BREAKING: Columbia anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil can be deported, judge rules

[Darkwind]

Read your own source, and tell me where exactly it forbids political activism? It only forbids being part of certain parties. NOT being politically active.

Incitement, property destruction, and violence is not political activism.

Political activism is hang posters on buildings. writing letters, chanting nonsensical slogans at whatever Gods they worship.

This is NOT a case of expressing an opinion different than the administration. I know you want it to be, but it isn't so fuck him.

 

[Edgetho]

You have to wait for them to get their talking points. Takes a bit these days as they are all discomboobulated.

DUE PROCESS!!!

Most of the dimocrap scum don't even know what that means.

Frankly, it seems to be bullshit phrase that can mean whatever somebody wants it to mean.

AFAIC, for a Goat Fucking Sand Monkey, it means duly caught and duly executed.



The last act of human dignity by this woman was to try to keep her skirt from flying up to protect her modesty after Goat Fucking scum flew hijacked American Aircraft into a Civilian target.

And dimocrap scum want to defend them.

Ask me why I despise dimocrap scum with every fiber of my Being again.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Incitement, property destruction, and violence is not political activism.

Political activism is hang posters on buildings. writing letters, chanting nonsensical slogans at whatever Gods they worship.

This is NOT a case of expressing an opinion different than the administration. I know you want it to be, but it isn't so fuck him.

I wonder, did Rubio cite as much in his evidentiary presentation against Khalil?

My mind is going a million mph about it.

 

[krichton]

Since I'm turning over a new leaf here, I'm gonna want to see what kind of evidence Rubio presented that convinced this judge he was deportable. "Meeting the burden of proof" for a judge is a pretty high standard. I am a proponent of First Amendment rights, so I really would like to know how the evidence was so compelling that it caused the judge to see past Khalil's First Amendment rights.

There's no evidence. Rubio simply cited the immigration and nationality act of 1952. This act allows the secretary of state sole discretion to oust anyone he pleases if he "believes" someone is a "threat" to national security. wink, wink

 

[krichton]

Good to hear a ruling from a judge that understands the situation.
It won't be long before a combination of pro-Palestinian leftists hellbent on dividing this nation get onto this thread and complain, as well as individuals who have no actual knowledge of the ongoing turmoil over there, jumping onboard to also protest. For those people, I'll put these actual facts out:
1. For the "Queers for Palestine" crowd, fact: To Hamas and most Palestinians, homosexuality is punishable by death. Period. The same holds true in Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, et cetera. Why? Because the Quran and Sharia rule, with an iron fist.
2. Why Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria and Iran want a complete genocide on "all" Jews, especially those in Israel: It's about "subjugation not territory." Definition of subjugation: To bring about domination or control by conquest. Islam is a "conquering religion."
3. As for Khalil, he came on a student visa, which means he comes knowing that he is just a "guest" and not entitled to the same rights as citizens, so must behave properly to stay. It's the same principle as when you invite a guest over to your house. If they start causing problems, you can toss them out. Foreign "guests" on student visas cannot actively support known terrorist organizations and calling for the downfall of the nation they are in a guest of.

Everyone in the US is guaranteed the right of free speech under the first amendment, citizen and non citizen alike. This is why it is the first and most important of the amendments. The act of lawful protest cannot be made a crime by the immigration and nationality act, thus circumventing the first amendment. Even Trump's supreme court would be forced to strike down the lower court's decision.

 

[forkup]

Incitement, property destruction, and violence is not political activism.

Political activism is hang posters on buildings. writing letters, chanting nonsensical slogans at whatever Gods they worship.

This is NOT a case of expressing an opinion different than the administration. I know you want it to be, but it isn't so fuck him.

So now we have one guy who claims he lied on his immigration forms. And you who claims he committed 3 other crimes. Crimes that if proven can cause deportation without any controversy.

You know who doesn't make those claims... the prosecutors. Just like they don't claim it in the hundreds of other cases of student visas being revoked as we speak.

Why make use of a legal loophole that allows for deportation by a simple, and rarely used determination by any Secretary of State in history besides Rubio. When a nice, simple, legal, and ubiquitous rationale is available? A rationale that would not be challenged if proven in a court of law.

My bet is that Trump and his cronies know that the nice, simple, legal and ubiquitous rationale would run headfirst into the first amendment. Something you guys claim to find very important, and to be interpreted in the broadest possible sense, when speech you like is concerned, and not worth the parchment in the national archives it was written on when you don't like that speech.

 

[krichton]

Foreigners on student/guest visas do not, repeat, do not have the same rights as citizens of this nation. If you are a guest here from a foreign nation, you have to act appropriately. Apparently you lack the concept to understand the word "guest."

Freedom of speech is guaranteed to all.