Report: 26 FBI INFORMANTS in J6 protest, some entered the Capitol

[struth]

Not in this thread you didn't.

Prety sure it was this thread, if not it was in response to you in another thread....twice.

 

[AntonToo]

Yes, I did.

No bullshit peddler, you didn't.

If you did, you would be able to link to it.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Prety sure it was this thread, if not it was in response to you in another thread....twice.

Nope, not in this thread or on any thread. Not twice, not even once. Looks like you're just running scared now. Which makes sense since the pipe bomber is a two-time Trump voter, not a Democrat.

Search results for query: Political-Junkie investigation

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[ColonelAngus]

January 6 is hiding under the bed of every communist.

It is hilarious to witness.

 

[markef]

I mean real evidence. Post articles.

• 1. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/dec/12/fbi-informants-stormed-capitol-jan-6-probe-says-bu/?utm_medium=subscriber&utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_campaign=morning&utm_content=paywall&utm_term=newsletter&bt_ee=B9TVRhfREcSgVX4MW9xrCeIjPfnglXvBZ3wtYYrmJsNx3SFlntH5HAVjSzzpIQYD&bt_ts=1734097228903 12-12-24
• FBI informants stormed Capitol on Jan. 6, but probe says bureau didn’t authorize it
• ++++++++++++++

3. FBI had 275 plainclothes agents embedded in Jan. 6 crowds, congressional source says | Blaze Media

FBI had 275 plainclothes agents embedded in Jan. 6 crowds, congressional source says September 25, 2025



4. FBI Jan. 6 report sets off a firestorm: Why did it take 56 months to disclose 274 agents at Capitol? | Blaze Media

FBI Jan. 6 report sets off a firestorm: Why did it take 56 months to disclose 274 agents at Capitol?

September 29, 2025



2. FBI lab report, contradictory witness statement inject fresh mystery in unsolved J6 pipe bomb case | Just The News

FBI lab report, contradictory witness statement inject fresh mystery in unsolved J6 pipe bomb case

Published: September 28, 2025 10:41pm

 

[markef]

Why is it so hard for you to wrap your head around the fact that Trump incited a mob of violent insurrectionists to storm the U.S. Capitol in an attempted coup to cling to power despite losing a fair election?
Why is it so hard to just embrace the reality of it?
Why have to work so hard making up other narratives?

Leading democrats and leftist news sources lied to you about what Trump actually said and you believed their lies.

 

[MagicMike]

Leading democrats and leftist news sources lied to you about what Trump actually said and you believed their lies.

View attachment 1263958

Drink that Kool Aid much?

 

[markef]

Yep, he did.

Just because democrats adopted the worst of interpretations of Trump's words does not mean their take on his J6 speech is acceptable.

Did trump incite violence on jan 6th
Researched on November 13, 2025

Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.


Reuters

Trump incited Jan. 6 attack after 'unhinged' White House meeting, panel told | Reuters
++++++++++++++++++


The Guardian

The BBC’s editing of Trump’s January 6 speech caused controversy – but what did he really say? | Donald Trump | The Guardian
++++++++++++


BBC

Capitol riots: Did Trump's words at rally incite violence?
++++++++++


NBC News

Highlights and evidence from Day One of January 6 hearings
+++++++++++++++++++++
Research steps

This article may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Refresh

Executive Summary

Donald Trump’s words and actions surrounding January 6, 2021 are tied by multiple official investigations and defendant statements to the Capitol attack, with the January 6 committee concluding he summoned and provoked the crowd and recommending charges for assisting or inciting an insurrection

Judges, legal scholars, media analyses, and hundreds of defendants present divergent factual knobs—some emphasize explicit rally language like “fight like hell,” others point to his “peacefully and patriotically” admonition—leaving the legal question of criminal incitement contested even as political and evidentiary accounts point to a causal link between his calls and the violence .

Accurate - Inaccurate

1. The central allegations — Who says Trump called people to action and what they claim

Multiple sources document that a substantial number of Jan. 6 criminal defendants and investigators assert they acted in response to Trump’s calls, framing his rhetoric as the motivating cause for traveling to Washington and breaching the Capitol. A CREW compilation reports 210 defendants from 40 states and DC explicitly saying they answered Trump’s call, which establishes a pattern of self-reported causation between his appeals and individual actions

The January 6 committee synthesized testimony, communications, and timelines to determine Trump summoned a mob and sought to overturn the election, recommending that his conduct be charged as incitement or aiding insurrection; the committee’s report and hearings argue his actions went beyond speech into coordinated effort

Reuters summarized lawmakers’ accusations that he incited the attack and presented evidence that aides expected him to urge a march to the Capitol.

These assertions converge on a factual claim: many participants and investigators link Trump’s pre- and intra‑day conduct to the riot itself, a link anchored in contemporaneous messages, rally rhetoric, and documented movements of groups to the Capitol.

2. The legal barrier — Why “incitement” is not automatic and how courts view it

U.S. criminal law treats incitement as a narrow doctrine requiring specific elements under Brandenburg v. Ohio: advocacy of imminent lawless action, intent to produce such action, and likelihood that the action will occur. Legal commentators and the Princeton Legal Journal argue that Trump’s January 6 speech may meet this standard—claiming it advocated lawless action and was likely to spur immediate violence—but they also highlight evidentiary challenges about intent and imminence, which are often decisive in court.

Public legal analysis notes that while phrases such as “fight like hell” can be read as exhortatory, the presence of a clause urging crowds to march “peacefully and patriotically” is used by defenders to argue against criminal intent, producing what scholars call an agonizingly close case.

The law demands a specific causal nexus between words and imminent lawless action; factual records and context collected by investigators feed into that nexus but do not uniformly settle it for a criminal conviction absent prosecutorial exercise and judicial determination.

3. The speech and context — Words, edits, and how different parties read them

 

[markef]

Drink that Kool Aid much?

 

[markef]

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts. Just making shit up doesn't change what happened on Trump's insurrection day.
It's like trying to distract from Trump's pedophilia by trying to talk about Joe Biden. Doesn't really work.
Speaking of Communists..do you and Donald Trump still think Vladimir Putin is a good guy?
Cuz you know...POOTY is a REAL Commie!

ABC10​

November 18, 2024 ·

Trump has never been convicted of a sex crime and isn’t required to register as a sex offender, contrary to what viral social media posts suggest.

 

[markef]

Fake news. Both Epps and Samsel independently told authorities what Epps said was “relax, the cops are doing their job.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene Reignites Jan. 6 Conspiracy Theories About FBI

"I think somebody that worked that hard to get people to go in the Capitol, why aren't they rotting away in the D.C. jail?" Greene asked during a live stream.

www.newsweek.com

But separate statements made by both Epps and Samsel to federal authorities say otherwise. Days after the riot, Epps called an FBI tip line and informed investigators that he had been trying to calm Samsel when he whispered into his ear rather than encourage him, the Times reported, citing unnamed people familiar with the call.

In an interview with the FBI in January last year, Samsel also said that a man he did not know approached him, encouraged him to relax and told him that the police were just doing their jobs, according to the Times, which obtained a recording of the interview.

Was Epps finally arrested by Biden's J6 democrat gestapo for telling protesters "Relax, the cops are just doing their jobs?"

• Ray Epps Sentence Is in, and It's Surprising Only If You Haven't Been Following Along – RedState 1-9-24
• Ray Epps Sentence Is in, and It's Surprising Only If You Haven't Been Following Along
• By Nick Arama | 1:05 PM on January 09, 2024
• +++++++++++++

Ray Epps GETS OFF EASY with Probation as Conservatives RE-IGNITE Fed Accusations: Rising Reacts
++++++++++++++

How do leftists get off posting lying crap?

 

[markef]

In order for proof and evidence to have any effect on you you have to keep an open mind that is willing to change when new facts present themselves.
Otherwise you'll just get stuck in this confirmation bias, cognitive-dissonant loop of asking for "proof" and then when presented with it denying it is real.
Watch, you're about to prove me right.

We have new evidence that show the J-6 committee was entirely leftist, lied, destroyed evidence, and covered up the truth.

• House committee investigation into Jan. 6 is off to a turbulent start. Here’s why
• ++++++++++++++
• IT WAS ALL PLANNED: Tactical Commander for US Capitol Police Admits Under Oath that "Agitators" Who Were "Highly Trained" Ripped Down Fencing Prior to Protest at US Capitol on Jan. 6 * The Gateway Pundit * by Jim Hoft

WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? Jan 6 Committee Sealed All Important VIDEOS and Documents for 50 Years – So They Can Continue to Lie About J-6 Protests and Fed Involvement

Published January 3, 2023 at 4:31pm

 

[markef]

You saying Trump didn't incite violence because he said "peacefully?"

There is much debate about how to properly interpret Trump's actual words on Jan 6. I believe conservatives have it right.

 

[markef]

Pedophile? The jury is out on that until Trump releases all of the Trump-Epstein(TM) files he's covering up. But he admitted he knew what Epstein was doing and his press secretary confirmed it. He knew Epstein was raping underage girls and didn't report Epstein to authorities. Makes him an accomplice.

Charging Trump with pedophilia without evidence the accusers hope to someday find is not only wrong but detestable.

 

[markef]

You need to watch the J6 Committee hearings....all of them
It will help you sound better informed and like you are talking less out of your ass.

The TDS leftist J6 committee has been shown to have lied and covered up evidence to protect democrat crimes on J6.

• Barry Loudermilk: J6 Committee failed to preserve records, withheld communication with White House - Washington Times 8-9-23
• House Republican charges J6 Committee failed to preserve records, withheld communication with W.H.
• +++++++++++++++

What the January 6 Committee Did With the Evidence Undercuts a Huge Dem Narrative (townhall.com) 8-10-23
What the January 6 Committee Did With the Evidence Undercuts a Huge Dem Narrative

Matt Vespa | August 10, 2023 1:25 PM

 

[markef]

Fake MAGA rage is a common lying leftist democrat theme.

 

[markef]

Drink that Kool Aid much?