Charlotte96
Senior Member
Orange county has always been a conservative stonghold in southern California. In 2018, Dimocrats won the congressional seat likely due to ballot harvesting.
Now however, it will be back in the hands of the GOP.
By the way "Young Kim" is not the name of an Asian rapper.
Young Kim defeats Gil Cisneros in another victory for Republicans in Orange County
Michigan high school football scores from the third round of the playoffs
https://web.whatsapp.com/send?text=http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/BB1b00Sy?ocid=sw
View attachment 416017Republican candidate Young Kim has won a congressional seat in Orange County, marking the second race in the county in which the GOP took back a district it had lost to Democrats during the 2018 "blue wave."
Ah yes, Orange County. Where the Ku Klux Klan won most of the seats on the city council of Anaheim back in the day. You are correct, it always has been a conservative stronghold. Lotta immigrants from Kansas.
Back in the day when? The 1920s? Both Republican candidates who won were Korean-Americans and so that makes your KKK comment very silly. You are correct though that we have always been very Conservative.
And what does the word "always" mean? Hm?
Jesus Christ on a Cracker, reading is a lost fucking art.
I would say that 119 years of Republicans winning in Orange County without a break would constitute as being always.
Exactly. Nobody suggests "always" means "from the beginning of time" but rather "historically".
That was the first thing the OP brought up, and I illustrated it. Simple as that.
The purpose of the OP is to show that Republicans won back those House seats in the year 2020, for reasons only you know you then decided to want to make the thread about the 1920s instead of 2020 and then proceeded to post a ton of stuff about the KKK that has zero to do with two Republican Korean-Americans winning the House seats.
I think what you are attempting to do is say that the people of Orange County, which includes me are all "racist" and all "historically racist" this of course is wrong on both counts as if we were "racist" we wouldn't be voting for Korean-Americans and if we were "historically racist" then in the 1920s we wouldn't have been Republican we would have been Democrat. You gave an example of a handful of apparent KKK associates being elected to Anaheim Council in 1924 which proves nothing, you are talking there about just 7 people.
I didn't even bring up the idea of "racists". Nor, I think did the OP. In fact the Klan wasn't entirely about racism anyway --- it was also about persecuting Catholics, and Jews, and labor unions, and drunks and philanderers, and people who "didn't go to church". *YOU* brought up racism here Toots.
Usually when the KKK is brought up it's to accuse someone of being "racist"