Remember Who We Are

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s not a matter of “free speech,” It’s a matter of a foreigner who has been invited to our country choosing to fuel the fires of the worst antisemitism we have seen since WWII - and his presence here is now causing harm to Jewish students.

Why does the “right” of an antisemite from Syria to ramp up hatred against Jews supersede the rights of Jewish American kids to safely attend classes at the university they’ve paid for?

It is not clear-cut, and in that case, the advantage should go to innocent Jewish Americans over that of an Islamic terrorist symoathizer here in this country as a guest.
Some of us grab onto the constitution as were it for and against us rather than against the Federal Government. All prior to the Bill of rights focuses totally on the way Government must operate. Even in the Bill of rights, that is protection from the Government up to the point where slaves were discussed. Even later on most of it was to tell the Government now to behave.
So do we have the right to be against this person under discussion? We sure do have that right.
 
So there are no charges, but you are fine with punishing him?

Disappointing.
There don’t have to be charges. He is not being tried for a crime. He is being deported because his presence here is harmful to Jews.
 
It’s not a matter of “free speech,” It’s a matter of a foreigner who has been invited to our country choosing to fuel the fires of the worst antisemitism we have seen since WWII - and his presence here is now causing harm to Jewish students.

Why does the “right” of an antisemite from Syria to ramp up hatred against Jews supersede the rights of Jewish American kids to safely attend classes at the university they’ve paid for?

Even if it is not clear-cut, the advantage should go to innocent Jewish Americans over that of an Islamic terrorist symoathizer here in this country as a guest.
"It’s not a matter of “free speech,” It’s a matter of a foreigner who has been invited to our country ..."


And loses the the right to disagree with you?

If he did anything that is illegal, why isn't he under arrest?


Do you know that the Left/Fascists arrest folks praying in front of an abortion clinic?
How do you feel about that?

It's about free speech, stuff you may not agree with.


You should be ashamed of yourself.
 
Everybody reading that, I want the actual opinions of all as to does that sound to you like a liberal or does it sound like extreme bias and hate against one race called whites?
He's not a well man. Most of us know that.
 
Some of us grab onto the constitution as were it for and against us rather than against the Federal Government. All prior to the Bill of rights focuses totally on the way Government must operate. Even in the Bill of rights, that is protection from the Government up to the point where slaves were discussed. Even later on most of it was to tell the Government now to behave.
So do we have the right to be against this person under discussion? We sure do have that right.
And have the right to say the opposite of whatever he says.
 
I believe you've missed the point by a mile.


"is more concerned that we don’t “punish” an Islamic terrorist supporter from a foreign country"d


Read more carefully.....I'm supporting the Constitution.


First Amendment​

First Amendment Explained


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
And we are saying that this goes beyond “free speech.” A antisemitic foreigner is on our soil and inciting more violence against a minority that has already had its rights infringed, sometimes violently.

This tolerance for inciting violence would never occur were it to be targeted against blacks, Muslims, or gays. But Jews? Eh. All of a sudden it’s “free speech” - even when it comes from an Islamic terrorist supporter from Syria.

His presence in this country is harmful to our citizens.
 
There don’t have to be charges. He is not being tried for a crime. He is being deported because his presence here is harmful to Jews.
"There don’t have to be charges."

I am shocked that you don't realize what you are saying;



LA Times article from 1991:

“We have no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, but the seriousness of the allegations and the weight of circumstantial information compel an effort to establish the facts,” said House Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-Wash.) and Senate Majority Leader George J. Mitchell (D-Me.) in a joint statement.


Are you now a Democrat?
 
"It’s not a matter of “free speech,” It’s a matter of a foreigner who has been invited to our country ..."


And loses the the right to disagree with you?

If he did anything that is illegal, why isn't he under arrest?


Do you know that the Left/Fascists arrest folks praying in front of an abortion clinic?
How do you feel about that?

It's about free speech, stuff you may not agree with.


You should be ashamed of yourself.
You should be ashamed of YOURSELF. This goes beyond free speech. He is a terrorist supporter from a foreign country who is inciting even more violence against American Jews, and you are willing to accept it by falsely labeling it “free speech.”
 
I found this report by apparently a sympathizer of his.


Khalil is Palestinian and was born and raised in Syria. At the time of protests in April 2024, he was in the U.S. on an F-1 student visa as a graduate student at Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs, according to Al Jazeera. He took on a role as a negotiator representing CUAD, which also made him relatively public compared with many of the other protesters who were conscious about obscuring their appearances. In May, he told Al Jazeera he was concerned that if he faced disciplinary action by the university, he could lose his student visa.

Absolutely. During the encampment, two friends who were international students told me they wished they could be there but couldn’t risk losing their visas. There was a similar fear among low-income students, who didn’t want to risk their scholarships or lose on-campus housing. Many chose to participate in other ways, like sharing pro-Palestinian content on social media or bringing food and supplies to the encampment.

Khalil was a lead negotiator representing the student protesters to the Columbia administration during the school’s “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” last spring. The student group behind the encampment — Columbia University Apartheid Divest, or CUAD — had two main demands: that Columbia cut all its ties to Israel, including divesting and halting plans to build a “global center” in Tel Aviv, and that the protesters themselves receive amnesty for their actions. During the whole political firestorm, Khalil and administrators, including at least two deans, were literally at the negotiating table day and night, though they never came to an agreement.

After the first mass arrests, the New York Post ran a front-page article about how student protesters arrested by the NYPD mostly came from privileged backgrounds. Part of that is just Columbia, where the annual cost of attendance is over $93,000 and only about 50 percent of undergraduates qualify for need-based financial aid. But another part of it was self-selection: Students in more precarious situations — the most precarious being the very real risk of deportation — chose to modulate their speech in order to protect themselves.

I graduated in May and moved to Washington to work at POLITICO full-time, but based on my conversations with people who are still there, the answer is that the vibes have shifted less than one might think.

Columbia is surely one of the most progressive college campuses in the country. We call it the “activist Ivy” for a reason, and it has a long history — of which it is quite proud — of political protest dating back to 1968, when anti-war demonstrators occupied Hamilton Hall for about a week. (Columbia’s former President Minouche Shafik waited less than 24 hours before calling on the NYPD to drag out protesters who had taken over the same building in April.) I wouldn’t expect the gains President Donald Trump made among younger voters to be evident at Columbia — and, realistically, even if they do exist, conservative students tend to keep those views to themselves.

AP25068677924775.jpg
  1. What other countries are taking away from Trump’s battle with Canada

  2. Trump asks Supreme Court to curb judges’ power to block policies nationwide

  3. ‘Beyond My Wildest Dreams’: The Architect of Project 2025 Is Ready for His Victory Lap

  4. Top broadband official exits Commerce Department with sharp Musk warning

  5. White House seriously considering deal from Oracle to run TikTok

 
and you'd be far from alone eagle, yet i'm reminded of those legless vets in wheelchairs that testified to having served for those a**holes to have freedom of speech




well, you've that right so far........ :rolleyes: ~S~
Im a vet with legs. Sorry. They come here as our guests. Then they VIOLATE THEIR OATHS and hold a foreign countries flag up and burn ours

At what point do we say enough of this BS
 
There don’t have to be charges. He is not being tried for a crime. He is being deported because his presence here is harmful to Jews.
He might not get deported. Recall we have Judges who are very much on his side.
 
You should be ashamed of YOURSELF. This goes beyond free speech. He is a terrorist supporter from a foreign country who is inciting even more violence against American Jews, and you are willing to accept it by falsely labeling it “free speech.”
How should I be ashamed of defending constitutional rights for all?
 
"I'm not sure you can compare the KKK with Hamas. To me, they are two vastly different entities. Besides, the KKK, as racist as they were, did not advocate genocide like Hamas. Actually, Planned Parenthood did and does that."

What? Apparently you don't know the history of Palestine or America.
Look, clearly you hate the KKK. So why the hell are you supporting them, the Democrats?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom