martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,498
- 43,719
- 2,300
Not at all. what is confusing is why you call it genocide and at the same time admit they were trying to exploit them for labor. The exploitation had priority over killing them, because they wanted the labor long term, unlike the Nazis who just wanted to work the jews to death before killing them off.
Actually, the Nazis only started really killing people when they realized they were losing the war. They were happy to work them to death just like the colonizers were happy to work the Natives to death.
Come on, buddy, be a man and admit what we did to people of color was wrong. We know you can do it.
So you’re unaware that the Native Americans use genocide to take land from other Native Americans.. Is this like a history lesson for you? Lol This is why the left should not be allowed to vote they don’t have a very good education
No, nothing on the level of what White people did happened.
I'm not sure why you guys are so reluctant to admit that our ancestors did bad stuff...
Bullshit. The Einstaszgruppen were killing jews as the Wehrmacht was marching across Russia in 1941. There is documented evidence of this, most notably in the Wanasee conference. The Wanesee conference happened around the time of the Battle of Moscow, where the German advance was checked, but they still felt they could beat Russia, and they went back on the Offensive in the spring of 1942 until meeting the true turning point of the war as Stalingrad. At the Wanassee conference they discussed and implemented the protocol for extermination, including areas they thought they could conquer, which puts your concept of them only killing the jews when they were losing in the dustbin.
I didn't do shit to people of color, so why should I have to pay for the sins of the past?
Also, if you want to go toe to toe with me on history, study harder.