Republicans Are Extremely Fearful of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[hadit]

I'm not even making an argument. I'm simply pointing out your error. No wonder you want to jump back into your comfort zone.

Here's the bottom line. Learn it and live it: Equal protection under the law does not mean you're guaranteed being paid if you refuse available work. It just doesn't, no matter how many times you run away and come back, saying it all over and over again.

it does if that is equal protection of the law. in any case, it is more cost effective. only the right wing complain about better solutions at lower cost.

You are simply wrong. If you think you are right, please cite the legal expert who says so. Of course you will not.

Face it, you simply don't get paid if you refuse to take available work, and you should not.

are you claiming we need to abolish employment at will?

I'm claiming it doesn't mean what you want it to mean. Even your own sources disagree with you. And you're not citing any legal experts, as I said you wouldn't.

The law itself is self-explanatory. The right wing merely prefers to be frivolous with the Poor.

Yes, it is self explanatory, and it says what I say it does. Can you quote the portion that says you get a paycheck even if you refuse available work? If you can't, accept that you're wrong and that one of your favorite trite sayings is false.

 

[danielpalos]

it does if that is equal protection of the law. in any case, it is more cost effective. only the right wing complain about better solutions at lower cost.

You are simply wrong. If you think you are right, please cite the legal expert who says so. Of course you will not.

Face it, you simply don't get paid if you refuse to take available work, and you should not.

are you claiming we need to abolish employment at will?

I'm claiming it doesn't mean what you want it to mean. Even your own sources disagree with you. And you're not citing any legal experts, as I said you wouldn't.

The law itself is self-explanatory. The right wing merely prefers to be frivolous with the Poor.

Yes, it is self explanatory, and it says what I say it does. Can you quote the portion that says you get a paycheck even if you refuse available work? If you can't, accept that you're wrong and that one of your favorite trite sayings is false.

employment is at the will of either party. The State has to prove for-cause employment to deny or disparage unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

A lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor, is immoral.

 

[rightwinger]

Dancing can be good...or bad...

Every President, republican and democrat has sough good relations with Saudi Arabian for sound national security reasons.


Your complaint that Trump did it, is something that only someone completely ignorant could make.

None have defended a murderer because they buy military goods

Trump has

 

[easyt65]

After humiliating herself before the public with her endless display of her ignorance, resulting in rebuke and mocking from her own fellow party members, AOC just recently tried to 'save face' by proclaiming that the problem is not her being so ignorant and making such ignorant public comments but that the problem instead is that 'people are more concerned with being factually correct than morally wrong'.

AOC seems to think that her being completely factually wrong on entire subjects / issues does not change the fact that her stance on issues - based on her own completely false ideas / beliefs - are still 'morally right'.

Bwuhahahaha.....

Claiming the GOP is somehow afraid of this ignorant socialist twit is laughable...until you consider that the fact that someone so stupid and so socialist has at least in small part access to 'power' now that she has been elected. THAT should scare the hell out od EVERYONE.

 

[danielpalos]

equal protection of the law is more important, anyway.

 

[Snouter]

All we know about Sandy "Donkey Face" Cortez is she lied about growing up in the Bronx.

Sandy's Resume:

2007 Graduated from Yorktown High School.
2007 Interned at Ted "The Swimmer" Kennedy's Immigration Office?
2011 Graduated from Boston University.
2012 Founder of failed publishing company called Brook Avenue Press.
2013 ?
2014 ?
2015 ?
2016 Involved in Crazy Bernie Sanders' campaign that was rigged to lose by Crooked Hillary. Made a road trip to the midwest after President Trump won in a landslide.
2017 Worked as an order taker at Flats Fix, a dive Mexican restaurant in Manhattan at some point
2018 "Community organizer."

Please free to fill in the gaps. There must be interviews with professors, the "community" she was a "community organzier" with, etc. Her tax returns (if she filed any) might add some insight, but in all honesty it appears she never had a real job. Someone had to be paying her bills. A

 

[hadit]

You are simply wrong. If you think you are right, please cite the legal expert who says so. Of course you will not.

Face it, you simply don't get paid if you refuse to take available work, and you should not.

are you claiming we need to abolish employment at will?

I'm claiming it doesn't mean what you want it to mean. Even your own sources disagree with you. And you're not citing any legal experts, as I said you wouldn't.

The law itself is self-explanatory. The right wing merely prefers to be frivolous with the Poor.

Yes, it is self explanatory, and it says what I say it does. Can you quote the portion that says you get a paycheck even if you refuse available work? If you can't, accept that you're wrong and that one of your favorite trite sayings is false.

employment is at the will of either party. The State has to prove for-cause employment to deny or disparage unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

A lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor, is immoral.

That's not a quote. That's just you making words mean things they don't mean again.

 

[danielpalos]

are you claiming we need to abolish employment at will?

I'm claiming it doesn't mean what you want it to mean. Even your own sources disagree with you. And you're not citing any legal experts, as I said you wouldn't.

The law itself is self-explanatory. The right wing merely prefers to be frivolous with the Poor.

Yes, it is self explanatory, and it says what I say it does. Can you quote the portion that says you get a paycheck even if you refuse available work? If you can't, accept that you're wrong and that one of your favorite trite sayings is false.

employment is at the will of either party. The State has to prove for-cause employment to deny or disparage unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

A lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor, is immoral.

That's not a quote. That's just you making words mean things they don't mean again.

don't understand the concepts, right wingers or just being frivolous when it is about the Poor.

 

[RUNVS]

Considering their President I am not sure Republicans should be commenting on politicians who don't know important facts they should know. AOC at least has the excuse of being new so she is allowed to make a few mistakes as she learns.

 

[hadit]

I'm claiming it doesn't mean what you want it to mean. Even your own sources disagree with you. And you're not citing any legal experts, as I said you wouldn't.

The law itself is self-explanatory. The right wing merely prefers to be frivolous with the Poor.

Yes, it is self explanatory, and it says what I say it does. Can you quote the portion that says you get a paycheck even if you refuse available work? If you can't, accept that you're wrong and that one of your favorite trite sayings is false.

employment is at the will of either party. The State has to prove for-cause employment to deny or disparage unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

A lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor, is immoral.

That's not a quote. That's just you making words mean things they don't mean again.

don't understand the concepts, right wingers or just being frivolous when it is about the Poor.

You're not supporting your own argument. Once again, you paint yourself into a corner.

 

[danielpalos]

The law itself is self-explanatory. The right wing merely prefers to be frivolous with the Poor.

Yes, it is self explanatory, and it says what I say it does. Can you quote the portion that says you get a paycheck even if you refuse available work? If you can't, accept that you're wrong and that one of your favorite trite sayings is false.

employment is at the will of either party. The State has to prove for-cause employment to deny or disparage unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States.

A lack of equal protection of the law for the Poor, is immoral.

That's not a quote. That's just you making words mean things they don't mean again.

don't understand the concepts, right wingers or just being frivolous when it is about the Poor.

You're not supporting your own argument. Once again, you paint yourself into a corner.

not dumbed down enough for the right wing?

 

[Synthaholic]

“Every critic, every detractor, will have to bow down to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It’s everyone who’s ever doubted Alex, who ever disagreed, who ever challenged her. It is the ultimate revenge to become the most powerful woman in the universe.”

 

[CrusaderFrank]

“Every critic, every detractor, will have to bow down to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It’s everyone who’s ever doubted Alex, who ever disagreed, who ever challenged her. It is the ultimate revenge to become the most powerful woman in the universe.”

You confused her with Wonder Woman

 

[Synthaholic]

“Every critic, every detractor, will have to bow down to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It’s everyone who’s ever doubted Alex, who ever disagreed, who ever challenged her. It is the ultimate revenge to become the most powerful woman in the universe.”

You confused her with Wonder Woman

Now I wonder if you even got the reference.

 

[Correll]

Dancing can be good...or bad...

Every President, republican and democrat has sough good relations with Saudi Arabian for sound national security reasons.


Your complaint that Trump did it, is something that only someone completely ignorant could make.

None have defended a murderer because they buy military goods

Trump has

Your ignorance of the national security reasons for our relationship with Saudi Arabia, is noted and you are laughed at.


EVERY SINGLE President in the modern era has sought and maintained good relations with Saudi Arabia.

Including your favorite Obama.

 

[rightwinger]

“Every critic, every detractor, will have to bow down to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It’s everyone who’s ever doubted Alex, who ever disagreed, who ever challenged her. It is the ultimate revenge to become the most powerful woman in the universe.”

Beautiful woman
Bright, dynamic and can dance

Drives conservatives nutz

 

[rightwinger]

Dancing can be good...or bad...

Every President, republican and democrat has sough good relations with Saudi Arabian for sound national security reasons.


Your complaint that Trump did it, is something that only someone completely ignorant could make.

None have defended a murderer because they buy military goods

Trump has

Your ignorance of the national security reasons for our relationship with Saudi Arabia, is noted and you are laughed at.


EVERY SINGLE President in the modern era has sought and maintained good relations with Saudi Arabia.

Including your favorite Obama.

Only Crooked Donnie approves of torture and murder

 

[Dragonlady]

You guys sure elect the wackos


.

The left didn’t elect Trump. You elected a President who believes everything he sees on TV, and is threatening to turn the FCC loose on SNL. Not to mention continuing a Twitter feud with a dead man.

 

[Redfish]

You guys sure elect the wackos


.

The left didn’t elect Trump. You elected a President who believes everything he sees on TV, and is threatening to turn the FCC loose on SNL. Not to mention continuing a Twitter feud with a dead man.

There are elements of the media that have become an arm of the democrat party, that is illegal and should be taken on. McCain was a traitor to his fellow prisoners in viet nam, his family, his first wife, his party, the voters who elected him, and his country. He does not deserve any respect in death. He was a bitter loser who only got where he was due to corruption in the upper levels of the Navy.

 

[pismoe]

'juan mcstain' was going to play Hero till his dying day . Trump fixed that .