Recent Rapid SST Rise

[Crepitus]

The numbers are there. The report is fully accessible. No pay wall.

What fudge is that?

What is a "breakout in canes" and who has predicted that such a thing would happen?

How about food scientists? How about medical scientists? How about people studying car safety? How about doctors and pediatricians? Do you ignore all of them?

Pretty sure the only scientists they believe are the ones they agree with.

 

[ding]

Pretty sure the only scientists they believe are the ones they agree with.

That would carry more weight if you actually understood the science and their models.

 

[Crick]

Pretty sure the only scientists they believe are the ones they agree with.

I think the problem is that they have been very cunningly told not to believe these specific scientists. The fossil fuel industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a campaign to do precisely that. THAT is the source of denier's disbeliefs. Obviously, an objective examination of the evidence shows the conclusions of mainstream science to be the best explanation and shows zero evidence of the massive conspiracy their disbelief requires.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I think the problem is that they have been very cunningly told not to believe these specific scientists. The fossil fuel industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a campaign to do precisely that. THAT is the source of denier's disbeliefs. Obviously, an objective examination of the evidence shows the conclusions of mainstream science to be the best explanation and shows zero evidence of the massive conspiracy their disbelief requires.

The fossil fuel industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a campaign to do precisely that.

To convince people to keep using cheap, reliable fossil fuels?
Doesn't seem like that takes much convincing.

 

[Crepitus]

The fossil fuel industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a campaign to do precisely that.

To convince people to keep using cheap, reliable fossil fuels?
Doesn't seem like that takes much convincing.

Oh well done! Point totally poven!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Oh well done! Point totally poven!

Thanks!

It worked.

Even clowns like you and Crick still use them.

 

[Crepitus]

Thanks!

It worked.

Even clowns like you and Crick still use them.

You may be confused on who's point you just made.

But that's OK. We know.

 

[ding]

You may be confused on who's point you just made.

But that's OK. We know.

You do realize the planet is in the middle of an ice age, right?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You may be confused on who's point you just made.

But that's OK. We know.

You're still using fossil fuels, but only because of the Big Oil propaganda.

It's awful!

 

[EMH]

Pretty sure the only scientists they believe are the ones they agree with.

So, if the oceans are warming as you claim, why is the strongest decade for canes still the 1940s?

U.S. Hurricane Strikes by Decade

If oceans are rising, why can't you show us a photo of a landmark sinking?

 

[EMH]

You do realize the planet is in the middle of an ice age, right?

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

To whiff on the definition of ICE AGE is to get climate science completely WRONG...

 

[jc456]

I think the problem is that they have been very cunningly told not to believe these specific scientists. The fossil fuel industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a campaign to do precisely that. THAT is the source of denier's disbeliefs. Obviously, an objective examination of the evidence shows the conclusions of mainstream science to be the best explanation and shows zero evidence of the massive conspiracy their disbelief requires.

How come Panama Canal doesn’t have enough sea water?

 

[Crick]

I think the problem is that they have been very cunningly told not to believe these specific scientists. The fossil fuel industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a campaign to do precisely that. THAT is the source of denier's disbeliefs. Obviously, an objective examination of the evidence shows the conclusions of mainstream science to be the best explanation and shows zero evidence of the massive conspiracy their disbelief requires.

Does anyone care to attempt to deny the existence or purpose of this fossil fuel industry campaign?

 

[jc456]

I think the problem is that they have been very cunningly told not to believe these specific scientists. The fossil fuel industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a campaign to do precisely that. THAT is the source of denier's disbeliefs. Obviously, an objective examination of the evidence shows the conclusions of mainstream science to be the best explanation and shows zero evidence of the massive conspiracy their disbelief requires.

Who is mainstream science?

 

[jc456]

Pretty sure the only scientists they believe are the ones they agree with.

sounds like the same thing from whoever you agree with right? How's it different and how does one set overrule another in your world? If your scientists were true scientists, your folks would debate them. but ahhhhhh the money wouldn't come if they ever did such a thing! FACT!

One way to disprove the msm science is to challenge it and watch their limp dicks shrivel up inside.

 

[ding]

Pretty sure the only scientists they believe are the ones they agree with.

The more people know about the earth's climate history, the more likely they are to not believe that CO2 drives the climate of the planet.

 

[Crick]

The more people know about the earth's climate history, the more likely they are to not believe that CO2 drives the climate of the planet.

Do you have some sort of survey or study to support that? Because I DO have several studies that indicate the more one knows about the climate the more likely one is to accept AGW as an accurate description of current climate behavior.

 

[ding]

Do you have some sort of survey or study to support that?

Will the empirical temperature record of the planet suffice? It's called the oxygen isotope curve. Do you need for me to walk you though it or can you walk yourself through it and explain to me what it is showing?

 

[jc456]

Pretty sure the only scientists they believe are the ones they agree with.

how come the Panama Canal doesn't have enough water to move ships through yet sea levels have supposedly risen? How the fk does that happen?

 

[Crepitus]

how come the Panama Canal doesn't have enough water to move ships through yet sea levels have supposedly risen? How the fk does that happen?

LMAO!!

Dude don't know how the Panama canal works, lol!!!