Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 68,594
- 34,163
- 2,300
We certainly do… unless you can find a good reason and evidence that all those advisors are lyingWe don't know that as fact, just as here say.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We certainly do… unless you can find a good reason and evidence that all those advisors are lyingWe don't know that as fact, just as here say.
They have it in writing from the planners themselves, calling these electors, fake electors. They have in writing, the illegal scheme and plan.heresy:
belief or opinion contrary to orthodox doctrine:
Not according to state law.
You can’t just make shit up and pretend like it’s normal.
They can “think” whatever they like.
It’s still fraud
We certainly do… unless you can find a good reason and evidence that all those advisors are lying
They have it in writing from the planners themselves, calling these electors, fake electors. They have in writing, the illegal scheme and plan.
And they have one of the fake elector scheme planners charged in Georgia, copping a plea deal and turned to a cooperating witness.
That is not hearsay.
Tangiable Evidence.heresy.
Improve your language comprehension.
All the states with fake electors. According to their election laws.What State, and what law?
Tangiable Evidence.
And first hand witness.
Is not hearssy.
Fact.
Learn the meaning of hearsy.
All the states with fake electors. According to their election laws.
Bullshit? States aren’t so stupid that they allow anyone to pretend to be a presidential elector. The election law lays out who is an elector and how that process works.Talk about a broad brush o' bullshit.
Bullshit? States aren’t so stupid that they allow anyone to pretend to be a presidential elector. The election law lays out who is an elector and how that process works.
A bunch of losers meeting and declaring themselves electors is not part of that process.
He didn’t have to believe them but when that many advisors tell you something it’s on YOU when you ignore themActually, the burden lies on them proving what they said they said, not the other way around.
Even then Trump didn't have to believe them.
He didn’t have to believe them but when that many advisors tell you something it’s on YOU when you ignore them
Is there any bullshit you won’t regurgitate?Like when Clinton had a chance to off Bin laden and he passed on it?
Is there any bullshit you won’t regurgitate?
It is fraud, because their “position” is untrue and they knew it. Fraud does not require anyone to accept your deception.And not fraud as long as the States didn't accept their position.
It is fraud, because their “position” is untrue and they knew it. Fraud does not require anyone to accept your deception.
They can “believe” anything they want but pretending to be a real elector is fraud.Their position was based on their belief of fraud happening that changed the outcome of the election in the given State.
They can “believe” anything they want but pretending to be a real elector is fraud.
Is bank robbery acceptable if you think the bank defrauded you and you think it’s your money?