Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We will never secure the border. NEVER! Get that idea out of your head.We don't need immigration reform, we need to enforce laws currently on the books and secure the border. We don';t need to be the dumping ground for the worlds poor and needy. We have our own problems, we don't need to import them.
What we need is to make sure the ones that come here work for a living and pay their taxes, instead of coming here to be welfare recipients like Obama's Auntie. Rubio's plan to register them under work visas and ban them from collecting welfare was the way to go.
We will never secure the border. NEVER! Get that idea out of your head.We don't need immigration reform, we need to enforce laws currently on the books and secure the border. We don';t need to be the dumping ground for the worlds poor and needy. We have our own problems, we don't need to import them.
What we need is to make sure the ones that come here work for a living and pay their taxes, instead of coming here to be welfare recipients like Obama's Auntie. Rubio's plan to register them under work visas and ban them from collecting welfare was the way to go.
Let's be clear about what you're saying. We'll never secure the Southern Border, not because we can't, but because there are too many people in the US who would object. When a traitor class as the right to vote, that signals deeper problems than merely open borders.
Securing the border is not a managerial or technical difficulty. Heck, even deporting 20 million infiltrators is a piece of cake - we deported over a million in one year back in the 1950s without the use of databases or hi-tech.
We will never secure the border. NEVER! Get that idea out of your head.We don't need immigration reform, we need to enforce laws currently on the books and secure the border. We don';t need to be the dumping ground for the worlds poor and needy. We have our own problems, we don't need to import them.
What we need is to make sure the ones that come here work for a living and pay their taxes, instead of coming here to be welfare recipients like Obama's Auntie. Rubio's plan to register them under work visas and ban them from collecting welfare was the way to go.
Let's be clear about what you're saying. We'll never secure the Southern Border, not because we can't, but because there are too many people in the US who would object. When a traitor class as the right to vote, that signals deeper problems than merely open borders.
Securing the border is not a managerial or technical difficulty. Heck, even deporting 20 million infiltrators is a piece of cake - we deported over a million in one year back in the 1950s without the use of databases or hi-tech.
It's both. Define secure. We have how many thousands of miles on our southern border? And even if we put a million man army on it, why wouldn't they just get on a boat and go around? Oh ok, yeah I suppose we could also interdict every single boat, and open up every single container. And how much are we gonna spend on this war against immigration again to make it "perfect?"
We will never secure the border. NEVER! Get that idea out of your head.We don't need immigration reform, we need to enforce laws currently on the books and secure the border. We don';t need to be the dumping ground for the worlds poor and needy. We have our own problems, we don't need to import them.
What we need is to make sure the ones that come here work for a living and pay their taxes, instead of coming here to be welfare recipients like Obama's Auntie. Rubio's plan to register them under work visas and ban them from collecting welfare was the way to go.
Let's be clear about what you're saying. We'll never secure the Southern Border, not because we can't, but because there are too many people in the US who would object. When a traitor class as the right to vote, that signals deeper problems than merely open borders.
Securing the border is not a managerial or technical difficulty. Heck, even deporting 20 million infiltrators is a piece of cake - we deported over a million in one year back in the 1950s without the use of databases or hi-tech.
It's both. Define secure. We have how many thousands of miles on our southern border? And even if we put a million man army on it, why wouldn't they just get on a boat and go around? Oh ok, yeah I suppose we could also interdict every single boat, and open up every single container. And how much are we gonna spend on this war against immigration again to make it "perfect?" How many ICE agents are paid off to overlook drug deals? Yeah, the illusion of power over our security is just that... and illusion.
We will never secure the border. NEVER! Get that idea out of your head.We don't need immigration reform, we need to enforce laws currently on the books and secure the border. We don';t need to be the dumping ground for the worlds poor and needy. We have our own problems, we don't need to import them.
What we need is to make sure the ones that come here work for a living and pay their taxes, instead of coming here to be welfare recipients like Obama's Auntie. Rubio's plan to register them under work visas and ban them from collecting welfare was the way to go.
Let's be clear about what you're saying. We'll never secure the Southern Border, not because we can't, but because there are too many people in the US who would object. When a traitor class as the right to vote, that signals deeper problems than merely open borders.
Securing the border is not a managerial or technical difficulty. Heck, even deporting 20 million infiltrators is a piece of cake - we deported over a million in one year back in the 1950s without the use of databases or hi-tech.
It's both. Define secure. We have how many thousands of miles on our southern border? And even if we put a million man army on it, why wouldn't they just get on a boat and go around? Oh ok, yeah I suppose we could also interdict every single boat, and open up every single container. And how much are we gonna spend on this war against immigration again to make it "perfect?" How many ICE agents are paid off to overlook drug deals? Yeah, the illusion of power over our security is just that... and illusion.
OH brother, did I ever misread your post.
You don't need a guard every 10 feet along the border. First you establish a barrier. A fence or wall. Then you place movement detectors in the ground. This makes the barrier impassable. The traffic is now funneled to the openings in the barrier. This is where you can concentrate security. As for boats, you interdict off-shore, during approach, not after they land on a beach.
Border security is completely feasible, it's just that it's unpopular with the traitor class of American voters.
We will never secure the border. NEVER! Get that idea out of your head.We don't need immigration reform, we need to enforce laws currently on the books and secure the border. We don';t need to be the dumping ground for the worlds poor and needy. We have our own problems, we don't need to import them.
What we need is to make sure the ones that come here work for a living and pay their taxes, instead of coming here to be welfare recipients like Obama's Auntie. Rubio's plan to register them under work visas and ban them from collecting welfare was the way to go.
Let's be clear about what you're saying. We'll never secure the Southern Border, not because we can't, but because there are too many people in the US who would object. When a traitor class as the right to vote, that signals deeper problems than merely open borders.
Securing the border is not a managerial or technical difficulty. Heck, even deporting 20 million infiltrators is a piece of cake - we deported over a million in one year back in the 1950s without the use of databases or hi-tech.
It's both. Define secure. We have how many thousands of miles on our southern border? And even if we put a million man army on it, why wouldn't they just get on a boat and go around? Oh ok, yeah I suppose we could also interdict every single boat, and open up every single container. And how much are we gonna spend on this war against immigration again to make it "perfect?" How many ICE agents are paid off to overlook drug deals? Yeah, the illusion of power over our security is just that... and illusion.
OH brother, did I ever misread your post.
You don't need a guard every 10 feet along the border. First you establish a barrier. A fence or wall. Then you place movement detectors in the ground. This makes the barrier impassable. The traffic is now funneled to the openings in the barrier. This is where you can concentrate security. As for boats, you interdict off-shore, during approach, not after they land on a beach.
Border security is completely feasible, it's just that it's unpopular with the traitor class of American voters.
ROFL feasible with what? You think humans can't figure out how to defeat sensors? You think border guards can't be bought? ROFL
You didn't misread my post, my point is two fold. We lack the will to put a dent in it and even if we did have the will only hubris leads one to believe that we, unlike all others in history before us, can completely secure our borders.
We will never secure the border. NEVER! Get that idea out of your head.We don't need immigration reform, we need to enforce laws currently on the books and secure the border. We don';t need to be the dumping ground for the worlds poor and needy. We have our own problems, we don't need to import them.
What we need is to make sure the ones that come here work for a living and pay their taxes, instead of coming here to be welfare recipients like Obama's Auntie. Rubio's plan to register them under work visas and ban them from collecting welfare was the way to go.
Let's be clear about what you're saying. We'll never secure the Southern Border, not because we can't, but because there are too many people in the US who would object. When a traitor class as the right to vote, that signals deeper problems than merely open borders.
Securing the border is not a managerial or technical difficulty. Heck, even deporting 20 million infiltrators is a piece of cake - we deported over a million in one year back in the 1950s without the use of databases or hi-tech.
It's both. Define secure. We have how many thousands of miles on our southern border? And even if we put a million man army on it, why wouldn't they just get on a boat and go around? Oh ok, yeah I suppose we could also interdict every single boat, and open up every single container. And how much are we gonna spend on this war against immigration again to make it "perfect?" How many ICE agents are paid off to overlook drug deals? Yeah, the illusion of power over our security is just that... and illusion.
OH brother, did I ever misread your post.
You don't need a guard every 10 feet along the border. First you establish a barrier. A fence or wall. Then you place movement detectors in the ground. This makes the barrier impassable. The traffic is now funneled to the openings in the barrier. This is where you can concentrate security. As for boats, you interdict off-shore, during approach, not after they land on a beach.
Border security is completely feasible, it's just that it's unpopular with the traitor class of American voters.
ROFL feasible with what? You think humans can't figure out how to defeat sensors? You think border guards can't be bought? ROFL
You didn't misread my post, my point is two fold. We lack the will to put a dent in it and even if we did have the will only hubris leads one to believe that we, unlike all others in history before us, can completely secure our borders.
I live on a ranch. Assuming you can get past my motion detectors that the damn pigs & deer trigger all the time, good luck getting past my inner fencing that has my pack of dog inside. Bring a half track you'll need it.A door lock can't stop a gang from committing a home invasion on your home, so spare yourself the expense of putting locks on your doors.
I live on a ranch. Assuming you can get past my motion detectors that the damn pigs & deer trigger all the time, good luck getting past my inner fencing that has my pack of dog inside. Bring a half track you'll need it.A door lock can't stop a gang from committing a home invasion on your home, so spare yourself the expense of putting locks on your doors.
As for the border... have you ever been there? Have you seen what it actually looks like along the Rio Grande?
Most folks assume it's a place where you can just run a fence line.
I live on a ranch. Assuming you can get past my motion detectors that the damn pigs & deer trigger all the time, good luck getting past my inner fencing that has my pack of dog inside. Bring a half track you'll need it.A door lock can't stop a gang from committing a home invasion on your home, so spare yourself the expense of putting locks on your doors.
As for the border... have you ever been there? Have you seen what it actually looks like along the Rio Grande?
Most folks assume it's a place where you can just run a fence line.
Maybe you don't understand the difference between sensors at a border that is a couple thousand miles long where tens of millions of of illegals are looking to find a way to sneak past. And one crook happening by my ranch. Besides, as I said that's just one of the layers. My dog's don't turn off. Unless you drop onto my roof and cut through you're just not getting in without having to kill a pack of dogs first. By then I'll be shooting at you. I love my dogs.I live on a ranch. Assuming you can get past my motion detectors that the damn pigs & deer trigger all the time, good luck getting past my inner fencing that has my pack of dog inside. Bring a half track you'll need it.A door lock can't stop a gang from committing a home invasion on your home, so spare yourself the expense of putting locks on your doors.
As for the border... have you ever been there? Have you seen what it actually looks like along the Rio Grande?
Most folks assume it's a place where you can just run a fence line.
Didn't some smart fellow upthread note "You think humans can't figure out how to defeat sensors?" Are you arguing with that guy when you claim your motion sensors keep you secure?
I could take you out by myself without any effort at all.
No matter what you might think...you'd be cake.
We will never secure the border. NEVER! Get that idea out of your head.We don't need immigration reform, we need to enforce laws currently on the books and secure the border. We don';t need to be the dumping ground for the worlds poor and needy. We have our own problems, we don't need to import them.
What we need is to make sure the ones that come here work for a living and pay their taxes, instead of coming here to be welfare recipients like Obama's Auntie. Rubio's plan to register them under work visas and ban them from collecting welfare was the way to go.
Let's be clear about what you're saying. We'll never secure the Southern Border, not because we can't, but because there are too many people in the US who would object. When a traitor class as the right to vote, that signals deeper problems than merely open borders.
Securing the border is not a managerial or technical difficulty. Heck, even deporting 20 million infiltrators is a piece of cake - we deported over a million in one year back in the 1950s without the use of databases or hi-tech.
It's both. Define secure. We have how many thousands of miles on our southern border? And even if we put a million man army on it, why wouldn't they just get on a boat and go around? Oh ok, yeah I suppose we could also interdict every single boat, and open up every single container. And how much are we gonna spend on this war against immigration again to make it "perfect?" How many ICE agents are paid off to overlook drug deals? Yeah, the illusion of power over our security is just that... and illusion.
ROFL Your dreaming if you think these POS democrats are gonna turn off the welfare spigot. Remove the jobs ROFL...We will never secure the border. NEVER! Get that idea out of your head.We don't need immigration reform, we need to enforce laws currently on the books and secure the border. We don';t need to be the dumping ground for the worlds poor and needy. We have our own problems, we don't need to import them.
What we need is to make sure the ones that come here work for a living and pay their taxes, instead of coming here to be welfare recipients like Obama's Auntie. Rubio's plan to register them under work visas and ban them from collecting welfare was the way to go.
Let's be clear about what you're saying. We'll never secure the Southern Border, not because we can't, but because there are too many people in the US who would object. When a traitor class as the right to vote, that signals deeper problems than merely open borders.
Securing the border is not a managerial or technical difficulty. Heck, even deporting 20 million infiltrators is a piece of cake - we deported over a million in one year back in the 1950s without the use of databases or hi-tech.
It's both. Define secure. We have how many thousands of miles on our southern border? And even if we put a million man army on it, why wouldn't they just get on a boat and go around? Oh ok, yeah I suppose we could also interdict every single boat, and open up every single container. And how much are we gonna spend on this war against immigration again to make it "perfect?" How many ICE agents are paid off to overlook drug deals? Yeah, the illusion of power over our security is just that... and illusion.
It's not an illusion. If we removed the job and benefit magnets they would self deport and it would be a deterrant against more coming.