Remember when republicans didn’t pretend the electoral college vote was sacred?

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Nov 10, 2011
31,795
12,632
1,560
Colorado
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

 
Last edited:
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

He-he! You ARE hilarious, Billy Boy! Thanks for the comic relief EVERY time you post.
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

He-he! You ARE hilarious, Billy Boy! Thanks for the comic relief EVERY time you post.
I’m right as always :itsok:
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

He-he! You ARE hilarious, Billy Boy! Thanks for the comic relief EVERY time you post.
I’m right as always :itsok:
He-he! Thanks for ANOTHER laugh, Billy!
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

He-he! You ARE hilarious, Billy Boy! Thanks for the comic relief EVERY time you post.
I’m right as always :itsok:
He-he! Thanks for ANOTHER laugh, Billy!
I’ll be here all night!
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

Remember when assholes like you thought one party was scum and the other was "Right On! Brother! Right On!".
Welfare check didn't come yet?
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

He-he! You ARE hilarious, Billy Boy! Thanks for the comic relief EVERY time you post.
I’m right as always :itsok:
He-he! Thanks for ANOTHER laugh, Billy!
I’ll be here all night!
He-he, you're killing me! Thanks again for the laughs.
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

Remember when assholes like you thought one party was scum and the other was "Right On! Brother! Right On!".
Welfare check didn't come yet?
I never said something so positive about democrats. Obviously there is plenty wrong with the party - republicans are just far worse. I get so sick of this false equivalency bullshit people do with both of these parties.
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.


Electoral College has only been sacred since 1787.

One of those new fangled ideas from the Founding Fathers.
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

Remember when assholes like you thought one party was scum and the other was "Right On! Brother! Right On!".
Welfare check didn't come yet?
I never said something so positive about democrats. Obviously there is plenty wrong with the party - republicans are just far worse. I get so sick of this false equivalency bullshit people do with both of these parties.
Let me tell you something you will see if you look...
For every piece of legislation Rs pass, the Ds pass counter legislation.
The reality that makes Ds the same scumbags as Rs?
The Ds legislation is always dated to take effect after the Rs legislation causes the damage.
So both parties = scumbags.
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.


WTF are you yammering about now?

Still upset over Hillary losing in 2016 and now making your excuses why Biden might lose in November?

The Founding Fathers created this system to ensure bigger States like New York would not bully smaller States seeing they ( New York ) held larger amounts of the population.

Every candidate knows they must win certain amount of States to win the Electoral College that elect the President and you know this if you were raised here in the States.

It amazes me at the stupidity of those like you that keep on complaining about how the Electoral College is unfair while not understanding that majority of States rejected Hillary Clinton and for good reason.

So if you want Biden to win in November then make sure you win the correct amount of States because the Popular Vote is never going to be the way we elect the President in my lifetime.
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

He-he! You ARE hilarious, Billy Boy! Thanks for the comic relief EVERY time you post.
I’m right as always :itsok:
He-he! Thanks for ANOTHER laugh, Billy!
I’ll be here all night!

You've got the time?

And the intellectual capacity?
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

Remember when assholes like you thought one party was scum and the other was "Right On! Brother! Right On!".
Welfare check didn't come yet?
I never said something so positive about democrats. Obviously there is plenty wrong with the party - republicans are just far worse. I get so sick of this false equivalency bullshit people do with both of these parties.

Why are you lying?

You have been beating the Democratic Party drum as the savior in all this and never once wrote a scathing opinion about their failures in all this.

So do not lie by saying you never said anything so positive about the Democrats because you stated in another thread you do not care about their words and failures and just focus on Trump!
 
Last edited:
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.


WTF are you yammering about now?

Still upset over Hillary losing in 2016 and now making your excuses why Biden might lose in November?

The Founding Fathers created this system to ensure bigger States like New York would not bully smaller States seeing they ( New York ) held larger amounts of the population.

Every candidate knows they must win certain amount of States to win the Electoral College that elect the President and you know this if you were raised here in the States.

It amazes me at the stupidity of those like you that keep on complaining about how the Electoral College is unfair while not understanding that majority of States rejected Hillary Clinton and for good reason.

So if you want Biden to win in November then make sure you win the correct amount of States because the Popular Vote is never going to be the way we elect the President in my lifetime.

I bet he wouldn't be complaining about the EC, if Hillary had won, via that system.
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

He-he! You ARE hilarious, Billy Boy! Thanks for the comic relief EVERY time you post.
I’m right as always :itsok:


Really, then you should have no problem getting a super-majority in both houses of congress to propose the amendment, RIGHT? Oh then you need to get 38 States to approve it, piece of cake. LMAO

.
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.


WTF are you yammering about now?

Still upset over Hillary losing in 2016 and now making your excuses why Biden might lose in November?

The Founding Fathers created this system to ensure bigger States like New York would not bully smaller States seeing they ( New York ) held larger amounts of the population.

Every candidate knows they must win certain amount of States to win the Electoral College that elect the President and you know this if you were raised here in the States.

It amazes me at the stupidity of those like you that keep on complaining about how the Electoral College is unfair while not understanding that majority of States rejected Hillary Clinton and for good reason.

So if you want Biden to win in November then make sure you win the correct amount of States because the Popular Vote is never going to be the way we elect the President in my lifetime.

I bet he wouldn't be complaining about the EC, if Hillary had won, via that system.

Of course not and he did not complain when Obama won twice or Bill Clinton won twice by the same system that elected Trump and Bush.

The individual knew how the President was elected and just want to change it now because they know Republicans can win without having to win California...
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

Yet another brain fart expressed in writing
 
Remember when Hillary admitted she had no idea what the electoral college was and had no idea it was used to elect Presidents?

:p
 
For the most part, they didn’t give it much thought because democratic winning candidates always won BOTH the popular vote and the electoral map. In fact, only a handful of winning presidents in history have lost the popular vote and most of those were republican! Bush AND Trump are part of the 5 specifically. It simply makes sense that it is a reflection of democracy for the candidate to win the popular vote even if it doesn’t actually decide the winner.

Because Trump lost the popular vote and probably will again, they try to pretend the electoral vote has always been sacred and the popular vote isn’t indictive of anything I guess lol. Republicans thrive on which narrative is the most convenient.

1q8nut.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top