Republicans try but can't change history

[Faun]

so Clinton blew up chemical weapons ans bio weapons all over the ME?

the article only says they said it was a success from continuing to make them, not that it got rid of existing ones.

Not all over the Middle East. No one even said that so who knows why your brain went there. And we know Clinton & Blair were successful since the U.N. went back into Iraq in 2002 and found nothing they hadn't already secured.

 

[Lesh]

well Saddam said! hahah

Actually the Inspectors "said".

And none were subsequently found

 

[struth]

Actually the Inspectors "said".

And none were subsequently found

nah the inspectors said he didn’t cooperate

 

[Leo123]

Fact check: Some Republicans have tried to rewrite the history of January 6. Here's how | CNN Politics

When the House Select Committee investigating the events of January 6 convenes for the first time, it will be against a backdrop of Republican objections and falsehoods.

www.cnn.com

Because history is what it is. Despite the efforts of Trump and his Cult members in Congress to rewrite it to reflect positively on Trump, theirs is a lost cause.

Trump and his disciples, since January 6 have tried over and over to convince the American people that the insurrection was caused by Antifa, was a peaceful event with lots of love in the air or was just a guided tour of the Capital building.

We know better! It was an aggressive attempt by white nationalists, inspired by Trump, to take over the government of the United States. Anyone who sees it in a different light is not a loyal, patriotic American, but rather is a Trump disciple who places him above the Constitution of the United States and the welfare of the majority of the American people.

Today's congressional hearing will expose the Trump people who tried to storm the Capital for what they really are: enemies of the American people.

Here we go again, the left blaming people for shit that they always do. The Marxist jig is up. Let's send the radicals packing.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

keeping siding with deadly dictators.

Keep lying. ITS ALL YOU KNOW HIW TO FO

nah the inspectors said he didn’t cooperate

No BLIX reported proactive cooperation from Iraq a month before the invasion.


Direct proactive cooperation was offered to the White House in December 02 But Bush refused to take it.

Sunday, December 22, 2002 FOX NEWS WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein's adviser Amir al-Saadi on Sunday invited the CIA to send its agents to Iraq to point out to U.N. inspectors sites the Bush administration suspects of weapons development.

Al-Saadi also said during a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq was prepared to answer any questions raised by the United States and Britain.

"We are ready to deal with each of those questions if you ask us," he said.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

nah the inspectors said he didn’t cooperate

Our SEC OF STATE in Jan 2003 said SH was cooperating and war was not inevitable.


MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: Finally, sir, that mobilization is occurring in Iraq right now, or in the region around Iraq. But at the same time, Iraq seems to be cooperating with the inspectors. I know your views on the Iraqi declaration, but aside from that, do you have any other evidence that Iraq is not complying with the UN resolution?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, the declaration is certainly noncompliant. There is no question about it. I don't think anybody is defending that declaration.


Colin Powell's remarks on ABC's This Week with George Stephanoplous: war is not “inevitable” DECEMBER 2002

Interview on ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos

They have been cooperating with the inspectors and we'll see if that cooperation continues.

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: And if it does, war is not inevitable?

SECRETARY POWELL: We've never said that war is inevitable. The President has always said that he is interested in a peaceful solution.
If invading IRAQ was not inevitable In January 2003 because of Iraqi cooperation according to Colin Powell, then how does an invasion become necessary in MARCH with continued Iraqi cooperation to a point of being proactive.

Your absolutely dishonest defense of BUSH killing half a million Iraqis at a cost of 5000 American soldiers and $1 trillion of American money Is flawed and absurd. You have nothing that supports any of your pure bullshit lies

 

[Correll]

They were Republican white-winger thugs.

1. They were Repubicans.

2. They were, mostly white.

3. They were mostly regular people, outraged over political matters and crossing a line from protest to rioting.

4. Your hysteria seems uncalled for. For you to be this hysterical over one riot, the antics of Antfia and BLM must have put you nearly at death's door. Or was that "different" for some reason?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Democrats are the ones who try to rewrite history.

Dumbing Down, Downer, Downest


The Blue-State Union's required school textbook on American History is titled Those Horrible White People.

 

[DudleySmith]

Not after September 11 2001? You are a liar because you cannot provide a quote:

Why would I kow tow to an idiot like yourself? You're not debating anything, just spewing bullshit.

 

[DudleySmith]

Not after September 11 2001? You are a liar because you cannot provide a link showing SH attacking any countries we had defense agreements with

Fucking moron denies his Hero didn't violate the cease fire agreements nearly every single day for years, then got stupid enough to directly threaten to kill members of a sitting President's family. Of course morons like NFBW actually admire that sort of idiocy and deeply resent George W. finishing off the piece of shit , because Clinton didn't have the balls to.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

SH said he didn’t have any - Bush said he had them. - Do you thinj it’s funny that our President was wrong and Iraq’s dictator was right therefore Bush gets 5000 Americans and half a million Iraqis killed for being wrong and proving SH was right.

By Selling Oil on the Black Market, Saddam Was Lowering Big Oil's Profits

If Dumbo Dubya, a puppet of Exxon, really believed that Saddam had WMDs, then he never would have invaded because thousands of our troop would have been quickly killed by them.

 

[DudleySmith]

By Selling Oil on the Black Market, Saddam Was Lowering Big Oil's Profits

If Dumbo Dubya, a puppet of Exxon, really believed that Saddam had WMDs, then he never would have invaded because thousands of our troop would have been quickly killed by them.

The problem with that theory is he didn't control any pipelines or tankers, and had to ship hot oil in tank trailers, small lots, which don't hold nearly enough to threaten Exxon's market share.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

one riot

JAN 6 was an attempts to overturn he election by preventing the counting of the certified electors on Jan 6 as is required by the Constitution.

Trump escalated the violence after the Capitol was originally breached and then did nothing to stop it for two hours.

“Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution,” Trump tweeted at 2.24 p.m.

"The select committee increasingly views that tweet as a catalyst of the day’s worst violence," Politico reported. "Multiple defendants charged with breaching the Capitol pointed to that tweet as a driver of the mob’s fury. Video footage captured by news media and taken by rioters themselves shows the crowd reacting to the tweet, which posted 10 minutes after the first wave of people entered the Capitol through a window shattered by a rioter wielding a stolen police shield

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Fucking moron denies his Hero didn't violate the cease fire agreements

I have never denied SH violated his ceasefire agree snd was in violation of it when Bush invaded in MARCH 2003.

You are a liar.

The fact of the matter is nobody had to die on any side to determine that SH did not have WMD hidden from inspectors.

The Invasion of Iraq was an absolute dimwit disaster based on a lie, and should not be sugarcoated by dimwitted Republicans only because a dimwitted Republican did it.

 

[Roudy]

No it was bush that should not have said that he had them since it was a lie..

In fact after 911 SH said he didn’t have any. SH actually invited the CIA and M I six to come in with the inspectorsTo search for a legend WMD Wherever they want it.

It was reported on Fox too:

Sunday, December 22, 2002 FOX NEWS WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein's adviser Amir al-Saadi on Sunday invited the CIA to send its agents to Iraq to point out to U.N. inspectors sites the Bush administration suspects of weapons development.



Al-Saadi also said during a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq was prepared to answer any questions raised by the United States and Britain.

"We are ready to deal with each of those questions if you ask us," he said.

The WMD's were the "official" reason for the Iraq war, the main reason was that if a bunch of determined lunatics with box cutters managed to turn airplanes into guided missiles as happened on 9-11, then a far more determined, militarized, financed and capable foe such as Iraq's Sadam that was threatening to outdo 9-11 could not remain standing.

9-11 changed everything.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Sadam that was threatening to outdo 9-11

You are just a liar.

Bush made a public offer ten days prior to the invasion and in writing at the UN where our President was willing to leave SH in powers - The public record and Bush’s willingness to avoid war means you are simply talking out of your ass.

 

[Roudy]

You are just a liar.

Bush made a public offer ten days prior to the invasion and in writing at the UN where our President was willing to leave SH in powers - The public record and Bush’s willingness to avoid war means you are simply talking out of your ass.

They were enforcing a no fly zone over Iraq for a decade, led by the US. And Sadam had already made one attempt at trying to assassinate Bush senior, a crazed dictator like Sadam with his resources, was obviously far more than newly formed Bin Laden's Al Queda wasn't more of a threat to the US. Anyhow I already told you that they shouldn't have touched Iraq because Sadam was keeping the Iranians at bay.

 

[surada]

By Selling Oil on the Black Market, Saddam Was Lowering Big Oil's Profits

If Dumbo Dubya, a puppet of Exxon, really believed that Saddam had WMDs, then he never would have invaded because thousands of our troop would have been quickly killed by them.

Iraq's oil production was way down. They desperately needed oil services companies for maintenance. Iraq was basically crippled by two decades of war and sanctions.

 

[DudleySmith]

Iraq's oil production was way down. They desperately needed oil services companies for maintenance. Iraq was basically crippled by two decades of war and sanctions.

It was crippled by its addiction to a 7th century death cult. Bush was ignorant like most 'elites' and really thought he could encourage leopards to change their stripes and rebuild a bunch of cultists into a civilized nation. He now knows better, and so do we. You loons just can't admit to that, too committed to 'Stupid'.

 

[DudleySmith]

Anyhow I already told you that they shouldn't have touched Iraq because Sadam was keeping the Iranians at bay.

Attacking Kuwait made that plan toast.