L.K.Eder
unbannable non-troll
blitz and blitzkrieg are two different things.
Let me say it this way: Both expressions are an anglicism in the German language, in the context you use this words.
the first was the name of the brits for the aerial bombardment of england. the second the rapid forward movements capturing huge areas in land wars. \cpt obvious
You did not understand what I said. Hitler could still today do war against France - this had stabilized his terror regime. Question: What stabilizes the USA with their neverending endless row of wars? You are a nation, which doesn't know what war is - and you are a nation, which doesn't know what peace is. You fight with your enemies against your friends (with Erdogan against the Kurds for example). And you fight against the other 50% percent of un-Americans in your own country. And you are arming yourselve to do as well a next civil war - as you are arming yourselve for the final catharsis. And a possible end of this story? A little planet without life turns around an unimportant sun in a galaxy, which was once called "milky way" - what no one will know in this future, because life is a forgotten thing.
you are all over the place, and frankly, your English is as well.
blitz and blitzkrieg are german words. how can they be anglicisms. they are germanisms used in the english language, and as demonstrated above, used wrongly.
this is quite pointless.