Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

[MagicMike]

ABC10​

November 18, 2024 ·

Trump has never been convicted of a sex crime and isn’t required to register as a sex offender, contrary to what viral social media posts suggest.

View attachment 1263965

Fale news
He raped a woman im a dressimg room with his fingers.

 

[WEATHER53]

They needed a ruckus, they were not getting one, so the Pelosi plants instigated it.

 

[Lesh]

They needed a ruckus, they were not getting one, so the Pelosi plants instigated it.

Bullshit

 

[WEATHER53]

Bullshit

She admitted it
Her daughter did also

 

[Lesh]

She admitted it
Her daughter did also

Nope

 

[Political-Junkie]

Fale news
He raped a woman im a dressimg room with his fingers.

He wasn't convicted of a crime for that. He was found liable in a civil suit of sexual assault, not rape.

 

[Political-Junkie]

They needed a ruckus, they were not getting one, so the Pelosi plants instigated it.

Fake news.

 

[Political-Junkie]

She admitted it
Her daughter did also

No, she didn't. She took responsibility for the Capitol Police being unprepared for the assault Trump sent their way.

 

[WEATHER53]

He wasn't convicted of a crime for that. He was found liable in a civil suit of sexual assault, not rape.

Yes rape is penis insertion and other fondlings sexual assault but Musty Mike does not have one nor has ever received one.
She invited him into the dressing room but “only for a kiss”. What a load of crap

 

[WEATHER53]

No, she didn't. She took responsibility for the Capitol Police being unprepared for the assault Trump sent their way.

She didn’t send enough cops because then they would have kept things under control

 

[Lockback]

She didn’t send enough cops because then they would have kept things under control

She got exactly what she wanted (and probably planned): a TV show that has been on rerun for 5.5 years.

 

[Lesh]

She didn’t send enough cops because then they would have kept things under control

Pelosi had no power to send or not send cops

But the irony is that you are blaming Pelosi (incorrectly) for not stopping YOUR BUDDIES from attacking the Capitol

 

[Lockback]

Pelosi had no power to send or not send cops

But the irony is that you are blaming Pelosi (incorrectly) for not stopping YOUR BUDDIES from attacking the Capitol

The Speaker of the House does not have direct operational command over any police force, but they have substantial indirect authority and influence over security for the House of Representatives, primarily through the House Sergeant at Arms and the Capitol Police Board.

Primary Security Force: U.S. Capitol Police (USCP)​

• The U.S. Capitol Police is the main federal law enforcement agency responsible for protecting the Capitol complex (including House chambers, offices, and grounds), Members of Congress, and congressional staff.
• The USCP is not under the direct command of the Speaker. It reports to the Capitol Police Board, which consists of:
  • House Sergeant at Arms (key member)
  • Senate Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper
  • Architect of the Capitol
• The Chief of the Capitol Police reports to this Board. The Board handles major policy, budgets, and decisions like requesting National Guard assistance.

Speaker's Influence​

The Speaker's power comes through the House Sergeant at Arms:

• The Speaker's party nominates the Sergeant at Arms, who is then elected by the full House at the start of each Congress (or appointed as acting by the Speaker in some cases).
• The House Sergeant at Arms is the chief law enforcement and protocol officer for the House. They maintain order in the House chamber under the direct direction of the Speaker (or presiding officer), oversee security on the House side of the Capitol, coordinate with USCP, and handle threat assessments for Members.
• Because the House Sergeant at Arms sits on the Capitol Police Board, the Speaker has strong indirect influence over USCP priorities, especially regarding the House.

In practice, Speakers (like Nancy Pelosi during the January 6 events) have significant sway over House-side security decisions, personnel (e.g., pushing for resignations), and resource allocation, even if not formal "command."

Other Forces the Speaker Could Potentially Muster​

Force	Authority	Notes
House Sergeant at Arms staff	Direct (via Speaker's direction)	Small force for chamber security, arrests for contempt, decorum enforcement.
U.S. Capitol Police	Indirect (via Sergeant at Arms + Board)	Primary protective force for the Capitol. Speaker cannot unilaterally deploy them outside normal protocols.
National Guard / DoD support	Indirect (via Capitol Police Board request)	Board must approve requests; President ultimately controls deployment. Speaker cannot order this alone.
Other federal LE (FBI, USMS, etc.)	Limited / coordination only	Possible through mutual aid or emergencies, but not under Speaker control.
D.C. Metropolitan Police	Mutual aid	Can assist via agreements, but not mustered by Speaker.

Limitations​

• The Speaker cannot unilaterally "call up" troops or federal agents like the President as Commander-in-Chief.
• Security decisions often require coordination with the Senate and executive branch.
• The House as a body (or through rules) sets broader parameters.

In summary, the Speaker's main tool is influence over the House Sergeant at Arms, who provides direct chamber security and helps steer the U.S. Capitol Police through the Board. This gives the Speaker real power to protect the House, especially in day-to-day operations and during crises, but it is shared and not absolute command.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Yes rape is penis insertion and other fondlings sexual assault but Musty Mike does not have one nor has ever received one.
She invited him into the dressing room but “only for a kiss”. What a load of crap

She claims he did put it in. Still, the jury went with sexual abuse, not rape.

 

[WEATHER53]

The Speaker of the House does not have direct operational command over any police force, but they have substantial indirect authority and influence over security for the House of Representatives, primarily through the House Sergeant at Arms and the Capitol Police Board.

Primary Security Force: U.S. Capitol Police (USCP)​

• The U.S. Capitol Police is the main federal law enforcement agency responsible for protecting the Capitol complex (including House chambers, offices, and grounds), Members of Congress, and congressional staff.
• The USCP is not under the direct command of the Speaker. It reports to the Capitol Police Board, which consists of:
  • House Sergeant at Arms (key member)
  • Senate Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper
  • Architect of the Capitol
• The Chief of the Capitol Police reports to this Board. The Board handles major policy, budgets, and decisions like requesting National Guard assistance.

Speaker's Influence​

The Speaker's power comes through the House Sergeant at Arms:

• The Speaker's party nominates the Sergeant at Arms, who is then elected by the full House at the start of each Congress (or appointed as acting by the Speaker in some cases).
• The House Sergeant at Arms is the chief law enforcement and protocol officer for the House. They maintain order in the House chamber under the direct direction of the Speaker (or presiding officer), oversee security on the House side of the Capitol, coordinate with USCP, and handle threat assessments for Members.
• Because the House Sergeant at Arms sits on the Capitol Police Board, the Speaker has strong indirect influence over USCP priorities, especially regarding the House.

In practice, Speakers (like Nancy Pelosi during the January 6 events) have significant sway over House-side security decisions, personnel (e.g., pushing for resignations), and resource allocation, even if not formal "command."

Other Forces the Speaker Could Potentially Muster​

Force	Authority	Notes
House Sergeant at Arms staff	Direct (via Speaker's direction)	Small force for chamber security, arrests for contempt, decorum enforcement.
U.S. Capitol Police	Indirect (via Sergeant at Arms + Board)	Primary protective force for the Capitol. Speaker cannot unilaterally deploy them outside normal protocols.
National Guard / DoD support	Indirect (via Capitol Police Board request)	Board must approve requests; President ultimately controls deployment. Speaker cannot order this alone.
Other federal LE (FBI, USMS, etc.)	Limited / coordination only	Possible through mutual aid or emergencies, but not under Speaker control.
D.C. Metropolitan Police	Mutual aid	Can assist via agreements, but not mustered by Speaker.

Limitations​

• The Speaker cannot unilaterally "call up" troops or federal agents like the President as Commander-in-Chief.
• Security decisions often require coordination with the Senate and executive branch.
• The House as a body (or through rules) sets broader parameters.

In summary, the Speaker's main tool is influence over the House Sergeant at Arms, who provides direct chamber security and helps steer the U.S. Capitol Police through the Board. This gives the Speaker real power to protect the House, especially in day-to-day operations and during crises, but it is shared and not absolute command.

Now these facts are going to infuriate feelings so get ready for “you can’t read”

 

[Political-Junkie]

The Speaker of the House does not have direct operational command over any police force, but they have substantial indirect authority and influence over security for the House of Representatives, primarily through the House Sergeant at Arms and the Capitol Police Board.

Primary Security Force: U.S. Capitol Police (USCP)​

• The U.S. Capitol Police is the main federal law enforcement agency responsible for protecting the Capitol complex (including House chambers, offices, and grounds), Members of Congress, and congressional staff.
• The USCP is not under the direct command of the Speaker. It reports to the Capitol Police Board, which consists of:
  • House Sergeant at Arms (key member)
  • Senate Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper
  • Architect of the Capitol
• The Chief of the Capitol Police reports to this Board. The Board handles major policy, budgets, and decisions like requesting National Guard assistance.

Speaker's Influence​

The Speaker's power comes through the House Sergeant at Arms:

• The Speaker's party nominates the Sergeant at Arms, who is then elected by the full House at the start of each Congress (or appointed as acting by the Speaker in some cases).
• The House Sergeant at Arms is the chief law enforcement and protocol officer for the House. They maintain order in the House chamber under the direct direction of the Speaker (or presiding officer), oversee security on the House side of the Capitol, coordinate with USCP, and handle threat assessments for Members.
• Because the House Sergeant at Arms sits on the Capitol Police Board, the Speaker has strong indirect influence over USCP priorities, especially regarding the House.

In practice, Speakers (like Nancy Pelosi during the January 6 events) have significant sway over House-side security decisions, personnel (e.g., pushing for resignations), and resource allocation, even if not formal "command."

Other Forces the Speaker Could Potentially Muster​

Force	Authority	Notes
House Sergeant at Arms staff	Direct (via Speaker's direction)	Small force for chamber security, arrests for contempt, decorum enforcement.
U.S. Capitol Police	Indirect (via Sergeant at Arms + Board)	Primary protective force for the Capitol. Speaker cannot unilaterally deploy them outside normal protocols.
National Guard / DoD support	Indirect (via Capitol Police Board request)	Board must approve requests; President ultimately controls deployment. Speaker cannot order this alone.
Other federal LE (FBI, USMS, etc.)	Limited / coordination only	Possible through mutual aid or emergencies, but not under Speaker control.
D.C. Metropolitan Police	Mutual aid	Can assist via agreements, but not mustered by Speaker.

Limitations​

• The Speaker cannot unilaterally "call up" troops or federal agents like the President as Commander-in-Chief.
• Security decisions often require coordination with the Senate and executive branch.
• The House as a body (or through rules) sets broader parameters.

In summary, the Speaker's main tool is influence over the House Sergeant at Arms, who provides direct chamber security and helps steer the U.S. Capitol Police through the Board. This gives the Speaker real power to protect the House, especially in day-to-day operations and during crises, but it is shared and not absolute command.

That only gives her 1/3 of the votes among the Capitol Police Board. Which always baffled me how people would blame the Speaker of the House, but not the Senate Majority Leader, for failing to protect the Capitol, as though it was 100% on Nancy Pelosi.

 

[Lockback]

That only gives her 1/3 of the votes among the Capitol Police Board. Which always baffled me how people would blame the Speaker of the House, but not the Senate Majority Leader, for failing to protect the Capitol, as though it was 100% on Nancy Pelosi.

Because she's a lightning rod and hated by many, including me.

 

[Lesh]

The Speaker of the House does not have direct operational command over any police force, but they have substantial indirect authority and influence over security for the House of Representatives, primarily through the House Sergeant at Arms and the Capitol Police Board.

Primary Security Force: U.S. Capitol Police (USCP)​

• The U.S. Capitol Police is the main federal law enforcement agency responsible for protecting the Capitol complex (including House chambers, offices, and grounds), Members of Congress, and congressional staff.
• The USCP is not under the direct command of the Speaker. It reports to the Capitol Police Board, which consists of:
  • House Sergeant at Arms (key member)
  • Senate Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper
  • Architect of the Capitol
• The Chief of the Capitol Police reports to this Board. The Board handles major policy, budgets, and decisions like requesting National Guard assistance.

Speaker's Influence​

The Speaker's power comes through the House Sergeant at Arms:

• The Speaker's party nominates the Sergeant at Arms, who is then elected by the full House at the start of each Congress (or appointed as acting by the Speaker in some cases).
• The House Sergeant at Arms is the chief law enforcement and protocol officer for the House. They maintain order in the House chamber under the direct direction of the Speaker (or presiding officer), oversee security on the House side of the Capitol, coordinate with USCP, and handle threat assessments for Members.
• Because the House Sergeant at Arms sits on the Capitol Police Board, the Speaker has strong indirect influence over USCP priorities, especially regarding the House.

In practice, Speakers (like Nancy Pelosi during the January 6 events) have significant sway over House-side security decisions, personnel (e.g., pushing for resignations), and resource allocation, even if not formal "command."

Other Forces the Speaker Could Potentially Muster​

Force	Authority	Notes
House Sergeant at Arms staff	Direct (via Speaker's direction)	Small force for chamber security, arrests for contempt, decorum enforcement.
U.S. Capitol Police	Indirect (via Sergeant at Arms + Board)	Primary protective force for the Capitol. Speaker cannot unilaterally deploy them outside normal protocols.
National Guard / DoD support	Indirect (via Capitol Police Board request)	Board must approve requests; President ultimately controls deployment. Speaker cannot order this alone.
Other federal LE (FBI, USMS, etc.)	Limited / coordination only	Possible through mutual aid or emergencies, but not under Speaker control.
D.C. Metropolitan Police	Mutual aid	Can assist via agreements, but not mustered by Speaker.

Limitations​

• The Speaker cannot unilaterally "call up" troops or federal agents like the President as Commander-in-Chief.
• Security decisions often require coordination with the Senate and executive branch.
• The House as a body (or through rules) sets broader parameters.

In summary, the Speaker's main tool is influence over the House Sergeant at Arms, who provides direct chamber security and helps steer the U.S. Capitol Police through the Board. This gives the Speaker real power to protect the House, especially in day-to-day operations and during crises, but it is shared and not absolute command.

For all of that… there is no evidence that Pelosi told the Capitol Police Board (who’s job it was to ask for NG or other support) not to do so.

None of them have made that claim

 

[Lesh]

Because she's a lightning rod and hated by many, including me.

So you make these bullshit claims because you hate Pelosi

That could be the first time you have posted something honest

 

[Lockback]

So you make these bullshit claims because you hate Pelosi

That could be the first time you have posted something honest

What bullshit claims?
Be specific.
Back up your shit.