Republican lawmaker calls for Kyle Rittenhouse, who is on trial for murder, to be elected to Congress

[Wyatt earp]

Got to love everyone having cell phones

 

[Wyatt earp]

It's not illegal, moron, and the rifle was loaned to Rittenhouse, not purchased for him.

You're a fucking moron, as always.

LOLOL

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever???

No, fucking moron, the rifle was not "loaned" to him. A friend purchased it for him because it's illegal to sell that weapon to anyone under 18 in Wisconsin.

​

19-year-old charged with illegally supplying gun to Kyle Rittenhouse

The friend of Rittenhouse, 17, purchased the gun later used to allegedly fatally shoot two men in Kenosha, Wisconsin, prosecutors say.

www.nbcnews.com

​

Dominick Black, of Kenosha, faces two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor, causing death, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kenosha County Circuit Court. If he's found guilty, he faces up to 6 years in prison per count.​

​

When reached by NBC News, Black’s attorney declined to comment on his client’s case at this time.​

​

The complaint says Black told authorities that over the summer he received money for the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle from Rittenhouse, his friend, who was too young to have legally purchased the weapon himself.​

Do you read your own links smelly cow, he GAVE that weapon to Kyle, not sold it..


From your own link


Dominick Black, of Kenosha, faces two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor

LOLOLOL

Dumbfuck, what part of this is beyond your first grade reading skills...?

​

"...he [Black] received money for the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle from Rittenhouse..."​

​

[emphasis added to highlight your ignorance]​

You don't read your own link, yes your a pinko..


Once again he is charged with giving not selling

 

[theHawk]

But Rosenbaum did not have a gun as was previously stated.

Rosenbum assaulted the kid with his fists and tried to take his gun. Anyone, including a police officer would had been within their rights to shoot such an attacker.

Are you really that upset about your child molester friend getting ventilated?

 

[Faun]

You claim your hero is a victim, not the aggressor, despite all evidence to the contrary.

I haven't said any such thing. You are still a disgusting liar.

You claimed Rittenhouse was shooting into a crowd, not defending himself from the attack of your pedo hero felon illegally carrying an illegal gun and illegally firing it at an underage kid who defended himself from your pedo hero felon.

Great, let's see your evidence the pedofile was armed and fired it at Rittenhouse...

It's not my evidence, Stupid. It is the facts of the case. Not my job to educate the ignorant on the topic at hand.

I'll accept that as you made that shit up, Spunky. He wasn't armed.

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

Are you really so fucking stupid you think the charges filed by the state lay out all the facts for the defense? Please tell us you aren't that fucking stupid.

The defense has released video showing shots were fired at Rittenhouse before he defended himself.

Two sides to every story, Simpleton.

LOLOL

Slobbers the forum retard who punted on first down when challenged to produce evidence supporting his bullshit.

As I stated before, it isn't my job to educate the ignorant on the topic at hand. You choose to listen to half the story, which is what keeps you ignorant.

It is your job to prove what you claim. You claimed a, "pedo hero felon illegally carrying an illegal gun and illegally firing it...,"

Your utter inability to prove that ridiculously absurd comment reveals you simply made it up.

LOLOL

Emoticons in lieu of proving your claims are not bullshit? That speaks for ya.

You sure do get bent when someone speaks ill of your pedo hero.

No, I challenge people to prove their claims when I know they're lying. And when they're lying, as I suspect, they can't prove their claims. Just as you couldn't.

Thanks for proving my point.

Yes, your point that you're a liar.

You are incorrect. That happens when you have a meltdown like the one you are in.

Nope, not incorrect. Remember, when challenged to prove your bullshit claim that the pedophile was armed with a gun and fired it at Rittenhouse, you ran from that challenge as fast as your walker would allow.

Liar he had a gun and BTW


View attachment 420566

LOL

You moron, he wasn't talking about that guy.

 

[Nostra]

Got to love everyone having cell phones


View attachment 420578

That looks suspiciously like a handgun in the hand of a felon.

 

[Faun]

It's not illegal, moron, and the rifle was loaned to Rittenhouse, not purchased for him.

You're a fucking moron, as always.

LOLOL

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever???

No, fucking moron, the rifle was not "loaned" to him. A friend purchased it for him because it's illegal to sell that weapon to anyone under 18 in Wisconsin.

​

19-year-old charged with illegally supplying gun to Kyle Rittenhouse

The friend of Rittenhouse, 17, purchased the gun later used to allegedly fatally shoot two men in Kenosha, Wisconsin, prosecutors say.

www.nbcnews.com

​

Dominick Black, of Kenosha, faces two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor, causing death, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kenosha County Circuit Court. If he's found guilty, he faces up to 6 years in prison per count.​

​

When reached by NBC News, Black’s attorney declined to comment on his client’s case at this time.​

​

The complaint says Black told authorities that over the summer he received money for the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle from Rittenhouse, his friend, who was too young to have legally purchased the weapon himself.​

Until this story the narrative was that Black loaned the rifle to Rittenhouse. This story came out Nov 10, only two weeks ago. The shooting occurred on Aug 25, about 3 months ago.

So? Your point is ... ?

 

[bripat9643]

It's not illegal, moron, and the rifle was loaned to Rittenhouse, not purchased for him.

You're a fucking moron, as always.

LOLOL

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever???

No, fucking moron, the rifle was not "loaned" to him. A friend purchased it for him because it's illegal to sell that weapon to anyone under 18 in Wisconsin.

​

19-year-old charged with illegally supplying gun to Kyle Rittenhouse

The friend of Rittenhouse, 17, purchased the gun later used to allegedly fatally shoot two men in Kenosha, Wisconsin, prosecutors say.

www.nbcnews.com

​

Dominick Black, of Kenosha, faces two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor, causing death, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kenosha County Circuit Court. If he's found guilty, he faces up to 6 years in prison per count.​

​

When reached by NBC News, Black’s attorney declined to comment on his client’s case at this time.​

​

The complaint says Black told authorities that over the summer he received money for the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle from Rittenhouse, his friend, who was too young to have legally purchased the weapon himself.​

Until this story the narrative was that Black loaned the rifle to Rittenhouse. This story came out Nov 10, only two weeks ago. The shooting occurred on Aug 25, about 3 months ago.

So? Your point is ... ?

I don't read the latest kyle Rittenhouse news every 5 minutes, moron.

 

[Faun]

Nope. Not what I said at all.

Learn to read, Dope.

Nah, but it's what you should have realized when you said what you said.

Cops don't police everyone equally.

No, Dummy. I said what I said. You just can't read, or are intentionally lying about what I said.

Either way, you are wrong.

You also said the pedophile had a gun -- you couldn't prove that.

You also said the pedophile fired the gun -- you couldn't prove that either.

You also said Grosskreutz is a felon -- you couldn't prove that either.

You lie a lot.

 

[Faun]

It's not illegal, moron, and the rifle was loaned to Rittenhouse, not purchased for him.

You're a fucking moron, as always.

LOLOL

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever???

No, fucking moron, the rifle was not "loaned" to him. A friend purchased it for him because it's illegal to sell that weapon to anyone under 18 in Wisconsin.

​

19-year-old charged with illegally supplying gun to Kyle Rittenhouse

The friend of Rittenhouse, 17, purchased the gun later used to allegedly fatally shoot two men in Kenosha, Wisconsin, prosecutors say.

www.nbcnews.com

​

Dominick Black, of Kenosha, faces two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor, causing death, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kenosha County Circuit Court. If he's found guilty, he faces up to 6 years in prison per count.​

​

When reached by NBC News, Black’s attorney declined to comment on his client’s case at this time.​

​

The complaint says Black told authorities that over the summer he received money for the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle from Rittenhouse, his friend, who was too young to have legally purchased the weapon himself.​

Until this story the narrative was that Black loaned the rifle to Rittenhouse. This story came out Nov 10, only two weeks ago. The shooting occurred on Aug 25, about 3 months ago.

So? Your point is ... ?

I don't read the latest kyle Rittenhouse news every 5 minutes, moron.

Yes, I know you spew a lot of bullshit because you're ignorant.

 

[colfax_m]

So here is a bunch of people Burning, Looting and Murdering, and this kid who is there protecting a friends business from such thugs, gets shot at, and he is the criminal? Come on man, are you Dog Face Pony Soldiers? You must be...

No one asked him to be there. Least of all the business owner.

Rosenbaum had nothing to do with any political movement. He was homeless, bipolar and recently admitted to the hospital for suicidality.

The reason kids shouldn't be running around the streets with rifles at night should be obvious to any rational person.

Rittenhous is many times the man you could ever be, regardless of his age.

I think he's a dumb kid who made some dumb mistakes, like a lot of kids. Except three people are dead for no reason and this is a damn tragedy.

 

[bripat9643]

Nope. Not what I said at all.

Learn to read, Dope.

Nah, but it's what you should have realized when you said what you said.

Cops don't police everyone equally.

No, Dummy. I said what I said. You just can't read, or are intentionally lying about what I said.

Either way, you are wrong.

You also said the pedophile had a gun -- you couldn't prove that.

You also said the pedophile fired the gun -- you couldn't prove that either.

You also said Grosskreutz is a felon -- you couldn't prove that either.

You lie a lot.

Kenosha protester charged with firing gun right before Kyle Rittenhouse began shooting

 

[Meathead]

So here is a bunch of people Burning, Looting and Murdering, and this kid who is there protecting a friends business from such thugs, gets shot at, and he is the criminal? Come on man, are you Dog Face Pony Soldiers? You must be...

No one asked him to be there. Least of all the business owner.

Rosenbaum had nothing to do with any political movement. He was homeless, bipolar and recently admitted to the hospital for suicidality.

The reason kids shouldn't be running around the streets with rifles at night should be obvious to any rational person.

Rittenhous is many times the man you could ever be, regardless of his age.

I think he's a dumb kid who made some dumb mistakes, like a lot of kids. Except three people are dead for no reason and this is a damn tragedy.

Three? Two thugs are dead, and that doesn't count,

 

[bripat9643]

So here is a bunch of people Burning, Looting and Murdering, and this kid who is there protecting a friends business from such thugs, gets shot at, and he is the criminal? Come on man, are you Dog Face Pony Soldiers? You must be...

No one asked him to be there. Least of all the business owner.

Rosenbaum had nothing to do with any political movement. He was homeless, bipolar and recently admitted to the hospital for suicidality.

The reason kids shouldn't be running around the streets with rifles at night should be obvious to any rational person.

Rittenhous is many times the man you could ever be, regardless of his age.

I think he's a dumb kid who made some dumb mistakes, like a lot of kids. Except three people are dead for no reason and this is a damn tragedy.

They are dead for a very good reason, they assualted an innocent man who defended himself. They clearly aren't innocent victims. They are criminals who got what they deserve.

 

[colfax_m]

No, that was the kid who had a lawful gun and was trying to protect himself from the progressive loving child rapists...Do you love child rapists?

Charges for a straw purchase on behalf of Rittenhouse:

Friend who bought rifle for Kyle Rittenhouse charged

A 19-year-old Kenosha man has been charged with giving Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, the rifle he used to kill two people during August unrest in Kenosha

www.jsonline.com

Rittenhouse was 17 when he was carrying the rifle, which is illegal in Wisconsin.

What to know about Wisconsin's open-carry laws, self defense and more in Kenosha protest shootings

Answers to questions like does Wisconsin have a stand-your-ground law and other relevant information on the fatal Kenosha shootings.

www.jsonline.com

It's not illegal, moron, and the rifle was loaned to Rittenhouse, not purchased for him.

You're a fucking moron, as always.

Wisconsin Gun Laws: What You Need to Know | USCCA

Wisconsin gun owners, you’re in luck. We’ve gathered (and answered) some of the most frequently asked questions regarding Wisconsin gun laws.

www.usconcealedcarry.com

Can Someone Under 21 Own a Handgun in Wisconsin?
Yes. Any person 18 years or older and not prohibited from possessing a firearm can own a handgun. Federal and state law prohibits handgun sales by licensed dealers to persons under 21 and private sales or other transfers of handguns or handgun ammunition to any person the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is under age 18.

They can't own a handgun. They can own a rifle, moron

They can't carry it openly.

(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

2013 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations :: 948. Crimes against children. :: 948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

law.justia.com

Just so you know, this is a criminal statute that makes it illegal to do so. I mention this because I'm able to cite a criminal statute when I accuse someone of committing a crime. Just wanted you to know that's what that looks like.

Not illegal, shit for brains:

https://www.ammoland.com/2020/09/kyle-rittenhouse-are-people-under-the-age-of-18-forbidden-from-open-carry-in-wi/​

​

Wisconsin Statute 948.60 regulates the possession of a dangerous weapon by persons under 18 years old. In paragraph (2) (a) it states:​

(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.​

Paragraph (3) lists exceptions. (3)(c) excludes most people who are under 18, except those in violation of 941.28 or 29.304 and 29.539.​

(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.​

Statute 948.60 only applies to a person under the age of 18 who are in violation of 941.28 or not in compliance with 29.304 and 29.593.​

​

What does it take to be in violation of 941.28? Here is the statute:​

(2) No person may sell or offer to sell, transport, purchase, possess or go armed with a short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle.​

In the statute, short-barreled shotguns or short-barreled rifles are those which require a special license under the National Firearms Act. In general, those are rifles with a barrel less than 16 inches in length or shotguns with a barrel less than 18 inches in length, or either which have an overall length of less than 26 inches.​

​

The rifle carried by Kyle Rittenhouse, as an ordinary AR15 type and does not fall into those categories, so Kyle was not violating 941.28.​

​

Was Kyle in violation of Wisconsin statute 29.304 and statute 29.539? These statutes deal with hunting regulation and with people under the age of 16 carrying rifles and shotguns. First, statute 29.304:​

29.304  Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.​

(b) Restrictions on possession or control of a firearm. No person 14 years of age or older but under 16 years of age may have in his or her possession or control any firearm unless he or she:​

Kyle is reported to be over 16 years old, so he was not violating statute 29.304.​

​

How about statute 29.539?​

29.593  Requirement for certificate of accomplishment to obtain hunting approval.​

Kyle was not hunting, so statute 29.539 does not apply.​

​

To sum up: Wisconsin statutes 940.60 only forbid people under the age of 18 from possessing or carrying dangerous weapons in very limited cases. If a person is 16 years of age or older, the statute only applies to rifles and shotguns which are covered under the National Firearms Act as short-barreled rifles or shotguns. People who are hunting have to comply with the hunting regulations, and there are general restrictions for people under the age of 16.​

​

Rittenhouse was not hunting which means he was not in compliance with 29.304 or 29.539.

The intent of the law is clear, that he was not allowed to carry a rifle under age.

 

[Polishprince]

So here is a bunch of people Burning, Looting and Murdering, and this kid who is there protecting a friends business from such thugs, gets shot at, and he is the criminal? Come on man, are you Dog Face Pony Soldiers? You must be...

No one asked him to be there. Least of all the business owner.

Rosenbaum had nothing to do with any political movement. He was homeless, bipolar and recently admitted to the hospital for suicidality.

The reason kids shouldn't be running around the streets with rifles at night should be obvious to any rational person.

Rittenhous is many times the man you could ever be, regardless of his age.

I think he's a dumb kid who made some dumb mistakes, like a lot of kids. Except three people are dead for no reason and this is a damn tragedy.

The reason why they are dead is that they were attacking a minor child, and at least one of them wanted give it to the kid in the caboose if his past history means anything.

It was a Public Service Homicide at the worst.

And once the rioters realized that the people were shooting back and defending themselves, the Kenosha riots were cancelled.

The mayor of Kenosha just needs to give the Latino kid a freaking medal and key to the city and put this behind him. The rest of Kenosha would have been burned if the Chomo hadn't been whacked.

 

[bripat9643]

It's not illegal, moron, and the rifle was loaned to Rittenhouse, not purchased for him.

You're a fucking moron, as always.

LOLOL

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever???

No, fucking moron, the rifle was not "loaned" to him. A friend purchased it for him because it's illegal to sell that weapon to anyone under 18 in Wisconsin.

​

19-year-old charged with illegally supplying gun to Kyle Rittenhouse

The friend of Rittenhouse, 17, purchased the gun later used to allegedly fatally shoot two men in Kenosha, Wisconsin, prosecutors say.

www.nbcnews.com

​

Dominick Black, of Kenosha, faces two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor, causing death, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kenosha County Circuit Court. If he's found guilty, he faces up to 6 years in prison per count.​

​

When reached by NBC News, Black’s attorney declined to comment on his client’s case at this time.​

​

The complaint says Black told authorities that over the summer he received money for the Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle from Rittenhouse, his friend, who was too young to have legally purchased the weapon himself.​

Until this story the narrative was that Black loaned the rifle to Rittenhouse. This story came out Nov 10, only two weeks ago. The shooting occurred on Aug 25, about 3 months ago.

So? Your point is ... ?

I don't read the latest kyle Rittenhouse news every 5 minutes, moron.

Yes, I know you spew a lot of bullshit because you're ignorant.

Spare me, asshole.

 

[Faun]

Nope. Not what I said at all.

Learn to read, Dope.

Nah, but it's what you should have realized when you said what you said.

Cops don't police everyone equally.

No, Dummy. I said what I said. You just can't read, or are intentionally lying about what I said.

Either way, you are wrong.

You also said the pedophile had a gun -- you couldn't prove that.

You also said the pedophile fired the gun -- you couldn't prove that either.

You also said Grosskreutz is a felon -- you couldn't prove that either.

You lie a lot.

Kenosha protester charged with firing gun right before Kyle Rittenhouse began shooting

LOL

He wasn't talking about that guy either.

 

[Polishprince]

No, that was the kid who had a lawful gun and was trying to protect himself from the progressive loving child rapists...Do you love child rapists?

Charges for a straw purchase on behalf of Rittenhouse:

Friend who bought rifle for Kyle Rittenhouse charged

A 19-year-old Kenosha man has been charged with giving Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, the rifle he used to kill two people during August unrest in Kenosha

www.jsonline.com

Rittenhouse was 17 when he was carrying the rifle, which is illegal in Wisconsin.

What to know about Wisconsin's open-carry laws, self defense and more in Kenosha protest shootings

Answers to questions like does Wisconsin have a stand-your-ground law and other relevant information on the fatal Kenosha shootings.

www.jsonline.com

It's not illegal, moron, and the rifle was loaned to Rittenhouse, not purchased for him.

You're a fucking moron, as always.

Wisconsin Gun Laws: What You Need to Know | USCCA

Wisconsin gun owners, you’re in luck. We’ve gathered (and answered) some of the most frequently asked questions regarding Wisconsin gun laws.

www.usconcealedcarry.com

Can Someone Under 21 Own a Handgun in Wisconsin?
Yes. Any person 18 years or older and not prohibited from possessing a firearm can own a handgun. Federal and state law prohibits handgun sales by licensed dealers to persons under 21 and private sales or other transfers of handguns or handgun ammunition to any person the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is under age 18.

They can't own a handgun. They can own a rifle, moron

They can't carry it openly.

(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

2013 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations :: 948. Crimes against children. :: 948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

law.justia.com

Just so you know, this is a criminal statute that makes it illegal to do so. I mention this because I'm able to cite a criminal statute when I accuse someone of committing a crime. Just wanted you to know that's what that looks like.

Not illegal, shit for brains:

https://www.ammoland.com/2020/09/kyle-rittenhouse-are-people-under-the-age-of-18-forbidden-from-open-carry-in-wi/​

​

Wisconsin Statute 948.60 regulates the possession of a dangerous weapon by persons under 18 years old. In paragraph (2) (a) it states:​

(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.​

Paragraph (3) lists exceptions. (3)(c) excludes most people who are under 18, except those in violation of 941.28 or 29.304 and 29.539.​

(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.​

Statute 948.60 only applies to a person under the age of 18 who are in violation of 941.28 or not in compliance with 29.304 and 29.593.​

​

What does it take to be in violation of 941.28? Here is the statute:​

(2) No person may sell or offer to sell, transport, purchase, possess or go armed with a short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle.​

In the statute, short-barreled shotguns or short-barreled rifles are those which require a special license under the National Firearms Act. In general, those are rifles with a barrel less than 16 inches in length or shotguns with a barrel less than 18 inches in length, or either which have an overall length of less than 26 inches.​

​

The rifle carried by Kyle Rittenhouse, as an ordinary AR15 type and does not fall into those categories, so Kyle was not violating 941.28.​

​

Was Kyle in violation of Wisconsin statute 29.304 and statute 29.539? These statutes deal with hunting regulation and with people under the age of 16 carrying rifles and shotguns. First, statute 29.304:​

29.304  Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.​

(b) Restrictions on possession or control of a firearm. No person 14 years of age or older but under 16 years of age may have in his or her possession or control any firearm unless he or she:​

Kyle is reported to be over 16 years old, so he was not violating statute 29.304.​

​

How about statute 29.539?​

29.593  Requirement for certificate of accomplishment to obtain hunting approval.​

Kyle was not hunting, so statute 29.539 does not apply.​

​

To sum up: Wisconsin statutes 940.60 only forbid people under the age of 18 from possessing or carrying dangerous weapons in very limited cases. If a person is 16 years of age or older, the statute only applies to rifles and shotguns which are covered under the National Firearms Act as short-barreled rifles or shotguns. People who are hunting have to comply with the hunting regulations, and there are general restrictions for people under the age of 16.​

​

Rittenhouse was not hunting which means he was not in compliance with 29.304 or 29.539.

The intent of the law is clear, that he was not allowed to carry a rifle under age.

Then charge him as a juvenile. See if a court adjudges him as a deliquent. Sending children to the penitentiary is wrong, IMHO

 

[Wyatt earp]

So here is a bunch of people Burning, Looting and Murdering, and this kid who is there protecting a friends business from such thugs, gets shot at, and he is the criminal? Come on man, are you Dog Face Pony Soldiers? You must be...

No one asked him to be there. Least of all the business owner.

Rosenbaum had nothing to do with any political movement. He was homeless, bipolar and recently admitted to the hospital for suicidality.

The reason kids shouldn't be running around the streets with rifles at night should be obvious to any rational person.

Rittenhous is many times the man you could ever be, regardless of his age.

I think he's a dumb kid who made some dumb mistakes, like a lot of kids. Except three people are dead for no reason and this is a damn tragedy.

Exactly, now what appears to be the truth (Faun is to fucking stupid to watch it)

 

[bripat9643]

No, that was the kid who had a lawful gun and was trying to protect himself from the progressive loving child rapists...Do you love child rapists?

Charges for a straw purchase on behalf of Rittenhouse:

Friend who bought rifle for Kyle Rittenhouse charged

A 19-year-old Kenosha man has been charged with giving Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, the rifle he used to kill two people during August unrest in Kenosha

www.jsonline.com

Rittenhouse was 17 when he was carrying the rifle, which is illegal in Wisconsin.

What to know about Wisconsin's open-carry laws, self defense and more in Kenosha protest shootings

Answers to questions like does Wisconsin have a stand-your-ground law and other relevant information on the fatal Kenosha shootings.

www.jsonline.com

It's not illegal, moron, and the rifle was loaned to Rittenhouse, not purchased for him.

You're a fucking moron, as always.

Wisconsin Gun Laws: What You Need to Know | USCCA

Wisconsin gun owners, you’re in luck. We’ve gathered (and answered) some of the most frequently asked questions regarding Wisconsin gun laws.

www.usconcealedcarry.com

Can Someone Under 21 Own a Handgun in Wisconsin?
Yes. Any person 18 years or older and not prohibited from possessing a firearm can own a handgun. Federal and state law prohibits handgun sales by licensed dealers to persons under 21 and private sales or other transfers of handguns or handgun ammunition to any person the transferor knows or has reasonable cause to believe is under age 18.

They can't own a handgun. They can own a rifle, moron

They can't carry it openly.

(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

2013 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations :: 948. Crimes against children. :: 948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

law.justia.com

Just so you know, this is a criminal statute that makes it illegal to do so. I mention this because I'm able to cite a criminal statute when I accuse someone of committing a crime. Just wanted you to know that's what that looks like.

Not illegal, shit for brains:

https://www.ammoland.com/2020/09/kyle-rittenhouse-are-people-under-the-age-of-18-forbidden-from-open-carry-in-wi/​

​

Wisconsin Statute 948.60 regulates the possession of a dangerous weapon by persons under 18 years old. In paragraph (2) (a) it states:​

(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.​

Paragraph (3) lists exceptions. (3)(c) excludes most people who are under 18, except those in violation of 941.28 or 29.304 and 29.539.​

(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.​

Statute 948.60 only applies to a person under the age of 18 who are in violation of 941.28 or not in compliance with 29.304 and 29.593.​

​

What does it take to be in violation of 941.28? Here is the statute:​

(2) No person may sell or offer to sell, transport, purchase, possess or go armed with a short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle.​

In the statute, short-barreled shotguns or short-barreled rifles are those which require a special license under the National Firearms Act. In general, those are rifles with a barrel less than 16 inches in length or shotguns with a barrel less than 18 inches in length, or either which have an overall length of less than 26 inches.​

​

The rifle carried by Kyle Rittenhouse, as an ordinary AR15 type and does not fall into those categories, so Kyle was not violating 941.28.​

​

Was Kyle in violation of Wisconsin statute 29.304 and statute 29.539? These statutes deal with hunting regulation and with people under the age of 16 carrying rifles and shotguns. First, statute 29.304:​

29.304  Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.​

(b) Restrictions on possession or control of a firearm. No person 14 years of age or older but under 16 years of age may have in his or her possession or control any firearm unless he or she:​

Kyle is reported to be over 16 years old, so he was not violating statute 29.304.​

​

How about statute 29.539?​

29.593  Requirement for certificate of accomplishment to obtain hunting approval.​

Kyle was not hunting, so statute 29.539 does not apply.​

​

To sum up: Wisconsin statutes 940.60 only forbid people under the age of 18 from possessing or carrying dangerous weapons in very limited cases. If a person is 16 years of age or older, the statute only applies to rifles and shotguns which are covered under the National Firearms Act as short-barreled rifles or shotguns. People who are hunting have to comply with the hunting regulations, and there are general restrictions for people under the age of 16.​

​

Rittenhouse was not hunting which means he was not in compliance with 29.304 or 29.539.

The intent of the law is clear, that he was not allowed to carry a rifle under age.

Where does the law say he can only posess the gun while he's hunting? How about driving home from the gun store? How about going to the shooting range to practice?

Why are leftwingers always such morons?