Republicans fail to make any rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women. Their failed arguments are examined here:

Men should make their preference known about giving birth to the child worked out with a woman before leaving their joy juice in the autonomous bi body part known as s vagina. IF NOT YES STFU about it.
Oh, now sex means pregnancy? What changed?

Again with the emotion. Where’s you logical argument?

Out the window, huh kid?
 
The conservative justices on the Supreme Court are all Catholic. The decision to overturn Roe versus wade was a white male Christian nationalist religious driven decision in violation of the constitution
If you dont mind, point out anywhere in the Constitution, where it says "A woman has the right to murder her baby". I will wait for your answer.
 
The conservative justices on the Supreme Court are all Catholic. The decision to overturn Roe versus wade was a white male Christian nationalist religious driven decision in violation of the constitution
Roe was always bad law. There is no right to abortion in the constitution. States rights are in the constitution and that's where the decision should be made.
 
If you dont mind, point out anywhere in the Constitution, where it says "A woman has the right to murder her baby". I will wait for your answer.


Republicans fail to make any rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women. 240524 {post•684}

NotfooledbyW May’24 Vrftma: It’s an unumerated right when the baby is inside her and a dependent part of her body she has autonomy over her own life and the fetuses life and the general public has no interest in a pregnant woman’s private life.

Your question was well answered four years earlier. #684

Does a Right to Privacy Exist in the US Constitution? 200502 {post•198}

dblack May’29 Vdartp: “The question is whether a fetus should be afforded legal rights before it is born. Claiming that it does establishes a precedent that grants government sovereignty over the contents of our bodies. That's taking state power too far.” dblvck 200502 Vdartp00198


nfbw 240524 Vrftma00684 to mkxnrms 240524 Srftma00682
 
Last edited:
Roe was always bad law
Only if you are a Vigano Catholic or white Christian nationalist or simply willing to subjugate your rational secular mind to their groupthink for callous political culture war slanderous ammunition against Democrats and thus against the multicultural actual working class voters of America .
 
Republicans fail to make any rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women. It is why Republicans are suffering politically since they won a states rights argument with the Dobbs decision.

But state’s rights do not supersede individual right’s including the unenumerated individual right to privacy for impregnated women.

One of Saint Ding’s failed arguments goes something like this:

ding said: It's extremely clear that the reason you are playing word games in your dehumanization of human life is to make it easier to kill them and dismiss their right to life. dvng. #4,716

An argument based upon what Saint Ding thinks I am thinking being evil, is not an argument at all.

Protected unborn life from the instant of conception has not been a norm for Americans for centuries. The norm the past fifty years has been that protected life begins at reasonable expectation of life outside the womb.

Saint Heynorm does the same thing by accusing me of thinking ZEFs are worthless clump of cells,

HeyNorm said: “ ….. all they are carrying is a worthless clump of cells, right? Like a parasite, right?” hynrm.23.11.19 #772

I don’t think that at all. My response is here:
nf.23.11.21 #11,948 to hynrm.23.11.19 #772

nf.23.11.21 #1
it's a human being. and it would be killing a human, which is against our laws. You don't believe in our laws?

Where in our law does it say mothers can murder their babies?
 
Only if you are a Vigano Catholic or white Christian nationalist or simply willing to subjugate your rational secular mind to their groupthink for callous political culture war slanderous ammunition against Democrats and thus against the multicultural actual working class voters of America .
Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg said it was bad law. Just as legal theory it's bad law. The court examined the right and found it unconstitutional. It should have ended there. Instead they invented an entirely new class of rights, penumbral rights. Whether you are for or against abortion, Roe was bad law.
 
Men should make their preference known about giving birth to the child worked out with a woman before leaving their joy juice in the autonomous bi body part known as s vagina. IF NOT YES STFU about it.
What's your point here? can you explain a little more for us?
 
Now that Ashley's diary has been authenticated, and we know for a fact that Joe Biden is an incestuous, pedophilic rapist, I'm wondering if there's an abortion in the story, too? An inbred baby that wasn't allowed to live.
 
Men should make their preference known about giving birth to the child worked out with a woman before leaving their joy juice in the autonomous bi body part known as s vagina. IF NOT YES STFU about it.
Oh so the men are the only ones responsible, why do you hate men so much that you want to relegate them to servant for women?
 
Oh so the men are the only ones responsible
Nope you are liar. If that is a question my answer is no, Both are are equally responsible to communicate intent with respect to pregnancy being wanted or not and moral objections to abortion.
 
Republicans fail to make any rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women. 240524 {post•684}

NotfooledbyW May’24 Vrftma: It’s an unumerated right when the baby is inside her and a dependent part of her body she has autonomy over her own life and the fetuses life and the general public has no interest in a pregnant woman’s private life.

Your question was well answered four years earlier. #684

Does a Right to Privacy Exist in the US Constitution? 200502 {post•198}

dblack May’29 Vdartp: “The question is whether a fetus should be afforded legal rights before it is born. Claiming that it does establishes a precedent that grants government sovereignty over the contents of our bodies. That's taking state power too far.” dblvck 200502 Vdartp00198


nfbw 240524 Vrftma00684 to mkxnrms 240524 Srftma00682
Murdering a baby isnt a right to privacy. Now again, show me in the Constitution where it is legal for a woman to execute her baby.
 
No it was made by 6 Justices properly interpreting the Constitution.
No its the opinion of six Catholics that make up the conservative majority who lean to the Republican religious right white Christian nationalist interpretation of the Constitution

To justify their decision they cited late nineteenth century state laws banning abortion from a period when women had no right to vote. Those male dominated laws should have had no bearing on a decision made in after 2020 where the man who appointed three of the six Catholics to the USSC lost the election and then tried to overturn that loss through attempted election fraud and violence against the peaceful transfer of power.

And now we know Sam Alito, the author of the Author of the Dobbs decision is in sympathy with trumps insurrection by flying the American flag upside down at his home. And then flying the “appeal to heaven“ flag at his vacation home in New Jersey.
 
No its the opinion of six Catholics that make up the conservative majority who lean to the Republican religious right white Christian nationalist interpretation of the Constitution

To justify their decision they cited late nineteenth century state laws banning abortion from a period when women had no right to vote. Those male dominated laws should have had no bearing on a decision made in after 2020 where the man who appointed three of the six Catholics to the USSC lost the election and then tried to overturn that loss through attempted election fraud and violence against the peaceful transfer of power.

And now we know Sam Alito, the author of the Author of the Dobbs decision is in sympathy with trumps insurrection by flying the American flag upside down at his home. And then flying the “appeal to heaven“ flag at his vacation home in New Jersey.
:eek-52:
 
Murdering a baby isnt a right to privacy.
Absolutely when the baby has entered the V public records is having been born alive.

Prior to giving childbirth, a woman has a right to privacy that you should respect unless you have no respect for women at all.
 
No its the opinion of six Catholics that make up the conservative majority who lean to the Republican religious right white Christian nationalist interpretation of the Constitution

To justify their decision they cited late nineteenth century state laws banning abortion from a period when women had no right to vote. Those male dominated laws should have had no bearing on a decision made in after 2020 where the man who appointed three of the six Catholics to the USSC lost the election and then tried to overturn that loss through attempted election fraud and violence against the peaceful transfer of power.

And now we know Sam Alito, the author of the Author of the Dobbs decision is in sympathy with trumps insurrection by flying the American flag upside down at his home. And then flying the “appeal to heaven“ flag at his vacation home in New Jersey.
Thankfully the majority of the country doesn't share your hatred of Catholics
 
Nope you are liar. If that is a question my answer is no, Both are are equally responsible to communicate intent with respect to pregnancy being wanted or not and moral objections to abortion.
If only what about when no contract is discussed and they just have at it then the man gets no rights
 

Forum List

Back
Top