Rep. Massie Debates Iran War Powers Resolution

[TNHarley]

States are strictly forbidden from engaging in war, retard.

You posted something completely irrelevant to the discussion. This is why I am done with you. You are too stupid to discuss this.
Good day. Again.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I am anti-war. And im not just anti-war when there is a certain letter in front of someones name.
And im certainly against the state giving itself more power. The constitution gave them enough.
And im going by what the constitution actually says, not making shit up to justify the fat ass bombing Iran.

So then . . . yes, if I look at your posting history, I will find you decrying Biden's attacks in Iraq and Syria?

 

[dblack]

Ok, I was done with your dumbass, but I cant pass this retarded shit up.

Yeah. I get it. Sometimes I get bored and click on "Show ignorant content". But in the end, it's just stirring up shit that stinks. They have no interest in being right, just winning.

 

[Godboy]

You posted something completely irrelevant to the discussion. This is why I am done with you. You are too stupid to discuss this.
Good day. Again.

Nope, you need to reference Google AI if you cant understand the Constitution. Ask google if states can engage in war.

 

[TNHarley]

So then . . . yes, if I look at your posting history, I will find you decrying Biden's attacks in Iraq and Syria?

of course. You will find me trashing more presidents too

 

[dblack]

of course. You will find me trashing more presidents too

He'll just ignore it. It's imperative to their worldview that everyone is either in their tribe, or the evil enemy. Nothing else fits.

 

[Seymour Flops]

He'll just ignore it. It's imperative to their worldview that everyone is either in their tribe, or the evil enemy. Nothing else fits.

Oh no.

If his story checks out, I'll admit it. It is so rare that a "not Democrat" criticizes a Democrat that it would be a man-bites-dog story.

BTW, I love the way TNHarley admits he has not been ignoring a poster he claimed was on ignore and then "another poster" comes in out of the blue (so to speak) to say WTTE of "oh yeah. we kewl people do that all the time."

You "two" make a great tag team!

 

[dblack]

Oh no.

If his story checks out, I'll admit it.

I won't hold my breath.

It is so rare that a "not Democrat" criticizes a Democrat that it would be a man-bites-dog story.

Not really. It's just hard to see when you're soaking in partisan idiocy.

BTW, I love the way TNHarley admits he has not been ignoring a poster he claimed was on ignore and then "another poster" comes in out of the blue (so to speak) to say WTTE of "oh yeah. we kewl people do that all the time."

You "two" make a great tag team!

 

[TNHarley]

Oh no.

If his story checks out, I'll admit it. It is so rare that a "not Democrat" criticizes a Democrat that it would be a man-bites-dog story.

BTW, I love the way TNHarley admits he has not been ignoring a poster he claimed was on ignore and then "another poster" comes in out of the blue (so to speak) to say WTTE of "oh yeah. we kewl people do that all the time."

You "two" make a great tag team!

I didnt claim he was on ignore, as he isnt. I am just tired of dumbassery in this thread.
And thank you for recognizing our greatness.

 

[Godboy]

of course. You will find me trashing more presidents too

Well, well, well... looky what i found with a quick search of your posts. You were saying the EXACT same thing that ive been saying, and you said it 9 days ago.

TNHarley - "The president doesnt need congress to respond to hostility.
That was even in the founders quote you first responded to."

Post in thread '1942'

Mar 2, 2026

Why? Because Jefferson refused to pay for safe passage of US commerce.

The fact remains Jefferson authorized military action without Congressional approval and it pretty much set the stage to where we are

The president doesnt need congress to respond to hostility.
That was even in the founders quote you first responded to.

• TNHarley

• 

 

[TNHarley]

Here is a history lesson for stupid people.
Tripoli attacked us.
There is no need for a declaration when another countries declares war. I have said that countless times. I even posted the letter alexander hamilton wrote about it. smh

 

[TNHarley]

Its hilarious watching godboy squirm like a worm with an extra chromosome.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I won't hold my breath.

You should have. You wouldn't have even turned very blue (so to speak).

Yes, TNHarley has one time criticized Biden for attacking Syria and advocated leaving Iran alone. In a thread in which he attacked Republicans for supporting Biden's attacks on Syria.

Post in thread 'Top Republicans supported Bidens airstrikes'

Feb 26, 2021

Biden's Syria airstrike earns applause from prominent Republicans | Fox News
Reps. Michael McCaul, French Hill, Sens. Marco Rubio, Lindsey Graham commended airstrike on alleged Iran-backed groups
And you know there are more than that. Maybe so many of you Republicans shouldnt say its the dems that are the war party.
Its the duopoly. THEY are THE "war party"

Not to comment beyond wondering what we should do about Iran? I mean we have forced sanctions upon them, so it's not like there's an option of "do nothing." We are doing something, and that's why the...

• TNHarley

• 

Here is what he said about Iran:

They used to not be a danger to us. But now they are close, if not already succeeded, to having nukes. Every country that has nukes is a danger to us.
We just need to let them be. We need to let everyone be.
If we have problems with a country, we should use $$ as a weapon. Not a bomb. And certainly not invasion.
Dreamworld. I know... at least until this stupid ass country wakes up one day and tells the duopoly to **** off.

 

[Godboy]

You should have. You wouldn't have even turned very blue (so to speak).

Yes, TNHarley has one time criticized Biden for attacking Syria and advocated leaving Iran alone. In a thread in which he attacked Republicans for supporting Biden's attacks on Syria.

Post in thread 'Top Republicans supported Bidens airstrikes'

Feb 26, 2021

Biden's Syria airstrike earns applause from prominent Republicans | Fox News
Reps. Michael McCaul, French Hill, Sens. Marco Rubio, Lindsey Graham commended airstrike on alleged Iran-backed groups
And you know there are more than that. Maybe so many of you Republicans shouldnt say its the dems that are the war party.
Its the duopoly. THEY are THE "war party"

Not to comment beyond wondering what we should do about Iran? I mean we have forced sanctions upon them, so it's not like there's an option of "do nothing." We are doing something, and that's why the...

• TNHarley

• 

Here is what he said about Iran:

They used to not be a danger to us. But now they are close, if not already succeeded, to having nukes. Every country that has nukes is a danger to us.
We just need to let them be. We need to let everyone be.
If we have problems with a country, we should use $$ as a weapon. Not a bomb. And certainly not invasion.
Dreamworld. I know... at least until this stupid ass country wakes up one day and tells the duopoly to **** off.

He said this too...

Post in thread '1942'

Mar 2, 2026

Why? Because Jefferson refused to pay for safe passage of US commerce.

The fact remains Jefferson authorized military action without Congressional approval and it pretty much set the stage to where we are

The president doesnt need congress to respond to hostility.
That was even in the founders quote you first responded to.

• TNHarley

• 

 

[TNHarley]

You should have. You wouldn't have even turned very blue (so to speak).

Yes, TNHarley has one time criticized Biden for attacking Syria and advocated leaving Iran alone. In a thread in which he attacked Republicans for supporting Biden's attacks on Syria.

Post in thread 'Top Republicans supported Bidens airstrikes'

Feb 26, 2021

Biden's Syria airstrike earns applause from prominent Republicans | Fox News
Reps. Michael McCaul, French Hill, Sens. Marco Rubio, Lindsey Graham commended airstrike on alleged Iran-backed groups
And you know there are more than that. Maybe so many of you Republicans shouldnt say its the dems that are the war party.
Its the duopoly. THEY are THE "war party"

Not to comment beyond wondering what we should do about Iran? I mean we have forced sanctions upon them, so it's not like there's an option of "do nothing." We are doing something, and that's why the...

• TNHarley

• 

Here is what he said about Iran:

They used to not be a danger to us. But now they are close, if not already succeeded, to having nukes. Every country that has nukes is a danger to us.
We just need to let them be. We need to let everyone be.
If we have problems with a country, we should use $$ as a weapon. Not a bomb. And certainly not invasion.
Dreamworld. I know... at least until this stupid ass country wakes up one day and tells the duopoly to **** off.

How right I was. We cant even get a "no more wars" president not to bomb multiple countries all over the world.
Its a sick fetish or something. IDK.

 

[Godboy]

How right I was. We cant even get a "no more wars" president not to bomb multiple countries all over the world.
Its a sick fetish or something. IDK.

When people think of "wars", they arent visualizing limited military engagements. Weve also been in a cold-to-hot war with Iran for DECADES! So this isnt realky a "new" war anyway. Also, people LOVE the idea of the IRGC being toppled.

Trump will be popular as all get out if he succeeds at regime change.

 

[Seymour Flops]

How right I was. We cant even get a "no more wars" president not to bomb multiple countries all over the world.
Its a sick fetish or something. IDK.

Or . . . you actually don't happen to be the only right person when everyone else is wrong.

Your idea about how we should "let Iran be" has a fatal flaw. They will never be willing to let us be, unless the Mullahs are no longer in power.

Maybe if we were willing to also let Israel be (be destroyed, that is). they might consider not calling us the Great Satan and attacking us constantly.

But I don't want to live in a world where theocratic fascists dictate to the U.S. who our allies can be and how we support them.

 

[TNHarley]

Or . . . you actually don't happen to be the only right person when everyone else is wrong.

Your idea about how we should "let Iran be" has a fatal flaw. They will never be willing to let us be, unless the Mullahs are no longer in power.

Maybe if we were willing to also let Israel be (be destroyed, that is). they might consider not calling us the Great Satan and attacking us constantly.

But I don't want to live in a world where theocratic fascists dictate to the U.S. who our allies can be and how we support them.

Yeah because they are known for randomly attacking countries that do them no wrong.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Yeah because they are known for randomly attacking countries that do them no wrong.

Okay, I'll bite.

What "wrong" have we done to Iran?

 

[TNHarley]

Okay, I'll bite.

What "wrong" have we done to Iran?

Are you unaware of our history the last few decades?

History of the US-Iran Conflict | Timeline, Deaths & Oil Data

Complete history of the US-Iran conflict from the 1953 CIA coup to 2026 strikes. Timeline, casualties, oil price data, sanctions laws, and Strait of Hormuz analysis.

www.davemanuel.com