newpolitics
vegan atheist indy
- Sep 27, 2008
- 2,931
- 262
- 48
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because drugs are bad when not dispensed by the proper authorities, as with all things in modern America only the well to do, through their physician, are allowed to escape reality for brief moments.
Also, now you know why the Justice Department was sending weapons down there as well. They needed to arm the US Gov'ts drug traders to fight against other drug cartels who didn't play ball with the US gov't and launder their drug money in select US Banks (Like Wells Fargo) Is it all starting to make sense now?The indictment pending against Zambada Niebla claims he served as the logistical coordinator for the cartel, helping to oversee an operation that imported into the U.S. multi-ton quantities of cocaine using various means, including but not limited to, Boeing 747 cargo aircraft, private aircraft buses, rail cars, tractor trailers, and automobiles.
The revelation that Zambada Niebla claims to have been a U.S. government asset, working with its sanction, is a shocking development in the so-called drug war and has gone largely un-reported by the U.S. media. The claim, if true, adds credence to theories long in play that the Mexican and U.S. governments are essentially showing favor toward the Sinaloa drug organization and its leadership, including El Mayo and Joaquin El Chapo Guzman Lorea, as part of a broader strategy to weaken and ultimately eliminate rival narco organizations. U.S. and Mexican government officials, of course, have consistently denied that any such arrangement is in place
Because idiots like you keep voting for the same people.
How about y'all try thinking for yourselves instead of being told what to think by the media.
People with an IQ over room temperature do not form their opinions based on media reports, particularly when that source is the HuffPuff.
Idiots.
Republicans by definition regard States' right sacro sanct . Well once upon a time in a galaxy far, far away they did. Apparently unlike the elephant, which never forgets, this bunch of coconuts has forgotten that. But then Republicans have been mucking around in everyone's rights, including States', for such a long time I really don't find this latest invasion the least bit surprising.
if carried out in the U.S
is incorrect."Under this bill, if a young couple plans a wedding in Amsterdam, and as part of the wedding, they plan to buy the bridal party some marijuana, they would be subject to prosecution," said Bill Piper, director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, which advocates for reforming the country's drug laws.
Republicans by definition regard States' right sacro sanct . Well once upon a time in a galaxy far, far away they did. Apparently unlike the elephant, which never forgets, this bunch of coconuts has forgotten that. But then Republicans have been mucking around in everyone's rights, including States', for such a long time I really don't find this latest invasion the least bit surprising.
What was the vote in committee? If you can not answer that. you are full of shit and speculation.
According to the OP's source, the acts would have to be carried out in the US.
According to the OP's source, the acts would have to be carried out in the US. Since this wedding is in Amsterdam, there would be no possibility of prosecution.
What was the vote in committee? If you can not answer that. you are full of shit and speculation.
Looks like it was 20-7 in subcommittee two days ago.
According to the OP's source, the acts would have to be carried out in the US.
The language in the bill is:
`(b) Whoever, within the United States, conspires with one or more persons, or aids or abets one or more persons, regardless of where such other persons are located, to engage in conduct at any place outside the United States that would constitute a violation of this title if committed within the United States, shall be subject to the same penalties that would apply to such conduct if it were to occur within the United States.'.
"You must spread some Reputation around before you give it to editec again."This is possible because both parties are the SAME party.
Anybody who thinks that the Dems are soft on drugs laws isn't paying attention.
Clinton's DoJ put more people in prison for marijuana crimes that Bush II's did.
"You must spread some Reputation around before you give it to editec again."This is possible because both parties are the SAME party.
Anybody who thinks that the Dems are soft on drugs laws isn't paying attention.
Clinton's DoJ put more people in prison for marijuana crimes that Bush II's did.
It is just hilarious the way so many fail to appreciate what an excellent Republican (if Bush is any measure of excellent Republican) Obama has been to date. The bailouts, the War on Drugs, stimulus spending, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, government sponsored healthcare, his 2nd Amendment position, deficit spending, the expansion of the regulatory state, upholding abuses of the interstate commerce clause, ... I have serious difficulties seeing what the Republicans are complaining about ... unless it's that they believe that McCain would have done more to advance their patently statist agenda.