Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

[Political-Junkie]

You should be careful not to repeat lying leftist narratives that are clearly lies. Congress investigated the 1996 California election that was stolen from Bob Dornan by illegals voting democrat and found evidence of large numbers of illegal immigrant voting illegally. We have talked about the congressional examinations of voter fraud evidence on J6 where evidence of illegals voting was presented and never refuted.

CREC-2021-01-06-house.pdf


3/4 minutes remaining. The gentleman may proceed. Mr. GOSAR. Mr. Speaker, as I was saying, the probability of these ectopic curves, you have a better likelihood of winning the Mega Millions lottery than you do having statistical issues here. Over 30,000 illegal aliens voted in Ari zona using the Federal ballot, yet our secretary of state refused the public ac cess to review the ballots.

Mr. Gosar saying 30,000 illegal aliens voted in Arizona, with no proof to back his claim, is not actual proof that 30,000 illegal aliens voted in Arizona.

You'll accept anything without proof just as long as you like how it sounds, won't you?

 

[jacksonlamb]

FBI agents surveilled the riot. They did not incite or entrap rioters.

 

[markef]

You're funny. That's not a fact as there is no evidence of that.

You think democrats did not plan the violence to stop the examination of evidence of fraud but you cannpt prove ypu are correct.

Congressional Record, Jan 6, 2021:


Mr. JORDAN. Madam Speaker, I rise to support the objection.

The SPEAKER. The gentleman from Ohio is recognized for 5 minutes.

Mr. JORDAN. Madam Speaker, Americans instinctively know there was something wrong with this election. During the campaign, Vice President Biden would do an event and he (VerDate Sep 11 2014 06:58 Jan 08, 2021 Jkt 019060 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K06JA7.009 H06JAPT1 January 6, 2021 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE H79) would get 50 people at the event. President Trump, at just one rally, gets 50,000 people.

President Trump increases votes with African Americans; increases votes with Hispanic Americans; won 19 of 20 bellwether counties; won Ohio by 8; Iowa by 8; and Florida by 3. President Trump got 11 million more votes than he did in 2016, and House Republicans won 27 of 27 toss-up races. But somehow the guy who never left his house wins the election?

Eighty million Americans, 80 million of our fellow citizens, Republicans and Democrats, have doubts about this election; and 60 million people, 60 million Americans think it was stolen. But Democrats say: No problem. No worries. Everything is fine. We asked for an investigation. We asked Chairman NADLER, Chairwoman MALONEY for an investigation. They said no. They wouldn’t want to investigate something that half the electorate has doubts about. It is just the Presidency of the United States. Why? Why not one single investiga tion? Why not even one single hearing over the last 9 weeks in the United States House of Representatives? Why? Because all the Democrats care about is making sure President Trump isn’t President.

For 41⁄2 years that is all they have cared about. July 31, 2016, before he was elected the first time, Jim Comey’s FBI takes out the insurance policy; opens an investigation on the President based on nothing. May 17, 2017, Bob Mueller was named special counsel. Two years they investigate the Russia hoax. Nineteen lawyers, 40 agents and $40 million of taxpayer money for nothing.

December 18, 2019, Democrat House Members vote to impeach President Trump based on an anonymous whistle blower with no firsthand knowledge, who was biased against the President and who worked for Joe Biden. But none of that worked. As hard as they tried, none of that worked. They threw everything they had at him. So what did they do next? They changed the rules. They changed the election law and they did it in an unconstitutional fashion, and that is what we are going to show over the next several hours of debate.

The Constitution is clear, as Whip SCALISE just said. State legislatures and only State legislatures set election law. In Arizona, the law says voter registration ends on October 5. Democrats said: We don’t care what the law says. (sspencer on DSK126QN23PROD with HOUSE) They went to a court, got an Obama- appointed judge to extend it 18 days. No debate, as Steve talked about. No debate. No discussion. They just did it. Pennsylvania, same thing. Pennsylvania laws say mail-in ballots have to be in by 8 p.m. election day. Democrat Supreme Court said: Nope. We are going to extend it. Election day doesn’t end on Tuesday now. They took it to Friday. Extended the election 3 days; not the legislature, the partisan Supreme Court. Pennsylvania law says mail-in ballots require signature verification. Democrat secretary of state said: Nope. I am going to decide by myself that it doesn’t, for 2.6 million ballots. Pennsylvania law says mail-in ballots can’t be processed until election day. Some counties said no. And you can imagine which counties they were. Democrat-run counties said no and allowed ballots to be cured and fixed before election day. They did an end-run around the Constitution in every State that Republicans will object to today. Every single one.

It was a pattern. It was their template. They did it in Arizona. They did it in Georgia. They did it in Michigan. They did it in Pennsylvania. They did it in Nevada. They did it in Wisconsin. Yet, some of our Members say: Don’t worry about it. We shouldn’t do anything. Just let it go. It was just six States who violated the Constitution.

What if it is 10 States next time? What if it is 15? What if, in 2024, 2028, it is 26 States? What if it is half the States that do an end-run around what the Constitution clearly spells out? We are the final check and balance. The authority rests with us, the United States Congress, the body closest to the American people, right where the Founders wanted it. We should do our duty. We should object to and vote for this objection to the Arizona electors.

 

[markef]

I guess you missed the SC stepping in and stopping the recount in Fla

Courts are not immune to flaws due the biases of judges.

 

[markef]

He explained why. Regardless, there's no question he did it. So there's your Antifa.

No Jussie Smollett pretender can prove he is telling the truth and supporters of pretenders also can prove nothing.

 

[markef]

The claim was impeachment is used to overthrow the government. Bill Ayers has nothing to do with that. You don't have to answer my question but you also don't get to divert away from it either.

Democrats tried to overthrow the government under President Trump. There can be no doubt about that fact.

 

[Lesh]

Democrats tried to overthrow the government under President Trump. There can be no doubt about that fact.

Not only is it not a fact

It’s batshittery

 

[Lesh]

You think democrats did not plan the violence to stop the examination of evidence of fraud but you cannpt prove ypu are correct.

Congressional Record, Jan 6, 2021:


Mr. JORDAN. Madam Speaker, I rise to support the objection.

The SPEAKER. The gentleman from Ohio is recognized for 5 minutes.

Mr. JORDAN. Madam Speaker, Americans instinctively know there was something wrong with this election. During the campaign, Vice President Biden would do an event and he (VerDate Sep 11 2014 06:58 Jan 08, 2021 Jkt 019060 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K06JA7.009 H06JAPT1 January 6, 2021 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE H79) would get 50 people at the event. President Trump, at just one rally, gets 50,000 people.

President Trump increases votes with African Americans; increases votes with Hispanic Americans; won 19 of 20 bellwether counties; won Ohio by 8; Iowa by 8; and Florida by 3. President Trump got 11 million more votes than he did in 2016, and House Republicans won 27 of 27 toss-up races. But somehow the guy who never left his house wins the election?

Eighty million Americans, 80 million of our fellow citizens, Republicans and Democrats, have doubts about this election; and 60 million people, 60 million Americans think it was stolen. But Democrats say: No problem. No worries. Everything is fine. We asked for an investigation. We asked Chairman NADLER, Chairwoman MALONEY for an investigation. They said no. They wouldn’t want to investigate something that half the electorate has doubts about. It is just the Presidency of the United States. Why? Why not one single investiga tion? Why not even one single hearing over the last 9 weeks in the United States House of Representatives? Why? Because all the Democrats care about is making sure President Trump isn’t President.

For 41⁄2 years that is all they have cared about. July 31, 2016, before he was elected the first time, Jim Comey’s FBI takes out the insurance policy; opens an investigation on the President based on nothing. May 17, 2017, Bob Mueller was named special counsel. Two years they investigate the Russia hoax. Nineteen lawyers, 40 agents and $40 million of taxpayer money for nothing.

December 18, 2019, Democrat House Members vote to impeach President Trump based on an anonymous whistle blower with no firsthand knowledge, who was biased against the President and who worked for Joe Biden. But none of that worked. As hard as they tried, none of that worked. They threw everything they had at him. So what did they do next? They changed the rules. They changed the election law and they did it in an unconstitutional fashion, and that is what we are going to show over the next several hours of debate.

The Constitution is clear, as Whip SCALISE just said. State legislatures and only State legislatures set election law. In Arizona, the law says voter registration ends on October 5. Democrats said: We don’t care what the law says. (sspencer on DSK126QN23PROD with HOUSE) They went to a court, got an Obama- appointed judge to extend it 18 days. No debate, as Steve talked about. No debate. No discussion. They just did it. Pennsylvania, same thing. Pennsylvania laws say mail-in ballots have to be in by 8 p.m. election day. Democrat Supreme Court said: Nope. We are going to extend it. Election day doesn’t end on Tuesday now. They took it to Friday. Extended the election 3 days; not the legislature, the partisan Supreme Court. Pennsylvania law says mail-in ballots require signature verification. Democrat secretary of state said: Nope. I am going to decide by myself that it doesn’t, for 2.6 million ballots. Pennsylvania law says mail-in ballots can’t be processed until election day. Some counties said no. And you can imagine which counties they were. Democrat-run counties said no and allowed ballots to be cured and fixed before election day. They did an end-run around the Constitution in every State that Republicans will object to today. Every single one.

It was a pattern. It was their template. They did it in Arizona. They did it in Georgia. They did it in Michigan. They did it in Pennsylvania. They did it in Nevada. They did it in Wisconsin. Yet, some of our Members say: Don’t worry about it. We shouldn’t do anything. Just let it go. It was just six States who violated the Constitution.

What if it is 10 States next time? What if it is 15? What if, in 2024, 2028, it is 26 States? What if it is half the States that do an end-run around what the Constitution clearly spells out? We are the final check and balance. The authority rests with us, the United States Congress, the body closest to the American people, right where the Founders wanted it. We should do our duty. We should object to and vote for this objection to the Arizona electors.

Hey dumbass, again, there was no examination of evidence

Legislators can object to a electoral count and it goes to a vote

GOP had no chance of winning ANY of those votes

It was THEATER

 

[hadit]

People there were already talking about storming the Capitol while Trump was still speaking. So what's your point?

That it's hard to make the case that the speech was responsible for the riot when the riot started before the speech ended.

 

[hadit]

Not only is it not a fact

It’s batshittery

Actually, they did participate in a temporarily successful insurrection while TRUMP! was president. Remember CHOP/CHAZ?

 

[markef]

Mr. Gosar saying 30,000 illegal aliens voted in Arizona, with no proof to back his claim, is not actual proof that 30,000 illegal aliens voted in Arizona.

You'll accept anything without proof just as long as you like how it sounds, won't you?

Democrats claim the obvious is not true if they do not want to believe the evidence. Illegal immigrants have been voting in US elections for decades, and politicians on both sides of the aisle know that for a fact. Denying the fact is dishonest and ignorant.

From the Congressional Record:

House Report 105-416 - DISMISSING THE ELECTION CONTEST AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ (govinfo.gov) 2-12-98
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ See Appendix C.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



dornan's allegations



In his Notice, Mr. Dornan alleged the following grounds for

contesting the election: (a) that there were approximately

1,985 more ballots counted than voters voting who were

accounted for in county records; (b) that illegal votes were

cast in that persons cast multiple votes or voted from business

addresses; (c) that absentee ballots were cast improperly; (d)

that under-age voters and non-citizens voted; (e) that

convicted felons may have voted; (f) that the precinct board

made errors sufficient to change the result of the election;

and (g) that there was an error in the vote-counting programs

or summation of ballot counts.

At the April 19, 1997 hearing, Mr. Dornan narrowed the

allegations upon which his Notice was based to the following:

Non-citizens voting; and

Voting irregularities such as improper delivery of

absentee ballots, double voting and phantom voting.

In support of these allegations, Mr. Dornan submitted,

among other things, affidavits and witness statements,

statistical charts, newspaper accounts, and

correspondence.8 ...

not permit a single contestant to

conduct discovery as contemplated in the Act.17

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\17\ This position was maintained even in the face of egregious

vote fraud such as in Wilson v. Leach, H. Rep. 96-784, 96th Cong., 2nd

Sess. (1980) (margin of 266 votes: 22 persons plead guilty to vote

buying; 58 persons admitted that they were paid to vote; the Contestant

produced ledger allegedly recording over 400 persons who sold their

vote in single precinct; press reported endemic system of massive vote

buying; the Contestee indicted for and acquitted of vote fraud--Motion

to Dismiss contest approved by the Democratic Majority of the Committee

on House Administration without any discovery or investigation.) ...
The question of how many aliens are registered and voting

in the Forty-sixth Congressional District has not been resolved

by this Task Force investigation. The investigation of this

contest has confirmed that there is a significant number of

aliens who appear within the INS data bases and are on the

voter registration rolls of Orange County. This fact leads

logically to a serious question and a troubling hypothesis: if

there is a significant number of ``documented aliens'', aliens

in INS records, on the Orange County voter registration rolls,

how many illegal or undocumented aliens may be registered to

vote in Orange County? ...
9th--The California Secretary of State announced that an

INS analysis of 1,100 persons enrolled in Hermandad citizenship

classes had discovered 490 documented non-citizens who

registered to vote in CA 46. Of these, 303 actually voted

illegally in CA 46, and 69 individuals had no record in INS

files.

 

[Lesh]

Actually, they did participate in a temporarily successful insurrection while TRUMP! was president. Remember CHOP/CHAZ?

Whatever that was… what it wasn’t… was an attempted overthrow of the Federal government

 

[markef]

FBI agents surveilled the riot. They did not incite or entrap rioters.

That claim has hardly been proven. Ray Epps may not have been working for the FBI as one of its agents, resources, operatives, informants, spies, or whatever, but there were others like him who were working with the FBI and its anti-Trump leaders.

 

[Lesh]

Democrats claim the obvious is not true if they do not want to believe the evidence. Illegal immigrants have been voting in US elections for decades, and politicians on both sides of the aisle know that for a fact. Denying the fact is dishonest and ignorant.

From the Congressional Record:

House Report 105-416 - DISMISSING THE ELECTION CONTEST AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ (govinfo.gov) 2-12-98
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ See Appendix C.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



dornan's allegations



In his Notice, Mr. Dornan alleged the following grounds for

contesting the election: (a) that there were approximately

1,985 more ballots counted than voters voting who were

accounted for in county records; (b) that illegal votes were

cast in that persons cast multiple votes or voted from business

addresses; (c) that absentee ballots were cast improperly; (d)

that under-age voters and non-citizens voted; (e) that

convicted felons may have voted; (f) that the precinct board

made errors sufficient to change the result of the election;

and (g) that there was an error in the vote-counting programs

or summation of ballot counts.

At the April 19, 1997 hearing, Mr. Dornan narrowed the

allegations upon which his Notice was based to the following:

Non-citizens voting; and

Voting irregularities such as improper delivery of

absentee ballots, double voting and phantom voting.

In support of these allegations, Mr. Dornan submitted,

among other things, affidavits and witness statements,

statistical charts, newspaper accounts, and

correspondence.8 ...

not permit a single contestant to

conduct discovery as contemplated in the Act.17

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\17\ This position was maintained even in the face of egregious

vote fraud such as in Wilson v. Leach, H. Rep. 96-784, 96th Cong., 2nd

Sess. (1980) (margin of 266 votes: 22 persons plead guilty to vote

buying; 58 persons admitted that they were paid to vote; the Contestant

produced ledger allegedly recording over 400 persons who sold their

vote in single precinct; press reported endemic system of massive vote

buying; the Contestee indicted for and acquitted of vote fraud--Motion

to Dismiss contest approved by the Democratic Majority of the Committee

on House Administration without any discovery or investigation.) ...
The question of how many aliens are registered and voting

in the Forty-sixth Congressional District has not been resolved

by this Task Force investigation. The investigation of this

contest has confirmed that there is a significant number of

aliens who appear within the INS data bases and are on the

voter registration rolls of Orange County. This fact leads

logically to a serious question and a troubling hypothesis: if

there is a significant number of ``documented aliens'', aliens

in INS records, on the Orange County voter registration rolls,

how many illegal or undocumented aliens may be registered to

vote in Orange County? ...
9th--The California Secretary of State announced that an

INS analysis of 1,100 persons enrolled in Hermandad citizenship

classes had discovered 490 documented non-citizens who

registered to vote in CA 46. Of these, 303 actually voted

illegally in CA 46, and 69 individuals had no record in INS

files.

So out of all of that they found less than 400 illegal votes out of tens of millions… over what span of time?

Decades?

 

[hadit]

Whatever that was… what it wasn’t… was an attempted overthrow of the Federal government

Absolutely it was. What else do you call a group staking out part of the US and unilaterally declaring that US, state and city governments have no jurisdiction or authority over it? They temporarily and successfully overthrew the US government for that part of the nation. It only fell apart when they realized no one was obligated to charge their phones for them.

 

[Lesh]

That it's hard to make the case that the speech was responsible for the riot when the riot started before the speech ended.

Yeah except for the fact that thousands who heard that speech JOINED IN

 

[markef]

Not only is it not a fact

It’s batshittery

​

​

Democrats' Final Day To Layout The Case To Remove President Trump​

 

[Lesh]

Absolutely it was. What else do you call a group staking out part of the US and unilaterally declaring that US, state and city governments have no jurisdiction or authority over it? They temporarily and successfully overthrew the US government for that part of the nation. It only fell apart when they realized no one was obligated to charge their phones for them.

Absolutely it wasn’t

 

[markef]

Hey dumbass, again, there was no examination of evidence

Legislators can object to a electoral count and it goes to a vote

GOP had no chance of winning ANY of those votes

It was THEATER

Of course there was no investigation of fraud or examination of evidence, which is exactly the result democrats were fighting like hell to achieve.

 

[Lesh]

Of course there was no investigation of fraud or examination of evidence, which is exactly the result democrats were fighting like hell to achieve.

Hey dumbfuck

It can not happen in that circumstance.

How stupid are you?

I already explained the process

Are you retarded?