Ready for some fake job numbers? Trump installs his Yes-Man in BLS

[AntonToo]

• Today, BLS had to revise down May and June jobs reports by a combined 258,000 jobs. These previous faulty jobs reports enabled the Federal Reserve to continue its disastrous policy of keeping interest rates high

What was the "fault"? Jobs data takes a few months to fully collect, thats why there are two revisions that follow INITIAL ESTIMATES.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Holy shit, you still cite Trump administration for math after the liberation day debacle?

You must be soft in the head.

/----/ You need to do more than attack the messenger. Here is your opportunity to post facts that contradict what the White House has claimed. Until you do, the White House claims stand.

 

[AntonToo]

/----/ You need to do more than attack the messenger. Here is your opportunity to post facts that contradict what the White House has claimed. Until you do, the White House claims stand.

Your "message" is uncritical repetition of administration's stupid propaganda, which is not based on facts or math, but on political needs.

The reason Trump fired the BLS head is that he didn't like the numbers, everything else is half-baked pretense.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Your "message" is uncritical repetition of administration's stupid propaganda, which is not based on facts or math, but on political needs.

The reason Trump fired the BLS head is that he didn't like the numbers, everything else is half-baked pretense.

/----/ Your "message" is the Tennesse two step. You only attack the White House but cannot refute anything they said.

How about The Hill, which said the exact same thing?
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has revised down its estimates of employment growth, cutting the number of jobs added by 818,000 from the previous estimates. This revision affects the employment growth from March 2023 to March 2024, reducing the total job growth from 2.9 million to about 2.1 million. The revisions are based on recalibrating the data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages to more precise quarterly unemployment claim data, which reflects actual payrolls. The revisions have raised concerns about the accuracy of the BLS's employment data and its implications for economic policy.

The Hill+2

 

[AntonToo]

What was the "fault"? Jobs data takes a few months to fully collect, thats why there are two revisions that follow INITIAL ESTIMATES.

Yep, no reply from Cellblock2429

We both know there will not be any because you are just a tool and fundamentally do not understand the white house propaganda you copy and paste.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Yep, no reply from Cellblock2429

We both know there will not be any because you are just a tool and fundamentally do not understand the white house propaganda you copy and paste.

/----/ By a few percent, sure. Maybe you glossed over the 818,000 overestimates. And if it takes a few months for the numbers to settle, then stop reporting them so quickly. Have a two-month lag. It's better than making an 818,000 screw up.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Editorializing without facts or proof is called <<<<<<partisan spin>>>>>>
Tariffs are raising $300b in new revenue to help balance the budget, along with $1.5T in spending cuts.

LOL....and Americans will be paying that $300b out of their own pocket.

You don't even believe the stupid MAGA bullshit that you post.

A balanced budget and a strong dollar is conservative policy, just sayin'.

Too bad that isn't what Trump is doing. Your fantasies aren't conservative policy.

 

[AntonToo]

/----/ By a few percent, sure. Maybe you glossed over the 818,000 overestimates.

What ass did you get "few %" from? Estimates are routinely MANY % of total job growth reported in initial release and they are ESPECIALLY off during times of economic volatility like during covid...or huge new across the board tariffs.

Maybe you didn't "gloss over" and can tell what fault specially BLS statisticians commited.

Comeon stop fronting, we both know you know nothing about any estimating and are just repeating White House propaganda.

 

[BackAgain]

Ready for some fake job numbers? Trump installs his Yes-Man in BLS​

lol.

Lib only likes fake job numbers and fake economic figures from Dumbocrap Administrations. And he has no evidence that the new ones are “fake.”

He’s just a poseur.

 

[AntonToo]

Lib only likes fake job numbers and fake economic figures from Dumbocrap Administrations.

Ok, show him where he was "not liking" numbers from first Trump administration, or any other administration for that matter.

If you can't, then just admit you made that shit up.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

You think your degenerate, content free comments earned more?

My condolences that you are illiterate.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Your post couldn’t be replied to any other way because it was totally devoid of any meaningful content.

Trump lied. That’s just a fact.

Thanks for your CNN tip,

 

[BackAgain]

Ok, show him where he was "not liking" numbers from first Trump administration, or any other administration for that matter.

If you can't, then just admit you made that shit up.

**** off *****.

Antoinette thinks anyone is answerable to him.

 

[Winco]

**** off *****.

Exactly.
Just like this *****....... read below....*****.

This sucks.......counter it *****.

Summary Table​

Metric	Value at Start (Jan 2017)	Value at End (Jan 2021)	Net Change
Unemployment Rate (official)	4.7%	~6.4%–6.3%	+1.7 percentage points
Net Jobs	—	—	–2.7 million jobs

 

[braalian]

I doubt the numbers will be “fake”.

Just extremely misleading and completely without context.

 

[Mac1958]

LOL....and Americans will be paying that $300b out of their own pocket.

You don't even believe the stupid MAGA bullshit that you post.

I think it's possible they still don't know how tariffs work.

After all this time.

That has to be some kind of fuckin' miracle.

 

[AntonToo]

**** off *****.

Antoinette thinks anyone is answerable to him.

Thats right, you pulled it out of your ass and are now all upset you got called on your bullshit.

 

[AntonToo]

I think it's possible they still don't know how tariffs work.

After all this time.

That has to be some kind of fuckin' miracle.

It's no miracle, they are just emotionally invested in NOT understanding even most basic, common sense economics.

 

[BackAgain]

The fake conservative has addressed economic “numbers” before.

Post in thread 'Biden Gloats After Disastrous September Jobs Report: 885,000 Full-Time Jobs Lost, 1 Million+ Part-Time Jobs Added, Record Multiple Jobholders'

Oct 9, 2023

500,000 adjusted full time jobs for Aug and Sep
3.8 UE
62.4 NLPR
10% lower than expected first time jobless claims
more than 8 million full time jobs not filled

He’s gaslighting. He types up a fake job-loss number, makes 5 threads about it and expects it to become true by repetition.

• Conservative from Georgia

• 

The moron chastised an actual conservative poster in that thread for using what he called “fake” numbers which dared to challenge the officially released numbers.

You truly cannot take his stilted biased and false claims seriously. Even his username is a deception effort.

By the way, this isn’t exactly breaking news. Anyone who has read some of his posts already grasps that’s he’s simply full of shit. He always has been and always will be. That’s why I refer to him simply as “lib.”

 

[Monoculturalist]

Trump just fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because the jobs report didn’t flatter him…
and now he’s hand-picking a Heritage Foundation loyalist who’s been trashing the agency for years to take over. This isn’t about “honest numbers,” it’s about rigging the scoreboard before the next game.

If you thought government stats were supposed to be nonpartisan, buckle up. we’re about to watch the BLS turned into a propaganda machine.

Trump to nominate longtime skeptic of Bureau of Labor Statistics as new agency head

Trump's naming of conservative economist E.J. Antoni comes after he fired the previous BLS commissioner, claiming without evidence that the July jobs report was "rigged."

www.nbcnews.com

Government stats haven't been nonpartisan in quite some time. Propaganda machine is an accurate phrase for much of government in general, regardless of party control. The same applies to the media.