link that PROVES they "ALL" had their cell phones out. Like maybe a PHOTO???
ROTFLMAO cuz you is one desperate sob.![]()
you are a complete waste of oxygen. please stop wasting it.
Of course it's terrorism. DUH. We all know that now. Not whether there was already a protest. Gov't doesn't run on Fox/Pub BS gossip time.
Oh, the desperation of the idiot fringe...
Why didn't you nominate a better candidate?
Don't blame Obama, you screwed your own pooch.
And stop with the pathetic conspiracy theories. Issa is a tool.
Of course it's terrorism. DUH. We all know that now. Not whether there was already a protest. Gov't doesn't run on Fox/Pub BS gossip time.
Of course it's terrorism. DUH. We all know that now. Not whether there was already a protest. Gov't doesn't run on Fox/Pub BS gossip time.
I knew it about an hour after it happened, what took you so long to figure it out?
We do know Bush was totally incompetent at reacting to reports of AlQaeda and planes etc., and Pubs were great at distracting Clinton with BJ BS...


Of course it's terrorism. DUH. We all know that now. Not whether there was already a protest. Gov't doesn't run on Fox/Pub BS gossip time.
Wow you're really obsessed with fox, aren't you?
Oh, the desperation of the idiot fringe...
Why didn't you nominate a better candidate?
Don't blame Obama, you screwed your own pooch.
And stop with the pathetic conspiracy theories. Issa is a tool.
Are you paid by Al Quaeda?
You are, aren't you..or you pay them.