Renewables are the future

You guys are insane. We want to stop tearing down rainforests and trees. Stop making our oceans our toilet bowls. Stop tearing away the ozone causing global warming fracking nuclear smokestack mother fuckers.

Ever see avatar? I know who you rooted for

We? You can only speak for yourself. What you want is not what your, "we", are doing.

You want to stop cutting down rainforests but that wood is being used to make Iron used to build your Wind Turbines.

You want to save the planet but you destroy miles and miles of the earth installing Windmills.

You say we can kive without coal but have no way to replace the coal used to manufacture millions of wind mills.

You claim we dont need coal while your green industry has dramatically and significantly increased the use of coal.

You use terms like renewable for wind mills that you replace with bigger ones every 8 years.

You claim cities are a 100% green that burn coal and wood.

You call Aspen an example of a 100% clean energy city when they use methane from the coal mine they sit on and tax to build wind mills.

And at that, your lousy wind mills leak oil everywhere they are placed.

Alternative, renewabke, green, clean, is all lies. Nothing you produce today, or in the future can be described as Green, Clean, Renewable, or alternative.

View attachment 62977
They can make gas/fuel out of weeds and common grass. At least they're working on it while you drill baby drill











Have you looked at how much MORE oil is used when you are making biofuel? There's a reason why bio jet fuel costs 35 bucks a gallon while standard jet fuel is around 5 bucks.

There is not a single bio fuel that can be produced that uses less fossil fuels than simply using that which is pumped from the ground. Bio fuels are a LAST resort fuel for when all the oil is gone. Then, and only then will bio fuels be cost effective and that is because they will be all that's left.

It is a common refrain amongst you folks that you truly have no clue what you are speaking about. And this is a classic example of that.
We can run on fecies
 
And according to what you just said, 100% of the waste is recycled, and there's zero problem just leaving it lying anywhere. Gotcha.

I said France recycled the spent fuel rods. Words are a funny thing. A nuclear reactor does not create nuclear waste. Waste is the label that the activists use.

Only 5% of the energy is spent when a nuclear fuel rod is removed from a nuclear reactor. I think that has changed seeings how our reactors used to run only 180 days and nights in a row to upwards of 500 continuos days. I hear nuclesr ships and subs run 20 years before needing fuel.

But either way nuclear fuel is recycled or used again in france.

And yes, spent nuclear fuel can be stored above ground, like where it us stored on the beach at san onofre in california.
So you're an hourly employee in a toxix dump
 
And every single one has coal fired power generation for the 18 hours their systems do not work..

You are so dam gullible! Use your head for something more than a hat rack..
We'd still be in the stone ages if the world were filled with people like you.

People like you think fairies will make everything good and your well meaning bull shit, that will kill millions of people, will get a pass because your too stupid to use your dam brain.
How will I kill millions? You're destroying the planet for humans. Cockroaches will live beyond us.

I can't believe you people think we can't survive without coal and oil. Trust me we'll be fine.

Your a fool..

You will kill millions by depriving them of heat, food, and medicines with your stupid bull shit ideas. You all think you know better but you cant even weigh the cost and effects of your actions.. You just want to feel good and dammed be the consequences for your actions because you were well meaning..

It's about time we put well meaning fools on trial for the crimes against people they commit so they can "feel good"..
You guys are insane. We want to stop tearing down rainforests and trees. Stop making our oceans our toilet bowls. Stop tearing away the ozone causing global warming fracking nuclear smokestack mother fuckers.

Ever see avatar? I know who you rooted for
just post up this great alternative energy source. It isn't solar, and it isn't wind, so what is it? I'm anxiously waiting for your magical source.
 
People like you think fairies will make everything good and your well meaning bull shit, that will kill millions of people, will get a pass because your too stupid to use your dam brain.
How will I kill millions? You're destroying the planet for humans. Cockroaches will live beyond us.

I can't believe you people think we can't survive without coal and oil. Trust me we'll be fine.
How will you survive without electricity? You can nit have electricity without coal and oil.

You literally want to live in the stone age.
We can make electricity wo that stuff. Countries and American cities are going zero carbon footprint without you

You really dont have a dam clue about how things are made or how they actually work..
I know smart engineers who say if we ran out of oil tomorrow we'd figure something out.

We better start mining Mars.
so why haven't they figured it out while oil is here? that's a really clever statement that means absolutely nothing. LOL the libturd mumbo jumbo.
 
And according to what you just said, 100% of the waste is recycled, and there's zero problem just leaving it lying anywhere. Gotcha.

I said France recycled the spent fuel rods. Words are a funny thing. A nuclear reactor does not create nuclear waste. Waste is the label that the activists use.

Only 5% of the energy is spent when a nuclear fuel rod is removed from a nuclear reactor. I think that has changed seeings how our reactors used to run only 180 days and nights in a row to upwards of 500 continuos days. I hear nuclesr ships and subs run 20 years before needing fuel.

But either way nuclear fuel is recycled or used again in france.

And yes, spent nuclear fuel can be stored above ground, like where it us stored on the beach at san onofre in california.

Now that's interesting, good point in accepting how the argument has been framed.

I don't think I've ever actually seen anything about what the true expected life of the rods are. You'd know better than me about that since it's your field.

What's the average down time when replacements are needed?
 
And according to what you just said, 100% of the waste is recycled, and there's zero problem just leaving it lying anywhere. Gotcha.

I said France recycled the spent fuel rods. Words are a funny thing. A nuclear reactor does not create nuclear waste. Waste is the label that the activists use.

Only 5% of the energy is spent when a nuclear fuel rod is removed from a nuclear reactor. I think that has changed seeings how our reactors used to run only 180 days and nights in a row to upwards of 500 continuos days. I hear nuclesr ships and subs run 20 years before needing fuel.

But either way nuclear fuel is recycled or used again in france.

And yes, spent nuclear fuel can be stored above ground, like where it us stored on the beach at san onofre in california.
So you're an hourly employee in a toxix dump
Yep, part time, 4,000$ a week. 72-84 hours, this week I get 40 hours of overtime, 32 straight. But seeings how i am older i stay in the office analyzing data here in nascar country. The aquisition crew is far away acquiring data at a heavy water reactor.

You want a job in this field, message me and I will gladly help you out. You need to have fair credit and no police record.

There are schools but the big boys all have thier own training programs.

It is nice to tell people my title, post pics of my work, but you wont find a post where I suggest you can not do what I do.

It takes some years to reach my level but the youger guys end up making more cause they work more hours, moving and setting up the remote controled robotics that go into the very high radiation areas. You do get exposed to radiation, I have 15 R lifetme.

I work on a componet of the nuclear reactor..

Spent fuel will kill you if you are exposed to it, when I looked at it, it was in the spent fuel pool or the reactor pool. Boronated water is used as a shield.

Anyhow my field is good, not great, but above average pay for part time work.
 
And according to what you just said, 100% of the waste is recycled, and there's zero problem just leaving it lying anywhere. Gotcha.

I said France recycled the spent fuel rods. Words are a funny thing. A nuclear reactor does not create nuclear waste. Waste is the label that the activists use.

Only 5% of the energy is spent when a nuclear fuel rod is removed from a nuclear reactor. I think that has changed seeings how our reactors used to run only 180 days and nights in a row to upwards of 500 continuos days. I hear nuclesr ships and subs run 20 years before needing fuel.

But either way nuclear fuel is recycled or used again in france.

And yes, spent nuclear fuel can be stored above ground, like where it us stored on the beach at san onofre in california.

Now that's interesting, good point in accepting how the argument has been framed.

I don't think I've ever actually seen anything about what the true expected life of the rods are. You'd know better than me about that since it's your field.

What's the average down time when replacements are needed?

3-4 weeks, depending on the plant, 18 to 24 month cycles. My inspection is done once every 5 years on new replacement componets, every 18 months on steam generators nit replaced.

I have been to most the cool places, Indian point which is leaking tritium, unit 1 ofvl three mile island, and SONGS which my company helped perform the inspection that shut those 2 reactors down.

I may end my career in refineries.
 
We'd still be in the stone ages if the world were filled with people like you.

People like you think fairies will make everything good and your well meaning bull shit, that will kill millions of people, will get a pass because your too stupid to use your dam brain.
How will I kill millions? You're destroying the planet for humans. Cockroaches will live beyond us.

I can't believe you people think we can't survive without coal and oil. Trust me we'll be fine.

Your a fool..

You will kill millions by depriving them of heat, food, and medicines with your stupid bull shit ideas. You all think you know better but you cant even weigh the cost and effects of your actions.. You just want to feel good and dammed be the consequences for your actions because you were well meaning..

It's about time we put well meaning fools on trial for the crimes against people they commit so they can "feel good"..
You guys are insane. We want to stop tearing down rainforests and trees. Stop making our oceans our toilet bowls. Stop tearing away the ozone causing global warming fracking nuclear smokestack mother fuckers.

Ever see avatar? I know who you rooted for
just post up this great alternative energy source. It isn't solar, and it isn't wind, so what is it? I'm anxiously waiting for your magical source.
 
There is a reason I press my questions, becsuse in challenging people to find the answer they will realize that green enetgy is a scam.

It sucks to come up with nothing, it hurts ro find out what you believe is wrong.

Most people give up, like old crook, mattpew, and one or two others who still flame hete or there.

But none of them have ever accounted for the cost, the pollution, or the land this giant scam is destroying.

Ivanpah was a great example of lies and deciet. A complete failure that burns natural gas but is labeled a solar plant.
 
And according to what you just said, 100% of the waste is recycled, and there's zero problem just leaving it lying anywhere. Gotcha.

I said France recycled the spent fuel rods. Words are a funny thing. A nuclear reactor does not create nuclear waste. Waste is the label that the activists use.

Only 5% of the energy is spent when a nuclear fuel rod is removed from a nuclear reactor. I think that has changed seeings how our reactors used to run only 180 days and nights in a row to upwards of 500 continuos days. I hear nuclesr ships and subs run 20 years before needing fuel.

But either way nuclear fuel is recycled or used again in france.

And yes, spent nuclear fuel can be stored above ground, like where it us stored on the beach at san onofre in california.
So you're an hourly employee in a toxix dump
Yep, part time, 4,000$ a week. 72-84 hours, this week I get 40 hours of overtime, 32 straight. But seeings how i am older i stay in the office analyzing data here in nascar country. The aquisition crew is far away acquiring data at a heavy water reactor.

You want a job in this field, message me and I will gladly help you out. You need to have fair credit and no police record.

There are schools but the big boys all have thier own training programs.

It is nice to tell people my title, post pics of my work, but you wont find a post where I suggest you can not do what I do.

It takes some years to reach my level but the youger guys end up making more cause they work more hours, moving and setting up the remote controled robotics that go into the very high radiation areas. You do get exposed to radiation, I have 15 R lifetme.

I work on a componet of the nuclear reactor..

Spent fuel will kill you if you are exposed to it, when I looked at it, it was in the spent fuel pool or the reactor pool. Boronated water is used as a shield.

Anyhow my field is good, not great, but above average pay for part time work.
You're in charge of all the blue valves
 
People like you think fairies will make everything good and your well meaning bull shit, that will kill millions of people, will get a pass because your too stupid to use your dam brain.
How will I kill millions? You're destroying the planet for humans. Cockroaches will live beyond us.

I can't believe you people think we can't survive without coal and oil. Trust me we'll be fine.

Your a fool..

You will kill millions by depriving them of heat, food, and medicines with your stupid bull shit ideas. You all think you know better but you cant even weigh the cost and effects of your actions.. You just want to feel good and dammed be the consequences for your actions because you were well meaning..

It's about time we put well meaning fools on trial for the crimes against people they commit so they can "feel good"..
You guys are insane. We want to stop tearing down rainforests and trees. Stop making our oceans our toilet bowls. Stop tearing away the ozone causing global warming fracking nuclear smokestack mother fuckers.

Ever see avatar? I know who you rooted for
just post up this great alternative energy source. It isn't solar, and it isn't wind, so what is it? I'm anxiously waiting for your magical source.
so what you doing with it other than posting pictures of it on an internet message board?
 
There is a reason I press my questions, becsuse in challenging people to find the answer they will realize that green enetgy is a scam.

It sucks to come up with nothing, it hurts ro find out what you believe is wrong.

Most people give up, like old crook, mattpew, and one or two others who still flame hete or there.

But none of them have ever accounted for the cost, the pollution, or the land this giant scam is destroying.

Ivanpah was a great example of lies and deciet. A complete failure that burns natural gas but is labeled a solar plant.

No argument that how it's being done is a scam. I've just looked at this as an engineering and construction problem. Not trying to make it sound like something works...that doesn't.

In the end, the only people who lose are the ones who don't ask the questions, or think about answers.
 
There is a reason I press my questions, becsuse in challenging people to find the answer they will realize that green enetgy is a scam.

It sucks to come up with nothing, it hurts ro find out what you believe is wrong.

Most people give up, like old crook, mattpew, and one or two others who still flame hete or there.

But none of them have ever accounted for the cost, the pollution, or the land this giant scam is destroying.

Ivanpah was a great example of lies and deciet. A complete failure that burns natural gas but is labeled a solar plant.

No argument that how it's being done is a scam. I've just looked at this as an engineering and construction problem. Not trying to make it sound like something works...that doesn't.

In the end, the only people who lose are the ones who don't ask the questions, or think about answers.
what's truly interesting for me is the lack of accountability with all of this. If a normal citizen asks a question, the response is totally a brutal implied just shut up and let the experts do their thing.

Fk no, and I'll say fk no until they come for me. Our tax dollars are used for research and development and I as a tax payer am entitled to an explanation on what is the future from use with those funds.

I don't get why experts think they are superior beings who don't have to answer to anyone.
 
There is a reason I press my questions, becsuse in challenging people to find the answer they will realize that green enetgy is a scam.

It sucks to come up with nothing, it hurts ro find out what you believe is wrong.

Most people give up, like old crook, mattpew, and one or two others who still flame hete or there.

But none of them have ever accounted for the cost, the pollution, or the land this giant scam is destroying.

Ivanpah was a great example of lies and deciet. A complete failure that burns natural gas but is labeled a solar plant.

No argument that how it's being done is a scam. I've just looked at this as an engineering and construction problem. Not trying to make it sound like something works...that doesn't.

In the end, the only people who lose are the ones who don't ask the questions, or think about answers.

For me, I have watched, and read about the plants for decades. I read in the paper when the first round of vwind turbines went belly up. I have a bunch of my own research, lots of .stuff.

I can go on and on.

Right now I am not addressing anything you said, just adding a bit to think about.

Like the biggest advantage of goingblight weight is not any of the things you stated, but a lighter wind turbine would require a lighter base. A lighter base is less cement. Cement use is a pretty big thing, nothing releases more co2 in the air than cement manufacturing. No other industry. Each modern wind turbine needs a good 1000 tons of cement. It takes a lot of fossil fuel to make that much cement. That is something most posting here can not grasp, 1000 tons of cement times 100 million wibd turbines is an incredible amount of co2.

Areogel, does that replace fiberglass which would mean no more use of the element boron which is a bit limited in supply. Once the boron is gone can fiberglass be made. Fiberglass or e-glass production requires propene, a chemical that only comes from oil. Will propene be needed in aerogel production?

It takes hours to research a new topic, hard on my cell phone which i have beenposting with.

I saw two prosesses to produce aerogel, one uses high heat, that would require fossil fuel

Any how, I know wind turbines, you cant make any metal parts without coke which comes from coal. Fiverglass needs 3000 degrees? Only fossil fuel is capable there.

So there you go, the next time we discuss this you know what the pissibilities are.

But nothing matters now that all the good wind spots are gone. That is why the went tall, the short towers ran out of places.

So much to say, so little time
 
Yes and no. Nuclear has it's own problems, mainly the waste generated which has to be dealt with.

Now when fission becomes possible, then there's an argument to be made there. However that's nowhere near doable currently. Maybe in another 50 years we'll be getting somewhere in that field.
How is the waste a problem today? How much land do we need to store it? If it is a problem how are they handling it now? How does France deal with thier wsste.

It's a problem because of the time it takes to decay, and store. It's not as big of a problem due to the limited number of reactors built, but it's definitely something to consider. As far as I know the French are storing theirs underground, like everyone else. Sooner or later you run out of room until they figure a way to neutralize it.

That I'd say more than the scare tactics associated with nuclear power is the reason more plants aren't built.










The main problem is people don't understand nuclear waste issues either. The longer the half life of a substance, the less dangerous it is. Half life is a direct measurement of how dangerous a radioactive isotope is. Uranium 238 has a half life of 4.5 billion years. So long as you don't ingest it the stuff won't bother you for the most part.

Iodine 131 on the other hand, with a half life of 8 days, emits gamma rays at a prodigious rate and merely being in its presence can lead to genetic damage and if exposure is too great radiation poisoning is the result with the subsequent nasty death. Long term, low dosage exposure will lead to various cancers in most people.

The beauty of a fast half life isotope is that it quite literally sublimates away with time into stable elements that are no longer dangerous. The more the material involved the more time is needed, but after a few years for even a major contamination the danger is vastly reduced.
 
You guys are insane. We want to stop tearing down rainforests and trees. Stop making our oceans our toilet bowls. Stop tearing away the ozone causing global warming fracking nuclear smokestack mother fuckers.

Ever see avatar? I know who you rooted for

We? You can only speak for yourself. What you want is not what your, "we", are doing.

You want to stop cutting down rainforests but that wood is being used to make Iron used to build your Wind Turbines.

You want to save the planet but you destroy miles and miles of the earth installing Windmills.

You say we can kive without coal but have no way to replace the coal used to manufacture millions of wind mills.

You claim we dont need coal while your green industry has dramatically and significantly increased the use of coal.

You use terms like renewable for wind mills that you replace with bigger ones every 8 years.

You claim cities are a 100% green that burn coal and wood.

You call Aspen an example of a 100% clean energy city when they use methane from the coal mine they sit on and tax to build wind mills.

And at that, your lousy wind mills leak oil everywhere they are placed.

Alternative, renewabke, green, clean, is all lies. Nothing you produce today, or in the future can be described as Green, Clean, Renewable, or alternative.

View attachment 62977
They can make gas/fuel out of weeds and common grass. At least they're working on it while you drill baby drill











Have you looked at how much MORE oil is used when you are making biofuel? There's a reason why bio jet fuel costs 35 bucks a gallon while standard jet fuel is around 5 bucks.

There is not a single bio fuel that can be produced that uses less fossil fuels than simply using that which is pumped from the ground. Bio fuels are a LAST resort fuel for when all the oil is gone. Then, and only then will bio fuels be cost effective and that is because they will be all that's left.

It is a common refrain amongst you folks that you truly have no clue what you are speaking about. And this is a classic example of that.
We can run on fecies











It takes more energy to process the poo than you get out of it. That's the whole point. Try doing some basic research some time. Down in Carson City the state prison used to operate a biowaste powered power plant. It failed. Even getting the waste material FOR FREE wasn't enough of a benefit. They couldn't even make it work when the fuel was FREE.
 
Yes and no. Nuclear has it's own problems, mainly the waste generated which has to be dealt with.

Now when fission becomes possible, then there's an argument to be made there. However that's nowhere near doable currently. Maybe in another 50 years we'll be getting somewhere in that field.
How is the waste a problem today? How much land do we need to store it? If it is a problem how are they handling it now? How does France deal with thier wsste.

It's a problem because of the time it takes to decay, and store. It's not as big of a problem due to the limited number of reactors built, but it's definitely something to consider. As far as I know the French are storing theirs underground, like everyone else. Sooner or later you run out of room until they figure a way to neutralize it.

That I'd say more than the scare tactics associated with nuclear power is the reason more plants aren't built.










The main problem is people don't understand nuclear waste issues either. The longer the half life of a substance, the less dangerous it is. Half life is a direct measurement of how dangerous a radioactive isotope is. Uranium 238 has a half life of 4.5 billion years. So long as you don't ingest it the stuff won't bother you for the most part.

Iodine 131 on the other hand, with a half life of 8 days, emits gamma rays at a prodigious rate and merely being in its presence can lead to genetic damage and if exposure is too great radiation poisoning is the result with the subsequent nasty death. Long term, low dosage exposure will lead to various cancers in most people.

The beauty of a fast half life isotope is that it quite literally sublimates away with time into stable elements that are no longer dangerous. The more the material involved the more time is needed, but after a few years for even a major contamination the danger is vastly reduced.
I think a post referring to dr bill warrenburg will disagree, he is a livermoore type scientist.

Uranium has 2 states? Before you are correct, after fission much different.

No time now, but wattenburg will be my source. Before and after, easy to think how different the half life will be
 
Yes and no. Nuclear has it's own problems, mainly the waste generated which has to be dealt with.

Now when fission becomes possible, then there's an argument to be made there. However that's nowhere near doable currently. Maybe in another 50 years we'll be getting somewhere in that field.
How is the waste a problem today? How much land do we need to store it? If it is a problem how are they handling it now? How does France deal with thier wsste.

It's a problem because of the time it takes to decay, and store. It's not as big of a problem due to the limited number of reactors built, but it's definitely something to consider. As far as I know the French are storing theirs underground, like everyone else. Sooner or later you run out of room until they figure a way to neutralize it.

That I'd say more than the scare tactics associated with nuclear power is the reason more plants aren't built.










The main problem is people don't understand nuclear waste issues either. The longer the half life of a substance, the less dangerous it is. Half life is a direct measurement of how dangerous a radioactive isotope is. Uranium 238 has a half life of 4.5 billion years. So long as you don't ingest it the stuff won't bother you for the most part.

Iodine 131 on the other hand, with a half life of 8 days, emits gamma rays at a prodigious rate and merely being in its presence can lead to genetic damage and if exposure is too great radiation poisoning is the result with the subsequent nasty death. Long term, low dosage exposure will lead to various cancers in most people.

The beauty of a fast half life isotope is that it quite literally sublimates away with time into stable elements that are no longer dangerous. The more the material involved the more time is needed, but after a few years for even a major contamination the danger is vastly reduced.
I think a post referring to dr bill warrenburg will disagree, he is a livermoore type scientist.

Uranium has 2 states? Before you are correct, after fission much different.

No time now, but wattenburg will be my source. Before and after, easy to think how different the half life will be






I know Bill quite well and he is a font of information.
 
You guys are insane. We want to stop tearing down rainforests and trees. Stop making our oceans our toilet bowls. Stop tearing away the ozone causing global warming fracking nuclear smokestack mother fuckers.

Ever see avatar? I know who you rooted for

We? You can only speak for yourself. What you want is not what your, "we", are doing.

You want to stop cutting down rainforests but that wood is being used to make Iron used to build your Wind Turbines.

You want to save the planet but you destroy miles and miles of the earth installing Windmills.

You say we can kive without coal but have no way to replace the coal used to manufacture millions of wind mills.

You claim we dont need coal while your green industry has dramatically and significantly increased the use of coal.

You use terms like renewable for wind mills that you replace with bigger ones every 8 years.

You claim cities are a 100% green that burn coal and wood.

You call Aspen an example of a 100% clean energy city when they use methane from the coal mine they sit on and tax to build wind mills.

And at that, your lousy wind mills leak oil everywhere they are placed.

Alternative, renewabke, green, clean, is all lies. Nothing you produce today, or in the future can be described as Green, Clean, Renewable, or alternative.

View attachment 62977
They can make gas/fuel out of weeds and common grass. At least they're working on it while you drill baby drill











Have you looked at how much MORE oil is used when you are making biofuel? There's a reason why bio jet fuel costs 35 bucks a gallon while standard jet fuel is around 5 bucks.

There is not a single bio fuel that can be produced that uses less fossil fuels than simply using that which is pumped from the ground. Bio fuels are a LAST resort fuel for when all the oil is gone. Then, and only then will bio fuels be cost effective and that is because they will be all that's left.

It is a common refrain amongst you folks that you truly have no clue what you are speaking about. And this is a classic example of that.
We can run on fecies











It takes more energy to process the poo than you get out of it. That's the whole point. Try doing some basic research some time. Down in Carson City the state prison used to operate a biowaste powered power plant. It failed. Even getting the waste material FOR FREE wasn't enough of a benefit. They couldn't even make it work when the fuel was FREE.
In the future you will just throw garbage in your fuel tank and your car will run on it.

 
We? You can only speak for yourself. What you want is not what your, "we", are doing.

You want to stop cutting down rainforests but that wood is being used to make Iron used to build your Wind Turbines.

You want to save the planet but you destroy miles and miles of the earth installing Windmills.

You say we can kive without coal but have no way to replace the coal used to manufacture millions of wind mills.

You claim we dont need coal while your green industry has dramatically and significantly increased the use of coal.

You use terms like renewable for wind mills that you replace with bigger ones every 8 years.

You claim cities are a 100% green that burn coal and wood.

You call Aspen an example of a 100% clean energy city when they use methane from the coal mine they sit on and tax to build wind mills.

And at that, your lousy wind mills leak oil everywhere they are placed.

Alternative, renewabke, green, clean, is all lies. Nothing you produce today, or in the future can be described as Green, Clean, Renewable, or alternative.

View attachment 62977
They can make gas/fuel out of weeds and common grass. At least they're working on it while you drill baby drill











Have you looked at how much MORE oil is used when you are making biofuel? There's a reason why bio jet fuel costs 35 bucks a gallon while standard jet fuel is around 5 bucks.

There is not a single bio fuel that can be produced that uses less fossil fuels than simply using that which is pumped from the ground. Bio fuels are a LAST resort fuel for when all the oil is gone. Then, and only then will bio fuels be cost effective and that is because they will be all that's left.

It is a common refrain amongst you folks that you truly have no clue what you are speaking about. And this is a classic example of that.
We can run on fecies











It takes more energy to process the poo than you get out of it. That's the whole point. Try doing some basic research some time. Down in Carson City the state prison used to operate a biowaste powered power plant. It failed. Even getting the waste material FOR FREE wasn't enough of a benefit. They couldn't even make it work when the fuel was FREE.
In the future you will just throw garbage in your fuel tank and your car will run on it.












Sure it will. It would be very nice if the world worked like in the movies. Unfortunately for you, it doesn't.
 

Forum List

Back
Top