Redacted Russiagate docs show the feds are STILL lying about Trump and their putsch attempt

Care4all said:
Wow, you really are completely uninformed, on what is actually in the Mueller Report!

www.acslaw.org

Key Findings of the Mueller Report | ACS

www.acslaw.org www.acslaw.org

Here above is a link that goes in to each issue, with a bracket and number highlighted listing the pages the report, reports such that YOU can go in to on the report to find it, in the report.... example: [1], [2], etc.

Click on the number in the bracket and it gives the pages in the M. Report where it states such...that you can get your pages where it is covered IN THE REPORT.

___________

Russia engaged in extensive attacks on the U.S. election system in 2016​

  • Russian interference in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systemic.”[1]
  • Major attack avenues included a social media “information warfare” campaign that “favored” candidate Trump[2] and the hacking of Clinton campaign-related databases and release of stolen materials through Russian-created entities and Wikileaks.[3]
  • Russia also targeted databases in many states related to administering elections gaining access to information for millions of registered voters.[4]


The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton” ​

  • In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5] Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.
  • Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6]
  • Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8]
  • The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering.
  • The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election.
  • The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]


Special Counsel Mueller declined to exonerate President Trump and instead detailed multiple episodes in which he engaged in obstructive conduct​

Key Findings of the Mueller Report​


ACS > Projects > The Presidential Investigation Education Project > Project Resources > Key Findings of the Mueller Report

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s testimony before Congress represents a critical opportunity for the legal community to help the American people understand what is in his March 2019 Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election. The following summary presents key findings from the Mueller Report and is intended to help lawyers and other concerned citizens speak and write about the Special Counsel’s findings in an informed manner. The summary was prepared by the Presidential Investigation Education Project, a partnership between the American Constitution Society (ACS) and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to promote an informed public evaluation of the investigations of Special Counsel Mueller and others into Russian interference in our elections.​

Click here for a downloadable fact sheet.
This resource is a part of ACS's Mueller Investigation resources. Click here to see all resources.

The Special Counsel investigation uncovered extensive criminal activity​

  • The investigation produced 37 indictments; seven guilty pleas or convictions; and compelling evidence that the president obstructed justice on multiple occasions. Mueller also uncovered and referred 14 criminal matters to other components of the Department of Justice.
  • Trump associates repeatedly lied to investigators about their contacts with Russians, and President Trump refused to answer questions about his efforts to impede federal proceedings and influence the testimony of witnesses.
  • A statement signed by over 1,000 former federal prosecutors concluded that if any other American engaged in the same efforts to impede federal proceedings the way Trump did, they would likely be indicted for multiple charges of obstruction of justice.

Russia engaged in extensive attacks on the U.S. election system in 2016​

  • Russian interference in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systemic.”[1]
  • Major attack avenues included a social media “information warfare” campaign that “favored” candidate Trump[2] and the hacking of Clinton campaign-related databases and release of stolen materials through Russian-created entities and Wikileaks.[3]
  • Russia also targeted databases in many states related to administering elections gaining access to information for millions of registered voters.[4]

The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton” ​

  • In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5] Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.
  • Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6]
  • Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8]
  • The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering.
  • The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election.
  • The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.[9]

Special Counsel Mueller declined to exonerate President Trump and instead detailed multiple episodes in which he engaged in obstructive conduct​

  • The Mueller Report states that if the Special Counsel’s Office felt they could clear the president of wrongdoing, they would have said so. Instead, the Report explicitly states that it “does not exonerate” the President[10] and explains that the Office of Special Counsel “accepted” the Department of Justice policy that a sitting President cannot be indicted.[11]
  • The Mueller report details multiple episodes in which there is evidence that the President obstructed justice. The pattern of conduct and the manner in which the President sought to impede investigations—including through one-on-one meetings with senior officials—is damning to the President.
  • Five episodes of obstructive conduct stand out as being particularly serious:
    • In June 2017 President Trump directed White House Counsel Don McGahn to order the firing of the Special Counsel after press reports that Mueller was investigating the President for obstruction of justice;[12] months later Trump asked McGahn to falsely refute press accounts reporting this directive and create a false paper record on this issue – all of which McGahn refused to do.[13]
    • After National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was fired in February 2017 for lying to FBI investigators about his contacts with Russian Ambassador Kislyak, Trump cleared his office for a one-on-one meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey and asked Comey to “let [Flynn] go;” he also asked then-Deputy National Security Advisor K.T. McFarland to draft an internal memo saying Trump did not direct Flynn to call Kislyak, which McFarland did not do because she did not know whether that was true.[14]
    • In July 2017, the President directed former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to instruct the Attorney General to limit Mueller’s investigation, a step the Report asserted “was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.”[15]
    • In 2017 and 2018, the President asked the Attorney General to “un-recuse” himself from the Mueller inquiry, actions from which a “reasonable inference” could be made that “the President believed that an unrecused Attorney General would play a protective role and could shield the President from the ongoing Russia Investigation.”[16]
    • The Report raises questions about whether the President, by and through his private attorneys, floated the possibility of pardons for the purpose of influencing the cooperation of Flynn, Manafort, and an unnamed person with law enforcement.[17]
Click to expand...
Your link is a far left nutbag outfit feeding you spin.

The actaul report us online. Cut and paste from it. I didn't ask you for spin from your handlers, Simp.
 
Nostra said:
Your link is a far left nutbag outfit feeding you spin.

The actaul report us online. Cut and paste from it. I didn't ask you for spin from your handlers, Simp.
Click to expand...
PBS… “far left outfit”…

I guess … if you consider gatewaypundit to be neutral
 
Marener said:
Then why do you support Trump doing it? That’s right. Because he’s above the law.
Click to expand...
Trump isn't doing it. This is more deflection by you, after the Jan 6th Committee was exposed
 
struth said:
um,your link isn't about Trump. Try again.
Click to expand...
struth said:
um,your link isn't about Trump. Try again.
Click to expand...
Of course it is! Trumps name is in the damn headline.

The FEC said the publisher’s “payment to Karen McDougal to purchase a limited life story right combined with its decision not to publish the story, in consultation with an agent of Donald J. Trump and for the purpose of influencing the election, constituted a prohibited corporate in-kind contribution.”
 
Marener said:
Of course it is! Trumps name is in the damn headline.

The FEC said the publisher’s “payment to Karen McDougal to purchase a limited life story right combined with its decision not to publish the story, in consultation with an agent of Donald J. Trump and for the purpose of influencing the election, constituted a prohibited corporate in-kind contribution.”
Click to expand...
ahhah wow you are stupid.

His name is in the headline? hahah yes, because the NI committed the same crime as Clinton and the DNC....Trump however didn't

you realize an "agent" of Trump's campaign, isn't in fact Trump....you can't be that stupid can you?
 
struth said:
ahhah wow you are stupid.

His name is in the headline? hahah yes, because the NI committed the same crime as Clinton and the DNC....Trump however didn't

you realize an "agent" of Trump's campaign, isn't in fact Trump....you can't be that stupid can you?
Click to expand...
No, it’s not the same crime at all.

I said that paying off Trump’s affairs was a campaign expense and that’s a fact. You’re not very smart because you’re getting confused.
 
SeaMajor7 said:
A soliloquy of feelings and conjecture; outright lies of both the obvious, and of omission.
I can't play a violin, but here goes... :eusa_boohoo:
Click to expand...
No my dear, it is Trumpers that are trying to rewrite history, in the image of Trump.

Facts are facts, what's in the mueller report, is in the Mueller report, and y'all don't have any... thanks to Trump and his minions who created out of whole cloth, their fabricated and untruthful rewrite of the facts through omission and intentional ignorance....that they knew their followers would grab on to like it was delicious ice cream!
 
Care4all said:
No my dear, it is Trumpers that are trying to rewrite history, in the image of Trump.

Facts are facts, what's in the mueller report, is in the Mueller report, and y'all don't have any... thanks to Trump and his minions who created out of whole cloth, their fabricated and untruthful rewrite of the facts through omission and intentional ignorance....that they knew their followers would grab on to like it was delicious ice cream!
Click to expand...
IRONY, especially that last paragraph. 🤣
 
Marener said:
No, it’s not the same crime at all.

I said that paying off Trump’s affairs was a campaign expense and that’s a fact. You’re not very smart because you’re getting confused.
Click to expand...
Agreed, a little differrent....still the NI and Clinton and the DNC violated campaign fin laws.

Clinton and the DNC launder payments through a law firm, to pay foreign nationals for Russian disinformation.

The NI paid a woman for her story.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The Dems/libs/ and all their allies are so devoid of leadership in Ca. they can't unite their...

< Previous Thread

Dem senator warns 'LA fires are preview of coming atrocities,' claims Trump bought off by 'Big Oil'

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Doc7505
Kash Patel Releases Massive Trove of Crossfire Hurricane Docs
2
Replies
22
Views
218
Doc7505
Doc7505
berg80
Fed officials are worried about the inflation impacts from Trump’s policies, minutes show
2
Replies
21
Views
401
berg80
berg80
munkle
Why Isn't Pam Bondi Prosecuting J6 Swamp Creature Cassidy Hutchinson, Not Pardoned, for Lying to Congress About Trump "Grabbing" for Steering Wheel?
2
Replies
32
Views
353
Failzero
Failzero
Doc7505
FBI Director Kash Patel Turns Over First Batch of Explosive Jan. 6 Pipe Bomb Docs to House Republicans
Replies
7
Views
153
Delldude
Delldude
Delldude
Top ten lies from Liz Cheney and J6
7 8 9
Replies
161
Views
3K
otto105
otto105

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom