I think we can have both
Columbus is not responsible for the morals of his era. He was no better and no worse than anyone else of the time.
There was no enlightened group protesting the subjugation of indigenous people. The moral compass was the Catholic Church who encouraged the conquest and conversion of savages and did not oppose slavery
But by the same token, what we remember him for wasn't that impressive either. He wasn't the first European to get to the Americas, and someone else would have gotten here after him if he hadn't.
So what we are celebrating is not so much him, but what he started... and maybe we need to rethink if that was entirely a good thing. It certainly wasn't for the Native Americans who died or the Africans who were brought over in chains because the Natives were dying faster than they could be enslaved.
So you want to celebrate people that genocide other people you just wont celebrate yours because of the color of your skin? Lol Interesting how long have you been insane?
That made absolutely not a lick of sense... Let's try someone else who can try to articulate the thought better.
Yeah... cause there is no other place on earth where people invaded other people.
No, but we don't give THEM holidays, either.
We don't have Attila the Hun day or Ghengis Khan Day or Hitler Day or even Napoleon Day.