Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 63,836
- 57,443
- 3,600
So it was a riot. Thanks.Not on riot day, January 6, 2021
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So it was a riot. Thanks.Not on riot day, January 6, 2021
You are wrong again. It was all legal. They wrote Trump won because the result could have changed. If it did change Trump would be the winner.
Pence could not have done that. There would not be a winner that day if anything happened.
One down.
Judge dismisses Nevada fake electors case over lack of jurisdiction - The Nevada Independent
Judge Mary Kay Holthus was unconvinced that Clark County was the appropriate place to hear the case. The state cannot re-file in another county because of a statute of limitations but will appeal the ruling.thenevadaindependent.com
He was banned from Twitter. Try again.
They were there in case those states changed their results or there was going to be an investigation. You are wrong. Nothing illegal about it.They were never certified yet were still sent to Congress to be counted. That's fraud.
The winner was also to be challenged that day. That is how it works. Pelosi changed that rule after the riot and no one was heard. That is the truth . You are lying.Which is why it was fraud. There was a winner and he was supposed to be certified by Congress on that day.
Did they tell you that? I have heard no such thing.No, not down. They'll simply refile in another county.
They were there in case those states changed their results or there was going to be an investigation. You are wrong. Nothing illegal about it.
Yes, for putting the Vice president's life at risk.
Did they tell you that? I have heard no such thing.
If the legislature changed that states results they would be legal electors. You have lost this argument troll.Retard, to be an official elector whose vote is sent to Congress to be counted, they have to be certified. They weren’t. That's why they're being indicted.
And that is supposed to mean something?It's what I expect will happen.
Very revealing you find this amusing.
They certified the result that Trump won. For truth to exist in your attempt at falsifying the record, the document would have to had read that the primary fact is that Trump lost the election in their state but they are available to serve as electors in the event that the situation becomes changed.They were there in case those states changed their results or there was going to be an investigation. You are wrong. Nothing illegal about it.
They certified the result that Trump won. For truth to exist in your attempt at falsifying the record, the document would have to had read that the primary fact is that Trump lost the election in their state but they are available to serve as electors in the event that the situation becomes changed.
The document they signed said Trump had already won. They may not have known their documents were to be used in a criminal conspiracy to commit fraud in an effort to extend Trump’s presidency beyond his first constitutional term,
You just helped convict every stupid Trump serving Republican who posed as certified electors before your fucking “if” took place.If the legislature changed that states results they would be legal electors.
Let me know when my subpoena is coming.You just helped convict every stupid Trump serving Republican who posed as certified electors before your fucking “if” took place.
Thanks.
You don’t get subpoenaed for making an argument that helps convict the criminals.Let me know when my subpoena is coming