progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 61,769
- 37,764
- 2,615
it should only be paid by the democrats that held them as slaves
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Blacks are not Africans and are not from Africa so the term is stupid.Sure. We'll just need their tribe card. There's likely still some around who actually are ancestors.
But most blacks in modern America have more in common with a white guy from Flagstaff than an African. The term African-American is one of the most misused terms around.
Much like “Native American” it’s the white mans term... Political correctness is for pussiesSure. We'll just need their tribe card. There's likely still some around who actually are ancestors.
But most blacks in modern America have more in common with a white guy from Flagstaff than an African. The term African-American is one of the most misused terms around.
I am not saying it is free, I am saying that anyone registered as a Democrat, they need to pay the reparations, as it was their fault for having slaves.Dems should voluntarily do this. It's the least they could do considering how much work they got for free. And there's that word again....free. They're always wanting something for free. It's just uncanny .
So now after screaming "SOCIALISM" for a couple weeks...the new meme id "REPARATIONS"!
No one is proposing that we cut checks to descendents of slaves.
Nice dishonesty
But hey...what better way to stir up racial animus...right?
Rile that racist base....
So what did Warren and Harris propose then?
Please see the link below. It documents attempts to promote reparations since 2001, I didn't research it before 2001, but lets say from 2000 to 2020 qualifies as "every". If you prefer, I could say "every since 2000"?
Reparations for slavery debate in the United States - Wikipedia
Let's just say the following:
In living memory, no national presidential candidate ventured to do so much as bring reparations up as a policy proposal, and no national party so much as mentioned reparations in their campaign platform. Sure, there were civil society organizations advocating for reparations, even books and articles written about the matter, but that had nothing whatsoever to do with election cycles. Democrats, up to this year, stayed well clear of the issue, or rejected it. When Ta-Nehisi Coates's article in the Atlantic was published, in 2014, you could almost hear a needle drop amidst the frenetic Democratic applause.
And that's why this...
Every election cycle we have some democrats trotting out the "free money" promise to supporters via "reparations".
... is misleading, at best. I would guess, you know better.
So what did Warren and Harris propose then?
You tell us. It's your claim.
I'm willing to bey it ain't what you say it is
So now after screaming "SOCIALISM" for a couple weeks...the new meme id "REPARATIONS"!
No one is proposing that we cut checks to descendents of slaves.
Nice dishonesty
But hey...what better way to stir up racial animus...right?
Rile that racist base....
That's it? John Conyers?Please see the link below. It documents attempts to promote reparations since 2001, I didn't research it before 2001, but lets say from 2000 to 2020 qualifies as "every". If you prefer, I could say "every since 2000"?
Reparations for slavery debate in the United States - Wikipedia
Let's just say the following:
In living memory, no national presidential candidate ventured to do so much as bring reparations up as a policy proposal, and no national party so much as mentioned reparations in their campaign platform. Sure, there were civil society organizations advocating for reparations, even books and articles written about the matter, but that had nothing whatsoever to do with election cycles. Democrats, up to this year, stayed well clear of the issue, or rejected it. When Ta-Nehisi Coates's article in the Atlantic was published, in 2014, you could almost hear a needle drop amidst the frenetic Democratic applause.
And that's why this...
Every election cycle we have some democrats trotting out the "free money" promise to supporters via "reparations".
... is misleading, at best. I would guess, you know better.
Nice try, but you seem to be overlooking John Conyers. He has been pushing for reparations since 1989. I take your point that the presidential candidates have been steering clear of that issue until this year, but IMHO Conyers using it in "election cycles" keeps my OP claim of "some democrats" using it as not very misleading.
Advocates still pushing for reparations to descendants of slaves
"In 2017, 150 years later, then-Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, as he had done since 1989, reintroduced bill H.R. 40, calling for the establishment of the Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act to "examine slavery and discrimination in the colonies and the United States from 1619 to the present and recommend appropriate remedies."
That's it? John Conyers?Please see the link below. It documents attempts to promote reparations since 2001, I didn't research it before 2001, but lets say from 2000 to 2020 qualifies as "every". If you prefer, I could say "every since 2000"?
Reparations for slavery debate in the United States - Wikipedia
Let's just say the following:
In living memory, no national presidential candidate ventured to do so much as bring reparations up as a policy proposal, and no national party so much as mentioned reparations in their campaign platform. Sure, there were civil society organizations advocating for reparations, even books and articles written about the matter, but that had nothing whatsoever to do with election cycles. Democrats, up to this year, stayed well clear of the issue, or rejected it. When Ta-Nehisi Coates's article in the Atlantic was published, in 2014, you could almost hear a needle drop amidst the frenetic Democratic applause.
And that's why this...
Every election cycle we have some democrats trotting out the "free money" promise to supporters via "reparations".
... is misleading, at best. I would guess, you know better.
Nice try, but you seem to be overlooking John Conyers. He has been pushing for reparations since 1989. I take your point that the presidential candidates have been steering clear of that issue until this year, but IMHO Conyers using it in "election cycles" keeps my OP claim of "some democrats" using it as not very misleading.
Advocates still pushing for reparations to descendants of slaves
"In 2017, 150 years later, then-Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, as he had done since 1989, reintroduced bill H.R. 40, calling for the establishment of the Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act to "examine slavery and discrimination in the colonies and the United States from 1619 to the present and recommend appropriate remedies."
How many times has he proposed that and where did those proposals go?
I wasn't aware that Conyers was running for President.
The CLAIM my idiot friend...was that Warren and Harris were calling for reparations.
You folks are lying?
Who'd thunk it huh?