Republicans Submit Articles To Impeach Biden As Soon As He's Sworn In

[mudwhistle]

If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.

No one cares.

You'd better care....because that's the slippery-slope you folks have started down.

Cool story bro...

View attachment 444629


Remember when you dic suckers freaked out over a tan suit -- but now you want to claim impeachment is cheapened because your cult leader was caught twice trying to overturn an election -- first with trying to extort a foreign nation into offering dirt on an opponent...

Second with him trying to incite a bunch of fragile minded white supremacist fascists into storming the Capitol and trying to overturn an election.....

Impeachment has become a joke.
They're going ot hav`

If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.

No one cares.

You'd better care....because that's the slippery-slope you folks have started down.

Cool story bro...

View attachment 444629


Remember when you dic suckers freaked out over a tan suit -- but now you want to claim impeachment is cheapened because your cult leader was caught twice trying to overturn an election -- first with trying to extort a foreign nation into offering dirt on an opponent...

Second with him trying to incite a bunch of fragile minded white supremacist fascists into storming the Capitol and trying to overturn an election.....

They're going to have to change the rules on impeachment.....because they're using it as a political tool rather a tool to remove or punish a bad president.
Right now Biden can be impeached in the House for saying a word or phrase that Democrats have criminalized.
How dare Trump say the election was a fraud.
IMPEACH TRUMP
How dare he tell his followers to let their voices be heard in a peaceful manner.
IMPEACH TRUMP AGAIN
You leftists are living in a fantasy world that doesn't work out here in reality.
It only works in your sick little demented world.
A demented political party needed a demented president.
Nothing but a bunch of Psychopaths....that's what you are.

 

[Roudy]

The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.

True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.

 

[daveman]

How would it be any diff than how the GOP treated Bill Clinton? This stupid feud has been going on since the rabid Reagan Repubs started it when GWB sr lost his reelection attempt.

Go back farther. When you guys formed the KKK to oppose Lincoln's policies is when it really started.

Moonglow did not form the KKK. That is unless his name is James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord or Richard R. Reed and he's at least 179 years old. NOR was it formed to "oppose Lincoln's policies" (who was already dead) or for any political purpose at all.

Remember, kids, no Democrat today is responsible for the KKK, but all Republicans today are responsible for slavery in America. So pay up!

Hey, Pogo, what have you done to assuage your white guilt today?

First time I have ever heard you admit to the Southern Strategy. Good for you.

Really? I'm responsible for the slavery that Republicans ended a century and a half ago?

I'd ask you to explain that rationally, but you're incapable.

You arent responsible for anything other than yourself. I was just congratulating you on admitting to the Southern Strategy

I was mocking leftist retardery. Are you admitting leftists are retarded?

The Southern Strategy is a myth, a desperate effort by Democrats to distance themselves from their 20th Century legislative racism.

Idiots buy it. Obviously.

It is known as history, and I am old enough to remember it happening.

You remember what didn't happen, then.

I am not the only one here who remembers it.

Yep, I remember it too. Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in of all places Philadelphia ... not the one in Pennsylvania where the Constitution came together where the Liberty Bell is, no the one in Mississippi where the infamous triple murder of civil rights activists went down in 1964, talking about "states' rights". 1964, the same year "states' rights" George Wallace offered to be Barry Goldwater's running mate because candidate Goldwater had voted against the Civil rights Act (Goldwater didn't need Wallace; he won the deep South without him).

Then there was the Republican Party strategist Lee Atwater, analyzing what Dave thinks never existed, in 1981:

>> You start out in 1954 by saying, "******, ******, ******." By 1968 you can't say "******"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "******, ******." <<​

​

That was the blueprint for the Republican Party to take over the one-party-rule of the South by highlighting race and how it (the RP) was going to be the device to keep black people down more so than the Democrats. And the Democrats obliged -- or we could say got it started -- by passing that 1964 Civil Rights Act, triggering both Wallace's offer and Strom Thurmond's until-then-unthinkable departure to the "party of Lincoln". Thus broke the dam.

Guess Daveward Gunnerhands never learned about all this shit while he was immersed in his guns.

I have no obligation to believe your fantasies, pussy.

Actually it's quoted history. And yes you're free to bury your head in the sand and wail to anyone who will still listen that it didn't happen. Even though it's all in the history books. Not the direction I would have taken but hey, that's just me.

The history of the Democratic Party is based on racism, and it continues to this day. You can't NUH UH your way out of it, no matter how hard you try. But you need to realize your acknowledgement is neither sought nor required.

Oh look. Daveward Gunnerhands wants to be awarded a drive-by because he can't argue with quoted history.
That's so cute. Rendered impotent by histories of fifty years ago he wants to shift to 190. Bravely ran away.

Oh look, Slogo the retarded monkey claims Dems supported the Civil Rights Act? No retard. There was almost ZERO support from Dems for that, giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote, or giving women the right to vote. All there in recorded history. Yet you choose to keep your head up your ass. Most people would be ashamed to be like you.

Next slide please

>> In this case, it becomes clear that Democrats in the north and the south were more likely to vote for the bill than Republicans in the north and south respectively. This difference in both houses is statistically significant with over 95% confidence. It just so happened southerners made up a larger percentage of the Democratic than Republican caucus, which created the initial impression than Republicans were more in favor of the act.​

​

Nearly 100% of Union state Democrats supported the 1964 Civil Rights Act compared to 85% of Republicans. None of the southern Republicans voted for the bill, while a small percentage of southern Democrats did. <<​

Gotta say, it's kind of amazing how y'all Bubblistas keep getting your collective ass schooled on this shit, and yet trot it right back out again looking for different results. It's as if y'all are just incapable of learning.

You mean like you pulling out the Magic Party Switch that lets you pretend Democrat racism didn't exist?

The Democrat party was the Republican party back in the day. Get a clue.

Dave can't pick up clues. He got dem guns in his hands.

What a nut job. And a hell of a liar.

You fellahs sure do get upset that people are allowed to disagree with you.

Youre allowed to disagree. I just dont want to hear you whining again about how Blacks dont support your party.

Never whined about it. You're making things up. Meanwhile, some blacks are indeed conservative.

They get treated very badly by liberal blacks and whites.

Youre always whining about why intelligent Blacks dont support your party. Thats why you deny the Southern Strategy even though the GOP leadership admitted to it.

Intelligent blacks DO support my party. You only think they're dumb because they don't share your victimhood fetish.

Further, you insist I should agree with whatever my party's leadership says. You're projecting your own intellectual weakness on me.

 

[daveman]

How would it be any diff than how the GOP treated Bill Clinton? This stupid feud has been going on since the rabid Reagan Repubs started it when GWB sr lost his reelection attempt.

Go back farther. When you guys formed the KKK to oppose Lincoln's policies is when it really started.

Moonglow did not form the KKK. That is unless his name is James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord or Richard R. Reed and he's at least 179 years old. NOR was it formed to "oppose Lincoln's policies" (who was already dead) or for any political purpose at all.

Remember, kids, no Democrat today is responsible for the KKK, but all Republicans today are responsible for slavery in America. So pay up!

Hey, Pogo, what have you done to assuage your white guilt today?

First time I have ever heard you admit to the Southern Strategy. Good for you.

Really? I'm responsible for the slavery that Republicans ended a century and a half ago?

I'd ask you to explain that rationally, but you're incapable.

You arent responsible for anything other than yourself. I was just congratulating you on admitting to the Southern Strategy

I was mocking leftist retardery. Are you admitting leftists are retarded?

The Southern Strategy is a myth, a desperate effort by Democrats to distance themselves from their 20th Century legislative racism.

Idiots buy it. Obviously.

It is known as history, and I am old enough to remember it happening.

You remember what didn't happen, then.

I am not the only one here who remembers it.

Yep, I remember it too. Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in of all places Philadelphia ... not the one in Pennsylvania where the Constitution came together where the Liberty Bell is, no the one in Mississippi where the infamous triple murder of civil rights activists went down in 1964, talking about "states' rights". 1964, the same year "states' rights" George Wallace offered to be Barry Goldwater's running mate because candidate Goldwater had voted against the Civil rights Act (Goldwater didn't need Wallace; he won the deep South without him).

Then there was the Republican Party strategist Lee Atwater, analyzing what Dave thinks never existed, in 1981:

>> You start out in 1954 by saying, "******, ******, ******." By 1968 you can't say "******"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "******, ******." <<​

​

That was the blueprint for the Republican Party to take over the one-party-rule of the South by highlighting race and how it (the RP) was going to be the device to keep black people down more so than the Democrats. And the Democrats obliged -- or we could say got it started -- by passing that 1964 Civil Rights Act, triggering both Wallace's offer and Strom Thurmond's until-then-unthinkable departure to the "party of Lincoln". Thus broke the dam.

Guess Daveward Gunnerhands never learned about all this shit while he was immersed in his guns.

I have no obligation to believe your fantasies, pussy.

Actually it's quoted history. And yes you're free to bury your head in the sand and wail to anyone who will still listen that it didn't happen. Even though it's all in the history books. Not the direction I would have taken but hey, that's just me.

The history of the Democratic Party is based on racism, and it continues to this day. You can't NUH UH your way out of it, no matter how hard you try. But you need to realize your acknowledgement is neither sought nor required.

Oh look. Daveward Gunnerhands wants to be awarded a drive-by because he can't argue with quoted history.
That's so cute. Rendered impotent by histories of fifty years ago he wants to shift to 190. Bravely ran away.

Oh look, Slogo the retarded monkey claims Dems supported the Civil Rights Act? No retard. There was almost ZERO support from Dems for that, giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote, or giving women the right to vote. All there in recorded history. Yet you choose to keep your head up your ass. Most people would be ashamed to be like you.

Pogo laughed at this post. Unintelligent people laugh at things they don't understand.

I laughed, because I knew at first sight what I was about to do with it.

Chuckle. I kill me.

Yes. You knew you were going to play your Bullshit Card. Because that's all you've got.

Actually that's more of that thar "history". You know, that shit that you had no clue about with the Southern Strategy and got your ass handed to you?

Dood, you ignore reality harder than anyone I ever met.

Daveward posts "note to self", mistakenly drops it on USMB.

You got schlonged, Gunnerhands. You had no idea of the history you tried to deny, and got your clock cleaned.

Good Gaea, will you stop whining that I don't believe leftist alternate history? I'm a rational person. I'm not going to embrace your fantasies.

Guess what Daveward ---- History doesn't give a shit whether you embrace it or not. Know why? Because she knows there's nothing you can do about it.

I know it too. That's why I wield it like a truncheon.

And you with your "Magic Switch". Hee hee hee.

I know history. She said to tell you you're full of shit.

Apparently not, since I/we provided links, quotes and facts to document what you had no clue of, and you had........... well nothing.

My that's a sparkling clean horologe situated on your wall Mr Gunnerhands. May I ask who cleans your clock?

Oh wait, I remember. I do.

It must be because I do it every day that it looks so fresh.

I provided proof of my claims. You stamping your foot and insisting it's not there only makes you look like a child.

But in your defense, I must say you are a child, and simply can't act any different.

 

[NoNukes]

The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.

True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.

What crimes? What treason?

 

[Roudy]

The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.

True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.

What crimes? What treason?

Using the IRS to attack opponents, selling weapons to the cartel that ended up killing our guards, lying to the public about the cause of losing our Ambassador in BenGhazi over a stupid video (to hide his incompetence in order to get elected, what they did with Hunter and Joe Biden corruption in China and other countries), colluding with Russian intelligence by using a fake Doosier and using our law and intelligence agencies to spy on and set up the campaign and candidate of the oppositiong party, inciting riots, looting and arson in at least two cases...to name a few.

Don't forget the 45 minute meeting of Obama's attorney general on the Tarmac with Bill Clinton, while Hillary was being investigated. Remind us again, did they go after her for obstruction wiping out her hard drive, 32,0000 subpoenaed emails, and smashing 13 mobile devices of which she claimed to have only one? Nope.

If anybody deserved to be impeached, it was that divisive incompetent piece of shit enemy of state Obama. But then again, he's Black and Democrat so as usual they get the dictator fascist get out of jail pass.

 

[NoNukes]

The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

Funny, I thought Republicans did that when they impeached Clinton over a blow job.

True, but then again, the republicans could have impeached Obama at least four times for all his crimes and treason, but they didn't.

What crimes? What treason?

Using the IRS to attack opponents, selling weapons to the cartel that ended up killing our guards, lying to the public about the cause of losing our Ambassador in BenGhazi over a stupid video (to hide his incompetence in order to get elected, what they did with Hunter and Joe Biden corruption in China and other countries), colluding with Russian intelligence by using a fake Doosier and using our law and intelligence agencies to spy on and set up the campaign and candidate of the oppositiong party, inciting riots, looting and arson in at least two cases...to name a few.

Don't forget the 45 minute meeting of Obama's attorney general on the Tarmac with Bill Clinton, while Hillary was being investigated. Remind us again, did they go after her for obstruction wiping out her hard drive, 32,0000 subpoenaed emails, and smashing 13 mobile devices of which she claimed to have only one? Nope.

If anybody deserved to be impeached, it was that divisive incompetent piece of shit enemy of state Obama. But then again, he's Black and Democrat so as usual they get the dictator fascist get out of jail pass.

Much of this is not true.

 

[WEATHER53]

Joe is going to take a knee on the inauguration platform to show his solidarity with Bogus Lies Mucho

 

[lantern2814]

How would it be any diff than how the GOP treated Bill Clinton? This stupid feud has been going on since the rabid Reagan Repubs started it when GWB sr lost his reelection attempt.

Go back farther. When you guys formed the KKK to oppose Lincoln's policies is when it really started.

Moonglow did not form the KKK. That is unless his name is James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord or Richard R. Reed and he's at least 179 years old. NOR was it formed to "oppose Lincoln's policies" (who was already dead) or for any political purpose at all.

Remember, kids, no Democrat today is responsible for the KKK, but all Republicans today are responsible for slavery in America. So pay up!

Hey, Pogo, what have you done to assuage your white guilt today?

First time I have ever heard you admit to the Southern Strategy. Good for you.

Really? I'm responsible for the slavery that Republicans ended a century and a half ago?

I'd ask you to explain that rationally, but you're incapable.

You arent responsible for anything other than yourself. I was just congratulating you on admitting to the Southern Strategy

I was mocking leftist retardery. Are you admitting leftists are retarded?

The Southern Strategy is a myth, a desperate effort by Democrats to distance themselves from their 20th Century legislative racism.

Idiots buy it. Obviously.

It is known as history, and I am old enough to remember it happening.

You remember what didn't happen, then.

I am not the only one here who remembers it.

Yep, I remember it too. Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in of all places Philadelphia ... not the one in Pennsylvania where the Constitution came together where the Liberty Bell is, no the one in Mississippi where the infamous triple murder of civil rights activists went down in 1964, talking about "states' rights". 1964, the same year "states' rights" George Wallace offered to be Barry Goldwater's running mate because candidate Goldwater had voted against the Civil rights Act (Goldwater didn't need Wallace; he won the deep South without him).

Then there was the Republican Party strategist Lee Atwater, analyzing what Dave thinks never existed, in 1981:

>> You start out in 1954 by saying, "******, ******, ******." By 1968 you can't say "******"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "******, ******." <<​

​

That was the blueprint for the Republican Party to take over the one-party-rule of the South by highlighting race and how it (the RP) was going to be the device to keep black people down more so than the Democrats. And the Democrats obliged -- or we could say got it started -- by passing that 1964 Civil Rights Act, triggering both Wallace's offer and Strom Thurmond's until-then-unthinkable departure to the "party of Lincoln". Thus broke the dam.

Guess Daveward Gunnerhands never learned about all this shit while he was immersed in his guns.

I have no obligation to believe your fantasies, pussy.

Actually it's quoted history. And yes you're free to bury your head in the sand and wail to anyone who will still listen that it didn't happen. Even though it's all in the history books. Not the direction I would have taken but hey, that's just me.

The history of the Democratic Party is based on racism, and it continues to this day. You can't NUH UH your way out of it, no matter how hard you try. But you need to realize your acknowledgement is neither sought nor required.

Oh look. Daveward Gunnerhands wants to be awarded a drive-by because he can't argue with quoted history.
That's so cute. Rendered impotent by histories of fifty years ago he wants to shift to 190. Bravely ran away.

Oh look, Slogo the retarded monkey claims Dems supported the Civil Rights Act? No retard. There was almost ZERO support from Dems for that, giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote, or giving women the right to vote. All there in recorded history. Yet you choose to keep your head up your ass. Most people would be ashamed to be like you.

Pogo laughed at this post. Unintelligent people laugh at things they don't understand.

I laughed, because I knew at first sight what I was about to do with it.

Chuckle. I kill me.

Yes. You knew you were going to play your Bullshit Card. Because that's all you've got.

Actually that's more of that thar "history". You know, that shit that you had no clue about with the Southern Strategy and got your ass handed to you?

Dood, you ignore reality harder than anyone I ever met.

Daveward posts "note to self", mistakenly drops it on USMB.

You got schlonged, Gunnerhands. You had no idea of the history you tried to deny, and got your clock cleaned.

Nice to see you still lie as you run away retard. Noting not one mention of the ZERO votes your side gave to the 15th Amendment. History called. She says you’re a liar.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.

Nolte: President Joe Biden Will Be Immediately Impeached for 4 Scandals

There is just no question a Biden administration will immediately be paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.

www.breitbart.com

"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.​

​

​

Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.​

​

​

There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."​

​

​

I don't believe that Biden will be President... at least not more than a few minutes. God is tired of the evil and corruption in America and the rest of the world. He will not allow Biden to continue.

I have to say, that's just ridiculous. God tolerates far worse evil and corruption existing every single day that humanity exists. He gives us free will to choose, and does not take that away because He decides He doesn't like our choices. It's up to us to fix the problems we create.

 

[Pogo]

Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president just because you can is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.

Nolte: President Joe Biden Will Be Immediately Impeached for 4 Scandals

There is just no question a Biden administration will immediately be paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.

www.breitbart.com

"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.​

​

​

Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.​

​

​

There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."​

​

​

let's see. You say:

If he should win. He's already won.

The House is still Demo controlled where such a bill wouldn't make it off the floor. Even all the Republicans wouldn't vote for it.

Rump is gone, Biden gets sworn in on Jan 20th. Get used to it.

Biden didn't win diddly squat and anyone that can claim that with a straight face is just asn inept as pedo Joe.....

I claim it, and you are a liar who cannot prove Biden didn't win.

Yes, we know what you've been told to say.

Are you saying I've been told to say Biden won? Dude, you have got to be high on something.

You've been told to believe Biden won fairly and transparently. You're a gullible moron.

And you've been told there was voter fraud with zero evidence. You should be ashamed for sucking up to these lies.

Oh, there was voter and election fraud, make NO mistake about that. Over 900 affidavits signed under penalty of perjury says so. I bet you have never even listened to those that came forward. Of course Silicon Valley has worked overtime censoring anyone that speaks out. Amerikka, the land of the sheeple living in a banana republic....

You'll never prove it, so yes, you are making the mistake, not me. Try again.

"You'll never prove it".

So, you, like most Democrats, have not been denying the fraud. You just say no one can prove it.

Yyyeeeahhh ummm..... without any evidence there simply IS NOTHING TO "DENY". This may come as a revelation but the burden of proof is never ---- as in not ever ---- on the receiving end.

 

[Pogo]

Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.

Nolte: President Joe Biden Will Be Immediately Impeached for 4 Scandals

There is just no question a Biden administration will immediately be paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.

www.breitbart.com

"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.​

​

​

Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.​

​

​

There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."​

​

​

I don't believe that Biden will be President... at least not more than a few minutes. God is tired of the evil and corruption in America and the rest of the world. He will not allow Biden to continue.

I have to say, that's just ridiculous. God tolerates far worse evil and corruption existing every single day that humanity exists. He gives us free will to choose, and does not take that away because He decides He doesn't like our choices. It's up to us to fix the problems we create.

Say ....

Why do you two think God is a "he"? Who would be the female that makes God male?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.

Nolte: President Joe Biden Will Be Immediately Impeached for 4 Scandals

There is just no question a Biden administration will immediately be paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.

www.breitbart.com

"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.​

​

​

Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.​

​

​

There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."​

​

​

The idea you think Trump did nothing wrong is comical.

He used federal funds to bribe a foreign official for political dirt on an adversary.

Then he foments a riot & insurrection in the Capitol.

The only thing comical here is your hypocrisy and melodrama, RealDumb. We'll get on taking your accusations against Trump seriously just as soon as YOU get around to extending them to Democrats doing the same things in even worse fashion.

Right now, your "outrage" about your accusations is nothing more than evidence that we should dismiss and laugh at them.

 

[Pogo]

How would it be any diff than how the GOP treated Bill Clinton? This stupid feud has been going on since the rabid Reagan Repubs started it when GWB sr lost his reelection attempt.

Go back farther. When you guys formed the KKK to oppose Lincoln's policies is when it really started.

Moonglow did not form the KKK. That is unless his name is James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord or Richard R. Reed and he's at least 179 years old. NOR was it formed to "oppose Lincoln's policies" (who was already dead) or for any political purpose at all.

Remember, kids, no Democrat today is responsible for the KKK, but all Republicans today are responsible for slavery in America. So pay up!

Hey, Pogo, what have you done to assuage your white guilt today?

First time I have ever heard you admit to the Southern Strategy. Good for you.

Really? I'm responsible for the slavery that Republicans ended a century and a half ago?

I'd ask you to explain that rationally, but you're incapable.

You arent responsible for anything other than yourself. I was just congratulating you on admitting to the Southern Strategy

I was mocking leftist retardery. Are you admitting leftists are retarded?

The Southern Strategy is a myth, a desperate effort by Democrats to distance themselves from their 20th Century legislative racism.

Idiots buy it. Obviously.

It is known as history, and I am old enough to remember it happening.

You remember what didn't happen, then.

I am not the only one here who remembers it.

Yep, I remember it too. Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in of all places Philadelphia ... not the one in Pennsylvania where the Constitution came together where the Liberty Bell is, no the one in Mississippi where the infamous triple murder of civil rights activists went down in 1964, talking about "states' rights". 1964, the same year "states' rights" George Wallace offered to be Barry Goldwater's running mate because candidate Goldwater had voted against the Civil rights Act (Goldwater didn't need Wallace; he won the deep South without him).

Then there was the Republican Party strategist Lee Atwater, analyzing what Dave thinks never existed, in 1981:

>> You start out in 1954 by saying, "******, ******, ******." By 1968 you can't say "******"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "******, ******." <<​

​

That was the blueprint for the Republican Party to take over the one-party-rule of the South by highlighting race and how it (the RP) was going to be the device to keep black people down more so than the Democrats. And the Democrats obliged -- or we could say got it started -- by passing that 1964 Civil Rights Act, triggering both Wallace's offer and Strom Thurmond's until-then-unthinkable departure to the "party of Lincoln". Thus broke the dam.

Guess Daveward Gunnerhands never learned about all this shit while he was immersed in his guns.

I have no obligation to believe your fantasies, pussy.

Actually it's quoted history. And yes you're free to bury your head in the sand and wail to anyone who will still listen that it didn't happen. Even though it's all in the history books. Not the direction I would have taken but hey, that's just me.

The history of the Democratic Party is based on racism, and it continues to this day. You can't NUH UH your way out of it, no matter how hard you try. But you need to realize your acknowledgement is neither sought nor required.

Oh look. Daveward Gunnerhands wants to be awarded a drive-by because he can't argue with quoted history.
That's so cute. Rendered impotent by histories of fifty years ago he wants to shift to 190. Bravely ran away.

Oh look, Slogo the retarded monkey claims Dems supported the Civil Rights Act? No retard. There was almost ZERO support from Dems for that, giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote, or giving women the right to vote. All there in recorded history. Yet you choose to keep your head up your ass. Most people would be ashamed to be like you.

Next slide please

>> In this case, it becomes clear that Democrats in the north and the south were more likely to vote for the bill than Republicans in the north and south respectively. This difference in both houses is statistically significant with over 95% confidence. It just so happened southerners made up a larger percentage of the Democratic than Republican caucus, which created the initial impression than Republicans were more in favor of the act.​

​

Nearly 100% of Union state Democrats supported the 1964 Civil Rights Act compared to 85% of Republicans. None of the southern Republicans voted for the bill, while a small percentage of southern Democrats did. <<​

Gotta say, it's kind of amazing how y'all Bubblistas keep getting your collective ass schooled on this shit, and yet trot it right back out again looking for different results. It's as if y'all are just incapable of learning.

You mean like you pulling out the Magic Party Switch that lets you pretend Democrat racism didn't exist?

The Democrat party was the Republican party back in the day. Get a clue.

Dave can't pick up clues. He got dem guns in his hands.

What a nut job. And a hell of a liar.

You fellahs sure do get upset that people are allowed to disagree with you.

Youre allowed to disagree. I just dont want to hear you whining again about how Blacks dont support your party.

Never whined about it. You're making things up. Meanwhile, some blacks are indeed conservative.

They get treated very badly by liberal blacks and whites.

Youre always whining about why intelligent Blacks dont support your party. Thats why you deny the Southern Strategy even though the GOP leadership admitted to it.

Is that akin to the "great society" where LBJ claims that he will have them ******* voting demcrat? Wasn't George Wallace a "demcrat"?????? Robert Byrd, the former KKK member that only had a change of heart when it became politically expedient also a demcrat"?? I guess Al Gore Sr was a closet repub? Pedo Joe and the Clintons were complicit in bring black youth to "heel" by pushing statutes guaranteed to lock up black youths and deny them of a future as convicted felons for victimless crimes.

George Wallace almost ran as Vice President with Goldwater. He was the old time southern Democrat and his beliefs gil not gel with the new Democratic Party.

Wallace in fact offered to switch parties in order to join Goldwater on the Republican ticket (Goldwater declined the offer). He really would not have needed to switch parties (e.g. Lincoln's running mate was a Democrat) but had he done so it would have made Wallace, and not Thurmond, the first one of the old "Solid South" bloc to jump to the Party of Lincoln, which was up to then (1964) unthinkable.

Actually that divorce had been inching closer for decades --- I mark the first crack in the armor at 1936 when FDR at the height of his influence got the party's convention to change the nomination rules from a 2/3 majority to a simple (50% + 1) majority, which cut the legs off the South's ability to effectively veto candidates with too much talk about "civil rights", as they did infamously in 1924, the longest convention in history with over a hundred ballots. After WW2 finished dominating current events, the next convention in 1948 saw Thurmond and a Southern delegation walk out and run their own candidate, exactly because they were hearing too much of that kind of talk. Those were the "Dixiecrats". Thurmond, the losing candidate, later ran for Senate, and the Democratic Party kicked him off the ballot, whereupon he ran as a write-in (and won).

The Dale Smith post quoted not only suffers from horrendous spelling but quotes an apocryphal LBJ "quote" that no one ever verified. It's absolutely bizarre the way these yahoo posters think that having an R or a D after your name somehow morphs you into a specific ideology. This of course leaves completely unexplainable what happens when somebody switches parties --- as Thurmond and a host of others did. I don't think they have any clue in the world what a political party IS.

 

[mudwhistle]

Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.

Nolte: President Joe Biden Will Be Immediately Impeached for 4 Scandals

There is just no question a Biden administration will immediately be paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.

www.breitbart.com

"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.​

​

​

Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.​

​

​

There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."​

​

​

I don't believe that Biden will be President... at least not more than a few minutes. God is tired of the evil and corruption in America and the rest of the world. He will not allow Biden to continue.

I have to say, that's just ridiculous. God tolerates far worse evil and corruption existing every single day that humanity exists. He gives us free will to choose, and does not take that away because He decides He doesn't like our choices. It's up to us to fix the problems we create.

God's not a Nazi.

 

[Pogo]

How would it be any diff than how the GOP treated Bill Clinton? This stupid feud has been going on since the rabid Reagan Repubs started it when GWB sr lost his reelection attempt.

Go back farther. When you guys formed the KKK to oppose Lincoln's policies is when it really started.

Moonglow did not form the KKK. That is unless his name is James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord or Richard R. Reed and he's at least 179 years old. NOR was it formed to "oppose Lincoln's policies" (who was already dead) or for any political purpose at all.

Remember, kids, no Democrat today is responsible for the KKK, but all Republicans today are responsible for slavery in America. So pay up!

Hey, Pogo, what have you done to assuage your white guilt today?

First time I have ever heard you admit to the Southern Strategy. Good for you.

Really? I'm responsible for the slavery that Republicans ended a century and a half ago?

I'd ask you to explain that rationally, but you're incapable.

You arent responsible for anything other than yourself. I was just congratulating you on admitting to the Southern Strategy

I was mocking leftist retardery. Are you admitting leftists are retarded?

The Southern Strategy is a myth, a desperate effort by Democrats to distance themselves from their 20th Century legislative racism.

Idiots buy it. Obviously.

It is known as history, and I am old enough to remember it happening.

You remember what didn't happen, then.

I am not the only one here who remembers it.

Yep, I remember it too. Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in of all places Philadelphia ... not the one in Pennsylvania where the Constitution came together where the Liberty Bell is, no the one in Mississippi where the infamous triple murder of civil rights activists went down in 1964, talking about "states' rights". 1964, the same year "states' rights" George Wallace offered to be Barry Goldwater's running mate because candidate Goldwater had voted against the Civil rights Act (Goldwater didn't need Wallace; he won the deep South without him).

Then there was the Republican Party strategist Lee Atwater, analyzing what Dave thinks never existed, in 1981:

>> You start out in 1954 by saying, "******, ******, ******." By 1968 you can't say "******"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "******, ******." <<​

​

That was the blueprint for the Republican Party to take over the one-party-rule of the South by highlighting race and how it (the RP) was going to be the device to keep black people down more so than the Democrats. And the Democrats obliged -- or we could say got it started -- by passing that 1964 Civil Rights Act, triggering both Wallace's offer and Strom Thurmond's until-then-unthinkable departure to the "party of Lincoln". Thus broke the dam.

Guess Daveward Gunnerhands never learned about all this shit while he was immersed in his guns.

I have no obligation to believe your fantasies, pussy.

Actually it's quoted history. And yes you're free to bury your head in the sand and wail to anyone who will still listen that it didn't happen. Even though it's all in the history books. Not the direction I would have taken but hey, that's just me.

The history of the Democratic Party is based on racism, and it continues to this day. You can't NUH UH your way out of it, no matter how hard you try. But you need to realize your acknowledgement is neither sought nor required.

Oh look. Daveward Gunnerhands wants to be awarded a drive-by because he can't argue with quoted history.
That's so cute. Rendered impotent by histories of fifty years ago he wants to shift to 190. Bravely ran away.

Oh look, Slogo the retarded monkey claims Dems supported the Civil Rights Act? No retard. There was almost ZERO support from Dems for that, giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote, or giving women the right to vote. All there in recorded history. Yet you choose to keep your head up your ass. Most people would be ashamed to be like you.

Pogo laughed at this post. Unintelligent people laugh at things they don't understand.

I laughed, because I knew at first sight what I was about to do with it.

Chuckle. I kill me.

Yes. You knew you were going to play your Bullshit Card. Because that's all you've got.

Actually that's more of that thar "history". You know, that shit that you had no clue about with the Southern Strategy and got your ass handed to you?

Dood, you ignore reality harder than anyone I ever met.

Daveward posts "note to self", mistakenly drops it on USMB.

You got schlonged, Gunnerhands. You had no idea of the history you tried to deny, and got your clock cleaned.

Good Gaea, will you stop whining that I don't believe leftist alternate history? I'm a rational person. I'm not going to embrace your fantasies.

Guess what Daveward ---- History doesn't give a shit whether you embrace it or not. Know why? Because she knows there's nothing you can do about it.

I know it too. That's why I wield it like a truncheon.

And you with your "Magic Switch". Hee hee hee.

I know history. She said to tell you you're full of shit.

Apparently not, since I/we provided links, quotes and facts to document what you had no clue of, and you had........... well nothing.

My that's a sparkling clean horologe situated on your wall Mr Gunnerhands. May I ask who cleans your clock?

Oh wait, I remember. I do.

It must be because I do it every day that it looks so fresh.

I provided proof of my claims. You stamping your foot and insisting it's not there only makes you look like a child.

But in your defense, I must say you are a child, and simply can't act any different.

You didn't claim anything, Gunnerhands. You denied the existence of in this case the Southern Strategy. And WE provided proof that your denial is just that. So as far as insisting it's not there, that's on you dood.

 

[Pogo]

Do you think they have the nuts?
If I was in Congress that's what I'd be doing right now.
They've impeached Trump twice, cheapening the process.....so clearly impeaching a president just for general purposes is the precedent.

I think that impeaching a president, just because you can, is wrong.....and should not be tolerated.....but that's what Democrats are essentially doing.

Congress is broken.....and I don't see it recovering any time soon.

Nolte: President Joe Biden Will Be Immediately Impeached for 4 Scandals

There is just no question a Biden administration will immediately be paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.

www.breitbart.com

"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.​

​

​

Maybe I’m missing something, but I can think of no other major presidential candidate, and certainly no other president (if he should win) who, on the day he was sworn in, would be immediately engulfed by not just one, but four — four! — impeachable scandals.​

​

​

There’s just no question that if Biden wins, once he takes office, his administration will be bogged down by legitimate investigations into his actual and credibly suspected wrongdoing, corruption, self-dealing, and sexual misconduct."​

​

​

The Democrats have cheapened impeachment to the point that it's become equavalent to hazing before you can join a frat.

We know the last time the Capitol was sacked was the British (or for Rumpbots, the "Canadians") in 1814. But when was the last time a POTUS stirred up a mob to attack the very government he's supposed to be the head of?

Far as I can tell that date was the Nevereth of Neverteen Neverty-Never.

If that isn't cause for impeachment with all possible speed WHAT THE FUCK IS?

 

[Pogo]

How would it be any diff than how the GOP treated Bill Clinton? This stupid feud has been going on since the rabid Reagan Repubs started it when GWB sr lost his reelection attempt.

Go back farther. When you guys formed the KKK to oppose Lincoln's policies is when it really started.

Moonglow did not form the KKK. That is unless his name is James Crowe, Calvin Jones, John Booker Kennedy, John Lester, Frank O. McCord or Richard R. Reed and he's at least 179 years old. NOR was it formed to "oppose Lincoln's policies" (who was already dead) or for any political purpose at all.

Remember, kids, no Democrat today is responsible for the KKK, but all Republicans today are responsible for slavery in America. So pay up!

Hey, Pogo, what have you done to assuage your white guilt today?

First time I have ever heard you admit to the Southern Strategy. Good for you.

Really? I'm responsible for the slavery that Republicans ended a century and a half ago?

I'd ask you to explain that rationally, but you're incapable.

You arent responsible for anything other than yourself. I was just congratulating you on admitting to the Southern Strategy

I was mocking leftist retardery. Are you admitting leftists are retarded?

The Southern Strategy is a myth, a desperate effort by Democrats to distance themselves from their 20th Century legislative racism.

Idiots buy it. Obviously.

It is known as history, and I am old enough to remember it happening.

You remember what didn't happen, then.

I am not the only one here who remembers it.

Yep, I remember it too. Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in of all places Philadelphia ... not the one in Pennsylvania where the Constitution came together where the Liberty Bell is, no the one in Mississippi where the infamous triple murder of civil rights activists went down in 1964, talking about "states' rights". 1964, the same year "states' rights" George Wallace offered to be Barry Goldwater's running mate because candidate Goldwater had voted against the Civil rights Act (Goldwater didn't need Wallace; he won the deep South without him).

Then there was the Republican Party strategist Lee Atwater, analyzing what Dave thinks never existed, in 1981:

>> You start out in 1954 by saying, "******, ******, ******." By 1968 you can't say "******"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "******, ******." <<​

​

That was the blueprint for the Republican Party to take over the one-party-rule of the South by highlighting race and how it (the RP) was going to be the device to keep black people down more so than the Democrats. And the Democrats obliged -- or we could say got it started -- by passing that 1964 Civil Rights Act, triggering both Wallace's offer and Strom Thurmond's until-then-unthinkable departure to the "party of Lincoln". Thus broke the dam.

Guess Daveward Gunnerhands never learned about all this shit while he was immersed in his guns.

I have no obligation to believe your fantasies, pussy.

Actually it's quoted history. And yes you're free to bury your head in the sand and wail to anyone who will still listen that it didn't happen. Even though it's all in the history books. Not the direction I would have taken but hey, that's just me.

The history of the Democratic Party is based on racism, and it continues to this day. You can't NUH UH your way out of it, no matter how hard you try. But you need to realize your acknowledgement is neither sought nor required.

Oh look. Daveward Gunnerhands wants to be awarded a drive-by because he can't argue with quoted history.
That's so cute. Rendered impotent by histories of fifty years ago he wants to shift to 190. Bravely ran away.

Oh look, Slogo the retarded monkey claims Dems supported the Civil Rights Act? No retard. There was almost ZERO support from Dems for that, giving blacks citizenship and the right to vote, or giving women the right to vote. All there in recorded history. Yet you choose to keep your head up your ass. Most people would be ashamed to be like you.

Pogo laughed at this post. Unintelligent people laugh at things they don't understand.

I laughed, because I knew at first sight what I was about to do with it.

Chuckle. I kill me.

Yes. You knew you were going to play your Bullshit Card. Because that's all you've got.

Actually that's more of that thar "history". You know, that shit that you had no clue about with the Southern Strategy and got your ass handed to you?

Dood, you ignore reality harder than anyone I ever met.

Daveward posts "note to self", mistakenly drops it on USMB.

You got schlonged, Gunnerhands. You had no idea of the history you tried to deny, and got your clock cleaned.

Nice to see you still lie as you run away retard. Noting not one mention of the ZERO votes your side gave to the 15th Amendment. History called. She says you’re a liar.

I don't have a "side", stupid, except that of Reality, which isn't really a "side" --- IT'S WHAT THE FUCK WE LIVE IN. And go learn to read ---- none of the above was about any "Amendment".

 

[22lcidw]

They have Court TV. Now we can have the Impeachment Channel. Impeachments all day...every day!

 

[justinacolmena]

"If Joe Biden happens to be elected president this year, he will enter office more hobbled by major scandals than any president in the history of the presidency, and there is just no question that his administration will be immediately paralyzed by impeachment proceedings.

Good. I don't care what sort of proceedings, any and all action against Joe Biden and his Democrat administration is justified in order to frustrate their evil works, and hinder, limit, and restrict the harm they intend to do to the country.

Meanwhile the work of freedom and liberty must go on in defiance of that government until it can be overthrown and our rights restored, with a new government that will remain more firmly under control of the Constitutional checks and balances that should have restrained its overreach and defended our Constitutional rights from such continual and progressive infringements.