OMGGGGGG....
another of these posts in which the poster pretends he/she isn't a member of "Melanin Masters," and that they see no further than skin color,
I don't believe I can stand another one without a supply of percocets in a pez dispenser.
At least admit you couldn't care less about the death unless it was do to action by someone with a white skin.
Now , you are just being ignorant, arrogant, and immature. Why would you ask a question of a complete stranger, get an honest answer, and then proceed to act as if you are an authority on what I really think?
If you cannot stand what I post, then you are not obligated to respond to what I have to say.
"If you cannot stand what I post, then you are not obligated to respond to what I have to say."
I will give you exactly what you deserve.
Reality is defined by actions, not words.
Your actions....your posts....no matter what way you phrase it...are designed to mitigate the anarchy of Ferguson and the criminality of the culprit.
You and every other apologist deserve the same contumely that this President deserves for coming down on the side of the issue that supports lawlessness.
The thug did everything that earned him his final reward.
There is no quibbling, no tip toeing around it.
If the thug attacked not just a hard-working store owner, and a law enforcement officer....Officer Wilson's actions, I am certain, saved lives of other innocents.
I certainly hope that there will be a fund set up to help the officer find a way to replace the (earned) career that was taken from him.
"You will give me what I derserve"? Your ego is way of control, there kid. And when combined with abject ignorance, that is not a very flattering trait.
You are entitled to your opinion, and you may continue this pointless dialogue with yourself by ASSuming what you believe I think.
However, I will now give you what you deserve. You are obviously a street corner philosopher, and not a very good one, who has read way too many books, listened to too many talk shows and in the process digested enough rhetoric to actually believe that you can accurately determine what the day to day "actions" are of a complete stranger on the Internet.
Your overinflated ego and lack of wordly experience make what you really ARE NOT, crystal clear.
And that is someone who actually is objective and has common sense.
You are too busy listening to YOURSELF talk, to actually listen with any objectivity.and that is a behavior that at some point in your life is going to cause you to be embarrased badly, if you already have not been.
What is in question from my perspective, is not that the one who was shot shoplifted, because he did, for which he should have been arrested, and detained, not shot 6 times and left in the street for 4 hours.
This is not the wild west, and this entire process has been questioned and criticized by "melanin challenged" legal experts who have a history of siding with law enforcement, so I suppose that makes them "apologists who are mitigating the criminality of the culprit"?
You are NOT a legal expert, nor am I, but if a number of real experts see the flaws in this case, and have gone public stating so, then that gets my attention.
If you don't like it, too bad. And not my problem.
And as far as the officer goes, he will not need a fund to assist him. There will be plenty of those out there like you who will deify him. He will land softly on his feet and likely earn more doing interviews, signing autographs at gun shows, and making personal appearances on talk shows in the next 6 months to a year than he would have earned in multiple years as a police officer in a dumpy little town like Ferguson.