Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In common law, when the Constitution was written, it was not murder to terminateMurdering a baby isnt a right to privacy. Now again, show me in the Constitution where it is legal for a woman to execute her baby.
Because there is no threat to his physical well being when giving birth to a child.If only what about when no contract is discussed and they just have at it then the man gets no rights
So once again, what Amendment guarantees the right of a woman to execute her baby? Or are you having problems with the verbiage?When the going gets tuff, the MAGA get going. So goes their defense of flee-dumb.
So i notice that you dont have a black robe on, please show the amendment that certifies your decision.In common law, when the Constitution was written, it was not murder to terminate
a pregnancy prior to “quickening” which is the basic equivalent to viability in today’s terminology.
So where in the Constitution does it even imply in the slightest degree that a human being during the in utero process of gestation has the same right to life as if it has been born?
Wait, what. Is it a baby or a fetus? Or maybe your just stupid?Republicans fail to make any rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women. 240524 {post•684}
NotfooledbyW May’24 Vrftma: It’s an unumerated right when the baby is inside her and a dependent part of her body she has autonomy over her own life and the fetuses life and the general public has no interest in a pregnant woman’s private life.
Your question was well answered four years earlier. #684
Does a Right to Privacy Exist in the US Constitution? 200502 {post•198}
dblack May’29 Vdartp: “The question is whether a fetus should be afforded legal rights before it is born. Claiming that it does establishes a precedent that grants government sovereignty over the contents of our bodies. That's taking state power too far.” dblvck 200502 Vdartp00198
nfbw 240524 Vrftma00684 to mkxnrms 240524 Srftma00682
You know Any one from Any side of the isle who thinks its ok to kill 2 year old's?Force?
Republicans fail to make any rational argument why women shouldn't murder 2-year-olds.
You know Any one from Any side of the isle who thinks its ok to kill 2 year old's?
NOW your just being a silly MAGA.
Thankfully the majority of the country doesn't share your hatred of Catholics
Your arguments are based 100% on bigotry and are not rational.I voted for Biden and I’m glad he professes normal American Catholicism as the
majority are.
Most Catholics are not Vigano Catholics referring to the estranged Catholic Bishop who kisses the Putin and Trump authoritarian rings for attention from the conspiracy enchanted global goofballs.
The weakness of having no rational argument asigning duty to society for forcing full term gestation on women who did not intend to become pregnant by suggestion that I hate Catholics is on display for all to see it
Republicans fail to make any rational argument why women shouldn't murder 2-year-olds.
Except the Republican Party is still using baby fetus to keep multicultural working class voters under the boot of the billionaire class who need cultural warriors to enshrine tax cuts and limits on wealth producing assets to be regulated,Voters in many states have already said that abortions are legal, period. The End.
No, banning access to abortion prior to the weeks that a woman can know she is pregnant deprives her of the option to opt out of going through full-term gestation and giving birth to a baby.nature forces full gestation not republicans,,
Wait, what. Is it a baby or a fetus?
You say it, but you cannot support it with facts reason logic and critical thinking. If you could you would, but you don’t. You just say it.Your arguments are based 100% on bigotry and are not rational.
it still kills the baby,,Except the Republican Party is still using baby fetus to keep multicultural working class voters under the boot of the billionaire class who need cultural warriors to enshrine tax cuts and limits on wealth producing assets to be regulated,
No, banning access to abortion prior to the weeks that a woman can know she is pregnant deprives her of the option to opt out of going through full-term gestation and giving birth to a baby.
That is the official Republican party doctrine.
Yes it does. The question is, does the woman become a menace to you and your family and our society when she has an abortion and it goes unpunished in a court of law?it still kills the baby,,
the robber that breaks into your house and murders your children doesnt menace me either,,Yes it does. The question is, does the woman become a menace to you and your family and our society when she has an abortion and it goes unpunished in a court of law?
Ignorance of what. Miscarriage kills the baby. Abortion as birth control kills the Baby. Abortion to save the life of the mother. What is your point?so ignorance is no excuse,,
thats a death by natural causes not an intentional act,,Ignorance of what. Miscarriage kills the baby. Abortion as birth control kills the Baby. Abortion to save the life of the mother. What is your point?
and were nominated each the same wayOK
No it was made by 6 Justices properly interpreting the Constitution.
ignorance of how one gets pregnant.Ignorance of what. Miscarriage kills the baby. Abortion as birth control kills the Baby. Abortion to save the life of the mother. What is your point?
it was never a law, congress never made it a law. Courts don't make laws.Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg said it was bad law. Just as legal theory it's bad law. The court examined the right and found it unconstitutional. It should have ended there. Instead they invented an entirely new class of rights, penumbral rights. Whether you are for or against abortion, Roe was bad law.
Yes there are but you chose not to see it that way, you are intolerant of others and ideas that you don't agree with. You have your opinion and that is all it is, an opinion and others on the other side believe their opinion is true and just and rational, that you don't think so is irrelevant.There is no rational argument for depriving a pregnant woman of her liberty to make choices about her body and her life when there is no harm to anyone outside and separated from her body if she chooses to end her pregnancy with a safe legal abortion. Banning that procedure in states that have white born again Christian majorities in state legislatures and governors has nothing to do with being rational at all. You can’t make a rational argument for depriving women of a liberty when no harm comes to your life limb or property when she aborts the fetus in her body. That’s why you stop at both sides are right and can go no farther towards truth when you choose to cop out.
