Republicans Submit Articles To Impeach Biden As Soon As He's Sworn In

Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president just because you can is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.



"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.
There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."

let's see. You say:

If he should win. He's already won.

The House is still Demo controlled where such a bill wouldn't make it off the floor. Even all the Republicans wouldn't vote for it.

Rump is gone, Biden gets sworn in on Jan 20th. Get used to it.
Biden didn't win diddly squat and anyone that can claim that with a straight face is just asn inept as pedo Joe.....
I claim it, and you are a liar who cannot prove Biden didn't win.
Yes, we know what you've been told to say.
Are you saying I've been told to say Biden won? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: Dude, you have got to be high on something.
You've been told to believe Biden won fairly and transparently. You're a gullible moron.
And you've been told there was voter fraud with zero evidence. You should be ashamed for sucking up to these lies.
Oh, there was voter and election fraud, make NO mistake about that. Over 900 affidavits signed under penalty of perjury says so. I bet you have never even listened to those that came forward. Of course Silicon Valley has worked overtime censoring anyone that speaks out. Amerikka, the land of the sheeple living in a banana republic....
You'll never prove it, so yes, you are making the mistake, not me. Try again.
"You'll never prove it".

So, you, like most Democrats, have not been denying the fraud. You just say no one can prove it.

Yyyeeeahhh ummm..... without any evidence there simply IS NOTHING TO "DENY". This may come as a revelation but the burden of proof is never ---- as in not ever ---- on the receiving end.
Uh huh. You just believe what you believe because you were told to believe it.
 
How would it be any diff than how the GOP treated Bill Clinton? This stupid feud has been going on since the rabid Reagan Repubs started it when GWB sr lost his reelection attempt.

Go back farther. When you guys formed the KKK to oppose Lincoln's policies is when it really started.
Moonglow did not form the KKK. That is unless his name is James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord or Richard R. Reed and he's at least 179 years old. NOR was it formed to "oppose Lincoln's policies" (who was already dead) or for any political purpose at all.
Remember, kids, no Democrat today is responsible for the KKK, but all Republicans today are responsible for slavery in America. So pay up!

Hey, Pogo, what have you done to assuage your white guilt today?
First time I have ever heard you admit to the Southern Strategy. Good for you.
Really? I'm responsible for the slavery that Republicans ended a century and a half ago?

I'd ask you to explain that rationally, but you're incapable.
You arent responsible for anything other than yourself. I was just congratulating you on admitting to the Southern Strategy
I was mocking leftist retardery. Are you admitting leftists are retarded?

The Southern Strategy is a myth, a desperate effort by Democrats to distance themselves from their 20th Century legislative racism.

Idiots buy it. Obviously.
It is known as history, and I am old enough to remember it happening.
You remember what didn't happen, then.
I am not the only one here who remembers it.

Yep, I remember it too. Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in of all places Philadelphia ... not the one in Pennsylvania where the Constitution came together where the Liberty Bell is, no the one in Mississippi where the infamous triple murder of civil rights activists went down in 1964, talking about "states' rights". 1964, the same year "states' rights" George Wallace offered to be Barry Goldwater's running mate because candidate Goldwater had voted against the Civil rights Act (Goldwater didn't need Wallace; he won the deep South without him).

Then there was the Republican Party strategist Lee Atwater, analyzing what Dave thinks never existed, in 1981:

>> You start out in 1954 by saying, "******, ******, ******." By 1968 you can't say "******"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "******, ******." <<​
That was the blueprint for the Republican Party to take over the one-party-rule of the South by highlighting race and how it (the RP) was going to be the device to keep black people down more so than the Democrats. And the Democrats obliged -- or we could say got it started -- by passing that 1964 Civil Rights Act, triggering both Wallace's offer and Strom Thurmond's until-then-unthinkable departure to the "party of Lincoln". Thus broke the dam.

Guess Daveward Gunnerhands never learned about all this shit while he was immersed in his guns.
I have no obligation to believe your fantasies, pussy.

Actually it's quoted history. And yes you're free to bury your head in the sand and wail to anyone who will still listen that it didn't happen. Even though it's all in the history books. Not the direction I would have taken but hey, that's just me.
The history of the Democratic Party is based on racism, and it continues to this day. You can't NUH UH your way out of it, no matter how hard you try. But you need to realize your acknowledgement is neither sought nor required.

Oh look. Daveward Gunnerhands wants to be awarded a drive-by because he can't argue with quoted history.
That's so cute. Rendered impotent by histories of fifty years ago he wants to shift to 190. Bravely ran away.
Oh look, Slogo the retarded monkey claims Dems supported the Civil Rights Act? No retard. There was almost ZERO support from Dems for that, giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote, or giving women the right to vote. All there in recorded history. Yet you choose to keep your head up your ass. Most people would be ashamed to be like you.
Pogo laughed at this post. Unintelligent people laugh at things they don't understand.

I laughed, because I knew at first sight what I was about to do with it.

Chuckle. I kill me.
Yes. You knew you were going to play your Bullshit Card. Because that's all you've got.

Actually that's more of that thar "history". You know, that shit that you had no clue about with the Southern Strategy and got your ass handed to you?

platter.jpg
Dood, you ignore reality harder than anyone I ever met.

Daveward posts "note to self", mistakenly drops it on USMB.

You got schlonged, Gunnerhands. You had no idea of the history you tried to deny, and got your clock cleaned.
Good Gaea, will you stop whining that I don't believe leftist alternate history? I'm a rational person. I'm not going to embrace your fantasies.

Guess what Daveward ---- History doesn't give a shit whether you embrace it or not. Know why? Because she knows there's nothing you can do about it.

I know it too. That's why I wield it like a truncheon.

And you with your "Magic Switch". Hee hee hee.
I know history. She said to tell you you're full of shit.

Apparently not, since I/we provided links, quotes and facts to document what you had no clue of, and you had........... well nothing.

My that's a sparkling clean horologe situated on your wall Mr Gunnerhands. May I ask who cleans your clock?

Oh wait, I remember. I do.

It must be because I do it every day that it looks so fresh.
I provided proof of my claims. You stamping your foot and insisting it's not there only makes you look like a child.

But in your defense, I must say you are a child, and simply can't act any different.

You didn't claim anything, Gunnerhands. You denied the existence of in this case the Southern Strategy. And WE provided proof that your denial is just that. So as far as insisting it's not there, that's on you dood.
YOU provided proof of Republicans pandering to liberals.

As if that proves anything.
 
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.
True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.
Except that is a lie. There are no proven crimes liar.
 
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.
True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.
What crimes? What treason?
Using the IRS to attack opponents, selling weapons to the cartel that ended up killing our guards, lying to the public about the cause of losing our Ambassador in BenGhazi over a stupid video (to hide his incompetence in order to get elected, what they did with Hunter and Joe Biden corruption in China and other countries), colluding with Russian intelligence by using a fake Doosier and using our law and intelligence agencies to spy on and set up the campaign and candidate of the oppositiong party, inciting riots, looting and arson in at least two cases...to name a few.

Don't forget the 45 minute meeting of Obama's attorney general on the Tarmac with Bill Clinton, while Hillary was being investigated. Remind us again, did they go after her for obstruction wiping out her hard drive, 32,0000 subpoenaed emails, and smashing 13 mobile devices of which she claimed to have only one? Nope.

If anybody deserved to be impeached, it was that divisive incompetent piece of shit enemy of state Obama. But then again, he's Black and Democrat so as usual they get the dictator fascist get out of jail pass.
Much of this is not true.
He's a known, proven liar on this board.
 
How would it be any diff than how the GOP treated Bill Clinton? This stupid feud has been going on since the rabid Reagan Repubs started it when GWB sr lost his reelection attempt.

Go back farther. When you guys formed the KKK to oppose Lincoln's policies is when it really started.
Moonglow did not form the KKK. That is unless his name is James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord or Richard R. Reed and he's at least 179 years old. NOR was it formed to "oppose Lincoln's policies" (who was already dead) or for any political purpose at all.
Remember, kids, no Democrat today is responsible for the KKK, but all Republicans today are responsible for slavery in America. So pay up!

Hey, Pogo, what have you done to assuage your white guilt today?
First time I have ever heard you admit to the Southern Strategy. Good for you.
Really? I'm responsible for the slavery that Republicans ended a century and a half ago?

I'd ask you to explain that rationally, but you're incapable.
You arent responsible for anything other than yourself. I was just congratulating you on admitting to the Southern Strategy
I was mocking leftist retardery. Are you admitting leftists are retarded?

The Southern Strategy is a myth, a desperate effort by Democrats to distance themselves from their 20th Century legislative racism.

Idiots buy it. Obviously.
It is known as history, and I am old enough to remember it happening.
You remember what didn't happen, then.
I am not the only one here who remembers it.

Yep, I remember it too. Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in of all places Philadelphia ... not the one in Pennsylvania where the Constitution came together where the Liberty Bell is, no the one in Mississippi where the infamous triple murder of civil rights activists went down in 1964, talking about "states' rights". 1964, the same year "states' rights" George Wallace offered to be Barry Goldwater's running mate because candidate Goldwater had voted against the Civil rights Act (Goldwater didn't need Wallace; he won the deep South without him).

Then there was the Republican Party strategist Lee Atwater, analyzing what Dave thinks never existed, in 1981:

>> You start out in 1954 by saying, "******, ******, ******." By 1968 you can't say "******"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "******, ******." <<​
That was the blueprint for the Republican Party to take over the one-party-rule of the South by highlighting race and how it (the RP) was going to be the device to keep black people down more so than the Democrats. And the Democrats obliged -- or we could say got it started -- by passing that 1964 Civil Rights Act, triggering both Wallace's offer and Strom Thurmond's until-then-unthinkable departure to the "party of Lincoln". Thus broke the dam.

Guess Daveward Gunnerhands never learned about all this shit while he was immersed in his guns.
I have no obligation to believe your fantasies, pussy.

Actually it's quoted history. And yes you're free to bury your head in the sand and wail to anyone who will still listen that it didn't happen. Even though it's all in the history books. Not the direction I would have taken but hey, that's just me.
The history of the Democratic Party is based on racism, and it continues to this day. You can't NUH UH your way out of it, no matter how hard you try. But you need to realize your acknowledgement is neither sought nor required.

Oh look. Daveward Gunnerhands wants to be awarded a drive-by because he can't argue with quoted history.
That's so cute. Rendered impotent by histories of fifty years ago he wants to shift to 190. Bravely ran away.
Oh look, Slogo the retarded monkey claims Dems supported the Civil Rights Act? No retard. There was almost ZERO support from Dems for that, giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote, or giving women the right to vote. All there in recorded history. Yet you choose to keep your head up your ass. Most people would be ashamed to be like you.
Pogo laughed at this post. Unintelligent people laugh at things they don't understand.

I laughed, because I knew at first sight what I was about to do with it.

Chuckle. I kill me.
Yes. You knew you were going to play your Bullshit Card. Because that's all you've got.

Actually that's more of that thar "history". You know, that shit that you had no clue about with the Southern Strategy and got your ass handed to you?

platter.jpg
Dood, you ignore reality harder than anyone I ever met.

Daveward posts "note to self", mistakenly drops it on USMB.

You got schlonged, Gunnerhands. You had no idea of the history you tried to deny, and got your clock cleaned.
Good Gaea, will you stop whining that I don't believe leftist alternate history? I'm a rational person. I'm not going to embrace your fantasies.

Guess what Daveward ---- History doesn't give a shit whether you embrace it or not. Know why? Because she knows there's nothing you can do about it.

I know it too. That's why I wield it like a truncheon.

And you with your "Magic Switch". Hee hee hee.
I know history. She said to tell you you're full of shit.

Apparently not, since I/we provided links, quotes and facts to document what you had no clue of, and you had........... well nothing.

My that's a sparkling clean horologe situated on your wall Mr Gunnerhands. May I ask who cleans your clock?

Oh wait, I remember. I do.

It must be because I do it every day that it looks so fresh.
I provided proof of my claims. You stamping your foot and insisting it's not there only makes you look like a child.

But in your defense, I must say you are a child, and simply can't act any different.

You didn't claim anything, Gunnerhands. You denied the existence of in this case the Southern Strategy. And WE provided proof that your denial is just that. So as far as insisting it's not there, that's on you dood.
YOU provided proof of Republicans pandering to liberals.

As if that proves anything.

:laughing0301:

Daveward Gunnerhands STILL butthurt that we handed him not one but two Republican CHAIRS, one of them black, directly contradicting his clueless ass after he sat here and purported to know more about the Republican Party than its own leaders.

You're pathetic.
 
Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president just because you can is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.



"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.
There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."

let's see. You say:

If he should win. He's already won.

The House is still Demo controlled where such a bill wouldn't make it off the floor. Even all the Republicans wouldn't vote for it.

Rump is gone, Biden gets sworn in on Jan 20th. Get used to it.
Biden didn't win diddly squat and anyone that can claim that with a straight face is just asn inept as pedo Joe.....
I claim it, and you are a liar who cannot prove Biden didn't win.
Yes, we know what you've been told to say.
Are you saying I've been told to say Biden won? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: Dude, you have got to be high on something.
You've been told to believe Biden won fairly and transparently. You're a gullible moron.
And you've been told there was voter fraud with zero evidence. You should be ashamed for sucking up to these lies.
Oh, there was voter and election fraud, make NO mistake about that. Over 900 affidavits signed under penalty of perjury says so. I bet you have never even listened to those that came forward. Of course Silicon Valley has worked overtime censoring anyone that speaks out. Amerikka, the land of the sheeple living in a banana republic....
You'll never prove it, so yes, you are making the mistake, not me. Try again.
"You'll never prove it".

So, you, like most Democrats, have not been denying the fraud. You just say no one can prove it.

Yyyeeeahhh ummm..... without any evidence there simply IS NOTHING TO "DENY". This may come as a revelation but the burden of proof is never ---- as in not ever ---- on the receiving end.
Uh huh. You just believe what you believe because you were told to believe it.

It ain't open for negotiation. It's how the fucking universe works.
 
How would it be any diff than how the GOP treated Bill Clinton? This stupid feud has been going on since the rabid Reagan Repubs started it when GWB sr lost his reelection attempt.

Go back farther. When you guys formed the KKK to oppose Lincoln's policies is when it really started.
Moonglow did not form the KKK. That is unless his name is James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord or Richard R. Reed and he's at least 179 years old. NOR was it formed to "oppose Lincoln's policies" (who was already dead) or for any political purpose at all.
Remember, kids, no Democrat today is responsible for the KKK, but all Republicans today are responsible for slavery in America. So pay up!

Hey, Pogo, what have you done to assuage your white guilt today?
First time I have ever heard you admit to the Southern Strategy. Good for you.
Really? I'm responsible for the slavery that Republicans ended a century and a half ago?

I'd ask you to explain that rationally, but you're incapable.
You arent responsible for anything other than yourself. I was just congratulating you on admitting to the Southern Strategy
I was mocking leftist retardery. Are you admitting leftists are retarded?

The Southern Strategy is a myth, a desperate effort by Democrats to distance themselves from their 20th Century legislative racism.

Idiots buy it. Obviously.
It is known as history, and I am old enough to remember it happening.
You remember what didn't happen, then.
I am not the only one here who remembers it.

Yep, I remember it too. Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in of all places Philadelphia ... not the one in Pennsylvania where the Constitution came together where the Liberty Bell is, no the one in Mississippi where the infamous triple murder of civil rights activists went down in 1964, talking about "states' rights". 1964, the same year "states' rights" George Wallace offered to be Barry Goldwater's running mate because candidate Goldwater had voted against the Civil rights Act (Goldwater didn't need Wallace; he won the deep South without him).

Then there was the Republican Party strategist Lee Atwater, analyzing what Dave thinks never existed, in 1981:

>> You start out in 1954 by saying, "******, ******, ******." By 1968 you can't say "******"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "******, ******." <<​
That was the blueprint for the Republican Party to take over the one-party-rule of the South by highlighting race and how it (the RP) was going to be the device to keep black people down more so than the Democrats. And the Democrats obliged -- or we could say got it started -- by passing that 1964 Civil Rights Act, triggering both Wallace's offer and Strom Thurmond's until-then-unthinkable departure to the "party of Lincoln". Thus broke the dam.

Guess Daveward Gunnerhands never learned about all this shit while he was immersed in his guns.
I have no obligation to believe your fantasies, pussy.

Actually it's quoted history. And yes you're free to bury your head in the sand and wail to anyone who will still listen that it didn't happen. Even though it's all in the history books. Not the direction I would have taken but hey, that's just me.
The history of the Democratic Party is based on racism, and it continues to this day. You can't NUH UH your way out of it, no matter how hard you try. But you need to realize your acknowledgement is neither sought nor required.

Oh look. Daveward Gunnerhands wants to be awarded a drive-by because he can't argue with quoted history.
That's so cute. Rendered impotent by histories of fifty years ago he wants to shift to 190. Bravely ran away.
Oh look, Slogo the retarded monkey claims Dems supported the Civil Rights Act? No retard. There was almost ZERO support from Dems for that, giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote, or giving women the right to vote. All there in recorded history. Yet you choose to keep your head up your ass. Most people would be ashamed to be like you.
Pogo laughed at this post. Unintelligent people laugh at things they don't understand.

I laughed, because I knew at first sight what I was about to do with it.

Chuckle. I kill me.
Yes. You knew you were going to play your Bullshit Card. Because that's all you've got.

Actually that's more of that thar "history". You know, that shit that you had no clue about with the Southern Strategy and got your ass handed to you?

platter.jpg
Dood, you ignore reality harder than anyone I ever met.

Daveward posts "note to self", mistakenly drops it on USMB.

You got schlonged, Gunnerhands. You had no idea of the history you tried to deny, and got your clock cleaned.
Good Gaea, will you stop whining that I don't believe leftist alternate history? I'm a rational person. I'm not going to embrace your fantasies.

Guess what Daveward ---- History doesn't give a shit whether you embrace it or not. Know why? Because she knows there's nothing you can do about it.

I know it too. That's why I wield it like a truncheon.

And you with your "Magic Switch". Hee hee hee.
I know history. She said to tell you you're full of shit.

Apparently not, since I/we provided links, quotes and facts to document what you had no clue of, and you had........... well nothing.

My that's a sparkling clean horologe situated on your wall Mr Gunnerhands. May I ask who cleans your clock?

Oh wait, I remember. I do.

It must be because I do it every day that it looks so fresh.
I provided proof of my claims. You stamping your foot and insisting it's not there only makes you look like a child.

But in your defense, I must say you are a child, and simply can't act any different.

You didn't claim anything, Gunnerhands. You denied the existence of in this case the Southern Strategy. And WE provided proof that your denial is just that. So as far as insisting it's not there, that's on you dood.
YOU provided proof of Republicans pandering to liberals.

As if that proves anything.

:laughing0301:

Daveward Gunnerhands STILL butthurt that we handed him not one but two Republican CHAIRS, one of them black, directly contradicting his clueless ass after he sat here and purported to know more about the Republican Party than its own leaders.

You're pathetic.
Boy, you really hate it that people aren't required to swallow your bullshit without question.

Cheer up. Maybe President Biden will mandate liberal Groupthink.
 
Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president just because you can is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.



"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.
There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."

let's see. You say:

If he should win. He's already won.

The House is still Demo controlled where such a bill wouldn't make it off the floor. Even all the Republicans wouldn't vote for it.

Rump is gone, Biden gets sworn in on Jan 20th. Get used to it.
Biden didn't win diddly squat and anyone that can claim that with a straight face is just asn inept as pedo Joe.....
I claim it, and you are a liar who cannot prove Biden didn't win.
Yes, we know what you've been told to say.
Are you saying I've been told to say Biden won? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: Dude, you have got to be high on something.
You've been told to believe Biden won fairly and transparently. You're a gullible moron.
And you've been told there was voter fraud with zero evidence. You should be ashamed for sucking up to these lies.
Oh, there was voter and election fraud, make NO mistake about that. Over 900 affidavits signed under penalty of perjury says so. I bet you have never even listened to those that came forward. Of course Silicon Valley has worked overtime censoring anyone that speaks out. Amerikka, the land of the sheeple living in a banana republic....
You'll never prove it, so yes, you are making the mistake, not me. Try again.
"You'll never prove it".

So, you, like most Democrats, have not been denying the fraud. You just say no one can prove it.

Yyyeeeahhh ummm..... without any evidence there simply IS NOTHING TO "DENY". This may come as a revelation but the burden of proof is never ---- as in not ever ---- on the receiving end.
Uh huh. You just believe what you believe because you were told to believe it.

It ain't open for negotiation. It's how the fucking universe works.
Link?
 
Boy, you really hate it that people aren't required to swallow your bullshit without question.

Cheer up. Maybe President Biden will mandate liberal Groupthink.

Tsk tsk tsk. Dave Dave Dave. This is about as pathetic as any delusional loser has sunk to on this site and that's saying a lot.

YOU sat here and proclaimed yourself to be Lord God Supreme of Republican Party history, then you had all kinds of links thrown in your face proving your head was way up your ass, and then you got quotes from the head of that Republican Party, TWICE. And you still don't have the balls to admit you were wrong.

Go ahead little man, grab the last word and be a big boy or some shit.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BWK
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.
True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.
What crimes? What treason?
Using the IRS to attack opponents, selling weapons to the cartel that ended up killing our guards, lying to the public about the cause of losing our Ambassador in BenGhazi over a stupid video (to hide his incompetence in order to get elected, what they did with Hunter and Joe Biden corruption in China and other countries), colluding with Russian intelligence by using a fake Doosier and using our law and intelligence agencies to spy on and set up the campaign and candidate of the oppositiong party, inciting riots, looting and arson in at least two cases...to name a few.

Don't forget the 45 minute meeting of Obama's attorney general on the Tarmac with Bill Clinton, while Hillary was being investigated. Remind us again, did they go after her for obstruction wiping out her hard drive, 32,0000 subpoenaed emails, and smashing 13 mobile devices of which she claimed to have only one? Nope.

If anybody deserved to be impeached, it was that divisive incompetent piece of shit enemy of state Obama. But then again, he's Black and Democrat so as usual they get the dictator fascist get out of jail pass.
Much of this is not true.
In fact, all of it is true.
 
Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.



"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.
There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

We know the last time the Capitol was sacked was the British (or for Rumpbots, the "Canadians") in 1814. But when was the last time a POTUS stirred up a mob to attack the very government he's supposed to be the head of?

Far as I can tell that date was the Nevereth of Neverteen Neverty-Never.

If that isn't cause for impeachment with all possible speed WHAT THE FUCK IS?
The last time the capital was sacked was over the summer and shortly thereafter by Biden voters and BLM / Antifa animals, while Democrat leaders incited and encouraged them.
 
Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.



"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.
There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

We know the last time the Capitol was sacked was the British (or for Rumpbots, the "Canadians") in 1814. But when was the last time a POTUS stirred up a mob to attack the very government he's supposed to be the head of?

Far as I can tell that date was the Nevereth of Neverteen Neverty-Never.

If that isn't cause for impeachment with all possible speed WHAT THE FUCK IS?
The last time the capital was sacked was over the summer and shortly thereafter by Biden voters and BLM / Antifa animals, while Democrat leaders incited and encouraged them.

Linky-winky?

By the way it's Capitol, not capital.
 
Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.



"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.
There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

We know the last time the Capitol was sacked was the British (or for Rumpbots, the "Canadians") in 1814. But when was the last time a POTUS stirred up a mob to attack the very government he's supposed to be the head of?

Far as I can tell that date was the Nevereth of Neverteen Neverty-Never.

If that isn't cause for impeachment with all possible speed WHAT THE FUCK IS?
The last time the capital was sacked was over the summer and shortly thereafter by Biden voters and BLM / Antifa animals, while Democrat leaders incited and encouraged them.

Linky-winky?

By the way it's Capitol, not capital.

June 19[edit]
On the night of Juneteenth protesters gathered at the Albert Pike Memorial in Judiciary Square and using ropes and chains toppled the statue of Pike. The statue was set on fire and a few minutes later local police extinguished the flames.[52] The statue was removed the following day by the National Park Service (NPS).[53] In response to the Pike statue being toppled, Trump tweeted: "The D.C. police are not doing their job as they watch a statue be ripped down & burn. These people should be immediately arrested. A disgrace to our Country!" Because the memorial is in a federal park, it is under jurisdiction of the NPS and U.S. Park Police, not the local police.[52]

June 23[edit]

Clark Mills' equestrian statue of Andrew Jackson north of the White House in May 2008.
Hundreds of protesters gathered near Clark Mills' 1842 equestrian statue of Andrew Jackson in Lafayette Square within President's Park. Protesters spray painted "killer" and other phrases on the pedestal. Rioters then affixed ropes to the statue and unsuccessfully attempted to pull it down. Police used batons and pepper spray to disperse the crowd.[54]

Several days later, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) charged four men with destruction of federal property for allegedly trying to bring down the statue. The Justice Department alleged that a video showed one of the men breaking off and destroying the wheels of the cannons located at the base of the statue as well as pulling on ropes when trying to bring down the statue.[55]


Gaetano Trentanove's Albert Pike Memorial statue near Judiciary Square in Washington, D.C. in December 2008.
Soon afterwards, the DOJ announced the arrest and charging of a man who was not only allegedly seen on video climbing up onto the Jackson statue and affixing a rope that was then used to try to pull the statue down, but also had on June 20 helped destroy Gaetano Trentanove's 1901 Albert Pike Memorial statue near Washington's Judiciary Square by pulling it from its base and setting it on fire. The DOJ's complaint alleged that the man had been captured on video dousing the federally-owned Pike statue with a flammable liquid, igniting it as it lay on the ground and using the fire to light a cigarette.[56]

The Lincoln Memorial, the World War II Memorial, and the statue of General Casimir Pulaski were vandalized during the protests in Washington, D.C.[68]

Unknown individuals vandalized the statue of Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of the Indian independence movement. The incident prompted the Indian Embassy to register a complaint with law enforcement agencies. Taranjit Singh Sandhu, the Indian Ambassador to the United States called the vandalism "a crime against humanity".[69][70] U.S. President Donald Trump called the defacement of Mahatma Gandhi's statue in D.C. a "disgrace".[71]
 
Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.



"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.
There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

We know the last time the Capitol was sacked was the British (or for Rumpbots, the "Canadians") in 1814. But when was the last time a POTUS stirred up a mob to attack the very government he's supposed to be the head of?

Far as I can tell that date was the Nevereth of Neverteen Neverty-Never.

If that isn't cause for impeachment with all possible speed WHAT THE FUCK IS?
The last time the capital was sacked was over the summer and shortly thereafter by Biden voters and BLM / Antifa animals, while Democrat leaders incited and encouraged them.

Linky-winky?

By the way it's Capitol, not capital.

June 19[edit]
On the night of Juneteenth protesters gathered at the Albert Pike Memorial in Judiciary Square and using ropes and chains toppled the statue of Pike. The statue was set on fire and a few minutes later local police extinguished the flames.[52] The statue was removed the following day by the National Park Service (NPS).[53] In response to the Pike statue being toppled, Trump tweeted: "The D.C. police are not doing their job as they watch a statue be ripped down & burn. These people should be immediately arrested. A disgrace to our Country!" Because the memorial is in a federal park, it is under jurisdiction of the NPS and U.S. Park Police, not the local police.[52]

June 23[edit]

Clark Mills' equestrian statue of Andrew Jackson north of the White House in May 2008.
Hundreds of protesters gathered near Clark Mills' 1842 equestrian statue of Andrew Jackson in Lafayette Square within President's Park. Protesters spray painted "killer" and other phrases on the pedestal. Rioters then affixed ropes to the statue and unsuccessfully attempted to pull it down. Police used batons and pepper spray to disperse the crowd.[54]

Several days later, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) charged four men with destruction of federal property for allegedly trying to bring down the statue. The Justice Department alleged that a video showed one of the men breaking off and destroying the wheels of the cannons located at the base of the statue as well as pulling on ropes when trying to bring down the statue.[55]


Gaetano Trentanove's Albert Pike Memorial statue near Judiciary Square in Washington, D.C. in December 2008.
Soon afterwards, the DOJ announced the arrest and charging of a man who was not only allegedly seen on video climbing up onto the Jackson statue and affixing a rope that was then used to try to pull the statue down, but also had on June 20 helped destroy Gaetano Trentanove's 1901 Albert Pike Memorial statue near Washington's Judiciary Square by pulling it from its base and setting it on fire. The DOJ's complaint alleged that the man had been captured on video dousing the federally-owned Pike statue with a flammable liquid, igniting it as it lay on the ground and using the fire to light a cigarette.[56]

The Lincoln Memorial, the World War II Memorial, and the statue of General Casimir Pulaski were vandalized during the protests in Washington, D.C.[68]

Unknown individuals vandalized the statue of Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of the Indian independence movement. The incident prompted the Indian Embassy to register a complaint with law enforcement agencies. Taranjit Singh Sandhu, the Indian Ambassador to the United States called the vandalism "a crime against humanity".[69][70] U.S. President Donald Trump called the defacement of Mahatma Gandhi's statue in D.C. a "disgrace".[71]

STILL not seeing any reference to the Capitol. Which looks like this:

capitol-logo.gif
You lose.
 
Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.



"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.
Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.
There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

We know the last time the Capitol was sacked was the British (or for Rumpbots, the "Canadians") in 1814. But when was the last time a POTUS stirred up a mob to attack the very government he's supposed to be the head of?

Far as I can tell that date was the Nevereth of Neverteen Neverty-Never.

If that isn't cause for impeachment with all possible speed WHAT THE FUCK IS?
The last time the capital was sacked was over the summer and shortly thereafter by Biden voters and BLM / Antifa animals, while Democrat leaders incited and encouraged them.

Linky-winky?

By the way it's Capitol, not capital.

June 19[edit]
On the night of Juneteenth protesters gathered at the Albert Pike Memorial in Judiciary Square and using ropes and chains toppled the statue of Pike. The statue was set on fire and a few minutes later local police extinguished the flames.[52] The statue was removed the following day by the National Park Service (NPS).[53] In response to the Pike statue being toppled, Trump tweeted: "The D.C. police are not doing their job as they watch a statue be ripped down & burn. These people should be immediately arrested. A disgrace to our Country!" Because the memorial is in a federal park, it is under jurisdiction of the NPS and U.S. Park Police, not the local police.[52]

June 23[edit]

Clark Mills' equestrian statue of Andrew Jackson north of the White House in May 2008.
Hundreds of protesters gathered near Clark Mills' 1842 equestrian statue of Andrew Jackson in Lafayette Square within President's Park. Protesters spray painted "killer" and other phrases on the pedestal. Rioters then affixed ropes to the statue and unsuccessfully attempted to pull it down. Police used batons and pepper spray to disperse the crowd.[54]

Several days later, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) charged four men with destruction of federal property for allegedly trying to bring down the statue. The Justice Department alleged that a video showed one of the men breaking off and destroying the wheels of the cannons located at the base of the statue as well as pulling on ropes when trying to bring down the statue.[55]


Gaetano Trentanove's Albert Pike Memorial statue near Judiciary Square in Washington, D.C. in December 2008.
Soon afterwards, the DOJ announced the arrest and charging of a man who was not only allegedly seen on video climbing up onto the Jackson statue and affixing a rope that was then used to try to pull the statue down, but also had on June 20 helped destroy Gaetano Trentanove's 1901 Albert Pike Memorial statue near Washington's Judiciary Square by pulling it from its base and setting it on fire. The DOJ's complaint alleged that the man had been captured on video dousing the federally-owned Pike statue with a flammable liquid, igniting it as it lay on the ground and using the fire to light a cigarette.[56]

The Lincoln Memorial, the World War II Memorial, and the statue of General Casimir Pulaski were vandalized during the protests in Washington, D.C.[68]

Unknown individuals vandalized the statue of Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of the Indian independence movement. The incident prompted the Indian Embassy to register a complaint with law enforcement agencies. Taranjit Singh Sandhu, the Indian Ambassador to the United States called the vandalism "a crime against humanity".[69][70] U.S. President Donald Trump called the defacement of Mahatma Gandhi's statue in D.C. a "disgrace".[71]

STILL not seeing any reference to the Capitol. Which looks like this:

capitol-logo.gif
You lose.
You must be blind then.
 
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.
True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.
What crimes? What treason?
Using the IRS to attack opponents, selling weapons to the cartel that ended up killing our guards, lying to the public about the cause of losing our Ambassador in BenGhazi over a stupid video (to hide his incompetence in order to get elected, what they did with Hunter and Joe Biden corruption in China and other countries), colluding with Russian intelligence by using a fake Doosier and using our law and intelligence agencies to spy on and set up the campaign and candidate of the oppositiong party, inciting riots, looting and arson in at least two cases...to name a few.

Don't forget the 45 minute meeting of Obama's attorney general on the Tarmac with Bill Clinton, while Hillary was being investigated. Remind us again, did they go after her for obstruction wiping out her hard drive, 32,0000 subpoenaed emails, and smashing 13 mobile devices of which she claimed to have only one? Nope.

If anybody deserved to be impeached, it was that divisive incompetent piece of shit enemy of state Obama. But then again, he's Black and Democrat so as usual they get the dictator fascist get out of jail pass.
Much of this is not true.
In fact, all of it is true.

Ah, you speak as the American version of either ISIS or the Taliban. If you want to live in a country with laws closer to the ones you want the rest of us to live under Try Yemen.
 
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.
True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.
What crimes? What treason?
Using the IRS to attack opponents, selling weapons to the cartel that ended up killing our guards, lying to the public about the cause of losing our Ambassador in BenGhazi over a stupid video (to hide his incompetence in order to get elected, what they did with Hunter and Joe Biden corruption in China and other countries), colluding with Russian intelligence by using a fake Doosier and using our law and intelligence agencies to spy on and set up the campaign and candidate of the oppositiong party, inciting riots, looting and arson in at least two cases...to name a few.

Don't forget the 45 minute meeting of Obama's attorney general on the Tarmac with Bill Clinton, while Hillary was being investigated. Remind us again, did they go after her for obstruction wiping out her hard drive, 32,0000 subpoenaed emails, and smashing 13 mobile devices of which she claimed to have only one? Nope.

If anybody deserved to be impeached, it was that divisive incompetent piece of shit enemy of state Obama. But then again, he's Black and Democrat so as usual they get the dictator fascist get out of jail pass.
Much of this is not true.
In fact, all of it is true.

Ah, you speak as the American version of either ISIS or the Taliban. If you want to live in a country with laws closer to the ones you want the rest of us to live under Try Yemen.
The American version of ISIS or Taliban is what you'll find in today's Democrat party and their foot soldiers in BLM, Antifa, Nation of Islam movements who cheered the burning and looting of our cities and destruction of the middle class and the replacement and defunding of the police with one that is an ideological puppet of the Left.
 
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.
True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.
What crimes? What treason?
Using the IRS to attack opponents, selling weapons to the cartel that ended up killing our guards, lying to the public about the cause of losing our Ambassador in BenGhazi over a stupid video (to hide his incompetence in order to get elected, what they did with Hunter and Joe Biden corruption in China and other countries), colluding with Russian intelligence by using a fake Doosier and using our law and intelligence agencies to spy on and set up the campaign and candidate of the oppositiong party, inciting riots, looting and arson in at least two cases...to name a few.

Don't forget the 45 minute meeting of Obama's attorney general on the Tarmac with Bill Clinton, while Hillary was being investigated. Remind us again, did they go after her for obstruction wiping out her hard drive, 32,0000 subpoenaed emails, and smashing 13 mobile devices of which she claimed to have only one? Nope.

If anybody deserved to be impeached, it was that divisive incompetent piece of shit enemy of state Obama. But then again, he's Black and Democrat so as usual they get the dictator fascist get out of jail pass.
Much of this is not true.
In fact, all of it is true.

Ah, you speak as the American version of either ISIS or the Taliban. If you want to live in a country with laws closer to the ones you want the rest of us to live under Try Yemen.
The American version of ISIS or Taliban is what you'll find in today's Democrat party and their foot soldiers in BLM, Antifa, Nation of Islam movements who cheered the burning and looting of our cities and destruction of the middle class and the replacement and defunding of the police with one that is an ideological puppet of the Left.

Care to check out what happened on Jan 6th? ISIS and the Taliban are attempting to overthrow legal elected Governments. And guess what, you party of the rumpsters tried to overthrow a legally elected government as well. You are being linked in with both the Taliban and ISIS because your methods are exactly the same and you intentions are exactly the same.
 
The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.
True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.
What crimes? What treason?
Using the IRS to attack opponents, selling weapons to the cartel that ended up killing our guards, lying to the public about the cause of losing our Ambassador in BenGhazi over a stupid video (to hide his incompetence in order to get elected, what they did with Hunter and Joe Biden corruption in China and other countries), colluding with Russian intelligence by using a fake Doosier and using our law and intelligence agencies to spy on and set up the campaign and candidate of the oppositiong party, inciting riots, looting and arson in at least two cases...to name a few.

Don't forget the 45 minute meeting of Obama's attorney general on the Tarmac with Bill Clinton, while Hillary was being investigated. Remind us again, did they go after her for obstruction wiping out her hard drive, 32,0000 subpoenaed emails, and smashing 13 mobile devices of which she claimed to have only one? Nope.

If anybody deserved to be impeached, it was that divisive incompetent piece of shit enemy of state Obama. But then again, he's Black and Democrat so as usual they get the dictator fascist get out of jail pass.
Much of this is not true.
In fact, all of it is true.
That is not a fact, a right wing lie.
 

Forum List

Back
Top