Remember when Obama was fascist for signing executive orders?

[Billy000]

Trump and his faux outrage slammed Obama for this. Republican voters themselves called it fascist .
It’s not fascist anymore though duh! Not when Trump does it! Here’s a fun fact, Trump has each year signed more EO’s than Obama did in his first four years.

What choice does Trump have than to play dictator? He’s too stupid and incompetent to come up with any signature legislation with congress even though all modern presidents have.

Trump outstripping Obama on pace of executive orders

President Donald Trump seems to have discovered it's easier and often more satisfying to get things done through administrative action.

apnews.com

 

[shockedcanadian]

The sad reality is, his "I have a pen and a phone" speech was widely cheered by his admirers. It was deemed necessary since both parties couldn't find common ground.

The other reality is, there is a deep divide in America representative of the parties. From my perspective, so it appears, one party in which the Constitution in it's original form, small businesses, American Exceptionalism and middle class matter, another party where "global socialism", "we are the world (economy, open borders, nationless states")", "the-constitution-is-a-living-document" is their view.

It has created deadlock and lack of cooperation due to the deep ideological positions taken. The global socialists I imagine will ultimate win, as they have self interest in seeing American Values replaced around the globe. This doesn't bode well for citizens rights and American Values obviously, which will soon be ripped down and replaced by a "modern" representation of what the rules are, what civil liberties and human rights means.

China First vs America First. Who will prevail? In the meantime, the lack of compromise appears to necessitate Executive Orders by Presidents.

 

[Billy000]

The sad reality is, his "I have a pen and a phone" speech was widely cheered by his admirers. It was deemed necessary since both parties couldn't find common ground.

The other reality is, there is a deep divide in America representative of the parties. From my perspective, so it appears, one party in which the Constitution in it's original form, small businesses, American Exceptionalism and middle class matter, another party where "global socialism", "we are the world (economy, open borders, nationless states")", "the-constitution-is-a-living-document" is their view.

It has created deadlock and lack of cooperation due to the deep ideological positions taken. The global socialists I imagine will ultimate win, as they have self interest in seeing American Values replaced around the globe. This doesn't bode well for citizens rights and American Values obviously, which will soon be ripped down and replaced by a "modern" representation of what the rules are, what civil liberties and human rights means.

China First vs America First. Who will prevail? In the meantime, the lack of compromise appears to necessitate Executive Orders by Presidents.

Who are the “global socialists” and what is their goal?

 

[shockedcanadian]

The sad reality is, his "I have a pen and a phone" speech was widely cheered by his admirers. It was deemed necessary since both parties couldn't find common ground.

The other reality is, there is a deep divide in America representative of the parties. From my perspective, so it appears, one party in which the Constitution in it's original form, small businesses, American Exceptionalism and middle class matter, another party where "global socialism", "we are the world (economy, open borders, nationless states")", "the-constitution-is-a-living-document" is their view.

It has created deadlock and lack of cooperation due to the deep ideological positions taken. The global socialists I imagine will ultimate win, as they have self interest in seeing American Values replaced around the globe. This doesn't bode well for citizens rights and American Values obviously, which will soon be ripped down and replaced by a "modern" representation of what the rules are, what civil liberties and human rights means.

China First vs America First. Who will prevail? In the meantime, the lack of compromise appears to necessitate Executive Orders by Presidents.

Who are the “global socialists” and what is their goal?

It's not easy to define in specific terms, in short, the global economic system funded by U.S taxpayers in particular (though not exclusively), your industries, jobs and the like exported for the benefit of other nations governments.

In more general terms, your capitalism funding state owned and operated ventures in other nations who offer little innovation and contribution other than tarriffing your products and protecting their industries while you ship wealth to them.

The long term objective, by design or happenstance, seems to be to weaken American influence and have it replaced, with a borderless system where your sovereignty and self determination can hardly be realized since some other state will make decisions on your behalf.

Take this virus as an example. Released by China as much of the world relied on them for PPE and other products. Maybe even the vaccine (which they could have already had in place before this virus was spread for all we know). Without local initiative, you are completely at the mercy of others, even a communist government, as Canada was in the early going of this pandemic.

 

[Billy000]

The sad reality is, his "I have a pen and a phone" speech was widely cheered by his admirers. It was deemed necessary since both parties couldn't find common ground.

The other reality is, there is a deep divide in America representative of the parties. From my perspective, so it appears, one party in which the Constitution in it's original form, small businesses, American Exceptionalism and middle class matter, another party where "global socialism", "we are the world (economy, open borders, nationless states")", "the-constitution-is-a-living-document" is their view.

It has created deadlock and lack of cooperation due to the deep ideological positions taken. The global socialists I imagine will ultimate win, as they have self interest in seeing American Values replaced around the globe. This doesn't bode well for citizens rights and American Values obviously, which will soon be ripped down and replaced by a "modern" representation of what the rules are, what civil liberties and human rights means.

China First vs America First. Who will prevail? In the meantime, the lack of compromise appears to necessitate Executive Orders by Presidents.

Who are the “global socialists” and what is their goal?

It's not easy to define in specific terms, in short, the global economic system funded by U.S taxpayers in particular (though not exclusively), your industries, jobs and the like exported for the benefit of other nations governments.

In more general terms, your capitalism funding state owned and operated ventures in other nations who offer little innovation and contribution other than tarriffing your products and protecting their industries while you ship wealth to them.

The long term objective, by design or happenstance, seems to be to weaken American influence and have it replaced, with a borderless system where your sovereignty and self determination can hardly be realized since some other state will make decisions on your behalf.

Take this virus as an example. Released by China as much of the world relied on them for PPE and other products. Maybe even the vaccine (which they could have already had in place before this virus was spread for all we know).

Okay but who are they exactly?

 

[idb]

I thought he was fascist for wearing a tan suit...actually... I just can't remember now...it's all such a blur...

 

[shockedcanadian]

The sad reality is, his "I have a pen and a phone" speech was widely cheered by his admirers. It was deemed necessary since both parties couldn't find common ground.

The other reality is, there is a deep divide in America representative of the parties. From my perspective, so it appears, one party in which the Constitution in it's original form, small businesses, American Exceptionalism and middle class matter, another party where "global socialism", "we are the world (economy, open borders, nationless states")", "the-constitution-is-a-living-document" is their view.

It has created deadlock and lack of cooperation due to the deep ideological positions taken. The global socialists I imagine will ultimate win, as they have self interest in seeing American Values replaced around the globe. This doesn't bode well for citizens rights and American Values obviously, which will soon be ripped down and replaced by a "modern" representation of what the rules are, what civil liberties and human rights means.

China First vs America First. Who will prevail? In the meantime, the lack of compromise appears to necessitate Executive Orders by Presidents.

Who are the “global socialists” and what is their goal?

It's not easy to define in specific terms, in short, the global economic system funded by U.S taxpayers in particular (though not exclusively), your industries, jobs and the like exported for the benefit of other nations governments.

In more general terms, your capitalism funding state owned and operated ventures in other nations who offer little innovation and contribution other than tarriffing your products and protecting their industries while you ship wealth to them.

The long term objective, by design or happenstance, seems to be to weaken American influence and have it replaced, with a borderless system where your sovereignty and self determination can hardly be realized since some other state will make decisions on your behalf.

Take this virus as an example. Released by China as much of the world relied on them for PPE and other products. Maybe even the vaccine (which they could have already had in place before this virus was spread for all we know).

Okay but who are they exactly?

"They", are generally big government cronies and their big donor backers. Who the hell else benefits from socialism funded by hard working, innovative capitalists?

 

[Muhammed]

Trump and his faux outrage slammed Obama for this. Republican voters themselves called it fascist .
It’s not fascist anymore though duh! Not when Trump does it! Here’s a fun fact, Trump has each year signed more EO’s than Obama did in his first four years.

Only an idiot would equate Obama's EOs with Trump's EOs.

Content matters, dumbass.

 

[mudwhistle]

Trump and his faux outrage slammed Obama for this. Republican voters themselves called it fascist .
It’s not fascist anymore though duh! Not when Trump does it! Here’s a fun fact, Trump has each year signed more EO’s than Obama did in his first four years.

What choice does Trump have than to play dictator? He’s too stupid and incompetent to come up with any signature legislation with congress even though all modern presidents have.

Trump outstripping Obama on pace of executive orders

President Donald Trump seems to have discovered it's easier and often more satisfying to get things done through administrative action.

apnews.com

LOL.....it's amazing how you folks on the left prove every day that Trump isn't a dictator by supporting riots and outright rebellion everywhere, then you turn around and claim that he's oppressing you by enforcing our laws.
You're nothing more than a mouse-fart in a hurricane.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The sad reality is, his "I have a pen and a phone" speech was widely cheered by his admirers. It was deemed necessary since both parties couldn't find common ground.

The other reality is, there is a deep divide in America representative of the parties. From my perspective, so it appears, one party in which the Constitution in it's original form, small businesses, American Exceptionalism and middle class matter, another party where "global socialism", "we are the world (economy, open borders, nationless states")", "the-constitution-is-a-living-document" is their view.

It has created deadlock and lack of cooperation due to the deep ideological positions taken. The global socialists I imagine will ultimate win, as they have self interest in seeing American Values replaced around the globe. This doesn't bode well for citizens rights and American Values obviously, which will soon be ripped down and replaced by a "modern" representation of what the rules are, what civil liberties and human rights means.

China First vs America First. Who will prevail? In the meantime, the lack of compromise appears to necessitate Executive Orders by Presidents.

Who are the “global socialists” and what is their goal?

Their goal is Global Socialism. Sheesh. 2+2.

In January 2017 we came off 28 solid years of globalist presidents. The establishment lost its decades-old control. Hence the total Democrat/RINO freak-out. Their hour had ended.

One notes with interest that the advertised-as-Republican Lincoln Project screeches more hysterically than even the Democrats, while articulating Democrat rhetoric all the while. It says much about those particular "Republicans".

 

[Wyatt earp]

Trump and his faux outrage slammed Obama for this. Republican voters themselves called it fascist .
It’s not fascist anymore though duh! Not when Trump does it! Here’s a fun fact, Trump has each year signed more EO’s than Obama did in his first four years.

What choice does Trump have than to play dictator? He’s too stupid and incompetent to come up with any signature legislation with congress even though all modern presidents have.

Trump outstripping Obama on pace of executive orders

President Donald Trump seems to have discovered it's easier and often more satisfying to get things done through administrative action.

apnews.com

LMFAO most all Trump's EOs was cancelling out Obama's

 

[wamose]

The sad reality is, his "I have a pen and a phone" speech was widely cheered by his admirers. It was deemed necessary since both parties couldn't find common ground.

The other reality is, there is a deep divide in America representative of the parties. From my perspective, so it appears, one party in which the Constitution in it's original form, small businesses, American Exceptionalism and middle class matter, another party where "global socialism", "we are the world (economy, open borders, nationless states")", "the-constitution-is-a-living-document" is their view.

It has created deadlock and lack of cooperation due to the deep ideological positions taken. The global socialists I imagine will ultimate win, as they have self interest in seeing American Values replaced around the globe. This doesn't bode well for citizens rights and American Values obviously, which will soon be ripped down and replaced by a "modern" representation of what the rules are, what civil liberties and human rights means.

China First vs America First. Who will prevail? In the meantime, the lack of compromise appears to necessitate Executive Orders by Presidents.

Who are the “global socialists” and what is their goal?

Their goal is Global Socialism. Sheesh. 2+2.

In January 2017 we came off 28 solid years of globalist presidents. The establishment lost its decades-old control. Hence the total Democrat/RINO freak-out. Their hour had ended.

One notes with interest that the advertised-as-Republican Lincoln Project screeches more hysterically than even the Democrats, while articulating Democrat rhetoric all the while. It says much about those particular "Republicans".

Lincoln project = RINO globalists, elitists, slavers, open border loving, big government totalitarians and warmongering assholes who hate the American worker and economy.

 

[lennypartiv]

Obama still is a fascist. He was a dictator-wannabe.

 

[lennypartiv]

I thought he was fascist for wearing a tan suit...actually... I just can't remember now...it's all such a blur...

You forgot about DACA? Obama didn't need Congress, Dems are just fine with Obama acting like a dictator.

 

[idb]

I thought he was fascist for wearing a tan suit...actually... I just can't remember now...it's all such a blur...

You forgot about DACA? Obama didn't need Congress, Dems are just fine with Obama acting like a dictator.

That's your definition of a fascist?
I think you should stick with howling about The Constitution being under attack from the tan suit...that makes more sense.

 

[whitehall]

The funny thing is that republicans never called Hussein a fascist. Only lefties use that term. There are executive orders and then there are executive orders. FDR's infamous 9066 was the most notorious EO in history authorizing the internment of American citizens and legal aliens without due process. Harry Truman sent Troops to Korea under an illegal EO but democrat icons are never held to the same standard as other politicians.

 

[beautress]

The sad reality is, his "I have a pen and a phone" speech was widely cheered by his admirers. It was deemed necessary since both parties couldn't find common ground.

The other reality is, there is a deep divide in America representative of the parties. From my perspective, so it appears, one party in which the Constitution in it's original form, small businesses, American Exceptionalism and middle class matter, another party where "global socialism", "we are the world (economy, open borders, nationless states")", "the-constitution-is-a-living-document" is their view.

It has created deadlock and lack of cooperation due to the deep ideological positions taken. The global socialists I imagine will ultimate win, as they have self interest in seeing American Values replaced around the globe. This doesn't bode well for citizens rights and American Values obviously, which will soon be ripped down and replaced by a "modern" representation of what the rules are, what civil liberties and human rights means.

China First vs America First. Who will prevail? In the meantime, the lack of compromise appears to necessitate Executive Orders by Presidents.

Dear ShockedCanadian,
We in America have not only the belief that Communism is incompatible with free people, conservatives still do. Hillary Clinton's college papers were devoted to Communism's chief shill, Saul Alinsky's steps to making a country into a communist country. We would find ourselves in total chaos if conservatives and President Trump weren't in the way of leftist radicals murdering and defunding police in Democrat stronghold population centers. We have zero intention of allowing this loss of Constitutional freedoms.

 

[Oddball]

Trump and his faux outrage slammed Obama for this. Republican voters themselves called it fascist .
It’s not fascist anymore though duh! Not when Trump does it! Here’s a fun fact, Trump has each year signed more EO’s than Obama did in his first four years.

What choice does Trump have than to play dictator? He’s too stupid and incompetent to come up with any signature legislation with congress even though all modern presidents have.

Trump outstripping Obama on pace of executive orders

President Donald Trump seems to have discovered it's easier and often more satisfying to get things done through administrative action.

apnews.com

Yes, I remember that...And I also remember that hack dickweeds like you didn't give a flying fuck then...What changed?

 

[Billy000]

Trump and his faux outrage slammed Obama for this. Republican voters themselves called it fascist .
It’s not fascist anymore though duh! Not when Trump does it! Here’s a fun fact, Trump has each year signed more EO’s than Obama did in his first four years.

What choice does Trump have than to play dictator? He’s too stupid and incompetent to come up with any signature legislation with congress even though all modern presidents have.

Trump outstripping Obama on pace of executive orders

President Donald Trump seems to have discovered it's easier and often more satisfying to get things done through administrative action.

apnews.com

LMFAO most all Trump's EOs was cancelling out Obama's

Uh well your retarded assumption doesn’t account for basic mathematics.

 

[beautress]

Trump and his faux outrage slammed Obama for this. Republican voters themselves called it fascist .
It’s not fascist anymore though duh! Not when Trump does it! Here’s a fun fact, Trump has each year signed more EO’s than Obama did in his first four years.

What choice does Trump have than to play dictator? He’s too stupid and incompetent to come up with any signature legislation with congress even though all modern presidents have.

Trump outstripping Obama on pace of executive orders

President Donald Trump seems to have discovered it's easier and often more satisfying to get things done through administrative action.

apnews.com

LMFAO most all Trump's EOs was cancelling out Obama's

Uh well your retarded assumption doesn’t account for basic mathematics.

Au contraire, mon amie, Mr. Bear is a rocket science engineer next to your dumbocrat tricksters who never cared much for reality and probity.