Republicans introduce joint resolution proposing Congress Term Limit Amendment

[Marener]

The overriding deep state?

Yes, use it against them, over and fucking over.

Deep state doesn’t control the executive. The president and their appointees do.

You know, people responsive to voters.

 

[martybegan]

Deep state doesn’t control the executive. The president and their appointees do.

You know, people responsive to voters.

LOL.

Let see how that works when Trump tries to implement his policies starting January 20th.

Then you clowns will be all about "brave members of agency X" refusing Trump's directives.

\

 

[Nostra]

Meanwhile, President-elect Mussolini hints at repealing the 22nd Amendment.

 

[Nostra]

Of course you Trumptards suffer no cognitive dissonance whatsoever in pushing for congressional term limits while supporting a lifetime presidency for your orange Mussolini.

After all, that would require actual cognition.

Link us up to all this support for a lifetime President, Simp.

Betcha can’t.

 

[Marener]

LOL.

Let see how that works when Trump tries to implement his policies starting January 20th.

Then you clowns will be all about "brave members of agency X" refusing Trump's directives.

\

When Trump tries to implement his policies, conservative justices are going to magically decide his interpretations of statutes are perfectly reasonable merely for the fact that they share his political ideology.

The conservative courts are political bodies, making and rewriting laws.

 

[martybegan]

When Trump tries to implement his policies, conservative justices are going to magically decide his interpretations of statutes are perfectly reasonable merely for the fact that they share his political ideology.

The conservative courts are political bodies, making and rewriting laws.

And progressive courts were never political?

Conservative justices are far more in line with the intent of the Constitution than any progressive justice.

 

[WorldWatcher]

And progressive courts were never political?

Conservative justices are far more in line with the intent of the Constitution than any progressive justice.

Justice Thomas and her husband Clarence agree.

WW

 

[martybegan]

Justice Thomas and her husband Clarence agree.

WW

There's that racial hatred again.

 

[Marener]

And progressive courts were never political?

Conservative justices are far more in line with the intent of the Constitution than any progressive justice.

Did the progressive courts overturn Chevron? It’s the conservative courts constantly grabbing power.

 

[martybegan]

Did the progressive courts overturn Chevron? It’s the conservative courts constantly grabbing power.

No, they made things up like Roe, Chevron and Plessey up.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Justice Thomas and her husband Clarence agree.

WW

There's that racial hatred again.

There is no race in that post.

There is disagreement with Clarence not recusing himself from cases because of his wife flagrant political activities regarding cases before the court he's sitting on.

WW

 

[Marener]

No, they made things up like Roe, Chevron and Plessey up.

Chevron limited judicial power.

Roe limited government power.

You’re become an authoritarian statist because it suits your agenda.

 

[martybegan]

There is no race in that post.

There is disagreement with Clarence not recusing himself from cases because of his wife flagrant political activities regarding cases before the court he's sitting on.

WW

Nice cover. Hate seeing a white woman marry a black man, don't ya?

There is no reason for him to recuse. How about we dig just as deep into the spouses of the Prog justices and see what pops up?

Haven't some of the progressive justices overseen same sex marriages? Shouldn't they recuse themselves from any court case regarding that issue?

 

[martybegan]

Chevron limited judicial power.

Roe limited government power.

You’re become an authoritarian statist because it suits your agenda.

Chevron wrongly did so in deference to the executive, while excusing the legislature from their actual role, writing laws that are explicit enough for the executive to enforce without interpretation.

Roe wrongly said the Judicial branch can make up constitutional rights.

 

[Marener]

Chevron wrongly did so in deference to the executive, while excusing the legislature from their actual role, writing laws that are explicit enough for the executive to enforce without interpretation.

Roe wrongly said the Judicial branch can make up constitutional rights.

Like I said, both reversals were power grabs. Liberal courts willingly limited themselves to respect the people of the country.

Conservative unaccountable lifetime appointment led judges make the decisions for us.

 

[martybegan]

Like I said, both reversals were power grabs. Liberal courts willingly limited themselves to respect the people of the country.

Conservative unaccountable lifetime appointment led judges make the decisions for us.

it's the system working as intended.

Roe made the decision for every single State, regardless of whether they wanted that or not.

Dobbs returned it to the States where it belongs, limiting federal power.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Nice cover. Hate seeing a white woman marry a black man, don't ya?

No why would I? I don't give a shit about skin color.

There is no reason for him to recuse. How about we dig just as deep into the spouses of the Prog justices and see what pops up?

What's funny is the hypocrisy of those defending Thomas while calling for Merchan to recuse himself because his daughter works for a political consulting firm.

Haven't some of the progressive justices overseen same sex marriages? Shouldn't they recuse themselves from any court case regarding that issue?

Why same-sex marriage are legal?

But I'll give you that on the condition any Justice that performs a different-sex marriage has to recuse themselves?

Deal?

WW

 

[martybegan]

No why would I? I don't give a shit about skin color.



What's funny is the hypocrisy of those defending Thomas while calling for Merchan to recuse himself because his daughter works for a political consulting firm.



Why same-sex marriage are legal?

But I'll give you that on the condition any Justice that performs a different-sex marriage has to recuse themselves?

Deal?

WW

I never said Merchan should recuse himself, I want him castigated by an appeals court for obvious bias all on his own.

No, because old fashioned marriage is and has never been an issue.

And for me same sex marriage isn't an issue when States change their marriage laws to allow for it, the issue is the court forcing it on States that don't want to do that.

 

[Hellokitty]

No, its telling congress to write more specific laws and stop delegating to the executive things that belong to the legislature.

Lobbyist write the laws, not congress or the executive branch.

 

[Marener]

Roe made the decision for every single State, regardless of whether they wanted that or not.

Like Brown.

Dobbs returned it to the States where it belongs, limiting federal power.

Like Plessy.