Republicans try but can't change history

[struth]

So we're invading the Philippines and Russia next?

There were no WMDs and the invasion was a foolish disaster

maybe…who knows what will be needed to clean up Xiden’s mess.

Doubt a russian invasion will ever happen though since they are a nuclear power

 

[NotfooledbyW]

well Saddam said! hahah

SH said he didn’t have any - Bush said he had them. - Do you thinj it’s funny that our President was wrong and Iraq’s dictator was right therefore Bush gets 5000 Americans and half a million Iraqis killed for being wrong and proving SH was right.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Then you agree, the Iraq war was a positive gain for the Iraqi people. Thank you.

No, it wasn't. Please stop posting shit.
Thank You!

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Yeah it was, that was day late and a dollar short, and after the UN found chemical weapons.

Congress did not and would not have ever authorized W to invade and occupy Iraq without removing the threat of WMD or to do regime change for regime change sake.

Regime change was necessary because BUSH lied that SH was hiding WMD from the inspectors in 2003.

BUSH Didn’t prearranged for regime change either,


BUSH LIED TO HAVE AN EXCISE FOR REGIME CHANGE:

HUGE LIE;

“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” DUBYA the DECIDER March 17 2003

 

[struth]

SH said he didn’t have any - Bush said he had them. - Do you thinj it’s funny that our President was wrong and Iraq’s dictator was right therefore Bush gets 5000 Americans and half a million Iraqis killed for being wrong and proving SH was right.

Yeah, Saddam is a known liar, dictator, killer, rapist, tyrant....not surprised some dembot is siding with him today

 

[struth]

No, it wasn't. Please stop posting shit.
Thank You!

well, it was, until Obama and Xiden surrendered it to ISIS and Iran.

Now, it's tough to say if they are better off then when Saddam and his socialist crew were raping, murdering, and torturing people.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Yeah, Saddam is a known liar, dictator, killer, rapist, tyrant....not surprised some dembot is siding with him today

Telling the truth is siding with the truth. You don’t tell the truth so you wouid know.

 

[Godboy]

No, it wasn't. Please stop posting shit.
Thank You!

Yes it was, obviously.

 

[Faun]

I didn’t say he invaded in 1998.

Saddam continued violations of the UN Resolutions, and attempts to continue to develop WMDs, is merely one of the numerous reasons to take out saddam

You quoted Clinton pointing out WMD's in 1998. That's irrelevant because that was before Clinton & Blare destroyed those WMD. By 2003, almost nothing was left and what was there was known by the U.N..

 

[struth]

Telling the truth is siding with the truth. You don’t tell the truth so you wouid know.

Saddam isn't the truth. Siding with Saddam is siding with a evil, brutal socialist dictator. Thanks for highlighting just how radical the dembots have become since the turn of the century.

 

[Faun]

well, it was, until Obama and Xiden surrendered it to ISIS and Iran.

Now, it's tough to say if they are better off then when Saddam and his socialist crew were raping, murdering, and torturing people.

LOL

Biden surrendered Iraq? How'd he do that? You know he wasn't Commander-in-Chief, right?

 

[struth]

You quoted Clinton pointing out WMD's in 1998. That's irrelevant because that was before Clinton & Blare destroyed those WMD. By 2003, almost nothing was left and what was there was known by the U.N..

Clinton stated that in 1998, as he was signing the Iraq Liberation Act, making it US Policy to over throw Saddam. There are numerous reasons, the fact that he had used WMDs, and made clear he use them again, was one of the many reasons.

But, by 2001, it was already policy of the United States to overthrow Saddam.

I am curious though, if you believe Clinton, what did Saddam do with all his WMDs?

 

[struth]

LOL

Biden surrendered Iraq? How'd he do that? You know he wasn't Commander-in-Chief, right?

Obama AND Xiden...they were President and VP, number 1 and 2.

Moreover, Xiden stated, he was personally responsbile for getting 150K troops out of Iraq, and surrendered to ISIS.....

he bragged about it....https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/national-international/joe-biden-i-was-responsible-for-getting-150000-combat-troops-out-of-iraq/2169029/

of course we had to go right back in after he did that because of the threat the "JV" team created,

 

[Faun]

Clinton stated that in 1998, as he was signing the Iraq Liberation Act, making it US Policy to over throw Saddam. There are numerous reasons, the fact that he had used WMDs, and made clear he use them again, was one of the many reasons.

But, by 2001, it was already policy of the United States to overthrow Saddam.

I am curious though, if you believe Clinton, what did Saddam do with all his WMDs?

Can't you read? I already pointed out Clinton & Blair destroyed those WMD.

CNN - Saddam Hussein proclaims 'victory' after airstrikes end - U.S., Britain: Mission accomplished - December 20, 1998

The Pentagon reported 97 sites had been hit and produced aerial photographs of what it said were damaged missile production facilities, collapsed Republican Guard barracks and a government building in Baghdad struck by three cruise missiles.

Both Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair said the mission -- to stop Iraq from continuing to make and store weapons of mass destruction -- was accomplished.​

 

[Faun]

Obama AND Xiden...they were President and VP, number 1 and 2.

Moreover, Xiden stated, he was personally responsbile for getting 150K troops out of Iraq, and surrendered to ISIS.....

he bragged about it....https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/national-international/joe-biden-i-was-responsible-for-getting-150000-combat-troops-out-of-iraq/2169029/

of course we had to go right back in after he did that because of the threat the "JV" team created,

Again, for the hard of learning, Biden was not the Comander-in-Chief. He had zero authority to make any military decisions. You shouldn't let your BDS dictate your thoughts.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

well, it was, until Obama and Xiden surrendered it to ISIS and Iran.

Bush and MALIKI December 2008 negotiated the date all US TROOOS HAD TO BE OUT. if you want to call it surrender it was BUsh’s

 

[struth]

Can't you read? I already pointed out Clinton & Blair destroyed those WMD.

CNN - Saddam Hussein proclaims 'victory' after airstrikes end - U.S., Britain: Mission accomplished - December 20, 1998​

​

The Pentagon reported 97 sites had been hit and produced aerial photographs of what it said were damaged missile production facilities, collapsed Republican Guard barracks and a government building in Baghdad struck by three cruise missiles.​

​

Both Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair said the mission -- to stop Iraq from continuing to make and store weapons of mass destruction -- was accomplished.​

so Clinton blew up chemical weapons ans bio weapons all over the ME?

the article only says they said it was a success from continuing to make them, not that it got rid of existing ones.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Saddam isn't the truth.

I did not say SH was the truth. He told the truth in 2002, and 2003 about having no WMD. Bush lied SH did not. ITS A FACT. that is the truth. Thus is not a Trump cult page where truth is whatever you want it to be.

 

[struth]

Again, for the hard of learning, Biden was not the Comander-in-Chief. He had zero authority to make any military decisions. You shouldn't let your BDS dictate your thoughts.

He said he was personally responsible. Is he a liar?

 

[struth]

I did not say SH was the truth. He told the truth in 2002,and 2003,having no WMD. Bush lied SH did not. ITS A FACT. that is the truth. Thus I’d not a Trump cult page where truth is whatever you want it to be.

keeping siding with deadly dictators. It’s what leftist do

next you’re gonna tell us how Pol Pot was misunderstood