Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

[Political-Junkie]

Old tweets show Raskin, Biden saying 'fight like hell' (nypost.com) 2-11-21

DECEMBER 7, 2023

​

Unearthed tweets show Jamie Raskin, Joe Biden saying ‘fight like hell’

By

Social Links forBruce Golding

Published Feb. 10, 2021

Updated Feb. 11, 2021, 4:29 p.m. ET

And who did what in response to Raskin saying that?

 

[Political-Junkie]

She misunderstood the peaceful character and nature of the overwhelming majority of Trump supporters and may not have been fully aware that a significant number of anti-Trump rioters had already planned to incite violence at the Capitol that day.

Why do you do that? You repeatedly claim anti-Trump people incited the riot even though you repeatedly fail to present evidence that's true.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Why do you do that? You repeatedly claim anti-Trump people incited the riot even though you repeatedly fail to present evidence that's true.

The crowd OUTSIDE the Capitol was fired upon unprovoked. The Capitol Police WAVED PROTESTORS INTO THE BUILDING.
The Capitol Police ESCORTED BUFFALO GUY INTO THE HOUSE CHAMBER, and then ESCORTED HIM AND HIS FRIENDS OUT.
One question has never been addressed about all that....
WHO GAVE THE ORDERS?
Squirm harder, worm.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Democrats don't blame democrats for the violence resulting from democrat hate speech. Look at how many deranged leftists have tried to murder Trump because democrats refer to him as a threat to democracy.

I'm not defending any of those lunatics on any way. Their actions are completely abhorrent and their deaths or lengthy prison terms are absolutely appropriate, and I'm glad every attempt failed. That said, you have no evidence that was their motivation.

I get you're desperate to play your whatabout card, but you have failed at every turn to show a direct correlation between speech and an acknowledged response. Whereas there is evidence of Trump making comments that day from the Ellipse, and some of his supporters responding to what we all witnessed unfold.

 

[SeaMajor7]

I'm not defending any of those lunatics on any way. Their actions are completely abhorrent and their deaths or lengthy prison terms are absolutely appropriate, and I'm glad every attempt failed. That said, you have no evidence that was their motivation.

I get you're desperate to play your whatabout card, but you have failed at every turn to show a direct correlation between speech and an acknowledged response. Whereas there is evidence of Trump making comments that day from the Ellipse, and some of his supporters responding to what we all witnessed unfold.

Translation: "I've got my NARRATIVE, and that'sTHAT."

 

[Lesh]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/big-new-book-ex-capitol-police-chief-confirms-gops-report-pelosis-culpability-jan-6-reveals-fbi-dhs-agency-knew-weeks-planned-attack/

BIG: New Book By Ex-Capitol Police Chief Confirms GOP’s Report On Pelosi’s Culpability for Jan. 6, Reveals FBI, DHS, And His Own Agency KNEW FOR WEEKS About Planned Attack

By Cullen Linebarger
Published January 2, 2023 at 1:40pm
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

National Guard Refused Before Jan. 6 Because 'Pelosi Will Never Go For It': Former Capitol Police Chief | The Epoch Times 9-20-23

National Guard Refused Before Jan. 6 Because 'Pelosi Will Never Go For It': Former Capitol Police Chief
Steven Sund told a U.S. House panel that his pleas for help on Jan. 3, 2021, were refused by the House and Senate sergeants at arms.

Former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund testifies before the Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight in Washington on Sept. 19, 2023. (U.S. House/Screenshot via The Epoch Times)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Capitol Police Chief Begged for National Guard: ‘Shots Fired on the US Capitol, Urgent Enough for You Now?’ | The Gateway Pundit | by Richard Abelson 8-14-23

Capitol Police Chief Begged for National Guard: ‘Shots Fired on the US Capitol, Urgent Enough for You Now?’

By Richard Abelson Aug. 14, 2023 9:45 am306 Comments



Former Chief of Capitol Police Steve Sund



As Gateway reported, Tucker Carlson sat down to interview the former Chief of the Capitol Police Steven Sund again, since his Fox News interview with Sund was canned after Tucker’s firing. Sund, who was never called to testify before the J6 committee, raises serious allegations against Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell and the Pentagon leadership of Gen. Mark Milley.

According to Steve Sund, the intel agencies had had several warnings of potential violence ahead of Jan. 6, but they were not communicated to him. “On Sunday and Monday, they had been discussing locking down the city… because of the concern for violence. You know who issues the permits on Capitol Hill for demonstrations? I do,” Sund told Tucker.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=


Liz Cheney, Jan. 6 Committee suppressed evidence of Trump pushing for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect Capitol | Blaze Media (theblaze.com) 3-10-24

Liz Cheney, Jan. 6 Committee suppressed key evidence of Trump pushing for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect Capitol: Report

PAUL SACCA

MARCH 10, 2024

Former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and the January 6 Committee suppressed key evidence that former President Donald Trump pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the U.S. Capitol building ahead of the riots, according to a report.

Cheney and the Democratic-led House Select Committee on January 6 contended that there was "no evidence" to support Trump officials' claims the White House had pressed for 10,000 National Guard troops ahead of the protests in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021.

However, a transcribed interview conducted by the committee from January 2022 appears to show evidence that Trump urged Democrat leadership to bring in thousands of National Guard troops to prevent any widespread violence on Jan. 6, according to a new report from The Federalist.

Then-Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato was interviewed by the committee on Jan. 28, 2022. The transcripts show that he told Cheney and other investigators that he overheard White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows urge Democrat D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as many National Guard troops as she needed to protect the city before the demonstrations centered around the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Ornato testified that Meadows "wanted to know if she need[ed] any more guardsmen."

"And I remember the number 10,000 coming up of, you know, 'The president wants to make sure that you have enough.' You know, 'He is willing to ask for 10,000.' I remember that number," Ornato told the January 6 Committee. "Now that you said it, it reminded me of it. And that she was all set. She had, I think it was like 350 or so for intersection control, and those types of things not in the law enforcement capacity at the time."

Mollie Ziegler Hemingway wrote, "Not only did the committee not accurately characterize the interview, they suppressed the transcript from public review. On top of that, committee allies began publishing critical stories and even conspiracy theories about Ornato ahead of follow-up interviews with him. Ornato was a career Secret Service official who had been detailed to the security position in the White House."

Republican Rep. Barry Loudermilk – chairman of the Committee on House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight – said in a statement on Friday, "The former J6 Select Committee apparently withheld Mr. Ornato’s critical witness testimony from the American people because it contradicted their pre-determined narrative."

"Mr. Ornato's testimony proves what Mr. Meadows has said all along, President Trump did in fact offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol, which was turned down," Loudermilk noted.

"This is just one example of important information the former Select Committee hid from the public because it contradicted what they wanted the American people to believe," he continued. "And, this is exactly why my investigation is committed to uncovering all the facts, no matter the outcome."

Also in Ornato's testimony, he explained how Trump's White House was frustrated with the response of a quick reaction force requested from the Department of Defense.

As the protests escalated into chaos, Meadows called on Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller to deploy the quick reaction force.

"So then I remember the chief saying, 'Hey, I'm calling Secretary of Defense to get that QRF in here,'" Ornato told the committee. "And then I remember the chief telling Miller, 'Get them in here, get them in here to secure the Capitol now.' And that's where I remember the National Guard being, you know, ordered by the chief."

According to Ornato's testimony, Meadows had been constantly inquiring about when the QRF would arrive to secure the Capitol.

So the guy who SHOULD have asked for NG support defends not doing so because he THOUGHT Pelosi would want him not to.

Yeah. Sure buddy

 

[Lesh]

Who knows what Trump meant by "stand back and stand by", but it sounded like he was telling fringe groups to stop inciting or committing violence like leftist barbarian savages.

Until he ended them… like on Ja 6

Which s what they did and how they took it

 

[Lesh]

Democrats had violent protesters inciting the violence that day so they could blame Trump as if the issue was not widespread voter fraud but about so-called republican efforts to overthrow the election that democrats falsely claimed was honest.

What would be the point of doing something to blame Trump?

The Dems had won. Trump was history

That entire narrative makes no sense

 

[Political-Junkie]

Former Federal ‘Informant’ Warned of Antifa, BLM Infiltrators at Capitol on Jan. 6 (theepochtimes.com) 7-8-22

Former Federal ‘Informant’ Warned of Antifa, BLM Infiltrators at Capitol on Jan. 6

Law enforcement aware large crowds would be travelling to Capitol from the Ellipse, documents show

By Joseph M. Hanneman

July 8, 2022 Updated: July 8, 2022

biggersmaller

The man whose posting on social media warned authorities that agent provocateurs from Antifa and Black Lives Matter would be at the U.S. Capitol dressed as Trump supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, is a self-described government informant tied to former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein.

Rosenstein warned about a “soft coup” against then-President Donald Trump in fall 2020.

On Jan. 4, 2021, an account under the name @JohnHereToHelp posted on Twitter that Antifa and BLM agitators were being bussed from Baltimore to Washington to cause trouble at the Capitol on the day of Trump’s speech …

There's never any evidence of any Antifa or BLM present there that day. There were some Oath Keepers that went who were recorded previously planning to "go kinetic" on Antifa, who they expected would be there counter protesting. Their plan, which included being heavily armed, was to go ultra violent with the hope they could disrupt the transfer of power. It's what led to their convictions of seditious conspiracy. And the only reason that war never occurred that day is because Antifa wasn't there.

 

[SeaMajor7]

What would be the point of doing something to blame Trump?

The Dems had won. Trump was history

That entire narrative makes no sense

IRONY

 

[Political-Junkie]

What is fake? That hearings scheduled on J6 to examine evidence of 2020 voting fraud were suspended because of the 'riot', much to democrat glee?

This is just one of many arguments against certifying the tainted election from the Congressional record of Jan 6, 2021, where congress was examining the many objections to the altered election processes in several states. The hearings were shut down by the planned riot and when congress reconvened the objections to the tainted election were simply ignored as the majority democrat House voted to certify Biden's illegitimate win.

CREC-2021-01-06-house.pdf

3/4 minutes remaining. The gentleman may proceed. Mr. GOSAR. Mr. Speaker, as I was saying, the probability of these ectopic curves, you have a better likelihood of winning the Mega Millions lottery than you do having statistical issues here. Over 30,000 illegal aliens voted in Arizona using the Federal ballot, yet our secretary of state refused the public access to review the ballots. Over a thousand residences were visited for proof of residency and address; 456 failed that test. They were vacant lots. Even the Recorder’s office was used as an address. sspencer on DSK126QN23PROD with HOUSE What are they hiding? If the process was fair, these would be improbable. These would be once-in-a-lifetime-type applications. So let’s look at the ballots, the signatures, and the adjudicated records. Until this is done, Mr. Speaker, we should not count this slate …

It's fake news because there was never any massive fraud proven to have occurred. It's fake news because virtually every claim of massive fraud was debunked. It's fake news because there's no evidence Democrats disrupted the counting. It's fake news because the two houses breaking out into separate sessions to debate the objects were not evidentiary hearings where evidence would be presented. Two hours were given to each house to voice their opinions before voting on the objections given for their state. Doubtful any objections from any state would have succeeded given no massive fraud was uncovered leading up to January 6th and each house, having a majority of Democrats, would have voted to not count their state's electors. Meaning Democrats neither wanted to delay or stop counting that day.

You're just constantly repeating falsehoods you can't back up with evidence. And you keep ignoring it was MAGA, not Democrats, chanting "stop the steal" as they stormed through the Capitol.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Wrongly convicted innocent persons are not guilty of a crime they did not commit no matter what any jury, tribunal, or democrat KKK lynch mob may claim to the contrary.

He wasn't convicted of any crime in this case. It's unfortunate for you, you simply can't deal with how deeply flawed as a human being your guy is.

 

[SeaMajor7]

It's fake news because there was never any massive fraud proven to have occurred. It's fake news because virtually every claim of massive fraud was debunked. It's fake news because there's no evidence Democrats disrupted the counting. It's fake news because the two houses breaking out into separate sessions to debate the objects were not evidentiary hearings where evidence would be presented. Two hours were given to each house to voice their opinions before voting on the objections given for their state. Doubtful any objections from any state would have succeeded given no massive fraud was uncovered leading up to January 6th and each house, having a majority of Democrats, would have voted to not count their state's electors. Meaning Democrats neither wanted to delay or stop counting that day.

You're just constantly repeating falsehoods you can't back up with evidence. And you keep ignoring it was MAGA, not Democrats, chanting "stop the steal" as they stormed through the Capitol.

^^^100% GASLIGHT THEATRE BULLSHIT NARRATIVES.^^^

 

[Political-Junkie]

About what Biden said? Try this:

https://www.allsides.com/news/2024-02-05-0800/facts-and-fact-checking-biden-makes-false-claim-about-jan-6-capitol-attack

FactCheck.org

AllSides Media Bias Rating: Lean Left
See full bias rating for FactCheck.orgLearn about media bias
Fact Check
About 140 law enforcement officers were injured during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, according to multiple reports. But no officers were “killed” that day, as President Joe Biden falsely claimed at a Jan. 31 campaign reception in Miami.

Biden made the claim at the private event after talking about former President Donald Trump “dividing” the country and “embracing political violence.”

“He sat and watched on the 6th of — of January, watched that riot go on, watched those people being killed — watched the cops being killed, watched what’s happening,” Biden said, according to a White House transcript of his full remarks.

Yeah, looks like Biden lied about that.

I tried the AOC link and it worked.

That was relatively meaningless. 7 people died. She said "almost 10." If getting into the weeds over how close or not 7 is to "almost 10" is what you want, that's fine for you, but I'm not interested.

 

[Political-Junkie]

And here this retard is STILL trying to rationalize the SOVIET LAWFARE that the demented LEFT put Trump and the whole country through.
What's next, a Russia Russia Russia revival?
Damn, these demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist zombie ASSHOLES are thoroughly devoid of anything that is REAL.

Can I get you a tissue?

 

[Political-Junkie]

The crowd OUTSIDE the Capitol was fired upon unprovoked. The Capitol Police WAVED PROTESTORS INTO THE BUILDING.
The Capitol Police ESCORTED BUFFALO GUY INTO THE HOUSE CHAMBER, and then ESCORTED HIM AND HIS FRIENDS OUT.
One question has never been addressed about all that....
WHO GAVE THE ORDERS?
Squirm harder, worm.

Trump. There, now your question has been answered.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Translation: "I've got my NARRATIVE, and that'sTHAT."

I appreciate you offering nothing to counter my post other than squealing.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Trump. There, now your question has been answered.

You're supposed to say TRUUUUUUUUUUMP
Do better.

 

[Political-Junkie]

^^^100% GASLIGHT THEATRE BULLSHIT NARRATIVES.^^^

Interesting. You had an opportunity to present evidence showing I'm wrong but instead went with that. Too bad.

 

[Political-Junkie]

You're supposed to say TRUUUUUUUUUUMP
Do better.

Looks like you're well trained. You did that for me. Good boy.